|
Post by Mr_DaftBurger on Dec 1, 2019 21:13:15 GMT
Can we deport anyone who believes in any religion? Can I go somewhere warm, but not ‘dry’ The Amazon rainforest sounds perfect!
|
|
|
Post by crapslinger on Dec 1, 2019 21:17:58 GMT
Can I go somewhere warm, but not ‘dry’ The Amazon rainforest sounds perfect! Most of it has been cut down.
|
|
|
Post by bathstoke on Dec 1, 2019 21:22:12 GMT
Can I go somewhere warm, but not ‘dry’ The Amazon rainforest sounds perfect! Do they have them👅🐸
|
|
|
Post by Mr_DaftBurger on Dec 1, 2019 21:42:54 GMT
The Amazon rainforest sounds perfect! Most of it has been cut down. He can go and plant some trees!
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 1, 2019 21:43:29 GMT
Can we deport anyone who believes in any religion? I’d deport myself if I could afford to 😁
|
|
|
Post by crapslinger on Dec 1, 2019 21:57:51 GMT
Can we deport anyone who believes in any religion? I’d deport myself if I could afford to 😁 If Corbibsky and his Marxist bro's get into power and stick to their WASPI pay out's manifesto pledge I will have the final piece for my jigsaw, they will won't they I am voting as a selfish bastard this time around Lanzarote here I come
|
|
|
Post by crapslinger on Dec 1, 2019 22:01:25 GMT
Most of it has been cut down. He can go and plant some trees! Maybe Jeremy will have a few over from the 2bn he has pledged to plant, he might need to give the old fucker a hand before he goes mind, that's a lot of fucking trees for a pensioner to set on his jack.
|
|
|
Post by followyoudown on Dec 1, 2019 22:23:43 GMT
Farage just now on ITV debate, no one who commits or attempts to commit terrorism acts should ever leave prison unless absolutely sure the "jihadi virus" in them is no more. Think most of us agree with that. Also mentioned there's still 74 convicted terrorists on the streets of Britain right now. He asked whether the rest of the panel were concerned and got complete silence. We need a hard fucking stance on this and pronto. Good job Jezza and Dianne will be taking the lead on this in two weeks time, our police will be carrying bb guns and peashooters. Diane you say....
|
|
|
Post by followyoudown on Dec 1, 2019 22:28:13 GMT
Farage just now on ITV debate, no one who commits or attempts to commit terrorism acts should ever leave prison unless absolutely sure the "jihadi virus" in them is no more. Think most of us agree with that. Also mentioned there's still 74 convicted terrorists on the streets of Britain right now. He asked whether the rest of the panel were concerned and got complete silence. We need a hard fucking stance on this and pronto. I watched a couple of minutes and saw it was the same as a few years back "Gang up on Farage" and had to turn off. They will say what they think is "safe" and popular. Not seen any of them but judging by this Richard had a stormer
|
|
|
Post by daisydog on Dec 2, 2019 4:01:38 GMT
Labour passed a law where it had to be proved that someone had in Farage's view had to have got rid of the extremist virus. The problem is that the probation service has been privatised and nobody gives a shit and leaves people to be re radicalised. Look at the evidence and stop doffing your cap to the Bullingdon boys.
|
|
|
Post by bathstoke on Dec 2, 2019 7:20:35 GMT
|
|
|
Post by mattador78 on Dec 2, 2019 8:48:22 GMT
True but the person who killed him stood against everything he believed in. Compassions, tolerance, equal rights, freedom of religion and countless more. I truly have admiration for the father to eloquently state his sons beliefs and and ask that his death not be treated as a propaganda tool for a election. However, election aside it should go to show that know matter how much forgiveness and belief a minority of people can show sometimes the mob should rule.
|
|
|
Post by raythesailor on Dec 2, 2019 8:54:06 GMT
Quite chilling to hear the now dead terrorist speaking on Radio Stoke with a local accent.
Since his release he was living in Stafford, probably at our expense.
|
|
|
Post by jeycov on Dec 2, 2019 8:58:12 GMT
True but the person who killed him stood against everything he believed in. Compassions, tolerance, equal rights, freedom of religion and countless more. I truly have admiration for the father to eloquently state his sons beliefs and and ask that his death not be treated as a propaganda tool for a election. However, election aside it should go to show that know matter how much forgiveness and belief a minority of people can show sometimes the mob should rule. Excellent response to this truly tragic event The system does need revisiting, and like many situations more time and resources needed here One man who rushed to help restrain the attacker was himself a murderer, out on supervision The parents of his victim understandably are not happy that he is no longer locked up Such a difficult dilemma
|
|
|
Post by wizzardofdribble on Dec 2, 2019 9:50:12 GMT
True but the person who killed him stood against everything he believed in. Compassions, tolerance, equal rights, freedom of religion and countless more. I truly have admiration for the father to eloquently state his sons beliefs and and ask that his death not be treated as a propaganda tool for a election. However, election aside it should go to show that know matter how much forgiveness and belief a minority of people can show sometimes the mob should rule. Excellent response to this truly tragic event The system does need revisiting, and like many situations more time and resources needed here One man who rushed to help restrain the attacker was himself a murderer, out on supervision The parents of his victim understandably are not happy that he is no longer locked up Such a difficult dilemma Especially given that the young woman whose throat this cunt slit had learning disabilities and a mental age of 12. What a pity the police didn't shoot this piece of fucking filth.
|
|
|
Post by bathstoke on Dec 2, 2019 11:17:44 GMT
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 2, 2019 11:36:34 GMT
I echo any sane persons sentiment on what should be done with these extremist scumbags who roam our streets heaping misery on people.
But we have to take a step back and reflect on our foreign policy, it has helped fan the flames of terrorism and quite frankly it's been an unmitigated disaster.
We have to change that, although the fact that the genie is already out of the bottle makes it so much more difficult.
What I find interesting though is that political commentators and politicians from all sides of the house are quick to ridicule Corbyn as someone who would somehow make us less secure, when the reality is if we'd have taken some of his advice over the years the streets, and our troops would me so much safer. They were on the wrong side of history most of the time, yet have the gall to criticise.
|
|
|
Post by crapslinger on Dec 2, 2019 11:56:37 GMT
Quite chilling to hear the now dead terrorist speaking on Radio Stoke with a local accent. Since his release he was living in Stafford, probably at our expense. They actually gave air time to this heathen creature, I see they have now arrested another scum bag from Stoke on terror related charges, why has the City become a breeding ground for these racist butchers, questions need to be asked and pretty blunt one's at that you are not telling me that the intentions of these terrorist scum bags were unknown in a close knit society within a community.
|
|
|
Post by serpico on Dec 2, 2019 12:05:23 GMT
I echo any sane persons sentiment on what should be done with these extremist scumbags who roam our streets heaping misery on people. But we have to take a step back and reflect on our foreign policy, it has helped fan the flames of terrorism and quite frankly it's been an unmitigated disaster. We have to change that, although the fact that the genie is already out of the bottle makes it so much more difficult. What I find interesting though is that political commentators and politicians from all sides of the house are quick to ridicule Corbyn as someone who would somehow make us less secure, when the reality is if we'd have taken some of his advice over the years the streets, and our troops would me so much safer. They were on the wrong side of history most of the time, yet have the gall to criticise. Unfortunately he does himself no favours by paling around with the likes of Hamas and co, any good points he makes about our foreign policy are lost, you can make the anti interventionist case without taking any side in any conflict. I agree with Corbyn on these wars, but he goes too far with it, I disagree with Israel’s policies towards the Palestinians but that doesn’t mean I have to support Hamas or think we should get involved in any way.
|
|
|
Post by trickydicky73 on Dec 2, 2019 12:26:49 GMT
Although I agree with Presser and Serpico on our disastrous foreign policy, I think we should be careful not to give these cunts any excuses.
We wouldn't do it with that loon in Norway or him in New Zealand, would we?
|
|
|
Post by crapslinger on Dec 2, 2019 12:43:21 GMT
Although I agree with Presser and Serpico on our disastrous foreign policy, I think we should be careful not to give these cunts any excuses. We wouldn't do it with that loon in Norway or him in New Zealand, would we? Haven't ISIS claimed responsibility for this atrocity, the same ISIS born from the Iraq II illegal war, Bliar and the Labour party at the time have blood on their hands.
|
|
|
Post by serpico on Dec 2, 2019 12:50:20 GMT
Although I agree with Presser and Serpico on our disastrous foreign policy, I think we should be careful not to give these cunts any excuses. We wouldn't do it with that loon in Norway or him in New Zealand, would we? I don’t think our foreign policy creates terrorists per-se, but it does help the already existing jihadi groups with their recruitment, had we just gone after bin laden after 9/11 the terror threat would have drastically dissipated, 9/11 was a last Hail Mary by bin laden to suck western armies into the Middle East, he knew that this would help galvanise a “vanguard” of Muslims, Iraq was the “hoped for but unexpected gift” to his organisation.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 2, 2019 12:58:14 GMT
I echo any sane persons sentiment on what should be done with these extremist scumbags who roam our streets heaping misery on people. But we have to take a step back and reflect on our foreign policy, it has helped fan the flames of terrorism and quite frankly it's been an unmitigated disaster. We have to change that, although the fact that the genie is already out of the bottle makes it so much more difficult. What I find interesting though is that political commentators and politicians from all sides of the house are quick to ridicule Corbyn as someone who would somehow make us less secure, when the reality is if we'd have taken some of his advice over the years the streets, and our troops would me so much safer. They were on the wrong side of history most of the time, yet have the gall to criticise. Unfortunately he does himself no favours by paling around with the likes of Hamas and co, any good points he makes about our foreign policy are lost, you can make the anti interventionist case without taking any side in any conflict. I agree with Corbyn on these wars, but he goes too far with it, I disagree with Israel’s policies towards the Palestinians but that doesn’t mean I have to support Hamas or think we should get involved in any way. They shouldn't be lost though. Take Libya for example, doesn't get as much press as Iraq as no troops have physically set foot on the ground, however it has been the biggest clusterfuck in the history of foreign policy. It is now a lawless society, the human trafficking capital of the world, run by several different versions of the same radical extremists heaping misery on the people who have been forced to remain. 13 MP's (13 FFS) voted against what many could see was going to happen: Allen, Mr Graham Baron, Mr John Campbell, Mr Ronnie Corbyn, Jeremy Durkan, Mark Gardiner, Barry Godsiff, Mr Roger Lucas, Caroline McDonnell, John Riordan, Mrs Linda Ritchie, Ms Margaret Skinner, Mr Dennis Wood, Mike Neo-liberal warmongers shouldn't dictate our foreign policy any longer.....
|
|
|
Post by trickydicky73 on Dec 2, 2019 13:01:42 GMT
Unfortunately he does himself no favours by paling around with the likes of Hamas and co, any good points he makes about our foreign policy are lost, you can make the anti interventionist case without taking any side in any conflict. I agree with Corbyn on these wars, but he goes too far with it, I disagree with Israel’s policies towards the Palestinians but that doesn’t mean I have to support Hamas or think we should get involved in any way. They shouldn't be lost though. Take Libya for example, doesn't get as much press as Iraq as no troops have physically set foot on the ground, however it has been the biggest clusterfuck in the history of foreign policy. It is now a lawless society, the human trafficking capital of the world, run by several different versions of the same radical extremists heaping misery on the people who have been forced to remain. 13 MP's (13 FFS) voted against what many could see was going to happen: Allen, Mr Graham Baron, Mr John Campbell, Mr Ronnie Corbyn, Jeremy Durkan, Mark Gardiner, Barry Godsiff, Mr Roger Lucas, Caroline McDonnell, John Riordan, Mrs Linda Ritchie, Ms Margaret Skinner, Mr Dennis Wood, Mike Neo-liberal warmongers shouldn't dictate our foreign policy any longer..... Thank goodness for Trump, then...
|
|
|
Post by salopstick on Dec 2, 2019 13:06:01 GMT
I echo any sane persons sentiment on what should be done with these extremist scumbags who roam our streets heaping misery on people. But we have to take a step back and reflect on our foreign policy, it has helped fan the flames of terrorism and quite frankly it's been an unmitigated disaster. We have to change that, although the fact that the genie is already out of the bottle makes it so much more difficult. What I find interesting though is that political commentators and politicians from all sides of the house are quick to ridicule Corbyn as someone who would somehow make us less secure, when the reality is if we'd have taken some of his advice over the years the streets, and our troops would me so much safer. They were on the wrong side of history most of the time, yet have the gall to criticise. As far as foreign policy goes trump is trying not to be the war monger his predecessors were.
|
|
|
Post by wagsastokie on Dec 2, 2019 13:17:14 GMT
I echo any sane persons sentiment on what should be done with these extremist scumbags who roam our streets heaping misery on people. But we have to take a step back and reflect on our foreign policy, it has helped fan the flames of terrorism and quite frankly it's been an unmitigated disaster. We have to change that, although the fact that the genie is already out of the bottle makes it so much more difficult. What I find interesting though is that political commentators and politicians from all sides of the house are quick to ridicule Corbyn as someone who would somehow make us less secure, when the reality is if we'd have taken some of his advice over the years the streets, and our troops would me so much safer. They were on the wrong side of history most of the time, yet have the gall to criticise. Is that the trump that has far less blood on his hands than his predecessor Obama Or does right wing blood count double or triple over blood spilt by the darling of the left
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 2, 2019 13:25:29 GMT
I echo any sane persons sentiment on what should be done with these extremist scumbags who roam our streets heaping misery on people. But we have to take a step back and reflect on our foreign policy, it has helped fan the flames of terrorism and quite frankly it's been an unmitigated disaster. We have to change that, although the fact that the genie is already out of the bottle makes it so much more difficult. What I find interesting though is that political commentators and politicians from all sides of the house are quick to ridicule Corbyn as someone who would somehow make us less secure, when the reality is if we'd have taken some of his advice over the years the streets, and our troops would me so much safer. They were on the wrong side of history most of the time, yet have the gall to criticise. Is that the trump that has far less blood on his hands than his predecessor Obama Or does right wing blood count double or triple over blood spilt by the darling of the left I make no apologies for Obama, he gets a free pass when he has blood on his hands over Libya and other interventions........
|
|
|
Post by wagsastokie on Dec 2, 2019 13:28:36 GMT
Is that the trump that has far less blood on his hands than his predecessor Obama Or does right wing blood count double or triple over blood spilt by the darling of the left I make no apologies for Obama, he gets a free pass when he has blood on his hands over Libya...... Him and good old hillary get far to many free passes One of the only good things about trump is his reluctance to play World policeman
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 2, 2019 13:35:12 GMT
I echo any sane persons sentiment on what should be done with these extremist scumbags who roam our streets heaping misery on people. But we have to take a step back and reflect on our foreign policy, it has helped fan the flames of terrorism and quite frankly it's been an unmitigated disaster. We have to change that, although the fact that the genie is already out of the bottle makes it so much more difficult. What I find interesting though is that political commentators and politicians from all sides of the house are quick to ridicule Corbyn as someone who would somehow make us less secure, when the reality is if we'd have taken some of his advice over the years the streets, and our troops would me so much safer. They were on the wrong side of history most of the time, yet have the gall to criticise. As far as foreign policy goes trump is trying not to be the war monger his predecessors were. I agree to a point, however until America (and Britain which I believe is where the Corbyn “coat tails” comment comes from) continues to shows hypocrisy over the Saudis riding roughshod over countries like Yemen whilst making billions from arms deals it can’t take any moral high ground......
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 2, 2019 13:36:08 GMT
A Better answer is to allow a full and robust debate about Islam, nothing off limits.
Now your details please .
All well and good but when are you planning the one for Judaism and Christianity?
|
|