|
Post by manmarking on Feb 10, 2017 8:28:33 GMT
It's no great surprise to find Tories based in the South East with precisely fuck all understanding of the north - like our little bean counter friend fyd - supporting Tory corruption in this way. Furiously tossing off his endless fake news propaganda like a chimp wanking off in a mirrored cage It's certainly no surprise that you have precisely nothing to add of any worth I hate to break it to you fyd but no one cares what the south east metropolitan elite like you thinks anymore. If anyone wanted a constant tickertape feed of what order-order.com was telling us to think every second of the day, I'm sure admin would install one at the top of the page
|
|
|
Post by manmarking on Feb 10, 2017 8:21:59 GMT
It's no great surprise to find Tories based in the South East with precisely fuck all understanding of the north - like our little bean counter friend fyd - supporting Tory corruption in this way. Furiously tossing off his endless fake news propaganda like a chimp wanking off in a mirrored cage There's a lot of underlying anger in you isn't there mate. Sometimes you manage to keep a lid on it and then sometimes there's a lot of venom that's quite evident in what you put. It does annoy me when the government fucks over my hometown and the north in general whilst corruptly propping up its own backyard, yes mate. If you don't care about the north then fair enough, no one's forcing you to Anyway, you only ever troll people on here so I'll thank you to stop projecting yourself all over me
|
|
|
Post by manmarking on Feb 10, 2017 8:08:51 GMT
It's no great surprise to find Tories based in the South East with precisely fuck all understanding of the north - like our little bean counter friend fyd - supporting Tory corruption in this way. Furiously tossing off his endless fake news propaganda like a chimp wanking off in a mirrored cage You may have a point about tories having little understanding of the north But please, don't for one minute think that labour have any better understanding ....imo they and the liberals have even less. Well I disagree. You have only to look at how "managed decline" was a Tory policy for Labour-run areas like Liverpool in the 80s. The Tories have only ever sought to subjugate northern industrial areas because they're of no electoral use. And besides, we wouldn't want that angry uneducated rabble getting a whiff of power, would we?
|
|
|
Post by manmarking on Feb 9, 2017 0:19:14 GMT
Labour Fucking Eoin Jesus you may as well quote the canary just as reliable order-order.com/2015/06/02/the-truth-about-dr-eoin-clarke/This core grant thing was announced in 2015 if it's the armageddon for the North claimed you'd think they'd be kicking up a bit of a stink about yet nothing apart from some loon whose previous claims include tory expenses story about to go Nuclear, in fact here's some reaction from that well known tory heartland of birmingham www.birminghammail.co.uk/news/midlands-news/george-osborne-offers-birmingham-neighbours-10201575Sir Albert Bore, Leader of Birmingham City Council, said: “In common with other local authorities, the city council has been encouraging central government to increase the devolution of funding to local government. Therefore, the announcement of the local retention of all business rates income, with local flexibility, is welcome in principle. “The further indication that the government will acknowledge that not all councils start from the same funding position, with some more able to generate adequate business rates income than others, is essential, particularly for authorities such as the large cities.“Nevertheless, it will be essential that the government also takes full account of the extent to which authorities like Birmingham depend upon core grant funding, which in Birmingham’s case is £280m in 2015/16. However, the statement also says that this funding devolution will be accompanied by extra responsibilities, without the details needed before we can fully judge the government’s proposals.” There you have it they approve of it in principle but want to know the full details, a clear acceptance that the government will look after councils that your nutcase says they are going to harm, the usual bullshit scaremongering this time from a fucking librarian It's almost like it's just making bullshit up to try and win two by-elections. Well obviously Birmingham and Leeds will not suffer from retention of Business Rates. It's forgotten lands like Stoke and Copeland which will bear the brunt. Still thos people from Millionaires Row in Guildford won't have to worry with their early sweetheart deal. After all they're better than the rest of us aren't they. Rich Surrey Lives Matter. It's no great surprise to find Tories based in the South East with precisely fuck all understanding of the north - like our little bean counter friend fyd - supporting Tory corruption in this way. Furiously tossing off his endless fake news propaganda like a chimp wanking off in a mirrored cage
|
|
|
Post by manmarking on Feb 8, 2017 18:08:40 GMT
Texts 'allegedly' pointing out bias. Is this really what Our Jeremy is hanging his hat on during PMQ's? It's a massive story and it made May look the shady shambolic enemy of the working class we all know her to be. Even the vilest of our vilest right wing papers are slating her performance in the commons today. Todger could never even be as reasoned or impartial as a rabidly right-wing publication owned by a wealthy member of the establishment. If the Tories introduced laws advocating concentration camps for the unemployed, he'd find a way to defend the concept
|
|
|
Post by manmarking on Feb 8, 2017 17:57:37 GMT
The real acid test is PMing one of your chums in admin to see if they think I'm **************. But you won't do that, because you know it won't provide you with what you want to believe. ************** has a wonderfully compelling writing style that is quite easy to emulate. Fuck me, even some of the daftest cunts on here have spotted elements of it. There are a few of his grammatical quirks I've not integrated yet. Shall I start doing that from now on? Zzzzzz Way to prove the man's point for him, Fraise
|
|
|
Post by manmarking on Feb 8, 2017 14:01:55 GMT
Once you've had black waggy you'll never go back 😅 I've never tried black before. Does it taste too bitter? It does when it comes gushing, thick and hot, out of my spout all up your mug
|
|
|
Post by manmarking on Feb 8, 2017 13:56:44 GMT
I have a friend who did voluntary work with "needy" people, she had her new winter coat stolen containing her house keys, cost her 90 quid to replace door locks, needless to say she didn't go again... Bloody fake news I'm afraid, mate. Easy mistake to make - you can't move for the bastard stuff these days
|
|
|
Post by manmarking on Feb 8, 2017 13:38:40 GMT
Great stuff Mr Corbyn - what other Rabbits can you pull out of the hat - via your mates. Corbyn for PM? Forever!!! Then you would see an even more corrupt load of Vermin Based on what evidence are you alleging that Jeremy Corbyn is corrupt, pal?
|
|
|
Post by manmarking on Feb 8, 2017 13:29:07 GMT
I am **************, and so is my wife. My situation is complicated. I'm ************** on here, Dave by day and Big Mama Fru-Fru by night My partner is half rice, half chips because I like all options on the table
|
|
|
Post by manmarking on Feb 8, 2017 13:06:10 GMT
Well done for getting into the spirit of our brave new alt-right world, D-Dogg. The great thing is that nowadays you don't really have to think about anything If someone or something challenges your preconceptions, it can just be fake and then you don't have to worry about it anymore. In this respect, our dear old Oatie was way ahead of the curve. People here have been crying "**************" of anything potentially troubling to their warped worldview for ages. I wonder if Donald Trump was mumf. They are both racists and mumf did ragequit around the time of the Republican primaries... Fuck off, **************. Fake news
|
|
|
Post by manmarking on Feb 8, 2017 12:49:15 GMT
My lad's at uni in Sheffield. Wanted to apply for an internship that came up for astrophysics in Texas He wasn't allowed Under represented groups only Got to Love his white privilege Fake news. Well done for getting into the spirit of our brave new alt-right world, D-Dogg. The great thing is that nowadays you don't really have to think about anything If someone or something challenges your preconceptions, it can just be fake and then you don't have to worry about it anymore. In this respect, our dear old Oatie was way ahead of the curve. People here have been crying "**************" of anything potentially troubling to their warped worldview for ages. I wonder if Donald Trump was mumf. They are both racists and mumf did ragequit around the time of the Republican primaries...
|
|
|
Post by manmarking on Feb 8, 2017 12:39:24 GMT
Because he's on a wind-up mate. Play him at his own game - just call him "todger" or the like. I called him "Roger Fuckheaderer" once - use that one if you fancy There's no sense reasoning with the unreasonable. Just tell him and his fake news to fuck off; it's the only way to play these jive muthas I try and keep things nice and civil, Roger Fuckheaderer is pretty funny though I admire your approach mate. I guess I'm more of the fight fire with fire persuasion
|
|
|
Post by manmarking on Feb 7, 2017 22:21:20 GMT
Thatcher 1-0 The Working Class
There's a real dearth of compassion and empathy in Britain these days. To quote Nigel Farage, I want my country back.
|
|
|
Post by manmarking on Feb 7, 2017 18:14:47 GMT
Even by your standards, this is gibberish mate. You criticise a columnist for going "round and round with strawman arguments" when you've spent just shy of four years doing precisely the same on here. You rail about democracy in one breath, yet criticise someone for "creating dialogue" in another. You deliberately mis-paraphrase the article as a cheap way of trying to ridicule its central point. You then cite an opinion piece from the Telegraph by a pro-Brexit columnist as some sort of easy breakdown of the facts Apart from that, yeah, totally agree I'm glad you're back Thanks mate I plan to lend a hand when the rabble is really out of control but focus on more fulfilling things the rest of the time. We'll see how that goes
|
|
|
Post by manmarking on Feb 7, 2017 18:11:42 GMT
What's that sound I can hear ........ is it stockportstokie* reversing ... So, you've equated someone who doesn't agree with throwing eggs at Nuttall to someone who wouldn't have the wherewith-all to stand up to Hitler. "a fucking egg being thrown, an egg!" What would you rather it be? Stamping on his head like you threatened to do to me recently? *Or is it swanseastokie ?? You get offended by an egg, A BLOODY EGG. Thank goodness your dad was made of stronger stuff. Safe to say that if someone egged Corbyn, he'd be hailing it as the greatest example of intellectual wit since Noel Coward was in his prime
|
|
|
Post by manmarking on Feb 7, 2017 18:07:34 GMT
Ricki, Ricki, Ricki come on love. The text you highlighted in bold is not a straw man argument. It's fact. You were the one who tried to define what remoaners are according to Brexiteers. You were wrong. It's not about future outcomes. It's not a voice that "remotely resembles dissent" as you put it. Those voices are trying to derail the process. Lucas, Sturgeon, Clegg, Clarke, Salmond, Gina Miller, Farrelly etc, etc, etc, etc are actually and really trying to either block the UK leaving the EU or delay it indefinitely or frustrate it continually in the courts. If you don't believe this statement there is no point in continuing. The time for 'legitimate points' as you put them like those of Matthew Parris is over. The debate raged for many, many, many months. The referendum has taken place the votes have been counted. Your (or Parris') ifs and ands pots and pans arguments about will it be a success or will it be a disaster is pure speculation not democratic debate. You can champion those who are continuing that narrative but they are absolutely worthless in February 2017. 2nd time I've had to mention it but why are you referring to me as 'Ricki' which is feminine? Because he's on a wind-up mate. Play him at his own game - just call him "todger" or the like. I called him "Roger Fuckheaderer" once - use that one if you fancy There's no sense reasoning with the unreasonable. Just tell him and his fake news to fuck off; it's the only way to play these jive muthas
|
|
|
Post by manmarking on Feb 7, 2017 11:14:50 GMT
Fake news
|
|
|
Post by manmarking on Feb 7, 2017 8:18:49 GMT
You're quite correct that it's really not difficult to have all your opinions neatly packaged up and provided for you by agenda-dominated media like the Telegraph Just like the buzz buzz of a little mosquito at night. If course it's agenda driven just as Parris' piece is. But one is straightforward and logical the other is hypothetical personal meanderings. When was the last time you had an original thought? When was the last time you learnt something that you didn't read online? One happens to coincide with your viewpoint, the other doesn't. Aside from that, they're both opinion pieces, not news. In answer to your questions, all the time mate, all the time
|
|
|
Post by manmarking on Feb 7, 2017 8:10:51 GMT
I will concede that my statement of "It's really not difficult" doesn't apply to you. He's pining for his master Alf, he's been missing for a couple of weeks licking his wounds Even Roger won't acknowledge you I'm afraid, carps. The more right-wing on here fear for their credibility being associated with you. You're the posting equivalent of Nigel Farage's unfortunate dalliances with national socialism
|
|
|
Post by manmarking on Feb 6, 2017 22:13:36 GMT
Even by your standards, this is gibberish mate. You criticise a columnist for going "round and round with strawman arguments" when you've spent just shy of four years doing precisely the same on here. You rail about democracy in one breath, yet criticise someone for "creating dialogue" in another. You deliberately mis-paraphrase the article as a cheap way of trying to ridicule its central point. You then cite an opinion piece from the Telegraph by a pro-Brexit columnist as some sort of easy breakdown of the facts Apart from that, yeah, totally agree I will concede that my statement of "It's really not difficult" doesn't apply to you. You're quite correct that it's really not difficult to have all your opinions neatly packaged up and provided for you by agenda-dominated media like the Telegraph
|
|
|
Post by manmarking on Feb 6, 2017 21:51:13 GMT
Don't get me wrong, I think it's wonderful that thevoid is embracing the idea of safe spaces on our little campus Did you manage to get hold of any friends to have a pint with? Yeah wild times mate. You'd have hated it though. Loads of intellectuals, gays, ethnics and all that
|
|
|
Post by manmarking on Feb 6, 2017 21:48:06 GMT
Well done, you've just proven Matthew Parris' point. He hasn't got a point. Parris, like some on here just go round and round with strawman arguments. He creates dialogue where none is needed. "I'm a Remainer and admit that Brexit might work, ergo if you are a Leaver you must admit the Brexit might be a disaster" "And if you don't agree with that logic you're a rabid, paranoid xenophobe" An article referencing Parris' drivel. Brexit means we're leaving the EU. It's not a crisis. It's an exercise in democracy It's really not difficult. " .... the people want Brexit. It was a democratic choice, not a coup by ideologues. During that referendum the British voters were told all the risks – and a few fantasies of apocalypse – and they still went for it. It sometimes feels as if the only politician who has grasped this fact is Theresa May. I share the concern that the Government sometimes fails to spell out its stance on business or immigration, that this plainly has an effect upon that skittish old maid we call The City. But I trust that behind closed doors she will work to get the best deal for the country. The fact that she – almost alone – understands what the country wants is a very good sign." Even by your standards, this is gibberish mate. You criticise a columnist for going "round and round with strawman arguments" when you've spent just shy of four years doing precisely the same on here. You rail about democracy in one breath, yet criticise someone for "creating dialogue" in another. You deliberately mis-paraphrase the article as a cheap way of trying to ridicule its central point. You then cite an opinion piece from the Telegraph by a pro-Brexit columnist as some sort of easy breakdown of the facts Apart from that, yeah, totally agree
|
|
|
Post by manmarking on Feb 6, 2017 18:55:14 GMT
As if you're so sensitive you have to block people, you soft twat No doubt those committed democrats in Ukip would approve of your attitude It does have the whiff of 'snowflake' doesn't it? Don't get me wrong, I think it's wonderful that thevoid is embracing the idea of safe spaces on our little campus
|
|
|
Post by manmarking on Feb 6, 2017 18:53:37 GMT
It does have the whiff of 'snowflake' doesn't it? ************** has a friend If he does then it's one more than you have
|
|
|
Post by manmarking on Feb 5, 2017 23:19:45 GMT
Excellent way to blame students without any actual proof who put that sign up. Bloody students, with their windows and stuff. I said 'looks like'. And given that I've blocked you, not sure why you're able to comment on my posts. As if you're so sensitive you have to block people, you soft twat No doubt those committed democrats in Ukip would approve of your attitude
|
|
|
Post by manmarking on Jan 29, 2017 18:33:54 GMT
RRP that's bollocks and you know it is or you're just on a wind up. The court cases were hopefully to delay and ultimately block Brexit. Do you really believe that Gina Miller was only some Constitutional Law nerd who just wanted all the i's dotted. Nonsense. I've absolutely no doubt that another referendum will be a carrot offered by other political parties in the next 10 GE's !! My point was that when you say that you "don't agree with the terms of exit" but you're just "questioning" the Government over Brexit it's just passive aggressive anti-Brexit stance as opposed to painting your face in the EU flag and blocking Trafalgar square. For the 1000th time, now the result of the referendum is to leave, we should leave the EU. That is what the public decided, and that is what should happen. You seem to be mixing up anti-Brexit feelings with an interest in what Brexit actually is. I mean, in a hypothetical world what would you do if Theresa May announced that Brexit included all football clubs closing down because it's a shit sport? Would you just shut the fuck up, and clap it along because after all it is Brexit and who are we to have any say in the process (and it is only a say after all, we have no actual power). A stupid example I know, but I don't know how else to explain why I might still have some sort of interest. It also seems amazing that a supposed anti-establishment vote has resulted in people being told to stop questioning politicians and just agree with what they are doing.An absolutely excellent point, but one which I fear is wasted in this arena
|
|
|
Post by manmarking on Jan 28, 2017 7:48:40 GMT
Paul Nuttall was quoted on T.V. this evening as supporting torture. Surely this disqualifies from being supported by any self respecting human being. I do not live in Stoke, but if I did I would find it difficult to support any of the candidates who have put themselves for election. I can understand all the reasons why people would think of voting UKIP but, for me, the party has achieved its aim of getting us out of Europe and now has little to offer. Paul Nuttall is thick as fuck but, as Michael Gove said, people are bored of experts these days. Nuttall is a liar and he doesn't know much about anything but that's irrelevant; his lack of qualifications is his main qualification.
|
|
|
Post by manmarking on Jan 28, 2017 7:38:03 GMT
Dylan wrote those words about a National sea change of ideas and dreams against the status quo that wasn't listening and didn't dare allow or believe there was another point of view out there. Left/right it makes no difference. The sentiment is exactly the same. The so called 'progressive Left' are now the Establishment. Clinton, Merkel, Corbyn etc, etc. Hand on heart is the World a better place after many, many years of Liberal Left / Socialist or Socialist Lite leadership? Anyway, where have you been hiding? The world hasn't been led by the left or socialists what the fuck are you on about? Not a scooby. As is his wont, Roger has failed to grasp the difference between liberal economic and liberal social policy. And yes you ask a fair question
|
|
|
Post by manmarking on Jan 27, 2017 18:33:04 GMT
They are probably turning in their graves at the thought of vinyl record players being replaced too. News Flash... Times change. Come gather around people Wherever you roam And admit that the waters Around you have grown And accept it that soon You'll be drenched to the bone And if your breath to you is worth saving Then you better start swimming or you'll sink like a stone For the times they are a-changing Come senators, congressmen Please heed the call Don't stand in the doorway Don't block up the hall For he that gets hurt Will be he who has stalled There's the battle outside raging.... Dylan wrote those words about a dynamic, youthful, progressive left-wing movement, not a load of ill-educated angry old right-wingers on an Internet messageboard, mate
|
|