|
|
Post by knowles on Dec 19, 2009 20:39:46 GMT
After Wilko's yellow card today, we now have five players sitting just one caution away from a suspension. They are: Ricardo Fuller Andy Wilkinson Ryan Shawcross Salif Diao Glenn Whelan I'm thinking some tactical bookings against Birmingham will go down pretty well.  |
|
|
|
Post by collo1983 on Dec 19, 2009 20:41:15 GMT
AB Faye must be close??
|
|
|
|
Post by Bojan Mackey on Dec 19, 2009 20:41:53 GMT
Delap has to be close as well.
|
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 19, 2009 20:42:42 GMT
Knowles i thought Faye was on 4 as well and maybe they all get booked at Man City so they miss the York game with the 7 day rule.
|
|
|
|
Post by knowles on Dec 19, 2009 20:46:52 GMT
The seven day rule has been scrapped now. Abdy has picked up five bookings this season, but two were in the same game against Hull (obviously meaning a red card!). Therefore, he currently sits on three.*
* According to my stats anyway!!
|
|
|
|
Post by potters11 on Dec 19, 2009 20:47:23 GMT
Delap has to be close as well. With one yellow!?!? ??? |
|
|
|
Post by collo1983 on Dec 19, 2009 20:49:04 GMT
Delap has to be close as well. With one yellow!?!? ??? Its all the miss-timed tackles recently that fools people......  |
|
|
|
Post by ProudPotter17 on Dec 19, 2009 20:49:54 GMT
I think Abdy is on 5. Which means he will not be suspended until he gets 10. Thats what I think anyway :S
|
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 19, 2009 20:50:01 GMT
James are you saying then that if some of them get booked at City they will miss the Birmingham game because thats not the way i understood it and i'm sure it was reported in the press that alot of players would miss York if they were booked at City.
|
|
|
|
Post by Bojan Mackey on Dec 19, 2009 20:52:08 GMT
Its all the miss-timed tackles recently that fools people...... It certainly is, i thought he was surely close to suspension after some of the tackles he's put in recently. |
|
|
|
Post by kingdeano on Dec 19, 2009 20:55:09 GMT
them 5 players named are all easily reaplaced imo, we have a decent squad now, ok fuller ainteasily replaceable but the others are imo!
|
|
|
|
Post by markscfc72 on Dec 19, 2009 20:56:32 GMT
James are you saying then that if some of them get booked at City they will miss the Birmingham game because thats not the way i understood it and i'm sure it was reported in the press that alot of players would miss York if they were booked at City. Yes thats right mate, i have realised recently from the games i have seen on Tv that the 7 day rule no longer exists, spinks must not of realised when he did that article before saying we could do with them getting booked at Man City to get suspended for York, it is in fact as Knowles says the Brum game we need them all to 'kick the ball away' / slag the ref off etc  |
|
|
|
Post by knowles on Dec 19, 2009 20:58:23 GMT
Yeah, what Mark said!!
Bookings v Man City= suspension for Birmingham
Bookings v Birmingham = suspension for York
As a result, I doubt Fuller will start at Eastlands.
|
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 19, 2009 20:58:48 GMT
Ok mark thanks for that.
|
|
|
|
Post by potters11 on Dec 19, 2009 21:15:02 GMT
Yeah, what Mark said!! Bookings v Man City= suspension for Birmingham Bookings v Birmingham = suspension for York As a result, I doubt Fuller will start at Eastlands. I also agree that Fuller probably won't start at Man City. However, he's now missed starting at Arsenal, Aston Villa and most probably Man City due to this looming suspension. Sometimes I think TP worries too much about one game suspensions. We are only seeing Fuller in bits and pieces of matches, when we should be seeing him for 90 mins every match! |
|
|
|
Post by myglassishalffull on Dec 19, 2009 21:48:14 GMT
Before 31st Dec 5 bookings=1 match ban after that 10 bookings =2 match ban. So if we can get past the Brum game on the 28th Dec we should be ok.
|
|
|
|
Post by scfcrob on Dec 20, 2009 1:00:47 GMT
Yeah, what Mark said!! Bookings v Man City= suspension for Birmingham Bookings v Birmingham = suspension for York As a result, I doubt Fuller will start at Eastlands. Top post ! |
|
|
|
Post by Paul Spencer on Dec 20, 2009 15:03:27 GMT
Before 31st Dec 5 bookings=1 match ban after that 10 bookings =2 match ban. So if we can get past the Brum game on the 28th Dec we should be ok. Are you suggesting that if the players who are currently on four bookings don't pick up another booking until after the Brum game then they won't receive any sort of a suspension until they reach ten bookings or are you saying that if they do get booked before Jan then they'll get a two match ban when they've picked up a further five bookings next year? cheers |
|
|
|
Post by fentonstokie on Dec 20, 2009 15:18:33 GMT
Yeah, what Mark said!! Bookings v Man City= suspension for Birmingham Bookings v Birmingham = suspension for York As a result, I doubt Fuller will start at Eastlands. The FA is closed from friday till tuesday the 29th so will the bookings in the Man City game count if they cant be officially processed before the Birmingham game??? Dont the club have to be notified bny the FA of any bans?? |
|
|
|
Post by bayernoatcake on Dec 20, 2009 15:37:56 GMT
Is that true? The FA is shut over the busiest period for football? It wouldn't surprise me if it was, daft twats.
|
|
|
|
Post by fentonstokie on Dec 20, 2009 15:39:55 GMT
Is that true? The FA is shut over the busiest period for football? It wouldn't surprise me if it was, daft twats. They shut for transfer windows dont they?? hence the extended period a few times. Plus the people that work there are the same has us and get bank holidays like us. |
|
|
|
Post by bayernoatcake on Dec 20, 2009 15:42:47 GMT
Is that true? The FA is shut over the busiest period for football? It wouldn't surprise me if it was, daft twats. They shut for transfer windows dont they?? hence the extended period a few times. Plus the people that work there are the same has us and get bank holidays like us. But they also have May-July without a full programme where they will do less and could have as much time off as they wanted and it wouldn't affect the season. With 2 games in that period, there should be somone there to process bookings. It's the least that sham of an organisation could do. |
|
|
|
Post by Paul Spencer on Dec 20, 2009 15:44:57 GMT
They shut for transfer windows dont they?? hence the extended period a few times. Plus the people that work there are the same has us and get bank holidays like us. But they also have May-July without a full programme where they will do less and could have as much time off as they wanted and it wouldn't affect the season. With 2 games in that period, there should be somone there to process bookings. It's the least that sham of an organisation could do. Agree bayern ... everybody else involved with the game they're administrating is still working at this time, so I can't see why they shouldn't. |
|
|
|
Post by fentonstokie on Dec 20, 2009 15:45:59 GMT
They shut for transfer windows dont they?? hence the extended period a few times. Plus the people that work there are the same has us and get bank holidays like us. But they also have May-July without a full programme where they will do less and could have as much time off as they wanted and it wouldn't affect the season. With 2 games in that period, there should be somone there to process bookings. It's the least that sham of an organisation could do. I honestly dont know if i'm right just sayin that if they cant process transfers at weekends then they must be shut on a bank holiday. |
|
|
|
Post by bayernoatcake on Dec 20, 2009 15:49:03 GMT
But they also have May-July without a full programme where they will do less and could have as much time off as they wanted and it wouldn't affect the season. With 2 games in that period, there should be somone there to process bookings. It's the least that sham of an organisation could do. I honestly dont know if i'm right just sayin that if they cant process transfers at weekends then they must be shut on a bank holiday. I haven't a clue but if they aren't and it affects the game as it will then they really do need their heads testing about priorities. Paul-exactly, every bugger else involved with football will be working so why should they get the day off? |
|
|
|
Post by myglassishalffull on Dec 20, 2009 17:32:32 GMT
Paul, thats exactly what I'm saying ! (and the rules state)
|
|
|
|
Post by surreystokie on Dec 20, 2009 21:10:08 GMT
Paul, Any suspensions below five, by 31st December, simply continue until ten are (or aren't) reached, by the end of February. FA closure on Monday, has nothing to do with it, or if a red is given that day, as it can be registered electronically. However, if an appeal (against a red card) is made electronically, by noon on the Tuesday, the player can then play in the next game. However, if deemed a 'frivolous' appeal, the club is liable to get an extra booking, when the appeal does come up. Hope this is clear. |
|
|
|
Post by PotterLog on Dec 20, 2009 21:42:59 GMT
Paul, Any suspensions below five, by 31st December, simply continue until ten are (or aren't) reached, by the end of February. FA closure on Monday, has nothing to do with it, or if a red is given that day, as it can be registered electronically. However, if an appeal (against a red card) is made electronically, by noon on the Tuesday, the player can then play in the next game. However, if deemed a 'frivolous' appeal, the club is liable to get an extra booking, when the appeal does come up. Hope this is clear. So a fifth booking earned after 31st Dec does NOT earn a suspension? It just counts towards the ten bookings, at which point a two-game suspension is served...? What's the end of February got to do with it? |
|
|
|
Post by salopstick on Dec 20, 2009 22:17:22 GMT
surprised to see fuller on that list
|
|
