|
|
Post by FullerMagic on May 19, 2023 7:31:41 GMT
Coates family up one place to 16th www.thetimes.co.uk/article/denise-john-peter-coates-net-worth-sunday-times-rich-list-h6pjwxwlt1. Gopi Hinduja and family – £35 billion 2. Sir Jim Ratcliffe – £29.7 billion 3. Sir Leonard Blavatnik – £28.6 billion 4. David and Simon Reuben and family – £24.4 billion 5. Sir James Dyson and family – £23 billion 6. Lakshmi Mittal and family – £16 billion 7. Guy, George, Alannah and Galen Weston and family – £14.5 billion 8. Charlene de Carvalho-Heineken and Michel de Carvalho – £13.1 billion 9. Kirsten and Jorn Rausing – £12 billion 10. Michael Platt – £11.5 billion 11. The Duke of Westminster and the Grosvenor family – £9.9 billion 12. Marit, Lisbet, Sigrid and Hans Rausing – £9.3 billion 13. Andy Currie – £9.2 billion 14. John Reece – £9.1 billion 15. Alex Gerko – £9.1 billion 16. Denise, John and Peter Coates and family – £8.8 billion
17. Anders Holch Povlsen £8.5 billion 18. Barnaby and Merlin Swire and family – £8.4 billion 19. John Fredriksen and family – £8.3 billion 20. Mikhail Fridman – £8.2 billion Coates family 2023 - £8795m (16th) 2022 - £8637m (17th) 2021 - £8448m (17th) 2020 - £7166m (16th) 2019 - £6856m (19th) 2018 - £5750m (21st) 2017 - £5000m (22nd) 2016 - £3765m (24th) 2015 - £2300m (44th) 2014 - £1200m (78th) 2013 - £925m (93rd) 2012 - £800m (92nd) 2011 - £750m (90th) 2010 - £500m (132nd) 2009 - £400m (128th) 2008 - £300m (270th) 2007 - £200m (351st) 2006 - £126m (442nd) |
|
|
|
Post by andystokey on May 19, 2023 7:39:32 GMT
Coates family up one place to 16th www.thetimes.co.uk/article/denise-john-peter-coates-net-worth-sunday-times-rich-list-h6pjwxwlt1. Gopi Hinduja and family – £35 billion 2. Sir Jim Ratcliffe – £29.7 billion 3. Sir Leonard Blavatnik – £28.6 billion 4. David and Simon Reuben and family – £24.4 billion 5. Sir James Dyson and family – £23 billion 6. Lakshmi Mittal and family – £16 billion 7. Guy, George, Alannah and Galen Weston and family – £14.5 billion 8. Charlene de Carvalho-Heineken and Michel de Carvalho – £13.1 billion 9. Kirsten and Jorn Rausing – £12 billion 10. Michael Platt – £11.5 billion 11. The Duke of Westminster and the Grosvenor family – £9.9 billion 12. Marit, Lisbet, Sigrid and Hans Rausing – £9.3 billion 13. Andy Currie – £9.2 billion 14. John Reece – £9.1 billion 15. Alex Gerko – £9.1 billion 16. Denise, John and Peter Coates and family – £8.8 billion
17. Anders Holch Povlsen £8.5 billion 18. Barnaby and Merlin Swire and family – £8.4 billion 19. John Fredriksen and family – £8.3 billion 20. Mikhail Fridman – £8.2 billion Coates family 2023 - £8795m (16th) 2022 - £8637m (17th) 2021 - £8448m (17th) 2020 - £7166m (16th) 2019 - £6856m (19th) 2018 - £5750m (21st) 2017 - £5000m (22nd) 2016 - £3765m (24th) 2015 - £2300m (44th) 2014 - £1200m (78th) 2013 - £925m (93rd) 2012 - £800m (92nd) 2011 - £750m (90th) 2010 - £500m (132nd) 2009 - £400m (128th) 2008 - £300m (270th) 2007 - £200m (351st) 2006 - £126m (442nd) Another 16th place finish, ffs |
|
|
|
Post by sneydgreenstokie1 on May 19, 2023 7:45:37 GMT
Coates family up one place to 16th www.thetimes.co.uk/article/denise-john-peter-coates-net-worth-sunday-times-rich-list-h6pjwxwlt1. Gopi Hinduja and family – £35 billion 2. Sir Jim Ratcliffe – £29.7 billion 3. Sir Leonard Blavatnik – £28.6 billion 4. David and Simon Reuben and family – £24.4 billion 5. Sir James Dyson and family – £23 billion 6. Lakshmi Mittal and family – £16 billion 7. Guy, George, Alannah and Galen Weston and family – £14.5 billion 8. Charlene de Carvalho-Heineken and Michel de Carvalho – £13.1 billion 9. Kirsten and Jorn Rausing – £12 billion 10. Michael Platt – £11.5 billion 11. The Duke of Westminster and the Grosvenor family – £9.9 billion 12. Marit, Lisbet, Sigrid and Hans Rausing – £9.3 billion 13. Andy Currie – £9.2 billion 14. John Reece – £9.1 billion 15. Alex Gerko – £9.1 billion 16. Denise, John and Peter Coates and family – £8.8 billion
17. Anders Holch Povlsen £8.5 billion 18. Barnaby and Merlin Swire and family – £8.4 billion 19. John Fredriksen and family – £8.3 billion 20. Mikhail Fridman – £8.2 billion Coates family 2023 - £8795m (16th) 2022 - £8637m (17th) 2021 - £8448m (17th) 2020 - £7166m (16th) 2019 - £6856m (19th) 2018 - £5750m (21st) 2017 - £5000m (22nd) 2016 - £3765m (24th) 2015 - £2300m (44th) 2014 - £1200m (78th) 2013 - £925m (93rd) 2012 - £800m (92nd) 2011 - £750m (90th) 2010 - £500m (132nd) 2009 - £400m (128th) 2008 - £300m (270th) 2007 - £200m (351st) 2006 - £126m (442nd) You would think top 12 is within reach for them for next season  |
|
|
|
Post by biglad180 on May 19, 2023 7:59:09 GMT
all that money surly if they really wanted they could buy our way to the premier league,,after all its only money what,s got Man city to where they are,, and now because of money Newcastle are becoming a big force,
|
|
|
|
Post by shakermaker on May 19, 2023 8:10:29 GMT
all that money surly if they really wanted they could buy our way to the premier league,,after all its only money what,s got Man city to where they are,, and now because of money Newcastle are becoming a big force, It says the Coates family, but as Denise is the mastermind behind the bet365 empire and has nothing to do with the club, how much of that £8.8 billion is credited to Uncle Peter and JC? |
|
|
|
Post by Eggybread on May 19, 2023 8:14:40 GMT
The worst of the worst list.
Capitalism at its most disgusting,whilst the country bleeds to death with war,corruption and poverty.
|
|
|
|
Post by prestwichpotter on May 19, 2023 8:21:21 GMT
The worst of the worst list. Capitalism at its most disgusting,whilst the country bleeds to death with war,corruption and poverty. Agree, it's a totally depressing list............ |
|
|
|
Post by Lakeland Potter on May 19, 2023 8:48:14 GMT
all that money surly if they really wanted they could buy our way to the premier league,,after all its only money what,s got Man city to where they are,, and now because of money Newcastle are becoming a big force, Man City's very rich owners were lucky in that they were able to put some significant money into their club before the current FFP rules came into force. That is one of the big problems with FFP - it doesn't just act as a brake on new rich owners, it tends to support the status quo - in that clubs which had vast sums of money pumped into them BEFORE FFP came in, are able to stay at the top of the spending league if they play their cards right. The reason being that if significant amounts of pre FFP money was invested in top young players then, after FFP was brought in, some of those players can be sold for big money which qualifies as legitimate income for FFP purposes. Clubs which didn't have that sort of money pumped in before FFP came along will always be playing catch up with those who did. |
|
|
|
Post by brinsleymaclagan on May 19, 2023 9:11:14 GMT
The worst of the worst list. Capitalism at its most disgusting,whilst the country bleeds to death with war,corruption and poverty. . Agreed, but weren’t the Coates family second on the list of highest tax payers in the country? At least they pay their dues, which is more than can be said for some scumbags! |
|
|
|
Post by magwitch on May 19, 2023 9:16:39 GMT
all that money surly if they really wanted they could buy our way to the premier league,,after all its only money what,s got Man city to where they are,, and now because of money Newcastle are becoming a big force, Man City's very rich owners were lucky in that they were able to put some significant money into their club before the current FFP rules came into force. That is one of the big problems with FFP - it doesn't just act as a brake on new rich owners, it tends to support the status quo - in that clubs which had vast sums of money pumped into them BEFORE FFP came in, are able to stay at the top of the spending league if they play their cards right. The reason being that if significant amounts of pre FFP money was invested in top young players then, after FFP was brought in, some of those players can be sold for big money which qualifies as legitimate income for FFP purposes. Clubs which didn't have that sort of money pumped in before FFP came along will always be playing catch up with those who did. This shows very clearly where the Board of Stoke City went wrong. For 10 years in the Premier league they cpompletely ignored or appeared to ignore the advent of the FFP, when they should have had some idea of the affect FFP would have when applied. In particular Tony Scholes and Peter Coates would have had years to talk about it and devise strategies to deal with the likely results. A fund could have been set up for that purpose, and Scholes as an accountant should have been thinking along these lines. Unfortunately the whole debacle of FFP seems to have caught them all completely by surpise, hence the prospect of many yeas struggling in the Championship, even coming close to relegation to the third tier. |
|
|
|
Post by wuzza on May 19, 2023 10:14:57 GMT
It’s good to know that SCFC is making its own small contribution by reducing the tax liability !
In all seriousness whilst we have the capitalist society we do - for better or for worse - people like the Coates’ can and do do their bit through paying tax and contributing to charity and in fact they are a shining example on both scores.
Due to the fundamental flaws in FFP and EFL rules the game is denied the possibility of huge amounts of money entering circulation and helping less fortunate clubs.
The whole thing is designed to maintain the status quo.
My only wish is that they do as much as they can to give the club outstanding facilities and plough as much as possible into youth development (although even that area is rigged to ensure the big boys hoover up other clubs talent whenever they feel like it).
|
|
|
|
Post by iamstokie on May 19, 2023 10:26:58 GMT
all that money surly if they really wanted they could buy our way to the premier league,,after all its only money what,s got Man city to where they are,, and now because of money Newcastle are becoming a big force, you not heard of ffp then lol 😂 |
|
|
|
Post by Pugsley on May 19, 2023 11:39:31 GMT
Coates family up one place to 16th www.thetimes.co.uk/article/denise-john-peter-coates-net-worth-sunday-times-rich-list-h6pjwxwlt1. Gopi Hinduja and family – £35 billion 2. Sir Jim Ratcliffe – £29.7 billion 3. Sir Leonard Blavatnik – £28.6 billion 4. David and Simon Reuben and family – £24.4 billion 5. Sir James Dyson and family – £23 billion 6. Lakshmi Mittal and family – £16 billion 7. Guy, George, Alannah and Galen Weston and family – £14.5 billion 8. Charlene de Carvalho-Heineken and Michel de Carvalho – £13.1 billion 9. Kirsten and Jorn Rausing – £12 billion 10. Michael Platt – £11.5 billion 11. The Duke of Westminster and the Grosvenor family – £9.9 billion 12. Marit, Lisbet, Sigrid and Hans Rausing – £9.3 billion 13. Andy Currie – £9.2 billion 14. John Reece – £9.1 billion 15. Alex Gerko – £9.1 billion 16. Denise, John and Peter Coates and family – £8.8 billion
17. Anders Holch Povlsen £8.5 billion 18. Barnaby and Merlin Swire and family – £8.4 billion 19. John Fredriksen and family – £8.3 billion 20. Mikhail Fridman – £8.2 billion Coates family 2023 - £8795m (16th) 2022 - £8637m (17th) 2021 - £8448m (17th) 2020 - £7166m (16th) 2019 - £6856m (19th) 2018 - £5750m (21st) 2017 - £5000m (22nd) 2016 - £3765m (24th) 2015 - £2300m (44th) 2014 - £1200m (78th) 2013 - £925m (93rd) 2012 - £800m (92nd) 2011 - £750m (90th) 2010 - £500m (132nd) 2009 - £400m (128th) 2008 - £300m (270th) 2007 - £200m (351st) 2006 - £126m (442nd) Obscene |
|
|
|
Post by ashleyscfc on May 19, 2023 11:41:56 GMT
This is the part ive never understood about our current owners.
We know the restrictions for FFP and P&L are predominantly based on turnover.
Higher the turnover, higher the allowed losses (i.e. How much they can put in)
Therefore why on earth havent we been doing everything possible to increase the turnover of the club? Easier said than done I know, but i've seen nothing to suggest we've tried to be top of the class in academy (could generate a massive income), recruitment, links with other clubs, off the pitch income etc etc.
Just seems odd.
|
|
|
|
Post by Gods on May 19, 2023 11:46:11 GMT
all that money surly if they really wanted they could buy our way to the premier league,,after all its only money what,s got Man city to where they are,, and now because of money Newcastle are becoming a big force, Man City's very rich owners were lucky in that they were able to put some significant money into their club before the current FFP rules came into force. That is one of the big problems with FFP - it doesn't just act as a brake on new rich owners, it tends to support the status quo - in that clubs which had vast sums of money pumped into them BEFORE FFP came in, are able to stay at the top of the spending league if they play their cards right. The reason being that if significant amounts of pre FFP money was invested in top young players then, after FFP was brought in, some of those players can be sold for big money which qualifies as legitimate income for FFP purposes. Clubs which didn't have that sort of money pumped in before FFP came along will always be playing catch up with those who did. Hear what you are saying but Newcastle only went super-sized quite recently and they are already In the Champions League. |
|
|
|
Post by skip on May 19, 2023 12:43:48 GMT
Since we were promoted to the Premier League they've moved up 254 places FFS!
|
|
|
|
Post by estrangedsonoffaye on May 19, 2023 13:11:15 GMT
This is the part ive never understood about our current owners. We know the restrictions for FFP and P&L are predominantly based on turnover. Higher the turnover, higher the allowed losses (i.e. How much they can put in) Therefore why on earth havent we been doing everything possible to increase the turnover of the club? Easier said than done I know, but i've seen nothing to suggest we've tried to be top of the class in academy (could generate a massive income), recruitment, links with other clubs, off the pitch income etc etc. Just seems odd. Academy upgrades and players will take years to come to fruition, we've sold our best prospects in decades off and made considerably less money than you get for simply being in the PL for a single season or from parachute payments. In terms of off the pitch stuff, we're a small market club with very little global appeal. Simon King said upon arrival focusing on the local market makes sense until you get promotion because there just isn't a sufficient market for Stoke City in the wider football world, certainly not one large enough to bring in serious money. This is not to say the club hasn't been lax in its commercial operations for years, poor marketing and social media usage has been a staple since relegation and I think King is very keen to change that but it's absolute peanuts compared to the big money spinner which is TV income. As soon as we dropped out of the PL our most lucrative source of money, TV income fell off a cliff, we had the parachute payments which basically prevented a points deduction but they reduce year on year and consequently turnover falls, that combined with the massive wages we've had on the books further closes the gap. Just to emphasise on tv money: Essentially the club risked the 18/19 summer and planned for a quick return back to the Premier League and that sweet tv deal, by missing promotion and essentially not putting the club on an EFL footing they essentially put us in this situation where we can't possibly make the money up and had to ride out the storm. |
|
|
|
Post by matelot1996 on May 19, 2023 13:41:26 GMT
Uh ohh, I think this may provoke a capitalism versus freebies for the unwashed debate 😂
|
|
|
|
Post by wakeypotter on May 19, 2023 13:43:50 GMT
Coates family up one place to 16th www.thetimes.co.uk/article/denise-john-peter-coates-net-worth-sunday-times-rich-list-h6pjwxwlt1. Gopi Hinduja and family – £35 billion 2. Sir Jim Ratcliffe – £29.7 billion 3. Sir Leonard Blavatnik – £28.6 billion 4. David and Simon Reuben and family – £24.4 billion 5. Sir James Dyson and family – £23 billion 6. Lakshmi Mittal and family – £16 billion 7. Guy, George, Alannah and Galen Weston and family – £14.5 billion 8. Charlene de Carvalho-Heineken and Michel de Carvalho – £13.1 billion 9. Kirsten and Jorn Rausing – £12 billion 10. Michael Platt – £11.5 billion 11. The Duke of Westminster and the Grosvenor family – £9.9 billion 12. Marit, Lisbet, Sigrid and Hans Rausing – £9.3 billion 13. Andy Currie – £9.2 billion 14. John Reece – £9.1 billion 15. Alex Gerko – £9.1 billion 16. Denise, John and Peter Coates and family – £8.8 billion
17. Anders Holch Povlsen £8.5 billion 18. Barnaby and Merlin Swire and family – £8.4 billion 19. John Fredriksen and family – £8.3 billion 20. Mikhail Fridman – £8.2 billion Coates family 2023 - £8795m (16th) 2022 - £8637m (17th) 2021 - £8448m (17th) 2020 - £7166m (16th) 2019 - £6856m (19th) 2018 - £5750m (21st) 2017 - £5000m (22nd) 2016 - £3765m (24th) 2015 - £2300m (44th) 2014 - £1200m (78th) 2013 - £925m (93rd) 2012 - £800m (92nd) 2011 - £750m (90th) 2010 - £500m (132nd) 2009 - £400m (128th) 2008 - £300m (270th) 2007 - £200m (351st) 2006 - £126m (442nd) Obscene People have done well for themselves 🤷♀️ |
|
|
|
Post by SCFC92 on May 19, 2023 13:56:47 GMT
People have done well for themselves 🤷♀️ Theres doing well for yourself and then there is having so much money that you couldn't spend it in a thousand lifetimes whilst we have impoverished children having baby formula stolen for them by desperate parents. I don't think it would be as much of an issue if the current government hadn't spent the last 5 years bunging all the public finances to their mates whilst stripping back the services we rely on. BACK ON TOPIC however The Coates family missed the boat with the whole self sustainability model we had in the Prem, and FFP is an absolute farce, this list and our local owners, who want to invest in the club, being multi billionaires, but not being allowed to proves that. |
|
|
|
Post by biglad180 on May 19, 2023 14:13:25 GMT
all that money surly if they really wanted they could buy our way to the premier league,,after all its only money what,s got Man city to where they are,, and now because of money Newcastle are becoming a big force, you not heard of ffp then lol 😂 thought we were free from that this season,,how do these big clubs spend £100 million on a player and get away with fair play? i herd on the radio the other day Man Utd were a billion pound in debt, and this summer they only yes only have £100 million to spend on players how does it work tell me thats fair play |
|
|
|
Post by Lakeland Potter on May 19, 2023 14:15:55 GMT
Man City's very rich owners were lucky in that they were able to put some significant money into their club before the current FFP rules came into force. That is one of the big problems with FFP - it doesn't just act as a brake on new rich owners, it tends to support the status quo - in that clubs which had vast sums of money pumped into them BEFORE FFP came in, are able to stay at the top of the spending league if they play their cards right. The reason being that if significant amounts of pre FFP money was invested in top young players then, after FFP was brought in, some of those players can be sold for big money which qualifies as legitimate income for FFP purposes. Clubs which didn't have that sort of money pumped in before FFP came along will always be playing catch up with those who did. Hear what you are saying but Newcastle only went super-sized quite recently and they are already In the Champions League. True - but we don't yet have sight of Newcastle's accounts for the period concerned. So we have no idea whether Newcastle are on course to breach FFP rules (on allowable losses) should they continue with this level of spending. Obviously the fact that they have virtually secured a Champion's League place for next season is going to help them satisfy FFP rules in terms of income v expenditure. But, had they not managed to qualify for the CL, it would not surprise me if they had perhaps sailed too close to the wind and might have been forced to scale back their spending in the next 2 years. |
|
|
|
Post by iamstokie on May 19, 2023 16:31:09 GMT
you not heard of ffp then lol 😂 thought we were free from that this season,,how do these big clubs spend £100 million on a player and get away with fair play? i herd on the radio the other day Man Utd were a billion pound in debt, and this summer they only yes only have £100 million to spend on players how does it work tell me thats fair play in the EFL you’re never clear ffp , you can only lose 39 mil over a rolling 3 yr period , the premier league have their own rules |
|
|
|
Post by Veritas on May 19, 2023 17:18:58 GMT
all that money surly if they really wanted they could buy our way to the premier league,,after all its only money what,s got Man city to where they are,, and now because of money Newcastle are becoming a big force, Our owners are fabulously wealthy by most measures but are nowhere near the same league as the oil rich Arab backers of Man C or Newcastle. |
|
|
|
Post by biglad180 on May 19, 2023 18:47:45 GMT
all that money surly if they really wanted they could buy our way to the premier league,,after all its only money what,s got Man city to where they are,, and now because of money Newcastle are becoming a big force, Our owners are fabulously wealthy by most measures but are nowhere near the same league as the oil rich Arab backers of Man C or Newcastle. yes you are correct mate but they could still buy us a decent team out of there loose change |
|
|
|
Post by wakefieldstokie on May 19, 2023 19:04:57 GMT
Apparently Betting is a great thing. For a select few anyway
|
|
|
|
Post by thepottypotter on May 19, 2023 19:06:50 GMT
Coates family up one place to 16th www.thetimes.co.uk/article/denise-john-peter-coates-net-worth-sunday-times-rich-list-h6pjwxwlt1. Gopi Hinduja and family – £35 billion 2. Sir Jim Ratcliffe – £29.7 billion 3. Sir Leonard Blavatnik – £28.6 billion 4. David and Simon Reuben and family – £24.4 billion 5. Sir James Dyson and family – £23 billion 6. Lakshmi Mittal and family – £16 billion 7. Guy, George, Alannah and Galen Weston and family – £14.5 billion 8. Charlene de Carvalho-Heineken and Michel de Carvalho – £13.1 billion 9. Kirsten and Jorn Rausing – £12 billion 10. Michael Platt – £11.5 billion 11. The Duke of Westminster and the Grosvenor family – £9.9 billion 12. Marit, Lisbet, Sigrid and Hans Rausing – £9.3 billion 13. Andy Currie – £9.2 billion 14. John Reece – £9.1 billion 15. Alex Gerko – £9.1 billion 16. Denise, John and Peter Coates and family – £8.8 billion
17. Anders Holch Povlsen £8.5 billion 18. Barnaby and Merlin Swire and family – £8.4 billion 19. John Fredriksen and family – £8.3 billion 20. Mikhail Fridman – £8.2 billion Coates family 2023 - £8795m (16th) 2022 - £8637m (17th) 2021 - £8448m (17th) 2020 - £7166m (16th) 2019 - £6856m (19th) 2018 - £5750m (21st) 2017 - £5000m (22nd) 2016 - £3765m (24th) 2015 - £2300m (44th) 2014 - £1200m (78th) 2013 - £925m (93rd) 2012 - £800m (92nd) 2011 - £750m (90th) 2010 - £500m (132nd) 2009 - £400m (128th) 2008 - £300m (270th) 2007 - £200m (351st) 2006 - £126m (442nd) Capitalism - bosses are thieving scum the lot of them. Profits, they only get rich by exploiting and underpaying workers in their respective companies. This type of theft is only considered legal under a capitalist system  |
|
|
|
Post by cvillestokie on May 19, 2023 19:20:18 GMT
Coates family up one place to 16th www.thetimes.co.uk/article/denise-john-peter-coates-net-worth-sunday-times-rich-list-h6pjwxwlt1. Gopi Hinduja and family – £35 billion 2. Sir Jim Ratcliffe – £29.7 billion 3. Sir Leonard Blavatnik – £28.6 billion 4. David and Simon Reuben and family – £24.4 billion 5. Sir James Dyson and family – £23 billion 6. Lakshmi Mittal and family – £16 billion 7. Guy, George, Alannah and Galen Weston and family – £14.5 billion 8. Charlene de Carvalho-Heineken and Michel de Carvalho – £13.1 billion 9. Kirsten and Jorn Rausing – £12 billion 10. Michael Platt – £11.5 billion 11. The Duke of Westminster and the Grosvenor family – £9.9 billion 12. Marit, Lisbet, Sigrid and Hans Rausing – £9.3 billion 13. Andy Currie – £9.2 billion 14. John Reece – £9.1 billion 15. Alex Gerko – £9.1 billion 16. Denise, John and Peter Coates and family – £8.8 billion
17. Anders Holch Povlsen £8.5 billion 18. Barnaby and Merlin Swire and family – £8.4 billion 19. John Fredriksen and family – £8.3 billion 20. Mikhail Fridman – £8.2 billion Coates family 2023 - £8795m (16th) 2022 - £8637m (17th) 2021 - £8448m (17th) 2020 - £7166m (16th) 2019 - £6856m (19th) 2018 - £5750m (21st) 2017 - £5000m (22nd) 2016 - £3765m (24th) 2015 - £2300m (44th) 2014 - £1200m (78th) 2013 - £925m (93rd) 2012 - £800m (92nd) 2011 - £750m (90th) 2010 - £500m (132nd) 2009 - £400m (128th) 2008 - £300m (270th) 2007 - £200m (351st) 2006 - £126m (442nd) Capitalism - bosses are thieving scum the lot of them. Profits, they only get rich by exploiting and underpaying workers in their respective companies. This type of theft is only considered legal under a capitalist system Well, they got rich because people are stupid and keep betting with them. |
|
|
|
Post by franklin on May 19, 2023 19:31:19 GMT
Well done to the Coates family and I hope they continue to grow their wealth and Stoke hopefully prosper on the pitch as a result of their hard work.
|
|
|
|
Post by matelot1996 on May 19, 2023 23:48:55 GMT
Coates family up one place to 16th www.thetimes.co.uk/article/denise-john-peter-coates-net-worth-sunday-times-rich-list-h6pjwxwlt1. Gopi Hinduja and family – £35 billion 2. Sir Jim Ratcliffe – £29.7 billion 3. Sir Leonard Blavatnik – £28.6 billion 4. David and Simon Reuben and family – £24.4 billion 5. Sir James Dyson and family – £23 billion 6. Lakshmi Mittal and family – £16 billion 7. Guy, George, Alannah and Galen Weston and family – £14.5 billion 8. Charlene de Carvalho-Heineken and Michel de Carvalho – £13.1 billion 9. Kirsten and Jorn Rausing – £12 billion 10. Michael Platt – £11.5 billion 11. The Duke of Westminster and the Grosvenor family – £9.9 billion 12. Marit, Lisbet, Sigrid and Hans Rausing – £9.3 billion 13. Andy Currie – £9.2 billion 14. John Reece – £9.1 billion 15. Alex Gerko – £9.1 billion 16. Denise, John and Peter Coates and family – £8.8 billion
17. Anders Holch Povlsen £8.5 billion 18. Barnaby and Merlin Swire and family – £8.4 billion 19. John Fredriksen and family – £8.3 billion 20. Mikhail Fridman – £8.2 billion Coates family 2023 - £8795m (16th) 2022 - £8637m (17th) 2021 - £8448m (17th) 2020 - £7166m (16th) 2019 - £6856m (19th) 2018 - £5750m (21st) 2017 - £5000m (22nd) 2016 - £3765m (24th) 2015 - £2300m (44th) 2014 - £1200m (78th) 2013 - £925m (93rd) 2012 - £800m (92nd) 2011 - £750m (90th) 2010 - £500m (132nd) 2009 - £400m (128th) 2008 - £300m (270th) 2007 - £200m (351st) 2006 - £126m (442nd) Capitalism - bosses are thieving scum the lot of them. Profits, they only get rich by exploiting and underpaying workers in their respective companies. This type of theft is only considered legal under a capitalist system Jesus Christ, A more inaccurate account of reality you will never read! Congratulations “Comrade” 😂 |
|
