|
Post by salopstick on May 17, 2024 15:02:24 GMT
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on May 17, 2024 15:09:53 GMT
Was on bail when she started shagging the next child. The CPS should prosecute themselves for that.
|
|
|
Teachers
May 17, 2024 15:56:09 GMT
via mobile
Post by sticky on May 17, 2024 15:56:09 GMT
Fit tbf, wish I could of shagged my teachersš
|
|
|
Post by felonious on May 17, 2024 18:21:51 GMT
Shouldn't this be on the Sex Education thread
|
|
|
Teachers
May 17, 2024 18:39:48 GMT
via mobile
Post by fullmetaljacket on May 17, 2024 18:39:48 GMT
Fucking hell.
All I used to get was a whipping with the cane.
She was a bit of a kink though
|
|
|
Post by lawrieleslie on May 17, 2024 19:18:31 GMT
Miss Sealy biology teacher at Wooly Grammar was a right tease in her short skirts and stockings. Always bending down to cupboards or reaching up to high shelves in the lab giving us an eyeful. Always wondered who the lucky git was giving her one.
|
|
|
Post by backintheday on May 17, 2024 21:45:46 GMT
Miss Sealy biology teacher at Wooly Grammar was a right tease in her short skirts and stockings. Always bending down to cupboards or reaching up to high shelves in the lab giving us an eyeful. Always wondered who the lucky git was giving her one. What year was that mate ? I was there till 75
|
|
|
Post by felonious on May 18, 2024 7:13:53 GMT
Miss Sealy biology teacher at Wooly Grammar was a right tease in her short skirts and stockings. Always bending down to cupboards or reaching up to high shelves in the lab giving us an eyeful. Always wondered who the lucky git was giving her one. What year was that mate ? I was there till 75 I've never heard the name either I can only remember a female history teacher but not her name.
|
|
|
Post by backintheday on May 18, 2024 17:58:34 GMT
What year was that mate ? I was there till 75 I've never heard the name either I can only remember a female history teacher but not her name. Can remember Janice the science lab technician enough to turn any woolly grammar poofs straightš
|
|
|
Post by lawrieleslie on May 25, 2024 19:52:58 GMT
Miss Sealy biology teacher at Wooly Grammar was a right tease in her short skirts and stockings. Always bending down to cupboards or reaching up to high shelves in the lab giving us an eyeful. Always wondered who the lucky git was giving her one. What year was that mate ? I was there till 75 I was there 64-69. I did biology for GCE yrs 4 and 5. She was teaching biology in year 4 so would have been 68. Mr Hayton was biology teacher for yr 5 in 69.
|
|
|
Teachers
May 25, 2024 20:28:18 GMT
via mobile
Post by RedandWhite90 on May 25, 2024 20:28:18 GMT
Glad to see Wolstanton High repping on this thread š
If anyone was there in the early 2000s they would know there is only one name that would come up.
|
|
|
Post by marylandstoke on May 25, 2024 21:28:09 GMT
Miss Sealy biology teacher at Wooly Grammar was a right tease in her short skirts and stockings. Always bending down to cupboards or reaching up to high shelves in the lab giving us an eyeful. Always wondered who the lucky git was giving her one. The kid sitting next to you?
|
|
|
Teachers
May 27, 2024 17:44:56 GMT
via mobile
Post by alsagerstokie on May 27, 2024 17:44:56 GMT
|
|
|
Post by lagwafis on May 27, 2024 18:25:52 GMT
Glad to see Wolstanton High repping on this thread š
If anyone was there in the early 2000s they would know there is only one name that would come up. hopefully not an 80 year old Miss Sealy
|
|
|
Teachers
May 27, 2024 18:29:49 GMT
via mobile
Post by RedandWhite90 on May 27, 2024 18:29:49 GMT
Glad to see Wolstanton High repping on this thread š
If anyone was there in the early 2000s they would know there is only one name that would come up. hopefully not an 80 year old Miss Sealy Nope.
|
|
|
Post by salopstick on Jul 4, 2024 12:32:26 GMT
6 and a half years
|
|
|
Post by redstriper on Jul 4, 2024 13:17:27 GMT
Seems a harsh a sentence imo, some rapists get similar. Nearly 16, and no consent issues by the sound of it, plus i imagine neither boy is traumatised in any way. I suspect pushy parents are behind this getting to court.
|
|
|
Post by Northy on Jul 4, 2024 13:27:20 GMT
Seems a harsh a sentence imo, some rapists get similar. Nearly 16, and no consent issues by the sound of it, plus i imagine neither boy is traumatised in any way. I suspect pushy parents are behind this getting to court. the judge advised 3 1/2 years of it will be out on licence, the 16 year old has said he has been left to bring up the baby.
|
|
|
Post by noustie on Jul 4, 2024 14:13:04 GMT
Seems a harsh a sentence imo, some rapists get similar. Nearly 16, and no consent issues by the sound of it, plus i imagine neither boy is traumatised in any way. I suspect pushy parents are behind this getting to court. Heard on the news that one of the lads is claiming the system let him down so angling for damages no doubt. Raises an interesting question really because a 30 year old teacher shagging a 15 year old is abusing power however you look at it but it's the equality angle I'm struggling with. Maybe it's bias on my part but are the various combinations all equal? I'd say a woman (30) shagging a lad (15) isn't the same as a bloke (30) shagging a girl (15) or lad (15) or maybe even a woman shagging a girl. If I'm doing a league table in my head worst top: Bloke abusing lad Bloke abusing girl Woman abusing girl Woman abusing lad It doesn't make much sense typing it out but equally don't think those are all equal in seriousness. Maybe it's perception and ignorance but an interesting one.
|
|
|
Post by salopstick on Jul 4, 2024 15:52:26 GMT
Seems a harsh a sentence imo, some rapists get similar. Nearly 16, and no consent issues by the sound of it, plus i imagine neither boy is traumatised in any way. I suspect pushy parents are behind this getting to court. The victim statement said heās traumatised by the abuse that he only realises now It seemed very set up I agree the teacher abused her position but that the lads were willing participants imo
|
|
|
Teachers
Jul 4, 2024 16:38:03 GMT
via mobile
Post by thehartshillbadger on Jul 4, 2024 16:38:03 GMT
Sheās a paedophile so deserves everything she gets
|
|
|
Post by mickeythemaestro on Jul 4, 2024 17:03:52 GMT
Seems a harsh a sentence imo, some rapists get similar. Nearly 16, and no consent issues by the sound of it, plus i imagine neither boy is traumatised in any way. I suspect pushy parents are behind this getting to court. The victim statement said heās traumatised by the abuse that he only realises now It seemed very set up I agree the teacher abused her position but that the lads were willing participants imo She broke a very clear law. A law which given her job she will have been very aware of. If we're all in for equality then I'm afraid women will just have to accept their fate if they are dirty scum bags. Justified sentence in my opinion..
|
|
|
Post by lawrieleslie on Jul 4, 2024 17:14:13 GMT
Sheās a paedophile so deserves everything she gets I thought a paedophile is someone with a sexual interest in pre-pubescent children. She was guilty of sexual activity with a child which is just as bad but there is a difference in law.
|
|
|
Post by thehartshillbadger on Jul 4, 2024 17:36:01 GMT
Sheās a paedophile so deserves everything she gets I thought a paedophile is someone with a sexual interest in pre-pubescent children. She was guilty of sexual activity with a child which is just as bad but there is a difference in law. Simply put itās someone who is sexually attracted to children, 15 is a child, she knew what she was doing. People bang on about equal rights etc how about in this case? You canāt have a rule for one and not the other. What makes it doubly worse is she is a person in a position of trust
|
|
|
Post by str8outtahampton on Jul 4, 2024 17:43:06 GMT
Seems a harsh a sentence imo, some rapists get similar. Nearly 16, and no consent issues by the sound of it, plus i imagine neither boy is traumatised in any way. I suspect pushy parents are behind this getting to court. Oh dear. The operative word is "nearly". In other words the boy was incapable of (informed) consent. How hard is it to understand that?
|
|
|
Post by lawrieleslie on Jul 4, 2024 17:45:34 GMT
I thought a paedophile is someone with a sexual interest in pre-pubescent children. She was guilty of sexual activity with a child which is just as bad but there is a difference in law. Simply put itās someone who is sexually attracted to children, 15 is a child, she knew what she was doing. People bang on about equal rights etc how about in this case? You canāt have a rule for one and not the other. What makes it doubly worse is she is a person in a position of trust Yes a 15 year old is a child but so is a 16 or 17 year old. A paedophile is generally accepted to be someone with sexual interest in pre-pubescent children 13 years or younger.
|
|
|
Teachers
Jul 4, 2024 17:50:03 GMT
via mobile
Post by thehartshillbadger on Jul 4, 2024 17:50:03 GMT
Simply put itās someone who is sexually attracted to children, 15 is a child, she knew what she was doing. People bang on about equal rights etc how about in this case? You canāt have a rule for one and not the other. What makes it doubly worse is she is a person in a position of trust Yes I agree that a 15 year old is a child but so is a 16 or 17 year old. A paedophile is generally accepted to be someone with sexual interest in pre-pubescent children 13 years or younger. We wonāt agree on this one Leslie so Iāll leave it there. And Iām aware the under 13 thing is a āgenerally acceptedā thing. And I totally disagree with that logic. My only question is how would you feel if your 15 year old son or daughter was sexually exploited by a teacher? What do you think would be an acceptable punishment in that case?
|
|
|
Teachers
Jul 4, 2024 18:23:33 GMT
via mobile
Post by emretezzy on Jul 4, 2024 18:23:33 GMT
I thought a paedophile is someone with a sexual interest in pre-pubescent children. She was guilty of sexual activity with a child which is just as bad but there is a difference in law. Simply put itās someone who is sexually attracted to children, 15 is a child, she knew what she was doing. People bang on about equal rights etc how about in this case? You canāt have a rule for one and not the other. What makes it doubly worse is she is a person in a position of trust You'd have ha dno issues going with a teacher badger!
|
|
|
Post by lawrieleslie on Jul 4, 2024 18:33:23 GMT
Yes I agree that a 15 year old is a child but so is a 16 or 17 year old. A paedophile is generally accepted to be someone with sexual interest in pre-pubescent children 13 years or younger. We wonāt agree on this one Leslie so Iāll leave it there. And Iām aware the under 13 thing is a āgenerally acceptedā thing. And I totally disagree with that logic. My only question is how would you feel if your 15 year old son or daughter was sexually exploited by a teacher? What do you think would be an acceptable punishment in that case? Ok badger we are just arguing labels here not punishments. It doesnāt matter, they are all guilty of sexual activity with minors which is abhorrent. And if it was my child the labelling of the offence would be irrelevant as long as they were subjected to the full force of the law as this teacher was.
|
|
|
Post by dirtygary69 on Jul 4, 2024 19:28:10 GMT
If it was a 30 year old bloke and 15 year old girl heād rightly be labelled as a nonce. There is no need for adults to be shagging kids no matter how close to 16 they might be. Iāve never got why anyone would do it even if it was legal but borderline, itās just odd.
|
|