|
Post by Gods on Sept 21, 2021 21:30:10 GMT
This made me laugh while reading up on tonight's famous victory!
Official SFDC site Clucas edged the Potters in front with a sublime strike 10 minutes from time and then Tymon set the seal on a satisfying night’s work as he made it 3-1 with a cross-cum-shot that caught out home goalkeeper Rob Elliot.
BBC Clucas' effort took a deflection off the boot of Moussa Sissoko and flew into the bottom corner, while Tymon shinned a first-time cross over Elliot's head.
|
|
|
Post by theonlooker on Sept 21, 2021 21:31:21 GMT
Both sites said 'Watford 1 - 3 Stoke'
Lovely.
|
|
|
Post by bayernoatcake on Sept 21, 2021 21:32:13 GMT
I was wondering if it was a shin 😂
|
|
|
Post by a on Sept 21, 2021 21:39:59 GMT
I was wondering if it was a shin 😂 Great technique 😂 Rooney shinned an overhead kick and they all loved that 😆
|
|
|
Post by ersaurebot 1, 000, 000 views on Sept 21, 2021 21:40:57 GMT
‘Cum Shot’ is all I really saw
|
|
|
Post by bayernoatcake on Sept 21, 2021 21:41:31 GMT
I was wondering if it was a shin 😂 Great technique 😂 Rooney shinned an overhead kick and they all loved that 😆 They did. I always call it a shinner and think overhead kicks should be banned for dangerous play 😂 Fun fun fun me.
|
|
|
Post by Kenilworth_Stokies on Sept 21, 2021 21:44:23 GMT
The whole Been write up was very sneery. I wonder who was responsible? Somebody who doesn't like us. Good.
|
|
|
Post by Billy the kid on Sept 21, 2021 22:03:13 GMT
Great technique 😂 Rooney shinned an overhead kick and they all loved that 😆 They did. I always call it a shinner and think overhead kicks should be banned for dangerous play 😂 Fun fun fun me. well atleast you recognise your a miserable cunt
|
|
|
Post by bayernoatcake on Sept 21, 2021 22:05:25 GMT
They did. I always call it a shinner and think overhead kicks should be banned for dangerous play 😂 Fun fun fun me. well atleast you recognise your a miserable cunt I’ve never claimed otherwise. D You’re*
|
|
|
Post by maninasuitcase on Sept 21, 2021 22:05:58 GMT
The whole Been write up was very sneery. I wonder who was responsible? Somebody who doesn't like us. Good. Probably some gooner wanker
|
|
|
Post by Billy the kid on Sept 21, 2021 22:08:14 GMT
well atleast you recognise your a miserable cunt I’ve never claimed otherwise. D You’re* A pedantic cunt too , and that is why I appreciate the contribution you make to this site (and honestly no sarchasim) please never change Bayern, you make my coffee breaks so much more entertaining.
|
|
|
Post by Gods on Sept 21, 2021 22:23:32 GMT
The whole Been write up was very sneery. I wonder who was responsible? Somebody who doesn't like us. Good. It was, the whole tone was captured in these 2 words 'wasteful Watford', no credit given to our plucky no-hopers! More from the same... 'Ashley Fletcher poked in a leveller but that was the only reward from 26 shots on goal for Xisco Munoz's side.'
|
|
|
Post by bayernoatcake on Sept 21, 2021 22:59:06 GMT
The whole Been write up was very sneery. I wonder who was responsible? Somebody who doesn't like us. Good. It was, the whole tone was captured in these 2 words 'wasteful Watford', no credit given to our plucky no-hopers! More from the same... 'Ashley Fletcher poked in a leveller but that was the only reward from 26 shots on goal for Xisco Munoz's side.' 1 goal from 26 shots does sort of imply they were wasteful 😂
|
|
|
Post by ratters on Sept 22, 2021 10:35:35 GMT
It was, the whole tone was captured in these 2 words 'wasteful Watford', no credit given to our plucky no-hopers! More from the same... 'Ashley Fletcher poked in a leveller but that was the only reward from 26 shots on goal for Xisco Munoz's side.' 1 goal from 26 shots does sort of imply they were wasteful 😂 They only had 1 more on target though than us, Half of there efforts were long rangers into the stand. It could easily have gone 3-1 to them for example, and they were wasteful, but thought we battled well.
|
|
|
Post by Kenilworth_Stokies on Sept 22, 2021 11:09:18 GMT
1 goal from 26 shots does sort of imply they were wasteful 😂 They only had 1 more on target though than us, Half of there efforts were long rangers into the stand. It could easily have gone 3-1 to them for example, and they were wasteful, but thought we battled well. Yup. Shots on target: Watford 7 - Stoke 6. www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/58553815Hardly as one sided as the report portrayed.
|
|
|
Post by AlbertTatlock on Sept 22, 2021 11:16:25 GMT
The whole Been write up was very sneery. I wonder who was responsible? Somebody who doesn't like us. Good. It was, the whole tone was captured in these 2 words 'wasteful Watford', no credit given to our plucky no-hopers! More from the same... 'Ashley Fletcher poked in a leveller but that was the only reward from 26 shots on goal for Xisco Munoz's side.' they had 7 shots on target to our 6 where the fuck do these people get their stats from? Watford v Stoke match statsGouranga.
|
|
|
Post by spitthedog on Sept 22, 2021 11:21:21 GMT
They only had 1 more on target though than us, Half of there efforts were long rangers into the stand. It could easily have gone 3-1 to them for example, and they were wasteful, but thought we battled well. Yup. Shots on target: Watford 7 - Stoke 6. www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/58553815Hardly as one sided as the report portrayed. Surely 26 shots and only 7 on target does mean they were exceptionally wasteful?......the Sky highlights definitely gives the impression of them being wasteful, two golden chances there. I didn't see the full game so cant comment if it was one sided or not. Not that it is very important anyway!
|
|
|
Post by bayernoatcake on Sept 22, 2021 11:40:15 GMT
1 goal from 26 shots does sort of imply they were wasteful 😂 They only had 1 more on target though than us, Half of there efforts were long rangers into the stand. It could easily have gone 3-1 to them for example, and they were wasteful, but thought we battled well. I'm not saying there were but if you're a journo who hasn't watched the game and sees that and will put the PL slant on it too, it makes sense that's all. I didn't watch the game so I have no idea who was anything.
|
|
|
Post by FullerMagic on Sept 22, 2021 11:46:25 GMT
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 22, 2021 11:52:47 GMT
The whole Been write up was very sneery. I wonder who was responsible? Somebody who doesn't like us. Good. In private beeb circles we’re referred to as gammon city fc.
|
|
|
Post by AlbertTatlock on Sept 22, 2021 12:09:14 GMT
You mean like Barnsley were fortunate? We were the away side and underdogs, people can say things like fortunate but our keeper did his job and they hit the woodwork, if the goals were bigger and our keeper wasn't there they may have won but then again if my sister had bollox she'd be my brother. We didn't cheat to win we competed and scored 2 more goals than Watford, it's easy to s blart about being unlucky but they weren't unlucky, they didn't lose to a dodgy penalty or having players sent off for no reason, they lost cause we were more accurate with our shooting and our keeper was better that the Watford strikers. Gouranga.
|
|
|
Post by mtrstudent on Sept 22, 2021 12:14:09 GMT
After seeing the highlights the BBC article is fair enough! A bit like the Barnsley game, it happens sometimes. I'll just enjoy it when we win 'em.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 22, 2021 17:37:21 GMT
You mean like Barnsley were fortunate? We were the away side and underdogs, people can say things like fortunate but our keeper did his job and they hit the woodwork, if the goals were bigger and our keeper wasn't there they may have won but then again if my sister had bollox she'd be my brother. We didn't cheat to win we competed and scored 2 more goals than Watford, it's easy to s blart about being unlucky but they weren't unlucky, they didn't lose to a dodgy penalty or having players sent off for no reason, they lost cause we were more accurate with our shooting and our keeper was better that the Watford strikers. Gouranga. Perfectly summed up.
|
|
|
Post by brinsleymaclagan on Sept 25, 2021 10:44:08 GMT
well atleast you recognise your a miserable cunt I’ve never claimed otherwise. D You’re* Glad you corrected yourself!
|
|
|
Post by StoKeith on Sept 25, 2021 14:05:50 GMT
I remember we lost 3-1 at home to Blackpool many years ago when the shot count was 26-6 in our favour (random specific memory!) so this match finally makes up for that loss.
|
|
|
Post by fazza90 on Sept 25, 2021 14:57:06 GMT
Vrancics goal reported by the BBC, "Vrancic was stumbling around in the box, barely keeping his feet like a drunk leaving the pub, the ball ping-ponging between his legs & it ricocheting into the goal"
|
|