|
|
Post by lordb on Sept 6, 2024 21:00:32 GMT
Its all there for everyone to see but only fan boys like yourself can’t see it That's frighteningly simplistic and frankly a bit of a daft thing to say. Corbyn's fault lies with the fact that he unashamedly confuses freedom of speech and expression with thinking everyone has an equal right to a voice when they don't necessarily because of the socio-political position they hold and express. For example, Corbyn thinks that Palestinians have just as equal a right to a voice as Israeli's, which is correct. But he will then proceed to seek to engage with Hamas at a time when they are openly slaughtering innocent Israeli's and moreover not attack Hamas' actions for fear of violating that Palestinian right to freedom of speech. Palestinians don't equal Hamas much in the same way that the English don't equal Reform - and to say that Corbyn's politics are antisemitic is equally wrong. Corbyn himself isn't antisemitic - Corbyn just has an overly simplistic way of approaching the Palestinian issue as he doesn't view Israeli citizens who have the protection of the US-backed Israeli state with the same victimhood as he views Palestinians. That's not preconceived antisemitism; it's a lack of intellect. But, to say that Corbyn hates Jews is as stupid as it gets and, frankly wrong. There is no evidence of Corbyn saying that anywhere because he hasn't. Corbyn's fault is that he applies generic and simplistic solutions to complex and nuanced problems on the global stage and it is for that reason that he is dangerous as a political leader - NOT because of stupid right wing views of him. Perfect summary The other clear fault with Corbyn is he supports Arsenal |
|
|
|
Post by Gawa on Sept 7, 2024 0:33:41 GMT
Its all there for everyone to see but only fan boys like yourself can’t see it That's frighteningly simplistic and frankly a bit of a daft thing to say. Corbyn's fault lies with the fact that he unashamedly confuses freedom of speech and expression with thinking everyone has an equal right to a voice when they don't necessarily because of the socio-political position they hold and express. For example, Corbyn thinks that Palestinians have just as equal a right to a voice as Israeli's, which is correct. But he will then proceed to seek to engage with Hamas at a time when they are openly slaughtering innocent Israeli's and moreover not attack Hamas' actions for fear of violating that Palestinian right to freedom of speech. Palestinians don't equal Hamas much in the same way that the English don't equal Reform - and to say that Corbyn's politics are antisemitic is equally wrong. Corbyn himself isn't antisemitic - Corbyn just has an overly simplistic way of approaching the Palestinian issue as he doesn't view Israeli citizens who have the protection of the US-backed Israeli state with the same victimhood as he views Palestinians. That's not preconceived antisemitism; it's a lack of intellect. But, to say that Corbyn hates Jews is as stupid as it gets and, frankly wrong. There is no evidence of Corbyn saying that anywhere because he hasn't. Corbyn's fault is that he applies generic and simplistic solutions to complex and nuanced problems on the global stage and it is for that reason that he is dangerous as a political leader - NOT because of stupid right wing views of him. Are you suggesting that our politicians shouldn't be engaging with the IDF at a time when they are openly slaughtering innocent Palestines? And moreover do you believe they don't attack IDF actions for fear of violating that Israel right to freedom of speech? I think most sane people in the modern world don't view Israeli citizens with "the same victimhood" as palestines because there is no parallels between the crimes and oppression suffered between the two in the modern era. Drawing a false equivalence between the two shows a lack of intellect. Corbyn tries to provide peaceful solutions to problems. Others prioritise profits over people. This is why he is a dangerous political leader as he acts in the interests of the many rather than the few. And now we have Tel Aviv Keith instead who thinks collective punishment of civillians is a countries right to "defend itself". And lastly there are Many Many Many examples out there of Corbyn condemning hamas. So to say "not attack Hamas' actions for fear of violating that Palestinian right to freedom of speech" is just making stuff up. What you do find is that Tel Aviv Keith, Rishi and Co. Are the ones who were unable, and in many cases still unable, to condemn Israels actions. Mainly because these same people are the ones who have been weaponising antisemitism for poltical gain. And when you call everyone an antisemite you don't like... it suddenly becomes very challenging to criticise the IDF when you've been the architects behind calling other critics antisemites. |
|
|
|
Post by Ariel Manto on Sept 8, 2024 18:53:10 GMT
That's frighteningly simplistic and frankly a bit of a daft thing to say. Corbyn's fault lies with the fact that he unashamedly confuses freedom of speech and expression with thinking everyone has an equal right to a voice when they don't necessarily because of the socio-political position they hold and express. For example, Corbyn thinks that Palestinians have just as equal a right to a voice as Israeli's, which is correct. But he will then proceed to seek to engage with Hamas at a time when they are openly slaughtering innocent Israeli's and moreover not attack Hamas' actions for fear of violating that Palestinian right to freedom of speech. Palestinians don't equal Hamas much in the same way that the English don't equal Reform - and to say that Corbyn's politics are antisemitic is equally wrong. Corbyn himself isn't antisemitic - Corbyn just has an overly simplistic way of approaching the Palestinian issue as he doesn't view Israeli citizens who have the protection of the US-backed Israeli state with the same victimhood as he views Palestinians. That's not preconceived antisemitism; it's a lack of intellect. But, to say that Corbyn hates Jews is as stupid as it gets and, frankly wrong. There is no evidence of Corbyn saying that anywhere because he hasn't. Corbyn's fault is that he applies generic and simplistic solutions to complex and nuanced problems on the global stage and it is for that reason that he is dangerous as a political leader - NOT because of stupid right wing views of him. Are you suggesting that our politicians shouldn't be engaging with the IDF at a time when they are openly slaughtering innocent Palestines? And moreover do you believe they don't attack IDF actions for fear of violating that Israel right to freedom of speech? I think most sane people in the modern world don't view Israeli citizens with "the same victimhood" as palestines because there is no parallels between the crimes and oppression suffered between the two in the modern era. Drawing a false equivalence between the two shows a lack of intellect. Corbyn tries to provide peaceful solutions to problems. Others prioritise profits over people. This is why he is a dangerous political leader as he acts in the interests of the many rather than the few. And now we have Tel Aviv Keith instead who thinks collective punishment of civillians is a countries right to "defend itself". And lastly there are Many Many Many examples out there of Corbyn condemning hamas. So to say "not attack Hamas' actions for fear of violating that Palestinian right to freedom of speech" is just making stuff up. What you do find is that Tel Aviv Keith, Rishi and Co. Are the ones who were unable, and in many cases still unable, to condemn Israels actions. Mainly because these same people are the ones who have been weaponising antisemitism for poltical gain. And when you call everyone an antisemite you don't like... it suddenly becomes very challenging to criticise the IDF when you've been the architects behind calling other critics antisemites. 1. "I think most sane people in the modern world don't view Israeli citizens with "the same victimhood" as palestines because there is no parallels between the crimes and oppression suffered between the two in the modern era. Drawing a false equivalence between the two shows a lack of intellect."That's the problem with Corbyn supporters - false inequality. Of course there is a parallel between innocent people on both sides being killed. The parallel is innocent people on both sides being killed in the name of a political elite which won't compromise. 2. "Corbyn tries to provide peaceful solutions to problems. Others prioritise profits over people."Like refusing to call out Hamas, I suppose? The hypocrisy of Corbyn supporters is mirrored only by the hypocrisy of the man himself. |
|
|
|
Post by Gawa on Sept 12, 2024 21:46:05 GMT
This guy hates Britain.
|
|
|
|
Post by scfcbiancorossi on Sept 12, 2024 22:26:38 GMT
Its all there for everyone to see but only fan boys like yourself can’t see it That's frighteningly simplistic and frankly a bit of a daft thing to say. Corbyn's fault lies with the fact that he unashamedly confuses freedom of speech and expression with thinking everyone has an equal right to a voice when they don't necessarily because of the socio-political position they hold and express. For example, Corbyn thinks that Palestinians have just as equal a right to a voice as Israeli's, which is correct. But he will then proceed to seek to engage with Hamas at a time when they are openly slaughtering innocent Israeli's and moreover not attack Hamas' actions for fear of violating that Palestinian right to freedom of speech. Palestinians don't equal Hamas much in the same way that the English don't equal Reform - and to say that Corbyn's politics are antisemitic is equally wrong. Corbyn himself isn't antisemitic - Corbyn just has an overly simplistic way of approaching the Palestinian issue as he doesn't view Israeli citizens who have the protection of the US-backed Israeli state with the same victimhood as he views Palestinians. That's not preconceived antisemitism; it's a lack of intellect. But, to say that Corbyn hates Jews is as stupid as it gets and, frankly wrong. There is no evidence of Corbyn saying that anywhere because he hasn't. Corbyn's fault is that he applies generic and simplistic solutions to complex and nuanced problems on the global stage and it is for that reason that he is dangerous as a political leader - NOT because of stupid right wing views of him. I actually agree with a fair chunk of that. Aside from the unnecessary comparison of Reform (a British political party who simply want to ban illegal immigration, support traditional British values, improve our failing economy, support pensioners and not ban stuff like smoking in pubs) to a murderous Islamic terrorist outfit like Hamas who openly slit the throats of Jewish women and children. |
|
|
|
Post by Ariel Manto on Sept 13, 2024 7:53:49 GMT
That's frighteningly simplistic and frankly a bit of a daft thing to say. Corbyn's fault lies with the fact that he unashamedly confuses freedom of speech and expression with thinking everyone has an equal right to a voice when they don't necessarily because of the socio-political position they hold and express. For example, Corbyn thinks that Palestinians have just as equal a right to a voice as Israeli's, which is correct. But he will then proceed to seek to engage with Hamas at a time when they are openly slaughtering innocent Israeli's and moreover not attack Hamas' actions for fear of violating that Palestinian right to freedom of speech. Palestinians don't equal Hamas much in the same way that the English don't equal Reform - and to say that Corbyn's politics are antisemitic is equally wrong. Corbyn himself isn't antisemitic - Corbyn just has an overly simplistic way of approaching the Palestinian issue as he doesn't view Israeli citizens who have the protection of the US-backed Israeli state with the same victimhood as he views Palestinians. That's not preconceived antisemitism; it's a lack of intellect. But, to say that Corbyn hates Jews is as stupid as it gets and, frankly wrong. There is no evidence of Corbyn saying that anywhere because he hasn't. Corbyn's fault is that he applies generic and simplistic solutions to complex and nuanced problems on the global stage and it is for that reason that he is dangerous as a political leader - NOT because of stupid right wing views of him. I actually agree with a fair chunk of that. Aside from the unnecessary comparison of Reform (a British political party who simply want to ban illegal immigration, support traditional British values, improve our failing economy, support pensioners and not ban stuff like smoking in pubs) to a murderous Islamic terrorist outfit like Hamas who openly slit the throats of Jewish women and children. Reform have a far more dark and sinister agenda than that which you unbelievably simplify. Reform attracts the kind of "bad apples" who are caught using the racial slur "P***" to describe the former prime minister Rishi Sunak; who describe Islam as a "disgusting cult"; who believe that the army should "just shoot" migrants crossing the Channel; who describe the Gay Pride flag as "degenerate" and think all members of the LGBTQ+ community are paedophiles. Reform UK and Nigel Farage specifically have previously openly stated that they had a deliberate strategy of destroying the BNP so that people who are minded that way don't any longer have a home to go to, and so who would then gravitate in Reform's direction. Corbyn has his faults - but he's not an ex-BNP fucktard. |
|
|
|
Post by Gawa on Sept 16, 2024 21:34:55 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by emretezzy on Sept 18, 2024 18:37:53 GMT
Corbyn taking Diane Abbott to Karl Marx grave in Highgate for a date must be the most leftist act ever seen in this country.
|
|
|
|
Post by shakermaker on Sept 24, 2024 8:29:15 GMT
Corbyn taking Diane Abbott to Karl Marx grave in Highgate for a date must be the most leftist act ever seen in this country. He knows how to treat a lady. Think they got a KFC after though. |
|
|
|
Post by prestwichpotter on Sept 24, 2024 8:37:43 GMT
Michael Rosen, wrong type of Jew. If ever you want evidence of the absolute scam that was the Labour antisemitism "crisis" just looked at the absolute disgusting filth that was aimed at Rosen during that period by Jews and non-Jews alike for being a friend and ally to the last Labour leader...... |
|
|
|
Post by Gawa on Sept 24, 2024 8:52:59 GMT
Michael Rosen, wrong type of Jew. If ever you want evidence of the absolute scam that was the Labour antisemitism "crisis" just looked at the absolute disgusting filth that was aimed at Rosen during that period by Jews and non-Jews alike for being a friend and ally to the last Labour leader...... The latest Jewish Chronicle scandal too is further evidence. And still nobody knows who bank rolls the newspaper. |
|
|
|
Post by prestwichpotter on Sept 24, 2024 8:58:31 GMT
Michael Rosen, wrong type of Jew. If ever you want evidence of the absolute scam that was the Labour antisemitism "crisis" just looked at the absolute disgusting filth that was aimed at Rosen during that period by Jews and non-Jews alike for being a friend and ally to the last Labour leader...... The latest Jewish Chronicle scandal too is further evidence. And still nobody knows who bank rolls the newspaper. The only thing these ghouls have no interest in is the real life cancer of actual antisemitism. And they're still portrayed as the good guys. I was accused on here by a poster I now block of being a raving antisemite the same week me and my two boys helped tidy up one of the local Jewish cemeteries in Whitefield after it was broken into and vandalised. You couldn't make this shit up, it would be funny if it wasn't such a disgrace....... |
|
|
|
Post by Gawa on Oct 15, 2024 9:49:40 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by Huddysleftfoot on Oct 15, 2024 10:08:18 GMT
When I think of how different this Country could have been.
Almost makes me weep.
|
|
|
|
Post by Ariel Manto on Oct 15, 2024 10:46:50 GMT
14th October 2024Dear Foreign Secretary We write to you with disgust over the government's complicity in one of the greatest crimes of our lifetime. This morning, we woke up to the news that Palestinian refugees sheltering in their tents had been burned alive. Killed by an Israeli airstrike on a hospital courtyard, their last moments on this earth were that of unimaginable pain and suffering. Moments earlier, Israeli airstrikes hit a school, killing 22 people who were awaiting polio vaccinations. The horror in Gaza is often described as a humanitarian crisis. The truth is, however, that this is not a humanitarian crisis. It is a genocide, aided and abetted by governments including our own. The government could have stood up to Israel the day it was elected. It could have opposed the genocide in Gaza. It could have ended military, economic and diplomatic support. It could have defended the equal application of international law. Instead, the failure to bring Israel to justice has emboldened it to kill thousands of people in Lebanon and now, wage war on the UN. The destruction over the weekend coincided with the 100-day anniversary of the new Labour government. Let us be in no doubt. It has been 100 days of shameful indifference to Palestinian life. 100 days of moral and political cowardice. 100 days of complicity in crimes against humanity. In light of the most recent horrors, please can you answer the following questions: • When will the UK government end a// arms sales to Israel, and join France, Italy, Spain, and Jordan in calling for a worldwide ban? • What red lines, if any, does Israel have to cross for the government to end its diplomatic and political support? • What is the government doing to facilitate urgent de-escalation and prevent an all-out regional war? • Does the UK government agree with the latest ICJ ruling that Israel's continued presence in the occupied Palestinian territories is illegal? • Does the UK government oppose genocide? We are proud to represent constituents of all faiths and none, united in a belief that all human life has equal value. We implore you to think of those who have been abandoned. We urge you to reflect on the legacy this government is leaving behind. We urge you to change course and stand up for our common humanity. Sincerely, Adnan Hussain MP, Jeremy Corbyn MP, Ayoub Khan MP, Shockat Adam MP, Iqbal Mohamed MP bsky.app/profile/babs05.bsky.social/post/3l6iewjh56n2r
|
|
|
|
Post by salopstick on Oct 15, 2024 11:58:09 GMT
14th October 2024Dear Foreign Secretary We write to you with disgust over the government's complicity in one of the greatest crimes of our lifetime. This morning, we woke up to the news that Palestinian refugees sheltering in their tents had been burned alive. Killed by an Israeli airstrike on a hospital courtyard, their last moments on this earth were that of unimaginable pain and suffering. Moments earlier, Israeli airstrikes hit a school, killing 22 people who were awaiting polio vaccinations. The horror in Gaza is often described as a humanitarian crisis. The truth is, however, that this is not a humanitarian crisis. It is a genocide, aided and abetted by governments including our own. The government could have stood up to Israel the day it was elected. It could have opposed the genocide in Gaza. It could have ended military, economic and diplomatic support. It could have defended the equal application of international law. Instead, the failure to bring Israel to justice has emboldened it to kill thousands of people in Lebanon and now, wage war on the UN. The destruction over the weekend coincided with the 100-day anniversary of the new Labour government. Let us be in no doubt. It has been 100 days of shameful indifference to Palestinian life. 100 days of moral and political cowardice. 100 days of complicity in crimes against humanity. In light of the most recent horrors, please can you answer the following questions: • When will the UK government end a// arms sales to Israel, and join France, Italy, Spain, and Jordan in calling for a worldwide ban? • What red lines, if any, does Israel have to cross for the government to end its diplomatic and political support? • What is the government doing to facilitate urgent de-escalation and prevent an all-out regional war? • Does the UK government agree with the latest ICJ ruling that Israel's continued presence in the occupied Palestinian territories is illegal? • Does the UK government oppose genocide? We are proud to represent constituents of all faiths and none, united in a belief that all human life has equal value. We implore you to think of those who have been abandoned. We urge you to reflect on the legacy this government is leaving behind. We urge you to change course and stand up for our common humanity. Sincerely, Adnan Hussain MP, Jeremy Corbyn MP, Ayoub Khan MP, Shockat Adam MP, Iqbal Mohamed MP bsky.app/profile/babs05.bsky.social/post/3l6iewjh56n2r Dear Jeremy Corbin If you had stuck to your Anti-EU principles and not sold your soul to the PLP you would be PM now. Kind regards S.Stick Esq |
|
|
|
Post by prestwichpotter on Oct 15, 2024 12:41:48 GMT
14th October 2024Dear Foreign Secretary We write to you with disgust over the government's complicity in one of the greatest crimes of our lifetime. This morning, we woke up to the news that Palestinian refugees sheltering in their tents had been burned alive. Killed by an Israeli airstrike on a hospital courtyard, their last moments on this earth were that of unimaginable pain and suffering. Moments earlier, Israeli airstrikes hit a school, killing 22 people who were awaiting polio vaccinations. The horror in Gaza is often described as a humanitarian crisis. The truth is, however, that this is not a humanitarian crisis. It is a genocide, aided and abetted by governments including our own. The government could have stood up to Israel the day it was elected. It could have opposed the genocide in Gaza. It could have ended military, economic and diplomatic support. It could have defended the equal application of international law. Instead, the failure to bring Israel to justice has emboldened it to kill thousands of people in Lebanon and now, wage war on the UN. The destruction over the weekend coincided with the 100-day anniversary of the new Labour government. Let us be in no doubt. It has been 100 days of shameful indifference to Palestinian life. 100 days of moral and political cowardice. 100 days of complicity in crimes against humanity. In light of the most recent horrors, please can you answer the following questions: • When will the UK government end a// arms sales to Israel, and join France, Italy, Spain, and Jordan in calling for a worldwide ban? • What red lines, if any, does Israel have to cross for the government to end its diplomatic and political support? • What is the government doing to facilitate urgent de-escalation and prevent an all-out regional war? • Does the UK government agree with the latest ICJ ruling that Israel's continued presence in the occupied Palestinian territories is illegal? • Does the UK government oppose genocide? We are proud to represent constituents of all faiths and none, united in a belief that all human life has equal value. We implore you to think of those who have been abandoned. We urge you to reflect on the legacy this government is leaving behind. We urge you to change course and stand up for our common humanity. Sincerely, Adnan Hussain MP, Jeremy Corbyn MP, Ayoub Khan MP, Shockat Adam MP, Iqbal Mohamed MP bsky.app/profile/babs05.bsky.social/post/3l6iewjh56n2r Dear Jeremy Corbin If you had stuck to your Anti-EU principles and not sold your soul to the PLP you would be PM now. Kind regards S.Stick Esq If Labour had kept to their 2017 stance not their 2019 one I think he'd be PM. But the NEC and the likes of Tom Watson and Starmer himself put pay to that more so than Corbyn due to the internal workings of the party. They didn't have a cat in hells chance of winning in 2019....... |
|
|
|
Post by wagsastokie on Oct 15, 2024 13:12:18 GMT
14th October 2024Dear Foreign Secretary We write to you with disgust over the government's complicity in one of the greatest crimes of our lifetime. This morning, we woke up to the news that Palestinian refugees sheltering in their tents had been burned alive. Killed by an Israeli airstrike on a hospital courtyard, their last moments on this earth were that of unimaginable pain and suffering. Moments earlier, Israeli airstrikes hit a school, killing 22 people who were awaiting polio vaccinations. The horror in Gaza is often described as a humanitarian crisis. The truth is, however, that this is not a humanitarian crisis. It is a genocide, aided and abetted by governments including our own. The government could have stood up to Israel the day it was elected. It could have opposed the genocide in Gaza. It could have ended military, economic and diplomatic support. It could have defended the equal application of international law. Instead, the failure to bring Israel to justice has emboldened it to kill thousands of people in Lebanon and now, wage war on the UN. The destruction over the weekend coincided with the 100-day anniversary of the new Labour government. Let us be in no doubt. It has been 100 days of shameful indifference to Palestinian life. 100 days of moral and political cowardice. 100 days of complicity in crimes against humanity. In light of the most recent horrors, please can you answer the following questions: • When will the UK government end a// arms sales to Israel, and join France, Italy, Spain, and Jordan in calling for a worldwide ban? • What red lines, if any, does Israel have to cross for the government to end its diplomatic and political support? • What is the government doing to facilitate urgent de-escalation and prevent an all-out regional war? • Does the UK government agree with the latest ICJ ruling that Israel's continued presence in the occupied Palestinian territories is illegal? • Does the UK government oppose genocide? We are proud to represent constituents of all faiths and none, united in a belief that all human life has equal value. We implore you to think of those who have been abandoned. We urge you to reflect on the legacy this government is leaving behind. We urge you to change course and stand up for our common humanity. Sincerely, Adnan Hussain MP, Jeremy Corbyn MP, Ayoub Khan MP, Shockat Adam MP, Iqbal Mohamed MP bsky.app/profile/babs05.bsky.social/post/3l6iewjh56n2r Dear Jeremy Corbin If you had stuck to your Anti-EU principles and not sold your soul to the PLP you would be PM now. Kind regards S.Stick Esq Or he hadn’t been backed stabbed by the duplicitous wanker starmer |
|
|
|
Post by phileetin on Oct 15, 2024 13:18:18 GMT
or bring him back , .... he makes the tories look respectable / electable
|
|
|
|
Post by elystokie on Oct 15, 2024 13:22:02 GMT
or bring him back , .... he makes the tories look respectable / electable Don't need Corbyn or anyone else for that. Just look across the pond at the 🍊🤡 |
|
|
|
Post by Ariel Manto on Oct 15, 2024 14:58:31 GMT
Dear Jeremy Corbin If you had stuck to your Anti-EU principles and not sold your soul to the PLP you would be PM now. Kind regards S.Stick Esq Or he hadn’t been backed stabbed by the duplicitous wanker starmer Oh I rather think you'll find Corbyn and his maleficient oiks were ousted by Morgan McSweeney and the Labour Together movement. |
|
|
|
Post by wagsastokie on Oct 15, 2024 15:35:21 GMT
Or he hadn’t been backed stabbed by the duplicitous wanker starmer Oh I rather think you'll find Corbyn and his maleficient oiks were ousted by Morgan McSweeney and the Labour Together movement. Starmer and his stance against Brexit and the undermining he did against the official position did nothing to help Though your probably correct sweeney is the organ grinder and Starmer is happy to be the compliant monkey The real important thing is who’s bought sweeney |
|
|
|
Post by Ariel Manto on Oct 15, 2024 17:36:44 GMT
Oh I rather think you'll find Corbyn and his maleficient oiks were ousted by Morgan McSweeney and the Labour Together movement. Starmer and his stance against Brexit and the undermining he did against the official position did nothing to help Though your probably correct sweeney is the organ grinder and Starmer is happy to be the compliant monkey The real important thing is who’s bought sweeney McSweeney has been in the Labour Party since the Blair Days. He's an original of the species you all affectionately call Blairite. As for Corbyn....he's back where he knows he belongs...chuntering at the back being occasionally and allegedly unintentionally antisemitic. All whilst arrogantly and delusionally claiming to be a man of principle and simultaneously turning doe-eyed over his parliamentary Brokeback Bedmate George Galloway. Corbynites all belong with Galloway; on the terrorist sympathising fringes. |
|
|
|
Post by wagsastokie on Oct 15, 2024 17:47:09 GMT
Starmer and his stance against Brexit and the undermining he did against the official position did nothing to help Though your probably correct sweeney is the organ grinder and Starmer is happy to be the compliant monkey The real important thing is who’s bought sweeney McSweeney has been in the Labour Party since the Blair Days. He's an original of the species you all affectionately call Blairite. As for Corbyn....he's back where he knows he belongs...chuntering at the back being occasionally and allegedly unintentionally antisemitic. All whilst arrogantly and delusionally claiming to be a man of principle and simultaneously turning doe-eyed over his parliamentary Brokeback Bedmate George Galloway. Corbynites all belong with Galloway; on the terrorist sympathising fringes. Deary me I sense a slight amount of bias in your answer At least you only accused corbyn of being unintentionally Antisemitic Most people with no particular agenda to grind would say corbyn hasn’t got a antisemitic bone in his body Anyway like a dog with a bone he’s particularly fond of I’ll try again Do you believe Israel should abide by international law |
|
|
|
Post by prestwichpotter on Oct 15, 2024 18:04:28 GMT
Starmer and his stance against Brexit and the undermining he did against the official position did nothing to help Though your probably correct sweeney is the organ grinder and Starmer is happy to be the compliant monkey The real important thing is who’s bought sweeney McSweeney has been in the Labour Party since the Blair Days. He's an original of the species you all affectionately call Blairite. As for Corbyn....he's back where he knows he belongs...chuntering at the back being occasionally and allegedly unintentionally antisemitic. All whilst arrogantly and delusionally claiming to be a man of principle and simultaneously turning doe-eyed over his parliamentary Brokeback Bedmate George Galloway. Corbynites all belong with Galloway; on the terrorist sympathising fringes. “Terrorist sympathiser” and “anti-Semite”, two of the laziest modern day insults there are. Must do better….. |
|
|
|
Post by Chewbacca the Wookie on Oct 15, 2024 18:06:26 GMT
I liken it to when a players injured and they become twice the player they are in reality.
Because Corbyn never made it to PM he’ll alway’s be “the best PM we never had.” (That’s John Smith for me) or some sort of messiah.
I guess we’ll never know which is a relief for me. I can’t think of anything worse.
|
|
|
|
Post by thehartshillbadger on Oct 15, 2024 18:08:10 GMT
McSweeney has been in the Labour Party since the Blair Days. He's an original of the species you all affectionately call Blairite. As for Corbyn....he's back where he knows he belongs...chuntering at the back being occasionally and allegedly unintentionally antisemitic. All whilst arrogantly and delusionally claiming to be a man of principle and simultaneously turning doe-eyed over his parliamentary Brokeback Bedmate George Galloway. Corbynites all belong with Galloway; on the terrorist sympathising fringes. “Terrorist sympathiser” and “anti-Semite”, two of the laziest modern day insults there are. Must do better….. How about sanctimonious woke snowflake? I know that’s a favourite of yours😉 |
|
|
|
Post by lordb on Oct 15, 2024 18:23:31 GMT
“Terrorist sympathiser” and “anti-Semite”, two of the laziest modern day insults there are. Must do better….. How about sanctimonious woke snowflake? I know that’s a favourite of yours😉 Is that different to a regular snowflake? Is it a special level like at the end of all good video games? |
|
|
|
Post by Ariel Manto on Oct 15, 2024 18:23:43 GMT
McSweeney has been in the Labour Party since the Blair Days. He's an original of the species you all affectionately call Blairite. As for Corbyn....he's back where he knows he belongs...chuntering at the back being occasionally and allegedly unintentionally antisemitic. All whilst arrogantly and delusionally claiming to be a man of principle and simultaneously turning doe-eyed over his parliamentary Brokeback Bedmate George Galloway. Corbynites all belong with Galloway; on the terrorist sympathising fringes. Deary me I sense a slight amount of bias in your answer At least you only accused corbyn of being unintentionally Antisemitic Most people with no particular agenda to grind would say corbyn hasn’t got a antisemitic bone in his body Anyway like a dog with a bone he’s particularly fond of I’ll try again Do you believe Israel should abide by international law You'll just have to go back to my initial reply to your question when you first asked it on another thread. |
|
|
|
Post by Ariel Manto on Oct 15, 2024 18:27:37 GMT
“Terrorist sympathiser” and “anti-Semite”, two of the laziest modern day insults there are. Must do better….. How about sanctimonious woke snowflake? I know that’s a favourite of yours😉 Wokeflake. You're welcome! |
|
