|
Post by knowles on Apr 26, 2010 15:58:38 GMT
|
|
|
Post by Douglas Reynholm on Apr 26, 2010 16:03:06 GMT
"However, it is understood that the Premier League is likely to be sympathetic as they are biased towards any team based in Manchester"
|
|
|
Post by stokie25 on Apr 26, 2010 16:09:42 GMT
"However, it is understood that the Premier League is likely to be sympathetic as they are biased towards any team based in Manchester" ;D ;D ;D
|
|
|
Post by Douglas Reynholm on Apr 26, 2010 16:12:51 GMT
Why should they be allowed to go loaning another keeper? They put all their eggs into one basket with Shay Given and as such they should face the consequences.
Not putting a call back clause into Hart's contract is totally their own fault. They have a keeper, they should be forced to use him.
If we asked the Premier League if we could loan another keeper as we don't want to use Begovic we would get a big fat no.
Fucking stinks.
|
|
|
Post by knowles on Apr 26, 2010 16:13:38 GMT
They can have Danzelle if they want.
|
|
|
Post by MilanStokie on Apr 26, 2010 17:18:24 GMT
Well they have 4 keepers and now 3 are out, it is hardly their fault and if Asmir got injured today we would be expecting the same wouldn't we?
|
|
|
Post by One-Two on Apr 26, 2010 17:22:27 GMT
Well they have 4 keepers and now 3 are out, it is hardly their fault and if Asmir got injured today we would be expecting the same wouldn't we? No, because we (hopefully) would have put a clause in the loan to say we can recall Simmo. They have 4 keepers and 2 injuries. It's their own fault they were too stupid to put a recall clause in Hart's loan.
|
|
|
Post by softlas on Apr 26, 2010 17:32:32 GMT
Simmo Was in line for this gig, Until Tommy got injured, They'd already contacted the club before yesterdays game, Simmo will be gutted I bet, He waits ages for tommy to get injured and then Begovic comes in and gets it, although Simmo will be back on the bench im sure he'd rather be at Man city playing ha ha
|
|