|
|
Post by markscfc72 on Feb 12, 2010 7:04:32 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by Lightwood on Feb 12, 2010 7:07:18 GMT
Excellent, now we really do have a great chance ;D
|
|
|
|
Post by Lakeland Potter on Feb 12, 2010 7:16:06 GMT
It always annoys me when pundits refer to us as Stoke but to our opponents as Manchester City. It shouldn't bother me but if our opponents deserve to be called by their full name so do we. Not quite as bad as referring to a certain team as "United" but still annoying.  So, a City win it is then! ;D |
|
|
|
Post by nottinghamstokie on Feb 12, 2010 7:25:09 GMT
John - I don't care what he calls us/them, or if he predicts us to lose 10-0, I'd far sooner have the league points next week  |
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 12, 2010 7:25:58 GMT
I think he's being generous to us.
In the Wigan game, our usually solid defence was exposed. I was thinking during that game that the prospect of Wright-Phillips vs. Wilkinson was a train wreck waiting to happen.
|
|
|
|
Post by nottinghamstokie on Feb 12, 2010 7:29:43 GMT
Malvern - do you mean "after" the Wigan game, or "during " ???
|
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 12, 2010 7:31:37 GMT
Malvern - do you mean "after" the Wigan game, or "during " ??? I was editing it as you were making your comment. You are of course correct. |
|
|
|
Post by ricardofuller10 on Feb 12, 2010 7:59:03 GMT
:/
|
|
|
|
Post by Mr Rottweiler on Feb 12, 2010 8:17:42 GMT
It always annoys me when pundits refer to us as Stoke but to our opponents as Manchester City. It shouldn't bother me but if our opponents deserve to be called by their full name so do we. Well he could hardly refer to them as "Manchester" could he?  |
|
|
|
Post by Lakeland Potter on Feb 12, 2010 8:25:54 GMT
It always annoys me when pundits refer to us as Stoke but to our opponents as Manchester City. It shouldn't bother me but if our opponents deserve to be called by their full name so do we. Well he could hardly refer to them as "Manchester" could he? Yes, but this is what he says in the text below the scores......... " City have excellent strength in depth up front. Stoke are another team on a good run, unbeaten for a while, but it's City at home and difficult to predict anything other than a City win". I'll take a "City" win!  |
|
|
|
Post by dexter97 on Feb 12, 2010 8:36:47 GMT
Just hedging his bets. If predicts a City win, he can't be wrong can he? |
|
|
|
Post by albundy on Feb 12, 2010 9:21:05 GMT
I agree with PP. There are 2 "city" s playing on Saturday and he should refer to them both correctly.
|
|
|
|
Post by stokerambler on Feb 12, 2010 9:41:20 GMT
I think he's being generous to us. In the Wigan game, our usually solid defence was exposed. I was thinking during that game that the prospect of Wright-Phillips vs. Wilkinson was a train wreck waiting to happen. I think Wilko will be on the bench after getting exposed at Wigan, and Huth will take the right back slot. Then it depends on whether Pulis thinks Faye is fit as to whether him or Higgy play in the centre, with Collins on the left if Faye's out. As for Lawro's prediction, I'd expect nothing else from him but a Man City win. They are unbeaten at home in the league so the odds are stacked against us. But hey we beat Spurs at WHL when no one gave us a chance... |
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 12, 2010 9:45:13 GMT
As long as it's a city win and not a citeh win i'll be happy |
|
|
|
Post by Stoke_FaN_DaN on Feb 12, 2010 10:15:56 GMT
mark please refer to them as manchester city, soon this will get as bad as united for that scum. for a moment i thought it was predicted a stoke win looking at the title.
|
|
|
|
Post by Targaryen Stokie on Feb 12, 2010 10:30:54 GMT
A City win will do me! ;D
|
|
"]
