|
|
Post by FullerMagic on Jan 9, 2013 23:20:38 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by DentySCFC on Jan 9, 2013 23:30:16 GMT
Good, Harry shafted us with him, now we can shaft Floppy Chops back.
|
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 9, 2013 23:45:54 GMT
Could be very interesting to see how this all pans out.
|
|
|
|
Post by johnsmithsupper on Jan 9, 2013 23:47:57 GMT
Doesn't Zamora still remain at qpr, interesting
|
|
|
|
Post by bayernoatcake on Jan 9, 2013 23:49:59 GMT
Doesn't Zamora still remain at qpr, interesting Good God no. |
|
|
|
Post by stockportstokie on Jan 9, 2013 23:50:21 GMT
How did we miss this one, quite a feasible deal when you think about it.
Would certainly be interesting to see how he would do there.
|
|
|
|
Post by bayernoatcake on Jan 9, 2013 23:52:52 GMT
How did we miss this one, quite a feasible deal when you think about it. Would certainly be interesting to see how he would do there. We didn't, we saw them talking about it in the tunnel at Man City!  |
|
|
|
Post by themightyragnar on Jan 10, 2013 0:16:48 GMT
Throw Owen and Crouch in and it's a deal.
By the way you can forget this Zamora shit as well.
Are you mad!
|
|
|
|
Post by Mint Berry Barks on Jan 10, 2013 0:42:38 GMT
Yes, because if there's one thing QPR need, it's definitely more center mids.
I'd swap him for Hoilett though.
|
|
|
|
Post by bayernoatcake on Jan 10, 2013 0:45:42 GMT
Yes, because if there's one thing QPR need, it's definitely more center mids. I'd swap him for Hoilett though. Tbf, 'Arry doesn't seem to trust them, especially the ones that "can't speak English". Now I know Palacios isn't the most fluent but...... ;D |
|
|
|
Post by scfcbiancorossi on Jan 10, 2013 0:49:44 GMT
This would be interesting.
|
|
|
|
Post by Paul Spencer on Jan 10, 2013 1:11:48 GMT
Good, Harry shafted us with him, now we can shaft Floppy Chops back. How did Redknapp 'shaft' us if he wants Palacios back? You don't sell a dodgy motor to somebody and then buy it back off them do you? It's not like he thought I know he's a croc, so I'll off load him to Stoke, if he then wants the lad back 18 months later? And we'd hardly be shafting him either by giving him back. If the story is true, then surely the question is ... why does 'Arry want him back? |
|
|
|
Post by stockportstokie on Jan 10, 2013 1:14:55 GMT
Good, Harry shafted us with him, now we can shaft Floppy Chops back. How did Redknapp 'shaft' us if he wants Palacios back? You don't sell a dodgy motor to somebody and then buy it back off them do you? It's not like he thought I know he's a croc, so I'll off load him to Stoke, if he then wants the lad back 18 months later? And we'd hardly be shafting him either by giving him back. If the story is true, then surely the question is ... why does 'Arry want him back? He's on for 10%  |
|
|
|
Post by Paul Spencer on Jan 10, 2013 1:21:08 GMT
How did Redknapp 'shaft' us if he wants Palacios back? You don't sell a dodgy motor to somebody and then buy it back off them do you? It's not like he thought I know he's a croc, so I'll off load him to Stoke, if he then wants the lad back 18 months later? And we'd hardly be shafting him either by giving him back. If the story is true, then surely the question is ... why does 'Arry want him back? He's on for 10% I'm sure he'll get a much bigger pay day be keeping QPR up. It's a very, very strange story. If Redknapp really does want him back and believes Palacios is the man to help him save QPR, does that then raise any questions about Wilson's time here to date? |
|
|
|
Post by bayernoatcake on Jan 10, 2013 1:29:01 GMT
There are questions to be raised anyway aren't there?
My main one would about his mobility, lack of it that is. Is it down to injuries or what? His time here has been very odd.
|
|
|
|
Post by stokeyouth on Jan 10, 2013 1:37:22 GMT
Can you imagine the wrist slashing if he basically keeps them up? Or at least plays a part. Or even completes 90mins ;D ;D
|
|
|
|
Post by bayernoatcake on Jan 10, 2013 1:39:59 GMT
It'll make the fuss over he who went to Leicester look small time!
"It can't have been windy today".
|
|
|
|
Post by LL Cool Dave on Jan 10, 2013 4:09:46 GMT
'he's already ruled America'
No wonder he's done fuck all for us. All along we've had Barack Paallacciooooous.
|
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 10, 2013 7:27:35 GMT
He is nowhere near the player he was at Wigan, for whatever reason and he is nowhere near the player that Harry Redknapp had at Tottenham for the first few months. He is also nowhere near the level of Stephen M'Bia. Samba Diakite has a lot more mobility and power, with similar ability on the ball. He's worse than Faurlin on almost every level.
It begs the question as to why Harry does want him to be fair.
|
|
|
|
Post by lawrieleslie on Jan 10, 2013 7:47:30 GMT
The one thing that would haunt Stoke is if WP went to QPR and was outstanding again. That would hurt a lot. Unless of course we get our money back for him which is unlikely.
|
|
|
|
Post by cheadlestokie on Jan 10, 2013 8:18:22 GMT
For me if he went to QPR and made a success of the move it would put a big question mark over TP's ability to progress us further.
But that is a big "if" and the arguement is for another day.
I feel a little sad in football terms that Palacios has not been the player he was expected to be,for whatever reason.
|
|
|
|
Post by stockportstokie on Jan 10, 2013 8:33:45 GMT
For me if he went to QPR and made a success of the move it would put a big question mark over TP's ability to progress us further. But that is a big "if" and the arguement is for another day. I feel a little sad in football terms that Palacios has not been the player he was expected to be,for whatever reason. I can't see the club sanctioning a move to another PL club for exactly this reason. It would be a PR disaster if he went and made a success of himself. |
|
|
|
Post by alexk on Jan 10, 2013 8:34:12 GMT
Swap him for Faurlin. Love him.
|
|
|
|
Post by crouchbot on Jan 10, 2013 8:41:01 GMT
Brilliant. Another 'name' who won't perform in QPR's nosedive to relegation! Club and player are well suited to each other.
|
|
|
|
Post by dadofsam on Jan 10, 2013 9:16:19 GMT
Just can't see this being true unfortunately
|
|
|
|
Post by likelyladgalizmo on Jan 10, 2013 9:36:08 GMT
newly promoted Stoke City
|
|
|
|
Post by ManderBeast on Jan 10, 2013 9:45:28 GMT
I called this about a month ago..
|
|
|
|
Post by rawli on Jan 10, 2013 9:45:51 GMT
Better weather down south.
|
|
|
|
Post by jimmygscfc1234 on Jan 10, 2013 10:08:37 GMT
If he went (which I very much doubt) wouldn't it be on a loan?
|
|
|
|
Post by stokeramblers on Jan 10, 2013 10:12:40 GMT
If he went (which I very much doubt) wouldn't it be on a loan? Why would it be on loan? |
|
