So if he gambled and changed the tactics and Watford nicked it which I have seen happen before then the whole psot would be on why Pulis changed the tactics. He really didn't need to change we looked the more likley to win [Puzzled ???]
Post by chesterfieldstokie on Dec 9, 2007 22:31:20 GMT
Better team yes, but most confidence comes with victories, also thinks how the other teams at the top would have looked at a victory by Stoke! Watford were there to be beaten, they created nothing, so we should have gone for it.
Post by wembleyofthenorth on Dec 10, 2007 0:26:07 GMT
talk of changing tactics and him getting it spot on??
It's the same tactics, parkin substitution and approach every game. Dont get me wrong, glad of the result and the way we "play" is working league wise . But giving points on how the tactics/managers decisions worked per game, I dont think so. He's hardly trying different combo's that are a success/failure and need judging.
It should be points based on the other teams ability to cope with or expose the tactical limitations.
Watford v's Pulis
Watford: Same tactics, with better players: 0-0 : therefore= -2 for Watford, they dont have an excuse.
Last Edit: Dec 10, 2007 0:40:23 GMT by wembleyofthenorth - Back to Top