|
|
Post by desman2 on Aug 3, 2024 9:49:03 GMT
In 2011 the leftists gloated at the riots against the government set off by a criminal getting shot in London. It turned into a lot of scroungers and idiots smashing cities up across the country. Chickens coming Home to roost they said. Bollicks they were just cunts I dont support these new riots. No normal people do. Again mindless cunts. But because it’s coming from the right the leftists now condemn it and all laws need changing, gestapo formed etc etc That’s the narrative Bit like the old poll tax riots. Some on here would be gloating all over it only to feel different when someone else does it. |
|
|
|
Post by Chewbacca the Wookie on Aug 3, 2024 10:50:41 GMT
Spot on. For some bad attention is better than no attention. Once again though my point was sharing it on here isn't going to make it worse. It's already viral and seen by millions..i simply said not sharing it on here won't suddenly make him get any less attention. It's gone beyond that point. i wasn’t talking about here specifically i was talking generally |
|
|
|
Post by mrnovember on Aug 3, 2024 11:14:32 GMT
I've absolutely no idea why you are asking me any of those questions. I never suggested that this incident was linked to islamic terrorism specifically and I didn't try to justify the attacks on mosques. I simply said that if stabbing 3 children to death cannot be defined as terrorism, then throwing bricks and bottles at a building cannot either. Bayern was being a dramatic narcissist. Who knows, maybe he wanted to redirect a conversation that was already live on two/three other threads, back to his own. While we're here though, mental illness is undoubtedly the root cause. But there will be a motivating or influencing factor that put the knife in his hand that day. Now that could be anything from religious or political extremism to over consumption of violent forms of media. Mental illness is the root cause but there will be some other catalyst. In my opinion of course. We'll find out at as it progresses through the courts. The reason I responded is that I don't think your statement that just because the stabbings aren't considered terrorism throwing bricks or bottle can't either - that simply doesn't follow. Terrorism isn't defined in terms of the severity of the act - it is defined by purpose and intent. You might be right that a triggering factor in the stabbings case was terrorism related but at the moment that is pure speculation. Some people participating in the riots may well have been indulging in violence for other reasons but it's pretty much an established fact that some of the people involved were motivated by a far right political agenda. Poltically motivated attacks on mosques are acts of terror. I think that dilutes the word. By that logic any actions of violence or aggression associated with activism are terrorism. The largely peaceful pro Palestine marches have manifested into violence against police on a couple of occasions in Manchester (possibly due to agitation) I wouldn't class that as terrorism. Violence for a political cause. |
|
|
|
Post by elystokie on Aug 3, 2024 11:29:44 GMT
Been smoking again mate?😉 I can take my medication when I choose, same as anyone else   |
|
|
|
Post by Davef on Aug 3, 2024 11:51:52 GMT
I don’t think that it’s terrorism. I think that’s too far to be honest. I think that it’s a piece of shit riot without a legitimate cause. All it will achieve is further destroying the crumbling infrastructure of the areas that the people live in. I’ve been pretty consistent when rioting occurs so in the interest of fairness: screw the rioters. The violence hasn't caused any deaths but it is terrorism in the sense that it is designed to make people fearful and assert control through the threat of violence. This isnt just a random spontaneous act - this is a planned act of violence in support of a political agenda. Other than the severity of the outcome it has all the hallmarks of terrorism. The police and the security services know the people behind this and the government are giving them the wherewithal to deal with them. Hopefully the ringleaders and the their runners will get taken out of circulation before the inevitable casualties mount up and there is no ambiguity about it being terrorism. If the attacks on and murder of little girls and their carers in Southport and the attempted murder of a soldier in Gillingham aren't considered to be acts of terrorism, then neither are these riots. |
|
|
|
Post by musik on Aug 3, 2024 12:25:46 GMT
It's like looking only for the turds your dog produced.
|
|
|
|
Post by bayernoatcake on Sept 11, 2024 16:58:48 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by prestwichpotter on Sept 11, 2024 17:30:16 GMT
Thicker than a whale omelette is our Stephen…. |
|
|
|
Post by LDE76 on Sept 11, 2024 17:45:16 GMT
Thicker than a whale omelette is our Stephen…. When I was at school there were no Germans in German. Mainly because they could already speak the language. |
|
|
|
Post by metalhead on Sept 11, 2024 17:52:31 GMT
Thicker than a whale omelette is our Stephen…. Tiny Tommy proving he's still Tommy the tit. |
|
|
|
Post by cheadlepotter on Sept 11, 2024 19:53:13 GMT
Surely he’ll just claim he copied and pasted from an email or whatever? |
|
|
|
Post by bayernoatcake on Sept 13, 2024 19:51:10 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by Rednwhitenblue on Oct 28, 2024 12:55:27 GMT
I see Robbo's going down... 18 months. Claimed to be bankrupt, lol. Come on, guys, set up a crowd-funder for him  |
|
|
|
Post by Huddysleftfoot on Oct 28, 2024 13:02:15 GMT
Rot in there you racist piece of shit.
|
|
|
|
Post by Huddysleftfoot on Oct 28, 2024 13:07:41 GMT
Grifters gonna grift....
|
|
|
|
Post by Paul Spencer on Oct 28, 2024 13:10:05 GMT
I see Robbo's going down... 18 months. Claimed to be bankrupt, lol. Come on, guys, set up a crowd-funder for him |
|
|
|
Post by Rednwhitenblue on Oct 28, 2024 13:11:07 GMT
"A fool and his money are soon parted"... |
|
|
|
Post by Rednwhitenblue on Oct 28, 2024 13:11:29 GMT
I see Robbo's going down... 18 months. Claimed to be bankrupt, lol. Come on, guys, set up a crowd-funder for him  |
|
|
|
Post by knype on Oct 28, 2024 13:18:37 GMT
The Leftwaffe still obsessed by TR...
|
|
|
|
Post by hamsta2 on Oct 28, 2024 13:32:32 GMT
The Leftwaffe still obsessed by TR... . Don’t you mean Stephen Yaxley-Lennon ? |
|
|
|
Post by Huddysleftfoot on Oct 28, 2024 13:38:13 GMT
The Leftwaffe still obsessed by TR... You ok Hun? |
|
|
|
Post by iancransonsknees on Oct 28, 2024 13:42:30 GMT
The Leftwaffe still obsessed by TR... You ok Hun? The sexual tension between you two is unbearable. It's like Paula Yates interviewing Michael Hutchance on The Big Breakfast. |
|
|
|
Post by Huddysleftfoot on Oct 28, 2024 13:52:42 GMT
The sexual tension between you two is unbearable. It's like Paula Yates interviewing Michael Hutchance on The Big Breakfast. I'll have a pint of what you're drinking mate. |
|
|
|
Post by noustie on Oct 28, 2024 13:59:13 GMT
The sexual tension between you two is unbearable. It's like Paula Yates interviewing Michael Hutchance on The Big Breakfast. Wonder if they forced Zig n Zag watch? |
|
|
|
Post by thehartshillbadger on Oct 28, 2024 14:01:44 GMT
The sexual tension between you two is unbearable. It's like Paula Yates interviewing Michael Hutchance on The Big Breakfast. Wonder if they forced Zig n Zag watch? Prestwich and Bluers? |
|
|
|
Post by Northy on Oct 28, 2024 14:03:58 GMT
Where is the letter he sent to himself? I can see something that could be a copy and paste into the tweet, if that can be done, or a screenshot, but I cant see anything that resembles a letter? |
|
|
|
Post by Ariel Manto on Oct 28, 2024 14:06:26 GMT
The reason I responded is that I don't think your statement that just because the stabbings aren't considered terrorism throwing bricks or bottle can't either - that simply doesn't follow. Terrorism isn't defined in terms of the severity of the act - it is defined by purpose and intent. You might be right that a triggering factor in the stabbings case was terrorism related but at the moment that is pure speculation. Some people participating in the riots may well have been indulging in violence for other reasons but it's pretty much an established fact that some of the people involved were motivated by a far right political agenda. Poltically motivated attacks on mosques are acts of terror. I think that dilutes the word. By that logic any actions of violence or aggression associated with activism are terrorism. The largely peaceful pro Palestine marches have manifested into violence against police on a couple of occasions in Manchester (possibly due to agitation) I wouldn't class that as terrorism. Violence for a political cause. The UK legal definition of terrorism is outlined in the **Terrorism Act 2000**. According to thie act, terrorism involves the use or threat of action where: 1. The action is designed to influence the government or an international governmental organization or to intimidate the public or a section of the public. 2. The use or threat is made for the purpose of advancing a political, religious, racial, or ideological cause. The specific actions included are: - Serious violence against a person. - Serious damage to property. - Endangering a person's life (other than that of the person committing the action). - Creating a serious risk to the health or safety of the public or a section of the public. - Actions designed to seriously interfere with or seriously disrupt an electronic system This definition covers a wide range of activities and is intended to address various forms of terrorism, both domestic and international. |
|
|
|
Post by mrnovember on Oct 28, 2024 15:01:38 GMT
I think that dilutes the word. By that logic any actions of violence or aggression associated with activism are terrorism. The largely peaceful pro Palestine marches have manifested into violence against police on a couple of occasions in Manchester (possibly due to agitation) I wouldn't class that as terrorism. Violence for a political cause. The UK legal definition of terrorism is outlined in the **Terrorism Act 2000**. According to thie act, terrorism involves the use or threat of action where: 1. The action is designed to influence the government or an international governmental organization or to intimidate the public or a section of the public. 2. The use or threat is made for the purpose of advancing a political, religious, racial, or ideological cause. The specific actions included are: - Serious violence against a person. - Serious damage to property. - Endangering a person's life (other than that of the person committing the action). - Creating a serious risk to the health or safety of the public or a section of the public. - Actions designed to seriously interfere with or seriously disrupt an electronic system This definition covers a wide range of activities and is intended to address various forms of terrorism, both domestic and international. All right, Statto. |
|
|
|
Post by Rednwhitenblue on Oct 28, 2024 15:05:38 GMT
The UK legal definition of terrorism is outlined in the **Terrorism Act 2000**. According to thie act, terrorism involves the use or threat of action where: 1. The action is designed to influence the government or an international governmental organization or to intimidate the public or a section of the public. 2. The use or threat is made for the purpose of advancing a political, religious, racial, or ideological cause. The specific actions included are: - Serious violence against a person. - Serious damage to property. - Endangering a person's life (other than that of the person committing the action). - Creating a serious risk to the health or safety of the public or a section of the public. - Actions designed to seriously interfere with or seriously disrupt an electronic system This definition covers a wide range of activities and is intended to address various forms of terrorism, both domestic and international. All right, Statto. Yeah, calm down, Manto, we don't want facts on here, this is the place for ill-informed, knee-jerk reactions. Right, Badge? 😄 |
|
|
|
Post by Huddysleftfoot on Oct 28, 2024 16:51:40 GMT
|
|
