|
Post by noustie on Oct 9, 2022 10:35:59 GMT
|
|
|
Post by musik on Oct 9, 2022 13:59:26 GMT
Have you guys taken the 3rd, 4th, 5th and 6th vaccine jab yet?
I took my 3rd January 17th.
None after that. Am I protected at all?
|
|
|
Post by musik on Oct 9, 2022 14:08:04 GMT
It's officially over now, Asda in Alsager have taken their screens down. They’ll be back up before Christmas. We’ve genuinely had an enquiry this week to reinstall a load of screens we removed 3 months ago from some offices at a pharmaceutical company because they believe Covid is coming back with a bang! I kid you not🤦🏻♂️ 100 persons died of Covid-19 in Sweden this week (or if it was the week before, I don't know). I got the info at work from someone who thought it was all about the war on the news here atm. Yes. The focus of importance has changed. I've noticed most complains now are about the effect on the cords long time. Not that much about taking jabs either now. I have taken 3. Last one 9 months ago. There is a man often seen on the buses here. He wears a face mask, a plastic shield as well covering his face, plus what looks like an overall. I wonder if he's someone with an extremely weak immune system or if the societal disease has got to his head.
|
|
jack1
Youth Player
Posts: 297
|
Post by jack1 on Oct 10, 2022 17:10:58 GMT
"84% increase in the relative incidence of cardiac-related death among males 18-39 years old within 28 days following mRNA vaccination"
|
|
|
Post by terryconroysmagic on Oct 10, 2022 18:11:45 GMT
"84% increase in the relative incidence of cardiac-related death among males 18-39 years old within 28 days following mRNA vaccination" And did you see the YouTube guidelines that he has to tippy toe around, farcical. You can’t say that the jab doesn’t reduce transmission! Big brother/tech is policing you 🙈
|
|
|
Post by felonious on Oct 10, 2022 18:45:28 GMT
That's interesting reactions to prescription drugs now the third biggest killer out there but at least with every other drug it comes complete with a long, long printed list of adverse reactions to look out for.
|
|
|
Post by mutters on Oct 10, 2022 18:49:20 GMT
"84% increase in the relative incidence of cardiac-related death among males 18-39 years old within 28 days following mRNA vaccination" And did you see the YouTube guidelines that he has to tippy toe around, farcical. You can’t say that the jab doesn’t reduce transmission! Big brother/tech is policing you 🙈 Barred off Twitter and then reinstated Says it all
|
|
|
Post by terryconroysmagic on Oct 10, 2022 18:51:19 GMT
And did you see the YouTube guidelines that he has to tippy toe around, farcical. You can’t say that the jab doesn’t reduce transmission! Big brother/tech is policing you 🙈 Barred off Twitter and then reinstated Says it all Was Campbell barred off Twitter? I’m not on any other social media, think my head would melt!
|
|
|
Post by mutters on Oct 10, 2022 19:00:55 GMT
It was this :
|
|
|
Post by terryconroysmagic on Oct 10, 2022 19:22:37 GMT
It was this : Jesus Christ. Something needs to be done about this misinformation and fact checking big tech/corporate censorship
|
|
|
Post by adri2008 on Oct 10, 2022 21:24:04 GMT
It was this : Jesus Christ. Something needs to be done about this misinformation and fact checking big tech/corporate censorship Not allowed to go against the official Covid consensus and the miracle vaccines. Only deranged lunatics question jabbing people with next to no risk.
|
|
|
Post by spitthedog on Oct 10, 2022 22:41:02 GMT
Who fact checks the fact checkers? Who are they? They don't seem to be scientists or have any medical expertise? Yet they wield enormous power and have been engaged in editing the facts relating to vaccine trial data! These mysterious fact checkers have huge contracts with Facebook, Twitter and Instagram. The British Medical Journal wrote an open letter to Facebook challenging their fact checking with specific reference to the way Facebook had misrepresented and blocked news relating to data integrity issues over Pzifer's vaccine trials when they had evidence that these these trials were not reliable. In September, a former employee of Ventavia, a contract research company helping carry out the main Pfizer covid-19 vaccine trial, began providing The BMJ with dozens of internal company documents, photos, audio recordings, and emails. These materials revealed a host of poor clinical trial research practices occurring at Ventavia that could impact data integrity and patient safety. We also discovered that, despite receiving a direct complaint about these problems over a year ago, the FDA (food and Drug Administration) did not inspect Ventavia’s trial sites. The BMJ commissioned an investigative reporter to write up the story for our journal. The article was published on 2 November, (2021) following legal review, external peer review and subject to The BMJ’s usual high level editorial oversight and review. Covid-19: Researcher blows the whistle on data integrity issues in Pfizer’s vaccine trial www.bmj.com/content/375/bmj.n... But from November 10, readers began reporting a variety of problems when trying to share our article. Some reported being unable to share it. Many others reported having their posts flagged with a warning about “Missing context … Independent fact-checkers say this information could mislead people.” Those trying to post the article were informed by Facebook that people who repeatedly share “false information” might have their posts moved lower in Facebook’s News Feed. Group administrators where the article was shared received messages from Facebook informing them that such posts were “partly false.” Readers were directed to a “fact check” performed by a Facebook contractor named Lead Stories. Fact Check: The British Medical Journal Did NOT Reveal Disqualifying And Ignored Reports Of Flaws In Pfizer COVID-19 Vaccine Trials leadstories.com/hoax-alert/20... We find the “fact check” performed by Lead Stories to be inaccurate, incompetent and irresponsible. – It fails to provide any assertions of fact that The BMJ article got wrong – It has a nonsensical title: “Fact Check: The British Medical Journal Did NOT Reveal Disqualifying And Ignored Reports Of Flaws In Pfizer COVID-19 Vaccine Trials” – The first paragraph inaccurately labels The BMJ a “news blog” – It contains a screenshot of our article with a stamp over it stating “Flaws Reviewed,” despite the Lead Stories article not identifying anything false or untrue in The BMJ article – It published the story on its website under a URL that contains the phrase “hoax-alert” We have contacted Lead Stories, but they refuse to change anything about their article or actions that have led to Facebook flagging our article. We have also contacted Facebook directly, requesting immediate removal of the “fact checking” label and any link to the Lead Stories article, thereby allowing our readers to freely share the article on your platform. There is also a wider concern that we wish to raise. We are aware that The BMJ is not the only high quality information provider to have been affected by the incompetence of Meta’s fact checking regime. To give one other example, we would highlight the treatment by Instagram (also owned by Meta) of Cochrane, the international provider of high quality systematic reviews of the medical evidence.
|
|
jack1
Youth Player
Posts: 297
|
Post by jack1 on Oct 10, 2022 22:48:51 GMT
"84% increase in the relative incidence of cardiac-related death among males 18-39 years old within 28 days following mRNA vaccination" And did you see the YouTube guidelines that he has to tippy toe around, farcical. You can’t say that the jab doesn’t reduce transmission! Big brother/tech is policing you 🙈 Yes mate! An absolute disgrace that qualified people can not speak freely about their concerns regarding something as important as peoples health!
|
|
|
Post by knype on Oct 11, 2022 5:13:10 GMT
It's been the same from the very start, anyone who goes against the narrative were either silenced or called tin foil hat wearers. None more so than some of the sheep on here
|
|
|
Post by musik on Oct 11, 2022 5:24:24 GMT
What are the guidelines over there about the vaccinations? What number are you on?
I won't take any more.
|
|
|
Post by terryconroysmagic on Oct 12, 2022 19:40:44 GMT
Unbelievable…WTF
|
|
|
Post by thehartshillbadger on Oct 12, 2022 19:52:08 GMT
What are the guidelines over there about the vaccinations? What number are you on? I won't take any more. I personally have no idea anymore. But I don’t think you need to have had any vaccinations whatsoever to do what you like really.
|
|
|
Post by noustie on Oct 12, 2022 20:02:57 GMT
Government's own website from April 21 says an added benefit of the vaccine is it cuts household transmission in half: www.gov.uk/government/news/one-dose-of-covid-19-vaccine-can-cut-household-transmission-by-up-to-halfThis was how the vaccine was sold further down the tree as the risk to the younger demographics dropped from a personal perspective they were nudged via a sense of social responsibility. It was the only reason I took the second dose so felt conned when they found transmission was cut for c. 10 weeks. You genuinely felt conned? Wow. Yeah mate - conned
|
|
|
Post by noustie on Oct 12, 2022 20:07:09 GMT
Their justification seems purely based on they didnt want to risk losing competitive advantage and if they hadn't have acted like unethical shitebags then someone else would so might as well crack on.
|
|
|
Post by spitthedog on Oct 12, 2022 20:27:25 GMT
So Pfizer did not know whether Covid vaccine stopped transmission before rollout.... in fact they never tested for it!....let this sink in! We've been completely hoodwinked on vaccinations and they are telling us now. This is not the conspiracy theorists telling us, this is the bloody companies themselves! ......not to mention the politicians who lied to us.
|
|
|
Post by spitthedog on Oct 12, 2022 20:46:46 GMT
You genuinely felt conned? Wow. Yeah mate - conned Well, Pfizer have this week admitted that you were conned, so it's not even a theory anymore. It's a fact.
|
|
|
Post by musik on Oct 12, 2022 21:11:28 GMT
I'm not AT ALL surprised about the content in that video above. It always work that way with medical drugs and vaccines. Noone has a f@ckin clue if it works, or why.
There are still very common medicine out there since the 80ies on the market, which noone still knows at all how it functions.
|
|
|
Post by spitthedog on Oct 13, 2022 7:42:10 GMT
I'm not AT ALL surprised about the content in that video above. It always work that way with medical drugs and vaccines. Noone has a f@ckin clue if it works, or why. There are still very common medicine out there since the 80ies on the market, which noone still knows at all how it functions. Still this story is receiving such little attention in the UK. It should be headline because it is an international scandal The fact that British Government signed a secrecy clause with Pfizer means they can never be investigated in the UK. The only Government to do so. They are beyond legal processes in this country. They are now being exposed as a criminal organisation and people have put their trust in them with untested vaccines that cost 76p to produce.
|
|
|
Post by spitthedog on Oct 13, 2022 7:45:02 GMT
I'm not AT ALL surprised about the content in that video above. It always work that way with medical drugs and vaccines. Noone has a f@ckin clue if it works, or why. There are still very common medicine out there since the 80ies on the market, which noone still knows at all how it functions. Still this story is receiving such little attention in the UK. It should be headline because it is an international scandal The fact that British Government signed a secrecy clause with Pfizer means they can never be investigated in the UK. The only Government to do so. They are beyond legal processes in this country. They are now being exposed as a criminal organisation and people have put their trust in them with untested vaccines that cost 76p to produce sold to British Govt at £22 each.
|
|
|
Post by BuzzB on Oct 13, 2022 7:58:56 GMT
What are the guidelines over there about the vaccinations? What number are you on? I won't take any more. Musik, mine go Jan 21, March 21, October 21 and October 22. I am happy to have an annual booster from here onwards, I am 62.
|
|
|
Post by henry on Oct 13, 2022 8:25:08 GMT
So Pfizer did not know whether Covid vaccine stopped transmission before rollout.... in fact they never tested for it!....let this sink in! We've been completely hoodwinked on vaccinations and they are telling us now. This is not the conspiracy theorists telling us, this is the bloody companies themselves! ......not to mention the politicians who lied to us. I had 3 jabs of this junk just to go on holiday. Remember all the world leaders saying Covid was a “pandemic of the unvaccinated “. Utter cunts who should be facing criminal charges.
|
|
|
Post by bjarnig on Oct 13, 2022 9:14:47 GMT
|
|
|
Post by stokeuk474 on Oct 13, 2022 10:41:43 GMT
If people want to have their Covid jabs then fair enough, bodily autonomy and all that, each to their own. However, I have never felt more justified in anything I have done, than refusing to have this shite put in to me over the last 2 years or so. I was convinced that these kind of stories would come out eventually, but i'm actually surprised that they've come out this soon whilst there is still a bit of covid milk left to be sucked from the proverbial tit.
|
|
|
Post by riverman on Oct 13, 2022 11:06:45 GMT
There were certain posters on this thread calling people who chose to exercise their human rights not to have the jab murderers. The silence from them is deafening. Like others on here I only had them so I could go on holiday etc. Something I totally regret now as it was unnecessary in the end. Hat off to those who stood their ground. Yet another conspiracy FACT to emerge.
|
|
|
Post by spitthedog on Oct 13, 2022 11:42:07 GMT
There were certain posters on this thread calling people who chose to exercise their human rights not to have the jab murderers. The silence from them is deafening. Like others on here I only had them so I could go on holiday etc. Something I totally regret now as it was unnecessary in the end. Hat off to those who stood their ground. Yet another conspiracy FACT to emerge. I (and many others) were vilified for even calling for a proper investigation of vaccinations before implementation, were told we were selfish and uncaring. Like you say, the silence is deafening. My wife was told she was going to be made redundant after 30 years of service in the NHS. We had all the stress and tension of threatened redundancy like many others. she was reprieved the day before the date of her compulsory redundancy after 6 months of uncertainty. What about all those who were made unemployed through this? Surely there should be huge compensation for loss of income and emotional stress that went with this.
|
|