|
Post by Eggybread on Mar 10, 2020 16:09:29 GMT
So you were actually incorrect on both. A hermaphrodite describes a person who is born with both female and male physical characteristics. Increasingly, however, intersex is becoming a more popular description when referring to individuals of this congenital state. A hermaphrodite may be born with both sex organs or may be born with one main sex organ, but possess part of a second opposite organ.
A bit of information for you not my own work copy and pasted from the geek site on the web. Hope that helps a sex organ is in fact any part of the reproductive system so yep a dick would suffice and you should be well aware of that.
Still no answer on the baby born with a penis question or is it to difficult for you ?
A true hermaphrodite ,look it up Einstein.
|
|
|
Post by Eggybread on Mar 10, 2020 16:14:01 GMT
It doesn't matter one jot who becomes the leader whoever it is will be slated by the chosen ones on here no matter what their policies are.So the entire thread is pointless. I actually believe the people have changed not the Labour party. People on here say they dont listen to the people well what for instance dont they listen too? Brexit is history so lets move on from that one. And do you think that the tories listen to you more? People of SOT are already finding out that they have lied to them=Austrity for example.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 10, 2020 16:43:38 GMT
I'm sure I listened to a radio programme several months back stating that they've got some fancy new term which doesn't upset them formerly known as hermaphrodites. Intersex.But we are in the 1970s on here so it will do for the purpose. Pretty sure that's a bar in Berlin....allegedly
|
|
|
Post by franklin66 on Mar 10, 2020 16:59:49 GMT
It doesn't matter one jot who becomes the leader whoever it is will be slated by the chosen ones on here no matter what their policies are.So the entire thread is pointless. I actually believe the people have changed not the Labour party. People on here say they dont listen to the people well what for instance dont they listen too? Brexit is history so lets move on from that one. And do you think that the tories listen to you more? People of SOT are already finding out that they have lied to them=Austrity for example. I agree it's pointless but it's not like you dont do exactly the same with the Tories 🤦‍♂️
|
|
|
Post by crapslinger on Mar 10, 2020 21:56:32 GMT
A hermaphrodite describes a person who is born with both female and male physical characteristics. Increasingly, however, intersex is becoming a more popular description when referring to individuals of this congenital state. A hermaphrodite may be born with both sex organs or may be born with one main sex organ, but possess part of a second opposite organ.
A bit of information for you not my own work copy and pasted from the geek site on the web. Hope that helps a sex organ is in fact any part of the reproductive system so yep a dick would suffice and you should be well aware of that.
Still no answer on the baby born with a penis question or is it to difficult for you ?
A true hermaphrodite ,look it up Einstein. I have, now what about that simple question I asked you numerous times, man up give me an answer what do you call is a new born child with a penis ? come on even for someone as mentally challenged as you it's not a difficult question, or are you avoiding facing the truth ? it seems to be a Monster raving Labour party trait recently, campaign for the minority and that is exactly who will vote for you unsurprisingly the majority have rejected the loony party and it's beliefs.
|
|
|
Post by crapslinger on Mar 10, 2020 22:02:41 GMT
It doesn't matter one jot who becomes the leader whoever it is will be slated by the chosen ones on here no matter what their policies are.So the entire thread is pointless. I actually believe the people have changed not the Labour party. People on here say they dont listen to the people well what for instance dont they listen too? Brexit is history so lets move on from that one. And do you think that the tories listen to you more? People of SOT are already finding out that they have lied to them=Austrity for example. Brexit is history is it negotiations are under way at long last, you don't live in S-o-T so what do you really know, is your son a male ie. does he have a penis or is it a case of self identification , people have changed not the Labour Party this is fcuking hilarious.
|
|
|
Post by songthrush01 on Mar 10, 2020 22:10:23 GMT
hes gone eggdead
|
|
|
Post by Clayton Wood on Mar 10, 2020 22:13:40 GMT
|
|
|
Post by crapslinger on Mar 10, 2020 22:29:36 GMT
|
|
|
Post by crapslinger on Mar 10, 2020 22:31:08 GMT
Intersex.But we are in the 1970s on here so it will do for the purpose. Pretty sure that's a bar in Berlin....allegedly Cock or Nein Cock that is the question ?
|
|
|
Post by Clayton Wood on Mar 10, 2020 22:34:17 GMT
|
|
|
Post by RichieBarkerOut! on Mar 11, 2020 10:21:28 GMT
Hey! Leave the people of Leek out of this!
|
|
|
Post by rogerjonesisgod on Mar 28, 2020 13:57:40 GMT
I had genuinely forgotten about this. Is anyone still bothered? By the quietness of this thread then probably not.
|
|
|
Post by Clayton Wood on Mar 28, 2020 16:31:22 GMT
I had genuinely forgotten about this. Is anyone still bothered? By the quietness of this thread then probably not. About as much interest as recruiting a 3rd choice goalkeeper.
|
|
|
Post by sheikhmomo on Mar 28, 2020 18:35:06 GMT
Is anyone still bothered? Daft tory bastards seem to be more interested than most! Anyway how proud were you with Johnson and the Tory bastards clapping the NHS barely 18 months after they literally celebrated voting down a nurses pay rise? Did it feel good?!
|
|
|
Post by rogerjonesisgod on Mar 28, 2020 20:38:01 GMT
Is anyone still bothered? Daft tory bastards seem to be more interested than most! Anyway how proud were you with Johnson and the Tory bastards clapping the NHS barely 18 months after they literally celebrated voting down a nurses pay rise? Did it feel good?! Are you interested in this campaign anymore?
|
|
|
Post by sheikhmomo on Mar 28, 2020 21:33:38 GMT
Daft tory bastards seem to be more interested than most! Anyway how proud were you with Johnson and the Tory bastards clapping the NHS barely 18 months after they literally celebrated voting down a nurses pay rise? Did it feel good?! Are you interested in this campaign anymore? Very interested. Did you hypocritically 'clap' the NHS?
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 29, 2020 13:06:13 GMT
A few of KS's proposed cabinet members have been leaked apparently, and it doesn't look good.
Rachel Reeves being the one who stated that Labour should cut benefits massively in 2013, and said they should force benefit claimants to work for the state before giving them money.
|
|
|
Post by harryburrows on Mar 29, 2020 16:18:12 GMT
A few of KS's proposed cabinet members have been leaked apparently, and it doesn't look good. Rachel Reeves being the one who stated that Labour should cut benefits massively in 2013, and said they should force benefit claimants to work for the state before giving them money. Benefits are a safety net .people who deliberately avoid work should be given ultimatums, work or go hungry . People who genuinely need help should of course have it
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 29, 2020 16:37:07 GMT
A few of KS's proposed cabinet members have been leaked apparently, and it doesn't look good. Rachel Reeves being the one who stated that Labour should cut benefits massively in 2013, and said they should force benefit claimants to work for the state before giving them money. Benefits are a safety net .people who deliberately avoid work should be given ultimatums, work or go hungry . People who genuinely need help should of course have it Impossible to draw that line without killing/harming some who don't deserve it. Hence why UBI is a better idea. Cutting benefits is the worst idea possible.
|
|
|
Post by rogerjonesisgod on Mar 29, 2020 17:06:37 GMT
So the word on the street is that after Starmer wins this week he's got a 'scorched' earth policy to dump all Corbynista's from positions of influence. The reckoning is that a slow transition would only produce resistance from the Left over every reshuffled position so better to do it all in one go.
Blair v2.0 A London Lawyer leading the Labour Party. New, New Labour.
|
|
|
Post by bigjohnritchie on Mar 29, 2020 17:29:28 GMT
Benefits are a safety net .people who deliberately avoid work should be given ultimatums, work or go hungry . People who genuinely need help should of course have it Impossible to draw that line without killing/harming some who don't deserve it. Hence why UBI is a better idea. Cutting benefits is the worst idea possible. Lil, I'm not necessarily against UBI. About 20 years ago, I floated the idea of UBI to a local prospective Labour MP, who eventually did become MP, who had a strong history in economics ( you may be able to work out who)...He basically reacted with derision, if I wasn't fairly immune, I'd say tried to humiliate the idea rather than me. One question for you, I'd be interested in your opinion, , that being a pragmatist, I can't see how it could work....if the amount was pitched at just enough that the lowest paid did not actually have to work ( in the lowest paid , basic jobs), then how would those jobs actually get done....I don't think that some people would do them to ' top up the UBI"....Unfortunately perhaps we need an incentive to work.....( I'd be all for ' sharedlabour' and other kinder, gentler ways of treating each other...but being a pragmatist I think that we are a million miles away from that.....rendering it unrealistic)
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 29, 2020 18:05:31 GMT
Impossible to draw that line without killing/harming some who don't deserve it. Hence why UBI is a better idea. Cutting benefits is the worst idea possible. Lil, I'm not necessarily against UBI. About 20 years ago, I floated the idea of UBI to a local prospective Labour MP, who eventually did become MP, who had a strong history in economics ( you may be able to work out who)...He basically reacted with derision, if I wasn't fairly immune, I'd say tried to humiliate the idea rather than me. One question for you, I'd be interested in your opinion, , that being a pragmatist, I can't see how it could work....if the amount was pitched at just enough that the lowest paid did not actually have to work ( in the lowest paid , basic jobs), then how would those jobs actually get done....I don't think that some people would do them to ' top up the UBI"....Unfortunately perhaps we need an incentive to work.....( I'd be all for ' sharedlabour' and other kinder, gentler ways of treating each other...but being a pragmatist I think that we are a million miles away from that.....rendering it unrealistic) It's not so much to top up, it makes people work for the money they want, instead of keeping them in the perpetual cycle of needing to work whatever they are stuck in or die. You'd see a huge increase in people wanting to learn new things and/or taking time to look for other jobs instead of having to rush to the next available one to stay alive, and you'd get far more productive workers because they aren't exhausted/hungry/mentally ruined from working 3 jobs just to pay the bills. I do get the point you make, but I still think you'd have plenty of people working the lowest paid, basic jobs, because they are generally easier to get, and those who do work them would be far less likely to accept dreadful working conditions. They might actually get paid what they deserve instead of pittance!
|
|
|
Post by followyoudown on Mar 29, 2020 18:11:07 GMT
So the word on the street is that after Starmer wins this week he's got a 'scorched' earth policy to dump all Corbynista's from positions of influence. The reckoning is that a slow transition would only produce resistance from the Left over every reshuffled position so better to do it all in one go. Blair v2.0 A London Lawyer leading the Labour Party. New, New Labour. Alexa play Civil War by Guns N Roses He will be the new leader for as long as there is a labour party and that is not guarenteed into the future.....
|
|
|
Post by bigjohnritchie on Mar 29, 2020 18:30:58 GMT
Lil, I'm not necessarily against UBI. About 20 years ago, I floated the idea of UBI to a local prospective Labour MP, who eventually did become MP, who had a strong history in economics ( you may be able to work out who)...He basically reacted with derision, if I wasn't fairly immune, I'd say tried to humiliate the idea rather than me. One question for you, I'd be interested in your opinion, , that being a pragmatist, I can't see how it could work....if the amount was pitched at just enough that the lowest paid did not actually have to work ( in the lowest paid , basic jobs), then how would those jobs actually get done....I don't think that some people would do them to ' top up the UBI"....Unfortunately perhaps we need an incentive to work.....( I'd be all for ' sharedlabour' and other kinder, gentler ways of treating each other...but being a pragmatist I think that we are a million miles away from that.....rendering it unrealistic) It's not so much to top up, it makes people work for the money they want, instead of keeping them in the perpetual cycle of needing to work whatever they are stuck in or die. You'd see a huge increase in people wanting to learn new things and/or taking time to look for other jobs instead of having to rush to the next available one to stay alive, and you'd get far more productive workers because they aren't exhausted/hungry/mentally ruined from working 3 jobs just to pay the bills. I do get the point you make, but I still think you'd have plenty of people working the lowest paid, basic jobs, because they are generally easier to get, and those who do work them would be far less likely to accept dreadful working conditions. They might actually get paid what they deserve instead of pittance! I'm just not sure that it would work in the way you think it would. I think many of my working class friends would simply see it as an opportunity not to work , already I know many people who have played the system all their lives. One benefit of it for me , and a saving, I'd hope that it would get rid of all the admin involved in assessments/ signng on...I'd like to think that the plethora of extra benefits etcwoukd be rendered unnecessary....but , as I say, I can't see it being introduced and I think that there are many jobs that would not be done.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 29, 2020 18:40:50 GMT
It's not so much to top up, it makes people work for the money they want, instead of keeping them in the perpetual cycle of needing to work whatever they are stuck in or die. You'd see a huge increase in people wanting to learn new things and/or taking time to look for other jobs instead of having to rush to the next available one to stay alive, and you'd get far more productive workers because they aren't exhausted/hungry/mentally ruined from working 3 jobs just to pay the bills. I do get the point you make, but I still think you'd have plenty of people working the lowest paid, basic jobs, because they are generally easier to get, and those who do work them would be far less likely to accept dreadful working conditions. They might actually get paid what they deserve instead of pittance! I'm just not sure that it would work in the way you think it would. I think many of my working class friends would simply see it as an opportunity not to work , already I know many people who have played the system all their lives. One benefit of it for me , and a saving, I'd hope that it would get rid of all the admin involved in assessments/ signng on...I'd like to think that the plethora of extra benefits etcwoukd be rendered unnecessary....but , as I say, I can't see it being introduced and I think that there are many jobs that would not be done. I dunno, even those who you think might not work would surely do so for nice things? If UBI simply covered cost of housing and food, then people would be working for holidays, for Christmas presents, for house purchases etc. That's a real incentive to better yourself, rather than the incentive many have at the minute, which is just to get enough to survive then do the exact same thing the next month ad infinitum. Without those worries I think the workforce would be a lot happier, productive, and willing to do extra.
|
|
|
Post by bigjohnritchie on Mar 29, 2020 18:42:59 GMT
I'm just not sure that it would work in the way you think it would. I think many of my working class friends would simply see it as an opportunity not to work , already I know many people who have played the system all their lives. One benefit of it for me , and a saving, I'd hope that it would get rid of all the admin involved in assessments/ signng on...I'd like to think that the plethora of extra benefits etcwoukd be rendered unnecessary....but , as I say, I can't see it being introduced and I think that there are many jobs that would not be done. I dunno, even those who you think might not work would surely do so for nice things? If UBI simply covered cost of housing and food, then people would be working for holidays, for Christmas presents, for house purchases etc. That's a real incentive to better yourself, rather than the incentive many have at the minute, which is just to get enough to survive then do the exact same thing the next month ad infinitum. Without those worries I think the workforce would be a lot happier, productive, and willing to do extra. I'd like to think that you are right
|
|
|
Post by The Drunken Communist on Mar 29, 2020 18:49:47 GMT
UBI has so many benefits for society that people don't even consider when talking about it. How many kids are dumped in play schools & such like 'cos both their parents are stuck at work every day? With UBI we can get back to one parent staying at home & bringing the kids up properly like we always used to, rather than the new trend of dumping them in play schools where only the kids who stamp their feet & scream the loudest get the attention. It's a huge reason for the bunch of entilted brats you see in the 18-25 age range right now. The same applies at the other end of the scale, no more dumping elderly relatives into care homes 'cos with UBI a family member can stay at home & look after them. It helps to keep families strong & rebuild communities like most of us were lucky enough to grow-up in before we were all forced to work ourselves into the ground & let 'others' care for our young/old.
|
|
|
Post by bigjohnritchie on Mar 29, 2020 18:56:31 GMT
UBI has so many benefits for society that people don't even consider when talking about it. How many kids are dumped in play schools & such like 'cos both their parents are stuck at work every day? With UBI we can get back to one parent staying at home & bringing the kids up properly like we always used to, rather than the new trend of dumping them in play schools where only the kids who stamp their feet & scream the loudest get the attention. It's a huge reason for the bunch of entilted brats you see in the 18-25 age range right now. The same applies at the other end of the scale, no more dumping elderly relatives into care homes 'cos with UBI a family member can stay at home & look after them. It helps to keep families strong & rebuild communities like most of us were lucky enough to grow-up in before we were all forced to work ourselves into the ground & let 'others' care for our young/old. As I said to Lil, I hope that you are right. The changes in the "normal economic thinking" in light of Coronavirus might result in a rethink....but it's hard to achieve any change.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 29, 2020 21:07:33 GMT
UBI has so many benefits for society that people don't even consider when talking about it. How many kids are dumped in play schools & such like 'cos both their parents are stuck at work every day? With UBI we can get back to one parent staying at home & bringing the kids up properly like we always used to, rather than the new trend of dumping them in play schools where only the kids who stamp their feet & scream the loudest get the attention. It's a huge reason for the bunch of entilted brats you see in the 18-25 age range right now. The same applies at the other end of the scale, no more dumping elderly relatives into care homes 'cos with UBI a family member can stay at home & look after them. It helps to keep families strong & rebuild communities like most of us were lucky enough to grow-up in before we were all forced to work ourselves into the ground & let 'others' care for our young/old. As I said to Lil, I hope that you are right. The changes in the "normal economic thinking" in light of Coronavirus might result in a rethink....but it's hard to achieve any change. That's my worry. To me this whole crisis has shown that we need to do things very differently when this is done. But I can imagine it'll be used as a 'this isn't the time to do something radical, lets get back to normal' type of push from politicians.
|
|