|
|
Post by french toast on Nov 8, 2009 16:46:13 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by Pugsley on Nov 8, 2009 16:48:58 GMT
You're obviously an idiot then. The sole reason Hull got back in the game is that their midfield took control and in Bullard had the best midfielder on the pitch. He was directly involved in their 2 goals.
Bar Etherington, Stoke's midfield was abysmal, in particular Delap.
|
|
|
|
Post by thecumbrianway on Nov 8, 2009 16:50:33 GMT
i have to admit, bullard was a clear difference for them as the game reached the last 15 minutes. i hate bullard aswell.
|
|
|
|
Post by french toast on Nov 8, 2009 16:51:10 GMT
You're obviously an idiot then. The sole reason Hull got back in the game is that their midfield took control and in Bullard had the best midfielder on the pitch. He was directly involved in their 2 goals. Bar Etherington, Stoke's midfield was abysmal, in particular Delap. i have already said our midfield was wank and ethers and shawcross were the only ones who were any good. but youre obviously an idiot if you think hull got the ball down and played, at every opertunity they were hitting it long. |
|
|
|
Post by fca47 on Nov 8, 2009 16:58:02 GMT
Didn't think he had a great game, but Stoke in the second half just hoofed it, there was no midfield, I don't think it was all their fault, the defence were just launching it to nobody in particular. In the first half we were playing through midfield and didn't look too bad. We just keep slipping back into giving the ball away. We need a leader in midfield which we don't seem to have. Think Delaps time has come, especially in home games where he gives us very little, except the throws.
|
|
|
|
Post by northstokie on Nov 8, 2009 17:00:08 GMT
He was crap until they scored their first then he started to run with the ball which we never cope with regardless of who it is..
Before that his crosses were going straight to the keeper and his passes were being intercepted left right and centre, thats when he wasn't passing it sideways and backwards
|
|
|
|
Post by alansuddick on Nov 8, 2009 17:08:55 GMT
jimmy bullard was right then.
|
|
|
|
Post by boothenender on Nov 8, 2009 17:18:04 GMT
jimmy bullard .... man of the match...............................FACT
just got back from game as i live in doncaster,fed up and pissed off....................FACT
|
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 8, 2009 17:22:00 GMT
I felt as soon as he took Fuller off I feared for us.
|
|
|
|
Post by Olgrligm on Nov 8, 2009 17:22:04 GMT
He was crap until they scored their first then he started to run with the ball which we never cope with regardless of who it is.. Before that his crosses were going straight to the keeper and his passes were being intercepted left right and centre, thats when he wasn't passing it sideways and backwards Very true. First half we reduced him to some long shots and backward passes that will look very good on the Opta stats and the Guardian Chalkboards and ProZone and whatever it is the young trendy managers of today mess about with, but an ineffective and pointless exercise. |
|
|
|
Post by french toast on Nov 8, 2009 17:22:14 GMT
no one is doubting bullard is man of the match, doubting that they got the ball down and played the pretty stuff  |
|
