|
Post by thegift on Dec 1, 2017 0:19:47 GMT
Mignolet should have walked. Atkinson is a twat. Does anybody honestly believe it would have made a scrap of difference tithe result if he's have been sent off? I don't. Yes. Wouldn't of made a difference at all. Hughes would of stuck with 3 at the back even if they had 10 men and we would still be getting over run. We were absolutely embarrassing.
|
|
|
Post by Scrotnig on Dec 1, 2017 0:21:47 GMT
Yes we could have got tonked 2-0 instead of 3-0, in fact knowing us it'd have been 4-0.
Let's not let crap excuses hide the truth. We were utter, utter shite.
They could have had every player sent off and we'd still have lost.
|
|
|
Post by stokebloke on Dec 1, 2017 8:22:55 GMT
Not only 1-1 but down to 10 men aswell. This season just gets better and better doesn't it!? Hang on - where'd you get this 1-1 from? If he didn't foul him it would of been a goal.
|
|
|
Post by stokienorthants on Dec 1, 2017 9:47:56 GMT
Hang on - where'd you get this 1-1 from? If he didn't foul him it would of been a goal. If he hadn’t fouled him he could not have been sent off.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 1, 2017 9:59:46 GMT
Whether it would have made a difference or not is irrelevant. He should have been sent off!
|
|
|
Post by ohbottom on Dec 1, 2017 12:15:49 GMT
Hang on - where'd you get this 1-1 from? If he didn't foul him it would of been a goal. But if he didn't foul him there'd be no question of a red card so they wouldn't be down to 10 men!!!
|
|
|
Post by ohbottom on Dec 1, 2017 12:16:29 GMT
Whether it would have made a difference or not is irrelevant. He should have been sent off! Of course he should, cheating qunt!
|
|
|
Post by ohbottom on Dec 1, 2017 12:22:30 GMT
Wouldn't of made a difference at all. Hughes would of stuck with 3 at the back even if they had 10 men and we would still be getting over run. We were absolutely embarrassing. Except he'd already switched to a back 4 by then, and we looked much better for it. We were indeed utterly dreadful for the first 20-odd minutes, but after he changed it we were highly unfortunate to go in at HT a goal down.
|
|
|
Post by rawli on Dec 1, 2017 12:25:18 GMT
Mignolet should have walked. Atkinson is a twat. Does anybody honestly believe it would have made a scrap of difference tithe result if he's have been sent off? I don't. I do. 10 men and Stoke with their tails up would have been a different proposition.
|
|
|
Post by skip on Dec 1, 2017 12:51:11 GMT
Mignolet wasn't the only one. How many cynical fouls did Liverpool defenders and midfielders commit in the second half? There were at least three or four other yellows. Apart from the obvious difference in technique between the two sides, Liverpool played like a right bunch of Sunday League stoppers. Dirty bastards.
|
|
|
Post by lordb on Dec 1, 2017 13:53:40 GMT
Wouldn't of made a difference at all. Hughes would of stuck with 3 at the back even if they had 10 men and we would still be getting over run. We were absolutely embarrassing. we had already gone to 4 at the back before that point did you watch the game?
|
|
|
Post by redstriper on Dec 1, 2017 14:00:05 GMT
Yes we could have got tonked 2-0 instead of 3-0, in fact knowing us it'd have been 4-0. Let's not let crap excuses hide the truth. We were utter, utter shite. They could have had every player sent off and we'd still have lost. Drama Queen is exactly what you are.
|
|
|
Post by thebet365 on Dec 1, 2017 14:04:49 GMT
Yes we could have got tonked 2-0 instead of 3-0, in fact knowing us it'd have been 4-0. Let's not let crap excuses hide the truth. We were utter, utter shite. They could have had every player sent off and we'd still have lost. We weren't utter utter shite once we'd changed formation, no-one knows how it would have turned out if he'd of been sent off. 1 Thing I do believe though is that Salah wouldn't have come on if they where pushed back defending their lead with only 10 men.
|
|
|
Post by thegift on Dec 1, 2017 14:07:42 GMT
Wouldn't of made a difference at all. Hughes would of stuck with 3 at the back even if they had 10 men and we would still be getting over run. We were absolutely embarrassing. we had already gone to 4 at the back before that point did you watch the game? Tbh i thought we changed just after the incident. I stand corrected.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 1, 2017 16:50:36 GMT
Mignolet should have walked. Atkinson is a twat. Does anybody honestly believe it would have made a scrap of difference tithe result if he's have been sent off? I don't. I do. 10 men and Stoke with their tails up would have been a different proposition. We are the worst team I've ever seen play against ten men. We have no width, we don't keep the ball well and stretch teams, we have zero creativity other than Shaqiri and how often do you see us getting around the back of defences? Liverpool would have sat on a 1-0 lead and hit us on the counter. All hypothetical of course but I really don't think it would have made a scrap of difference to the end result.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 2, 2017 0:04:50 GMT
Irrespective of what the result would have been, HE SHOULD HAVE BEEN SENT OFF!
|
|
|
Post by Bagwash on Dec 2, 2017 1:28:06 GMT
Irrespective of what the result would have been, HE SHOULD HAVE BEEN SENT OFF! I suppose it has been mentioned but you know for a fact that Grant,in an exact similar situation would have walked. Most other sports,although not as rich as football employ video technology.The reason football doesn't is because it would create a leveller playing field. The Premier League is corrupt,always bending over for the elite few(we all know who they are)and the sooner they piss off and join a European super league the better.At the very least it would be competitive.
|
|