|
|
Post by myleftboot on Mar 11, 2010 14:53:04 GMT
I had a scorecast with BetFred last night with Fuller being first scorer (obviously before I knew he wasn't playing).
With him not playing am I right in presuming the bet is null and void and I can claim my money back?
Cheers in advance.
|
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 11, 2010 15:03:58 GMT
I had a scorecast with BetFred last night with Fuller being first scorer (obviously before I knew he wasn't playing). With him not playing am I right in presuming the bet is null and void and I can claim my money back? Cheers in advance. That's the case with most Bookies, yes. |
|
|
|
Post by oularesarse on Mar 11, 2010 15:05:50 GMT
I had a scorecast with BetFred last night with Fuller being first scorer (obviously before I knew he wasn't playing). With him not playing am I right in presuming the bet is null and void and I can claim my money back? Cheers in advance. Same here! I threw my ticket away though! |
|
timmis
Youth Player
HUGHES OUT!
Posts: 459
|
Post by timmis on Mar 11, 2010 15:06:59 GMT
its not the case with most bookies.
the standard rule with bookmakers is that the scorecast will become a correct score bet.
i.e.
£5 on fuller & 2-1 @ 45/1
would become
£5 on 2-1 @ 8/1
|
|
|
|
Post by padders01 on Mar 11, 2010 15:07:08 GMT
I had a scorecast with BetFred last night with Fuller being first scorer (obviously before I knew he wasn't playing). With him not playing am I right in presuming the bet is null and void and I can claim my money back? Cheers in advance. That's the case with most Bookies, yes. No it's not, the scorecast becomes a full time result bet, so therefore your 1-1 bet is a winning bet, probably around 6-1/7-1. The goalscorer part of the bet becomes a non-runner |
|
|
|
Post by twisty on Mar 11, 2010 15:07:20 GMT
No its not void
if the selected player does not start or comes off the bench after the first goal has been scored the bet becomes a correct score single
so if you had fuller to score first and stoke to win 3-1
fuller didnt play
so you bet becomes what ever stake you had on a 3-1 bet
|
|
|
|
Post by knowles on Mar 11, 2010 15:07:30 GMT
The bet reverts to just the scoreline with Bet365. i.e. You put a fiver on Fuller first scorer and 1-1 @ 35/1 This bet will then turn into a fiver on 1-1 @ 6/1 **What timmis said  ;D** |
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 11, 2010 15:10:15 GMT
I had a scorecast with BetFred last night with Fuller being first scorer (obviously before I knew he wasn't playing). With him not playing am I right in presuming the bet is null and void and I can claim my money back? Cheers in advance. That's the case with most Bookies, yes. No it's not, you daft cunt. What a nob head. |
|
|
|
Post by knowles on Mar 11, 2010 15:13:37 GMT
;D. Don't make me laugh at work T.
|
|
|
|
Post by Merciful on Mar 11, 2010 15:14:58 GMT
Is no-one willing to help this lad out?
No, it's not void.
Apparently, and I say apparently, what happens is the correct goalscorer part becomes void but your stake then goes on to the correct score only part, i.e. 1-1.
Hope this helps.
|
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 11, 2010 15:17:45 GMT
;D. Don't make me laugh at work T. My bad, J  |
|
|
|
Post by nicholasjalcock on Mar 11, 2010 15:18:14 GMT
I had a small wager with betfred at Wembley on Ryan scoring but decided to keep the slip
with the programme.
|
|
|
|
Post by McLovin on Mar 11, 2010 17:59:09 GMT
Is no-one willing to help this lad out? No, it's not void. Apparently, and I say apparently, what happens is the correct goalscorer part becomes void but your stake then goes on to the correct score only part, i.e. 1-1. Hope this helps. Finally, someone comes to the rescue! ;D |
|
sex, drugs & house-music - 3 words - 3 good times.
;D**
