|
Post by Deleted on Dec 1, 2019 16:13:56 GMT
This type of reporting does my head in. Nothing Corbyn says there is controversial - but the interviewer is trying to dress it up as him saying something newsworthy. It has nothing to do with informing the public. It is all about the journalist getting a few hits on social media. What Corbyn does “wrong” here is repeat a journalist's words. When she said “not necessarily” he should have said something like parole is a critical part of our justice system. It needs to applied correctly. In this case, it seems it wasn’t. That way he denies the journalist the opportunity to do some self-promotion at his expense. Well there is next weeks election battle Boris I will lock terrorists up for good Whilst a Labour government will let them on the streets to kill again Whilst neither are necessarily true I have a feeling the former will resonate better with the target voters You're right. Never underestimate the effect of saying 'I'll kill all the bad guys' to a group of people. Doesn't matter whether you are lying or whether that is morally right, you'll get a lot of voters by saying that.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 1, 2019 17:01:17 GMT
Perhaps you should be as angry about the Conservatives taking your tax payer money and giving in to private companies who don’t provide the healthcare services they are meant to? Or the probation services for that matter or social care or the private firms administrating universal credit. Oh the irony of giving someone money and them not spending it how you thought 👀
|
|
|
Post by thevoid on Dec 1, 2019 17:22:23 GMT
Perhaps you should be as angry about the Conservatives taking your tax payer money and giving in to private companies who don’t provide the healthcare services they are meant to? Or the probation services for that matter or social care or the private firms administrating universal credit. Oh the irony of giving someone money and them not spending it how you thought 👀 Well the Tories are evil apparently so this behaviour is to be expected. I thought these people were a force for good though?
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 1, 2019 17:25:44 GMT
Perhaps you should be as angry about the Conservatives taking your tax payer money and giving in to private companies who don’t provide the healthcare services they are meant to? Or the probation services for that matter or social care or the private firms administrating universal credit. Oh the irony of giving someone money and them not spending it how you thought 👀 Well the Tories are evil apparently so this behaviour is to be expected. I thought these people were a force for good though? You’ll get some lying dickheads wherever but I’d rather not have them in charge of the country’s purse strings...
|
|
|
Post by partickpotter on Dec 2, 2019 7:44:18 GMT
Well the Tories are evil apparently so this behaviour is to be expected. I thought these people were a force for good though? You’ll get some lying dickheads wherever but I’d rather not have them in charge of the country’s purse strings... So you’ll not be voting for Labour in this GE.
|
|
|
Post by rogerjonesisgod on Dec 2, 2019 9:20:35 GMT
Has he laid a wreath yet? This type of reporting does my head in. Nothing Corbyn says there is controversial - but the interviewer is trying to dress it up as him saying something newsworthy. It has nothing to do with informing the public. It is all about the journalist getting a few hits on social media. What Corbyn does “wrong” here is repeat a journalist's words. When she said “not necessarily” he should have said something like parole is a critical part of our justice system. It needs to applied correctly. In this case, it seems it wasn’t. That way he denies the journalist the opportunity to do some self-promotion at his expense. But he couldn't because Khan was sentenced under Labour laws created in 2008 that made release halfway through his sentence automatic and took that decision out of the remit of the parole board. Boris' "do or die" pledge was him just repeating what Lewis Goodall said. He should have said "well hang on Lewis, let's not go too far" but he didn't and is hammered daily for it.
|
|
|
Post by thevoid on Dec 2, 2019 10:21:09 GMT
Well the Tories are evil apparently so this behaviour is to be expected. I thought these people were a force for good though? You’ll get some lying dickheads wherever but I’d rather not have them in charge of the country’s purse strings... Not sure what that has to do with my original post but hey ho
|
|
|
Post by rogerjonesisgod on Dec 3, 2019 1:31:46 GMT
Ian Lavery personally took £165,000 out of a Miners pension fund. This is just a piss take. Labour did nothing, zero, zilch and nada about Orgreave when they were un power for 13 years.
|
|
|
Post by partickpotter on Dec 3, 2019 7:27:41 GMT
Ian Lavery personally took £165,000 out of a Miners pension fund. This is just a piss take. Labour did nothing, zero, zilch and nada about Orgreave when they were un power for 13 years. It’s another Labour Hail Mary. Another branch on that magic money tree. Another trade union leader taking the piss out of his own union by pocketing huge sums of money for himself from the Union’s own funds. But, it’s a very well made video and could work in persuading some traditional Labour voters in the North who are thinking of voting Tory to think again.
|
|
|
Post by trickydicky73 on Dec 3, 2019 8:35:26 GMT
Ian Lavery personally took £165,000 out of a Miners pension fund. This is just a piss take. Labour did nothing, zero, zilch and nada about Orgreave when they were un power for 13 years. It’s another Labour Hail Mary. Another branch on that magic money tree. Another trade union leader taking the piss out of his own union by pocketing huge sums of money for himself from the Union’s own funds. But, it’s a very well made video and could work in persuading some traditional Labour voters in the North who are thinking of voting Tory to think again. You won't be saying that when the bert comes in.
|
|
|
Post by trickydicky73 on Dec 3, 2019 13:18:01 GMT
Ian Lavery personally took £165,000 out of a Miners pension fund. This is just a piss take. Labour did nothing, zero, zilch and nada about Orgreave when they were un power for 13 years. It’s another Labour Hail Mary. Another branch on that magic money tree. Another trade union leader taking the piss out of his own union by pocketing huge sums of money for himself from the Union’s own funds. But, it’s a very well made video and could work in persuading some traditional Labour voters in the North who are thinking of voting Tory to think again. Now that their vote is deemed worth a shit. As predicted.
|
|
|
Post by rogerjonesisgod on Dec 3, 2019 14:58:21 GMT
Why is Corbo apologising for something that a) Chakrabarti got a peerage for sorting out and b) Momo and Prestwich tells us is only a 'smear'?
|
|
|
Post by rogerjonesisgod on Dec 3, 2019 15:06:01 GMT
"I've dealt with it" - Jeremy Corbyn on anti-semitism in the Labour Party, 3rd December 2919.
|
|
|
Post by Eggybread on Dec 3, 2019 15:07:31 GMT
Why is Corbo apologising for something that a) Chakrabarti got a peerage for sorting out and b) Momo and Prestwich tells us is only a 'smear'? "First time during the election" How much more apology do they need.
|
|
|
Post by rogerjonesisgod on Dec 3, 2019 19:32:32 GMT
Why is Corbo apologising for something that a) Chakrabarti got a peerage for sorting out and b) Momo and Prestwich tells us is only a 'smear'? "First time during the election" How much more apology do they need. Maybe until the 130 pending cases have been sorted and the EHRC have concluded their investigation.
|
|
|
Post by rogerjonesisgod on Dec 3, 2019 19:45:15 GMT
Prick.
|
|
|
Post by salopstick on Dec 3, 2019 19:53:42 GMT
That cunt is so privileged. Private education an embassy job etc When is it in front page of the mirror
|
|
|
Post by mrcoke on Dec 3, 2019 20:50:37 GMT
Ian Lavery personally took £165,000 out of a Miners pension fund. This is just a piss take. Labour did nothing, zero, zilch and nada about Orgreave when they were un power for 13 years. When Gordon Brown was Chancellor he raised the pension funds by taxing pension investment dividends that were re-invested in the pension fund. Previously re-invested funds in a pension scheme were tax free, which helped the fund to grow faster to maximise the value of the pension scheme. This act effectively destroyed final salary pension schemes as they could not grow fast enough to be viable. The present Labour proposals to increase taxation will effectively make pensions schemes hardly worth while investing in and pension schemes will have little more value than state pensions, despite workers and employers investing in them. Incidentally the biggest thief of all time from pensions was the Labour magnate Robert Maxwell.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 3, 2019 20:56:40 GMT
Why is Corbo apologising for something that a) Chakrabarti got a peerage for sorting out and b) Momo and Prestwich tells us is only a 'smear'? He’s apologising for the extremely small minority of Labour members who have indulged in antisemitism, as well as being slow to get to grips with the parties internal mechanisms. As he has had done several times previously and is happy to do so again it seems. He should also apologise on behalf of Jenni Formby’s predecessor Ian McNicol who sat on investigations of antisemitism in the party, then had the audacity to blame Corbyn and Formby for not tackling things quickly enough. Not difficult to comprehend really roger
|
|
|
Post by algor on Dec 3, 2019 21:01:33 GMT
Why is Corbo apologising for something that a) Chakrabarti got a peerage for sorting out and b) Momo and Prestwich tells us is only a 'smear'? "First time during the election" How much more apology do they need. Every fucking day until no Jew feels the need to escape the country if he becomes the Prime Minister!
|
|
|
Post by algor on Dec 3, 2019 21:10:05 GMT
Why is Corbo apologising for something that a) Chakrabarti got a peerage for sorting out and b) Momo and Prestwich tells us is only a 'smear'? He’s apologising for the extremely small minority of Labour members who have indulged in antisemitism, as well as being slow to get to grips with the parties internal mechanisms. As he has had done several times previously and is happy to do so again it seems. He should also apologise on behalf of Jenni Formby’s predecessor Ian McNicol who sat on investigations of antisemitism in the party, then had the audacity to blame Corbyn and Formby for not tackling things quickly enough. Not difficult to comprehend really roger Your Labour anti-Semitism denial is not difficult to comprehend Prestwhich, Disgusting!
|
|
|
Post by thevoid on Dec 3, 2019 21:42:18 GMT
How many Jewish MPs have been promoted to positions of influence under JC?
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 3, 2019 21:46:18 GMT
He’s apologising for the extremely small minority of Labour members who have indulged in antisemitism, as well as being slow to get to grips with the parties internal mechanisms. As he has had done several times previously and is happy to do so again it seems. He should also apologise on behalf of Jenni Formby’s predecessor Ian McNicol who sat on investigations of antisemitism in the party, then had the audacity to blame Corbyn and Formby for not tackling things quickly enough. Not difficult to comprehend really roger Your Labour anti-Semitism denial is not difficult to comprehend Prestwhich, Disgusting! I’m not denying it at all. It’s there in approximately 0.06% of cases and needs to be stamped out. Antisemitism is abhorrent. It’s vile. It’s a cancer in our society.....
|
|
|
Post by salopstick on Dec 3, 2019 21:49:12 GMT
Tonight dianne abbot has tried the legal route to stop the telegraph printing the story
|
|
|
Post by PotterLog on Dec 3, 2019 22:01:01 GMT
Your Labour anti-Semitism denial is not difficult to comprehend Prestwhich, Disgusting! I’m not denying it at all. It’s there in approximately 0.06% of cases and needs to be stamped out. Antisemitism is abhorrent. It’s vile. It’s a cancer in our society..... Quoting that risible percentage figure is a form of denial
|
|
|
Post by rogerjonesisgod on Dec 3, 2019 22:01:29 GMT
Why is Corbo apologising for something that a) Chakrabarti got a peerage for sorting out and b) Momo and Prestwich tells us is only a 'smear'? He’s apologising for the extremely small minority of Labour members who have indulged in antisemitism, as well as being slow to get to grips with the parties internal mechanisms. As he has had done several times previously and is happy to do so again it seems. He should also apologise on behalf of Jenni Formby’s predecessor Ian McNicol who sat on investigations of antisemitism in the party, then had the audacity to blame Corbyn and Formby for not tackling things quickly enough. Not difficult to comprehend really roger 130 pending cases.
|
|
|
Post by trickydicky73 on Dec 3, 2019 22:16:43 GMT
That cunt is so privileged. Private education an embassy job etc When is it in front page of the mirror Thank fuck she went to the wall for him.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 3, 2019 22:28:09 GMT
I’m not denying it at all. It’s there in approximately 0.06% of cases and needs to be stamped out. Antisemitism is abhorrent. It’s vile. It’s a cancer in our society..... Quoting that risible percentage figure is a form of denial You got any facts to go with that statement? I’m denying nothing.....
|
|
|
Post by followyoudown on Dec 3, 2019 22:36:46 GMT
I’m not denying it at all. It’s there in approximately 0.06% of cases and needs to be stamped out. Antisemitism is abhorrent. It’s vile. It’s a cancer in our society..... Quoting that risible percentage figure is a form of denial Indeed considering there are 650 MP's that would mean 4 now its probably closer to 4 Labour prospective MP's not having made an anti semitic than it is to being only 4.
|
|
|
Post by PotterLog on Dec 3, 2019 23:54:34 GMT
Quoting that risible percentage figure is a form of denial You got any facts to go with that statement? I’m denying nothing..... The party is currently under investigation for institutional racism, 87% of British Jews think Corbyn is antisemitic and there is a great avalanche of evidence of antisemitism in the party from local meetings, social media, and activists and party officials. Blithely trotting out “oh yes there is a problem with 0.06% of the party” because someone sat down and span a few numbers of official investigations versus total membership is absolutely denying the critical, era-defining institutional problem the party is plagued with.
|
|