|
Post by thehartshillbadger on Nov 28, 2024 14:19:40 GMT
|
|
|
Post by oggyoggy on Nov 28, 2024 14:29:38 GMT
|
|
|
Post by salopstick on Nov 28, 2024 15:21:28 GMT
most of you fucking children will be gone from here
|
|
|
Post by wannabee on Nov 28, 2024 15:50:05 GMT
A VPN easily circumvents, kids are usually more tech smart than their parents Social Media will receive even more data on everyone in some vain attempt to exclude U16 A novel idea might be parents taking responsibility for their children, a tough ask I know I agree with the sentiment just don't see how it can be achieved unless you go down the Chinese route of a Firewall for everyone
|
|
|
Post by thisisouryear on Nov 28, 2024 15:53:51 GMT
A controlling state taking responsibility away from the parents, just another step to controlling people's lives
|
|
|
Post by thehartshillbadger on Nov 28, 2024 15:56:26 GMT
A VPN easily circumvents, kids are usually more tech smart than their parents Social Media will receive even more data on everyone in some vain attempt to exclude U16 A novel idea might be parents taking responsibility for their children, a tough ask I know I agree with the sentiment just don't see how it can be achieved unless you go down the Chinese route of a Firewall for everyone All good points
|
|
|
Post by vamborools on Nov 28, 2024 17:09:39 GMT
Hats off to them for giving it a go We'll still be debating it in 10 years time
|
|
|
Post by Gawa on Nov 28, 2024 17:11:07 GMT
Has its pros and cons in my opinion.
As Wannabe said it feels like it may well simply be the state trying to seize further control of social media as to enforce something like this requires verifying peoples identities. Which means everyone will need to prove their age.
Another attack on freedom of speech and expression in my eyes.
|
|
|
Post by thisisouryear on Nov 28, 2024 22:25:23 GMT
Has its pros and cons in my opinion. As Wannabe said it feels like it may well simply be the state trying to seize further control of social media as to enforce something like this requires verifying peoples identities. Which means everyone will need to prove their age. Another attack on freedom of speech and expression in my eyes. I don't understand why this isn't being described as woke cancel culture attack on free speech nonsense. It seems people are very selective with what's woke and what isn't
|
|
|
Post by Gawa on Nov 28, 2024 22:29:09 GMT
Has its pros and cons in my opinion. As Wannabe said it feels like it may well simply be the state trying to seize further control of social media as to enforce something like this requires verifying peoples identities. Which means everyone will need to prove their age. Another attack on freedom of speech and expression in my eyes. I don't understand why this isn't being described as woke cancel culture attack on free speech nonsense. It seems people are very selective with what's woke and what isn't Its woke cancel culture mate
|
|
|
Post by metalhead on Nov 28, 2024 22:36:23 GMT
Very very good idea imo.
|
|
|
Post by spitthedog on Nov 30, 2024 0:47:58 GMT
A VPN easily circumvents, kids are usually more tech smart than their parents Social Media will receive even more data on everyone in some vain attempt to exclude U16 A novel idea might be parents taking responsibility for their children, a tough ask I know I agree with the sentiment just don't see how it can be achieved unless you go down the Chinese route of a Firewall for everyone and Chinese folk get around the firewalls quite easily.
|
|
|
Post by wannabee on Nov 30, 2024 1:29:56 GMT
A VPN easily circumvents, kids are usually more tech smart than their parents Social Media will receive even more data on everyone in some vain attempt to exclude U16 A novel idea might be parents taking responsibility for their children, a tough ask I know I agree with the sentiment just don't see how it can be achieved unless you go down the Chinese route of a Firewall for everyone and Chinese folk get around the firewalls quite easily. Not easily, but congratulations on proving my point.
|
|
|
Post by mtrstudent on Nov 30, 2024 3:34:22 GMT
Has its pros and cons in my opinion. As Wannabe said it feels like it may well simply be the state trying to seize further control of social media as to enforce something like this requires verifying peoples identities. Which means everyone will need to prove their age. Another attack on freedom of speech and expression in my eyes. Yeah mate that's what I'm worried about too. Everyone wants naturally to protect kids, but that makes them an easy tool for a prying government.
|
|
|
Post by Chewbacca the Wookie on Nov 30, 2024 4:09:20 GMT
It’s a great idea. Will be interesting to see the results.
The Aussies get a lot right.
|
|
|
Post by JoeinOz on Nov 30, 2024 12:28:27 GMT
It's good intentions. Bt is most likely unworkable.
|
|
|
Post by iancransonsknees on Nov 30, 2024 12:40:33 GMT
Has its pros and cons in my opinion. As Wannabe said it feels like it may well simply be the state trying to seize further control of social media as to enforce something like this requires verifying peoples identities. Which means everyone will need to prove their age. Another attack on freedom of speech and expression in my eyes. I don't understand why this isn't being described as woke cancel culture attack on free speech nonsense. It seems people are very selective with what's woke and what isn't Oggy's Woke, Badger isn't. Job done. Kids need to experience the freedom and pleasure of growing up without social media.
|
|
|
Post by thisisouryear on Nov 30, 2024 12:52:30 GMT
I don't understand why this isn't being described as woke cancel culture attack on free speech nonsense. It seems people are very selective with what's woke and what isn't Oggy's Woke, Badger isn't. Job done. Kids need to experience the freedom and pleasure of growing up without social media. Who should implement that though? The government or their parents? It's all nanny state woke bollocks if you ask me. There are many people who cry woke at everything agreeing with this who should be calling it out given they have nailed their colours to the anti woke mast
|
|
|
Post by thehartshillbadger on Nov 30, 2024 13:11:25 GMT
Oggy's Woke, Badger isn't. Job done. Kids need to experience the freedom and pleasure of growing up without social media. Who should implement that though? The government or their parents? It's all nanny state woke bollocks if you ask me. There are many people who cry woke at everything agreeing with this who should be calling it out given they have nailed their colours to the anti woke mast There’s nothing woke about protecting as best we can children from mental and physical abuse, grooming, suicide etc. Children should be protected at all costs.
|
|
|
Post by iancransonsknees on Nov 30, 2024 13:16:56 GMT
Who should implement that though? The government or their parents? It's all nanny state woke bollocks if you ask me. There are many people who cry woke at everything agreeing with this who should be calling it out given they have nailed their colours to the anti woke mast There’s nothing woke about protecting as best we can children from mental and physical abuse, grooming, suicide etc. Children should be protected at all costs. I'd be more worried about the people who still want access to kids on social media. Parents have devolved their responsibility as it is, the don't even want to feed them in London so Sadiq is dishing out free snapping for all. Labour are dishing out breakfasts in primary school. They'll be clothing them next. It'd put those paedo hunters who catfish the nonces out of business too.
|
|
|
Post by jesusmcmuffin on Nov 30, 2024 13:23:42 GMT
A VPN easily circumvents, kids are usually more tech smart than their parents Social Media will receive even more data on everyone in some vain attempt to exclude U16 A novel idea might be parents taking responsibility for their children, a tough ask I know I agree with the sentiment just don't see how it can be achieved unless you go down the Chinese route of a Firewall for everyone and Chinese folk get around the firewalls quite easily. They invented them to be fair I might be thinking of fireworks actually
|
|
|
Post by thisisouryear on Nov 30, 2024 14:03:39 GMT
Who should implement that though? The government or their parents? It's all nanny state woke bollocks if you ask me. There are many people who cry woke at everything agreeing with this who should be calling it out given they have nailed their colours to the anti woke mast There’s nothing woke about protecting as best we can children from mental and physical abuse, grooming, suicide etc. Children should be protected at all costs. That's what being a parent is all about, no need for interference from the government
|
|
|
Post by mtrstudent on Nov 30, 2024 15:59:03 GMT
Who should implement that though? The government or their parents? It's all nanny state woke bollocks if you ask me. There are many people who cry woke at everything agreeing with this who should be calling it out given they have nailed their colours to the anti woke mast There’s nothing woke about protecting as best we can children from mental and physical abuse, grooming, suicide etc. Children should be protected at all costs. I think everyone's on the same page with wanting to care for kids. If Australia can make it work it could be really pioneering and it'd be great if something were done to reduce the damage the socials are doing. But... "at all costs"? Seems like it could lead to dark spots. If it's "at all costs" then there's a really good argument for banning e.g. the Catholic Church or other religions from being near children, at least for some points in the past. Is that where we want to go? Maybe Australia will work out a good way of doing it that respects privacy & freedom. I'd like to see that.
|
|
|
Post by superjw on Nov 30, 2024 18:14:10 GMT
The only realistic way to implement it is an age verification for everyone where you will have to submit photo id (passport etc) as part of the sign up process.
Unless AI can do the legwork you will be talking human verification of ID in some cases which will take X amount of time.
Don’t forget social media already have age blocks, but they are easily circumvented by giving a false age…
|
|