|
|
Post by mattyd2 on Dec 8, 2020 17:31:08 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by crapslinger on Dec 8, 2020 17:35:00 GMT
Is she related to Shamima Begum ? |
|
|
|
Post by mattyd2 on Dec 8, 2020 17:42:50 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by crapslinger on Dec 8, 2020 17:46:32 GMT
Sounds familiar to what happens on here. |
|
|
|
Post by prestwichpotter on Dec 8, 2020 17:47:07 GMT
1. I'm not sure anyone has ever claimed "it's only the Tories are corrupt?"
2. Innocent until proven guilty
|
|
|
|
Post by mattyd2 on Dec 8, 2020 17:50:32 GMT
Sounds familiar to what happens on here. Nah....That never happens here surely... |
|
|
|
Post by lordb on Dec 8, 2020 18:07:50 GMT
Can't believe anyone believes only Tories are corrupt
What a bizarre concept
However I do believe any government with a large majority is inevitably going to see more corruption
Personally I believe that ex Public Schoolboys are more likely to be corrupt than everyone else.
But not exclusively.
All parties have ex Public Schoolboys of course.
Tories will always have more than most.
|
|
|
|
Post by crapslinger on Dec 8, 2020 18:12:58 GMT
Can't believe anyone believes only Tories are corrupt What a bizarre concept However I do believe any government with a large majority is inevitably going to see more corruption Personally I believe that ex Public Schoolboys are more likely to be corrupt than everyone else. But not exclusively. All parties have ex Public Schoolboys of course. Tories will always have more than most. Is Sir Kier Starmer ex public school ? |
|
|
|
Post by wagsastokie on Dec 8, 2020 19:50:17 GMT
What’s more important has starmer withdrew the whip or does he only do that for telling the truth
|
|
|
|
Post by felonious on Dec 8, 2020 20:26:41 GMT
Can't believe anyone believes only Tories are corrupt What a bizarre concept However I do believe any government with a large majority is inevitably going to see more corruption Personally I believe that ex Public Schoolboys are more likely to be corrupt than everyone else.But not exclusively. All parties have ex Public Schoolboys of course. Tories will always have more than most. Seriously? What's that based on? |
|
|
|
Post by foster on Dec 8, 2020 20:35:53 GMT
All politicians and parties are full of shit. What's your point?
|
|
|
|
Post by crapslinger on Dec 8, 2020 20:38:26 GMT
Can't believe anyone believes only Tories are corrupt What a bizarre concept However I do believe any government with a large majority is inevitably going to see more corruption Personally I believe that ex Public Schoolboys are more likely to be corrupt than everyone else.But not exclusively. All parties have ex Public Schoolboys of course. Tories will always have more than most. Seriously? What's that based on? Prejudice simple as that. |
|
|
|
Post by lordb on Dec 9, 2020 12:13:47 GMT
Can't believe anyone believes only Tories are corrupt What a bizarre concept However I do believe any government with a large majority is inevitably going to see more corruption Personally I believe that ex Public Schoolboys are more likely to be corrupt than everyone else.But not exclusively. All parties have ex Public Schoolboys of course. Tories will always have more than most. Seriously? What's that based on? seriously? |
|
|
|
Post by wagsastokie on Dec 9, 2020 12:33:06 GMT
Seriously? What's that based on? seriously? Yes what is it based on |
|
|
|
Post by cobhamstokey on Dec 10, 2020 18:24:57 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by felonious on Dec 10, 2020 18:33:20 GMT
Think he's doing some research  |
|
|
|
Post by partickpotter on Dec 10, 2020 18:37:18 GMT
She’s pleaded not guilty. So nothing absolutely disgraceful - for now, and maybe not ever. |
|
|
|
Post by felonious on Dec 10, 2020 18:45:11 GMT
She’s pleaded not guilty. So nothing absolutely disgraceful - for now, and maybe not ever. The property is understood to be run by a housing association, but the tenants are nominated by the council. Investigators reportedly wanted to know how she got to the top of an 18,000-strong waiting list so quickly given she did not have children. Nothing to see here, the Guardian quoting the Sun about a Corbyn ally |
|
|
|
Post by partickpotter on Dec 10, 2020 18:46:02 GMT
She’s pleaded not guilty. So nothing absolutely disgraceful - for now, and maybe not ever. The property is understood to be run by a housing association, but the tenants are nominated by the council. Investigators reportedly wanted to know how she got to the top of an 18,000-strong waiting list so quickly given she did not have children. Nothing to see here, the Guardian quoting the Sun about a Corbyn ally Innocent till proven guilty. |
|
|
|
Post by cobhamstokey on Dec 10, 2020 19:05:22 GMT
She’s pleaded not guilty. So nothing absolutely disgraceful - for now, and maybe not ever. Fair point. We shall see in time. |
|
|
|
Post by cobhamstokey on Oct 29, 2021 5:58:19 GMT
somehow i think the apologies said through gritted teeth. So,some time ago,you referred to the actions of Apsana Begum as absolutely disgusting. She was subsequently acquitted. Have you apologised yourself,through gritted teeth,or in any other way? Out of respect for 4372 and transparency I thought I’d pull this thread up as apparently I used the word “disgusting” to describe the actions of Ms Begum (the word I actually used was “disgraceful”). Though I don’t believe commenting on an action in this way is anywhere near as bad as calling the Tory party “scum” especially when it comes from the deputy leader of the Labour party, if the lovely Ms Rayner is gracious enough to apologise for her actions then I’m more than happy to put my hands up and apologise for using the word “disgraceful” to comment on the article on what is a very public forum. To Ms Begum if she’s a poster on the Oatcake I can only add that I wasn’t aware of her being found innocent of all charges and with the thread being over a year old it had clean slipped out of my head unlike 4372’s. Apologies and good luck for the future x |
|
|
|
Post by thevoid on Oct 29, 2021 6:06:16 GMT
So,some time ago,you referred to the actions of Apsana Begum as absolutely disgusting. She was subsequently acquitted. Have you apologised yourself,through gritted teeth,or in any other way? Out of respect for 4372 and transparency I thought I’d pull this thread up as apparently I used the word “disgusting” to describe the actions of Ms Begum (the word I actually used was “disgraceful”). Though I don’t believe commenting on an action in this way is anywhere near as bad as calling the Tory party “scum” especially when it comes from the deputy leader of the Labour party if the lovely Ms Rayner is gracious enough to apologise for her actions then I’m more than happy to put my hands up and apologise for using the word “disgraceful” to comment on the article on what is a very public forum. To Ms Begum if she’s a poster on the Oatcake I can only add that I wasn’t aware of her being found innocent of all charges and with the thread being over a year old it had clean slipped out of my head unlike 4372’s. Apologies and good luck for the future x Well said mate. In other news, good luck to 4372 'and' RWB in the upcoming World Memory Open! |
|
|
|
Post by cobhamstokey on Oct 29, 2021 6:09:57 GMT
Out of respect for 4372 and transparency I thought I’d pull this thread up as apparently I used the word “disgusting” to describe the actions of Ms Begum (the word I actually used was “disgraceful”). Though I don’t believe commenting on an action in this way is anywhere near as bad as calling the Tory party “scum” especially when it comes from the deputy leader of the Labour party if the lovely Ms Rayner is gracious enough to apologise for her actions then I’m more than happy to put my hands up and apologise for using the word “disgraceful” to comment on the article on what is a very public forum. To Ms Begum if she’s a poster on the Oatcake I can only add that I wasn’t aware of her being found innocent of all charges and with the thread being over a year old it had clean slipped out of my head unlike 4372’s. Apologies and good luck for the future x Well said mate. In other news, good luck to 4372 'and' RWB in the upcoming World Memory Open! Don’t worry i’m busy trawling the threads from 2005 to see what comments I can drag up to prove a political point.  |
|
|
|
Post by thevoid on Oct 29, 2021 6:14:56 GMT
Well said mate. In other news, good luck to 4372 'and' RWB in the upcoming World Memory Open! Don’t worry i’m busy trawling the threads from 2005 to see what comments I can drag up to prove a political point. It's a day well spent |
|
|
|
Post by Rednwhitenblue on Oct 29, 2021 8:38:27 GMT
Out of respect for 4372 and transparency I thought I’d pull this thread up as apparently I used the word “disgusting” to describe the actions of Ms Begum (the word I actually used was “disgraceful”). Though I don’t believe commenting on an action in this way is anywhere near as bad as calling the Tory party “scum” especially when it comes from the deputy leader of the Labour party if the lovely Ms Rayner is gracious enough to apologise for her actions then I’m more than happy to put my hands up and apologise for using the word “disgraceful” to comment on the article on what is a very public forum. To Ms Begum if she’s a poster on the Oatcake I can only add that I wasn’t aware of her being found innocent of all charges and with the thread being over a year old it had clean slipped out of my head unlike 4372’s. Apologies and good luck for the future x Well said mate. In other news, good luck to 4372 'and' RWB in the upcoming World Memory Open! Rent free once again! This from the poster who continues to nurse a ten year old grudge over something that never actually happened in the first place; I suppose a half decent memory would help in that regard  Well done on your apology, Cobham. |
|
|
|
Post by 4372 on Oct 29, 2021 8:59:13 GMT
So,some time ago,you referred to the actions of Apsana Begum as absolutely disgusting. She was subsequently acquitted. Have you apologised yourself,through gritted teeth,or in any other way? Out of respect for 4372 and transparency I thought I’d pull this thread up as apparently I used the word “disgusting” to describe the actions of Ms Begum (the word I actually used was “disgraceful”). Though I don’t believe commenting on an action in this way is anywhere near as bad as calling the Tory party “scum” especially when it comes from the deputy leader of the Labour party, if the lovely Ms Rayner is gracious enough to apologise for her actions then I’m more than happy to put my hands up and apologise for using the word “disgraceful” to comment on the article on what is a very public forum. To Ms Begum if she’s a poster on the Oatcake I can only add that I wasn’t aware of her being found innocent of all charges and with the thread being over a year old it had clean slipped out of my head unlike 4372’s. Apologies and good luck for the future x Actually,well done for acknowledging the error. |
|
|
|
Post by followyoudown on Oct 29, 2021 9:19:34 GMT
So,some time ago,you referred to the actions of Apsana Begum as absolutely disgusting. She was subsequently acquitted. Have you apologised yourself,through gritted teeth,or in any other way? Out of respect for 4372 and transparency I thought I’d pull this thread up as apparently I used the word “disgusting” to describe the actions of Ms Begum (the word I actually used was “disgraceful”). Though I don’t believe commenting on an action in this way is anywhere near as bad as calling the Tory party “scum” especially when it comes from the deputy leader of the Labour party, if the lovely Ms Rayner is gracious enough to apologise for her actions then I’m more than happy to put my hands up and apologise for using the word “disgraceful” to comment on the article on what is a very public forum. To Ms Begum if she’s a poster on the Oatcake I can only add that I wasn’t aware of her being found innocent of all charges and with the thread being over a year old it had clean slipped out of my head unlike 4372’s. Apologies and good luck for the future x It's true she was found innocent of living in a council house she was not entitled too, a rather interesting defence that it was not her who applied for it but her husband in an attempt to discredit her, she did visit the flat she didnt apply for several times and of course continues to live there after moving into a flat she didnt apply for but the jury said not guilty so she isn't. |
|
|
|
Post by thevoid on Oct 29, 2021 9:35:44 GMT
Well said mate. In other news, good luck to 4372 'and' RWB in the upcoming World Memory Open! Rent free once again! This from the poster who continues to nurse a ten year old grudge over something that never actually happened in the first place; I suppose a half decent memory would help in that regard Well done on your apology, Cobham. So not unlike you having to unnecessarily reference scfcbiancorossi on a completely separate thread on the other side of the board last week then 😉 Strange how your usually excellent memory skills turn to shit when we're discussing your own transgressions isn't it mate? |
|
|
|
Post by cobhamstokey on Oct 29, 2021 9:38:17 GMT
Out of respect for 4372 and transparency I thought I’d pull this thread up as apparently I used the word “disgusting” to describe the actions of Ms Begum (the word I actually used was “disgraceful”). Though I don’t believe commenting on an action in this way is anywhere near as bad as calling the Tory party “scum” especially when it comes from the deputy leader of the Labour party, if the lovely Ms Rayner is gracious enough to apologise for her actions then I’m more than happy to put my hands up and apologise for using the word “disgraceful” to comment on the article on what is a very public forum. To Ms Begum if she’s a poster on the Oatcake I can only add that I wasn’t aware of her being found innocent of all charges and with the thread being over a year old it had clean slipped out of my head unlike 4372’s. Apologies and good luck for the future x Actually,well done for acknowledging the error. I don’t have an issue with apologising if I’m in the wrong even if i was slightly misquoted in the word I used. |
|
|
|
Post by partickpotter on Nov 1, 2021 8:58:54 GMT
Actually,well done for acknowledging the error. I don’t have an issue with apologising if I’m in the wrong even if i was slightly misquoted in the word I used. Misquoting is a regular feature of some contributors to this forum! |
|
