|
Post by Deleted on Mar 14, 2018 14:48:29 GMT
He got one season didn't he? with the owners already determined to get rid and change guard. He really didn't do badly, signed Robinho who was class, and i believe signed Kompany too, the best servant that club has ever had. He was fucking incredible for us for 3 years, turned us from a shitty, rotting, stale club who were on a downward spiral, into a club that genuinely had realistic aspirations of top 7 finishes. He well and truly fucked it right up but there's obviously a good manager there. Maybe i am still bitter about what he's dpne to our club It's an absolute disgrace, for that defence we have to have conceded the amount they have is absolutely a joke. But he's not the worst manager ever, he just completely shat his pants 24 months ago.
|
|
|
Post by RAF on Mar 14, 2018 15:03:36 GMT
All the twattings we took, we never once had the same defence.
0-4 Chelsea , Johnson, BMI, Pieters 7-2 Man City , Edwards, Zouma, Wimmer, Pieters 0-3 Liverpool, Zouma, Shawcross, BMI 5-1 Spurs , Zouma, Shawcross, Wimmer 0-3 West Ham, Cameron, Shawcross, Wimmer,Pieters 5-0 Chelsea , Edwards,Wimmer,Shawcross, Tymon 3-0 Man Utd, Bauer, Zouma,BMI, Tymon
Fucking basketcase mental. How the fuck can you get any semblance of stability with that?
H
|
|
|
Post by thegift on Mar 14, 2018 15:07:43 GMT
All the twattings we took, we never once had the same defence. 0-4 Chelsea , Johnson, BMI, Pieters 7-2 Man City , Edwards, Zouma, Wimmer, Pieters 0-3 Liverpool, Zouma, Shawcross, BMI 5-1 Spurs , Zouma, Shawcross, Wimmer 0-3 West Ham, Cameron, Shawcross, Wimmer,Pieters 5-0 Chelsea , Edwards,Wimmer,Shawcross, Tymon 3-0 Man Utd, Bauer, Zouma,BMI, Tymon Fucking basketcase mental. How the fuck can you get any semblance of stability with that? H How long did it take you to find that out lol
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 14, 2018 15:08:41 GMT
All the twattings we took, we never once had the same defence. 0-4 Chelsea , Johnson, BMI, Pieters 7-2 Man City , Edwards, Zouma, Wimmer, Pieters 0-3 Liverpool, Zouma, Shawcross, BMI 5-1 Spurs , Zouma, Shawcross, Wimmer 0-3 West Ham, Cameron, Shawcross, Wimmer,Pieters 5-0 Chelsea , Edwards,Wimmer,Shawcross, Tymon 3-0 Man Utd, Bauer, Zouma,BMI, Tymon Fucking basketcase mental. How the fuck can you get any semblance of stability with that? H Pressed dislike by the way because I totally agree with you, but I don't like what I am reading....A sort of double negative if you like...
|
|
|
Post by RAF on Mar 14, 2018 15:13:30 GMT
All the twattings we took, we never once had the same defence. 0-4 Chelsea , Johnson, BMI, Pieters 7-2 Man City , Edwards, Zouma, Wimmer, Pieters 0-3 Liverpool, Zouma, Shawcross, BMI 5-1 Spurs , Zouma, Shawcross, Wimmer 0-3 West Ham, Cameron, Shawcross, Wimmer,Pieters 5-0 Chelsea , Edwards,Wimmer,Shawcross, Tymon 3-0 Man Utd, Bauer, Zouma,BMI, Tymon Fucking basketcase mental. How the fuck can you get any semblance of stability with that? H How long did it take you to find that out lol The stats or that it was basketcase mental? H
|
|
|
Post by thegift on Mar 14, 2018 15:14:40 GMT
How long did it take you to find that out lol The stats or that it was basketcase mental? H The stats for sure.
|
|
|
Post by RAF on Mar 14, 2018 15:38:35 GMT
The stats or that it was basketcase mental? H The stats for sure. Two minutes from my Stoke City F.C spotters handbook. H
|
|
|
Post by thegift on Mar 14, 2018 15:47:55 GMT
Seems like the general feeling on the Saints message board is that they really don't want Hughes.
|
|
|
Post by pez75 on Mar 14, 2018 15:54:27 GMT
Seems like the general feeling on the Saints message board is that they really don't want Hughes. Is that because you have created several alter-egos on that mb as well?
|
|
|
Post by thegift on Mar 14, 2018 15:57:51 GMT
Seems like the general feeling on the Saints message board is that they really don't want Hughes. Is that because you have created several alter-egos on that mb as well? Being brutally honest, i did try to sign up to their forum but it said you cant use a 'free email' like hotmail or outlook you have to use a work or college or an official ISP one. So sacked it off. Weird.
|
|
|
Post by davejohnno1 on Mar 14, 2018 16:01:51 GMT
Weren't you the one saying that WBA relegation was due to Pardew? Redknapp had longer than Pardew to save QPR and failed dismally. Hughes was sacked after 12 games. Redknapp had well over half a season to save them. If we go down, Lambert will have to take a huge slice of the responsibility. He too, had plenty of time to save us, our position when he joined wasn't perilous given we'd only just slipped into the bottom 3, he had good players returning from injury and 3 new players to rely on. If Lambert was even half decent, he'd have saved our skin easily. He isn't and he is going to take us down ably assisted and abetted by Mark Hughes and our transfer team. The damage was down by hughes at stoke, no striker to score goals and we are doomed. He had 4 years to sort this and thought the answer was Berahino who, when signed, hadn't score in a year, massively unfit and failed a drugs test, yet Hughes chased him for 2 seasons and finally decided he was the man at 15 million pounds. WBA relegation is down to Pardew. Pulis didn't leave them 7 points a drift at the bottom of the table, they also had strikers to score them goals. Did Pulis go abroad with them and rob a taxi at the expense of ashaming the club? 7 points adrift? You sure about that? If they had strikers to score them goals, how come they were relegated easily with Redknapp at the helm? They didn't even get close to staying up. Surely with players to score goals, that should have been easily achievable considering Hughes was sacked after 12 games (12 GAMES) of that season. Do you know that Hughes chased Berahino? Do you know that it was him driving the signature of that particular player? We have a transfer team of which Hughes was a part of. He has paid the price for poor transfers with his job. Hopefully 2 other members of the same transfer team will soon follow suit. You are full of shit and you contradict yourself with practically every post you make.
|
|
|
Post by davejohnno1 on Mar 14, 2018 16:03:21 GMT
Maybe i am still bitter about what he's dpne to our club It's an absolute disgrace, for that defence we have to have conceded the amount they have is absolutely a joke. But he's not the worst manager ever, he just completely shat his pants 24 months ago. He didn't have the luxury of fielding the good defence we have though did he? How many times was BMI available for as an example? How many times did we take to the pitch with a back 4 of Bauer, Shawcross, Zouma, Pieters whilst Hughes was here this season?
|
|
|
Post by thegift on Mar 14, 2018 16:10:08 GMT
davejohnno1 Hughes was chasing him for 2 seasons, that's a fact that was known across this message board as he tried him one season and the next season following it. November 2017 - The month when pulis was sacked - So in answer to your question - Yes i am sure they were not 7 points adrift when pulis got sacked 14. Newcastle United 14 (-6) 15. Stoke City 13 (-10) 16. Everton 12 (-15) 17. West Bromwich Albion 11 (-9) 18. West Ham United 10 (-14) 19. Swansea City 9 (-8) 20. Crystal Palace 8 (-17)
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 14, 2018 16:16:19 GMT
Mark Hughes should never have been sacked. Yes I admit we were on a bit of a slump but the man as never been relegated. He would have turned things around. If only! Looking at his overall record Mark Hughes was clever in that he knew how to change a game that was drifting away and all the players respected him. If he was still here Ireland for one would be back in the side who was outstanding against Man U. Ramadan would be out on the wing giving 100%. Not like chopped no show lazy boy!
I wish him well at the Santa and he will keep them up.
😔😔
|
|
|
Post by thegift on Mar 14, 2018 16:18:38 GMT
Mark Hughes should never have been sacked. 😔😔 Get a grip you moron
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 14, 2018 16:21:24 GMT
Mark Hughes should never have been sacked. 😔😔 Get a grip you moron Somebody as come home from school and is watching Cars the movie! You Moron! 😂
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 14, 2018 16:25:00 GMT
It's an absolute disgrace, for that defence we have to have conceded the amount they have is absolutely a joke. But he's not the worst manager ever, he just completely shat his pants 24 months ago. He didn't have the luxury of fielding the good defence we have though did he? How many times was BMI available for as an example? How many times did we take to the pitch with a back 4 of Bauer, Shawcross, Zouma, Pieters whilst Hughes was here this season? He had Edwards, who is a good level, and a defence of Shawcross and Zouma available almost every week. To go from conceding more than 2 a game to conceding under 1 a game instantaneously is not just down to two players.
|
|
|
Post by thegift on Mar 14, 2018 16:28:39 GMT
Somebody as come home from school and is watching Cars the movie! You Moron! 😂 Win Percentage % Mark Hughes 33.16% Tony Pulis (Second spell) 36.64% Johan Boskamp 35.29% Tony Pulis 2002 2005 (first spell) 35.88% Steve Cotterill 23.08% So on both occasions, in the last 16 years, Tony Pulis, on both spells has had the highest win percentage the clubs ever seen.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 14, 2018 16:33:51 GMT
Somebody as come home from school and is watching Cars the movie! You Moron! 😂 Win Percentage % Mark Hughes 33.16% Tony Pulis (Second spell) 36.64% Johan Boskamp 35.29% Tony Pulis 2002 2005 (first spell) 35.88% Steve Cotterill 23.08% So on both occasions, in the last 16 years, Tony Pulis, on both spells has had the highest win percentage the clubs ever seen. Both spells included championship football and if I remember rightly both included promotion pushes.
|
|
|
Post by potterblade on Mar 14, 2018 16:36:30 GMT
Somebody as come home from school and is watching Cars the movie! You Moron! 😂 Win Percentage % Mark Hughes 33.16% Tony Pulis (Second spell) 36.64% Johan Boskamp 35.29% Tony Pulis 2002 2005 (first spell) 35.88% Steve Cotterill 23.08% So on both occasions, in the last 16 years, Tony Pulis, on both spells has had the highest win percentage the clubs ever seen. Nip and tuck with Boskamp though what's he up to these days?
|
|
|
Post by Pugsley on Mar 14, 2018 16:36:41 GMT
Win Percentage % Mark Hughes 33.16% Tony Pulis (Second spell) 36.64% Johan Boskamp 35.29% Tony Pulis 2002 2005 (first spell) 35.88% Steve Cotterill 23.08% So on both occasions, in the last 16 years, Tony Pulis, on both spells has had the highest win percentage the clubs ever seen. Both spells included championship football and if I remember rightly both included promotion pushes. Pointless discussing anything with this fool mate, he's as thick as 2 short planks.
|
|
|
Post by thegift on Mar 14, 2018 16:37:54 GMT
Win Percentage % Mark Hughes 33.16% Tony Pulis (Second spell) 36.64% Johan Boskamp 35.29% Tony Pulis 2002 2005 (first spell) 35.88% Steve Cotterill 23.08% So on both occasions, in the last 16 years, Tony Pulis, on both spells has had the highest win percentage the clubs ever seen. Both spells included championship football and if I remember rightly both included promotion pushes. Which, ironically, given the little funds we have, is 10x more difficult than being chucked millions and blowing it on shithouses.
|
|
|
Post by ohbottom on Mar 14, 2018 16:52:32 GMT
Somebody as come home from school and is watching Cars the movie! You Moron! 😂 Win Percentage % Mark Hughes 33.16% Tony Pulis (Second spell) 36.64% Johan Boskamp 35.29% Tony Pulis 2002 2005 (first spell) 35.88% Steve Cotterill 23.08% So on both occasions, in the last 16 years, Tony Pulis, on both spells has had the highest win percentage the clubs ever seen. Hang on a sec, TP's win % in the PL with us was just under 30%, so not as good as Hughes then And don't forget that we had one of the highest net spends on transfers of any club in the PL in those early years.
|
|
|
Post by davejohnno1 on Mar 14, 2018 17:04:54 GMT
davejohnno1 Hughes was chasing him for 2 seasons, that's a fact that was known across this message board as he tried him one season and the next season following it. November 2017 - The month when pulis was sacked - So in answer to your question - Yes i am sure they were not 7 points adrift when pulis got sacked 14. Newcastle United 14 (-6) 15. Stoke City 13 (-10) 16. Everton 12 (-15) 17. West Bromwich Albion 11 (-9) 18. West Ham United 10 (-14) 19. Swansea City 9 (-8) 20. Crystal Palace 8 (-17) I wasn't on about West Brom being 7 points adrift as you well know. It does, however, seem unlikely that QPR were 7 points adrift (which is where you said Hughes left them) given than he was sacked 12 games into the season. Palace were barely 7 points adrift of safety earlier this season and they'd lost their opening 7 games without scoring a goal. Just because we were linked with Berahino for 2 transfer windows doesn't necessarily mean that it was the manager that had the hard on for him. He is/was part of a transfer team. Shit though that signing was, and that of Wimmer and Imbula, the transfer team consists of more than the manager. If one man should take the rap for that, so should the other 2. I stand by the earlier comment...You are full of shit. EDIT - When Hughes was sacked, QPR were 5 points adrift of safety having only played 12 games.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 14, 2018 17:06:28 GMT
Somebody as come home from school and is watching Cars the movie! You Moron! 😂 Probably best to know the difference between as and has before calling someone a moron 😉
|
|
|
Post by thegift on Mar 14, 2018 17:12:06 GMT
davejohnno1 Hughes was chasing him for 2 seasons, that's a fact that was known across this message board as he tried him one season and the next season following it. November 2017 - The month when pulis was sacked - So in answer to your question - Yes i am sure they were not 7 points adrift when pulis got sacked 14. Newcastle United 14 (-6) 15. Stoke City 13 (-10) 16. Everton 12 (-15) 17. West Bromwich Albion 11 (-9) 18. West Ham United 10 (-14) 19. Swansea City 9 (-8) 20. Crystal Palace 8 (-17) I wasn't on about West Brom being 7 points adrift as you well know. It does, however, seem unlikely that QPR were 7 points adrift (which is where you said Hughes left them) given than he was sacked 12 games into the season. Palace were barely 7 points adrift of safety earlier this season and they'd lost their opening 7 games without scoring a goal. Just because we were linked with Berahino for 2 transfer windows doesn't necessarily mean that it was the manager that had the hard on for him. He is/was part of a transfer team. Shit though that signing was, and that of Wimmer and Imbula, the transfer team consists of more than the manager. If one man should take the rap for that, so should the other 2. I stand by the earlier comment...You are full of shit. I was on about Tony Pulis, at west brom, and that when he got sacked he did not leave west brom 7 points adrift of the relegation zone.... nothing to do with QPR... pretty sure you have mid read that. I didn't say Hughes is at fault 100% - but what i am saying is that he MUST take most of the flack.
|
|
|
Post by davejohnno1 on Mar 14, 2018 18:12:04 GMT
Sky sports has just had us in 16th when Hughes was sacked and 19th now.
Some improvement Lambert has made.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 14, 2018 18:36:30 GMT
Sky sports has just had us in 16th when Hughes was sacked and 19th now. Some improvement Lambert has made. We're 1000x better. Had he been in for longer we wouldn't be as low as we are. He's not perfect but if you can't see the improvement i'd suggest you clean your glasses.
|
|
|
Post by robstokie on Mar 14, 2018 18:36:43 GMT
Sky sports has just had us in 16th when Hughes was sacked and 19th now. Some improvement Lambert has made. we were 18th - two teams below us won the day after the Newcastle game - which was Sparkys last.
|
|
|
Post by trickydicky73 on Mar 14, 2018 18:41:54 GMT
Sky sports has just had us in 16th when Hughes was sacked and 19th now. Some improvement Lambert has made. We're 1000x better. Had he been in for longer we wouldn't be as low as we are. He's not perfect but if you can't see the improvement i'd suggest you clean your glasses. Don't you miss those regular twattings?
|
|