|
Post by crouchpotato1 on Nov 20, 2017 22:20:24 GMT
Is he on some kind of bonus if he doesn’t use them? One again tonight and in truth one that killed our attacking threat.If you’re bringing Crouch on the last player you take off is Shaqiri FFS. Yes he was doing his usual 2nd half prancing around(and as for his free kick😡) but he’s the man to supply the crosses🙄
|
|
|
Post by Pugsley on Nov 20, 2017 22:21:17 GMT
Is he on some kind of bonus if he doesn’t use them? One again tonight and in truth one that killed our attacking threat.If you’re bringing Crouch on the last player you take off is Shaqiri FFS. Yes he was doing his usual 2nd half prancing around(and as for his free kick😡) but he’s the man to supply the crosses🙄 Clampdown from the owner and CEO on appearance money.
|
|
|
Post by boskampsflaps on Nov 20, 2017 22:22:04 GMT
Its the worst part of his management, he doesn't have a clue.
|
|
|
Post by s7oke on Nov 20, 2017 22:22:20 GMT
I dont know but when he does make them i find myself wishing that he hadn't usually............................
|
|
|
Post by s7oke on Nov 20, 2017 22:23:06 GMT
Its the worst part of his management, he doesn't have a clue. Don't forget Zonal marking.........................
|
|
|
Post by jwhpotter on Nov 20, 2017 22:29:40 GMT
Is he on some kind of bonus if he doesn’t use them? One again tonight and in truth one that killed our attacking threat.If you’re bringing Crouch on the last player you take off is Shaqiri FFS. Yes he was doing his usual 2nd half prancing around(and as for his free kick😡) but he’s the man to supply the crosses🙄 Seemed very strange at the time but Shaqiri was carrying a bit of a knock apparently
|
|
|
Post by s7oke on Nov 20, 2017 22:31:22 GMT
Is he on some kind of bonus if he doesn’t use them? One again tonight and in truth one that killed our attacking threat.If you’re bringing Crouch on the last player you take off is Shaqiri FFS. Yes he was doing his usual 2nd half prancing around(and as for his free kick😡) but he’s the man to supply the crosses🙄 Seemed very strange at the time but Shaqiri was carrying a bit of a knock apparently if he was he certainly didn't want to come off..............
|
|
|
Post by crouchpotato1 on Nov 20, 2017 22:31:57 GMT
Is he on some kind of bonus if he doesn’t use them? One again tonight and in truth one that killed our attacking threat.If you’re bringing Crouch on the last player you take off is Shaqiri FFS. Yes he was doing his usual 2nd half prancing around(and as for his free kick😡) but he’s the man to supply the crosses🙄 Seemed very strange at the time but Shaqiri was carrying a bit of a knock apparently Yes I’ve just read Hughes’s comment but Shaqiri’s face told a different story to me
|
|
|
Post by boweryboy on Nov 20, 2017 22:37:59 GMT
The thing is Shaqiri has drifted out of the game in the second half of the last three games...as soon as he goes out on the right wing.thats the end of his effectiveness on the game...when he moves from the middle where we all want to see him effect the game has he has proved in the first half of the last three games....but he becomes anonymous in the second half for some reason.and we cannot afford for that to happen.thats why he is being substituted in the second half....
|
|
|
Post by bayernoatcake on Nov 20, 2017 22:38:48 GMT
Bottle job
|
|
|
Post by spiderpuss on Nov 20, 2017 22:49:42 GMT
Our only idea at the moment seems to be the Crouch substitution. That's it.
|
|
|
Post by cheekymatt71 on Nov 20, 2017 22:51:05 GMT
We looked slow and tired but still only 1 sub all game??
It was dereliction of duty not to put some more fresh legs on tonight and try to win the game.
Why does he even bother to name a subs bench ?
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 20, 2017 22:52:10 GMT
We are beyond frustrating to watch. We are just so 'meh' in everything that we do.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 20, 2017 22:53:13 GMT
Our only idea at the moment seems to be the Crouch substitution. That's it. I think it demonstrates the (lack of) confidence he has, in the squad he built.
|
|
|
Post by professorplump on Nov 20, 2017 23:51:32 GMT
It says more about a lack of quality on the bench than anything else. BMI would only come on to cover an injury. Adam and Affelay don't offer anything much that Allen and Fletcher can't give. He could have used Berahino or Jese but would they really have turned things around? Shaqiri is our best player by a mile but he has a dodgy fitness record and needs to be looked after carefully. If there is any suggestion that he was feeling stiff then he has to come off. You would all be squealing if he stayed on and pulled a muscle.
|
|
|
Post by riccyfuller93 on Nov 20, 2017 23:55:31 GMT
No shape, clueless subs, clueless manager.
|
|
|
Post by Edward Tattsyrup on Nov 20, 2017 23:58:28 GMT
He should be banned from making subs, they never have a positive impact on the result.
How many times does he make changes and it costs us a goal, because we try and hols on to a single goal lead.
|
|
|
Post by kustokie on Nov 20, 2017 23:59:02 GMT
He needs to delegate this responsibility to someone else. Diouf was totally knackered and Shaqiri is our best crosser. He should taken off Diouf and Allen or Sohbi, brought on Berahino or Jese and Crouch and switched to 4-4-2. This armchair management is dead easy, init?
|
|
|
Post by cooper67 on Nov 21, 2017 0:16:51 GMT
He should be banned from making subs, they never have a positive impact on the result. How many times does he make changes and it costs us a goal, because we try and hols on to a single goal lead. You mean apart from those 3 Crouch goals that have gained us 5 points??
|
|
|
Post by Pugsley on Nov 21, 2017 0:17:08 GMT
He should be banned from making subs, they never have a positive impact on the result. How many times does he make changes and it costs us a goal, because we try and hols on to a single goal lead. You mean like the last home game? Or the Southampton game? What about the Hawthorns? Did Crouch start there?
|
|
|
Post by bayernoatcake on Nov 21, 2017 0:18:22 GMT
He should be banned from making subs, they never have a positive impact on the result. How many times does he make changes and it costs us a goal, because we try and hols on to a single goal lead. You mean like the last home game? Or the Southampton game? What about the Hawthorns? Did Crouch start there? I can only imagine what you'd be like if TP only had one plan and it was a bit shit.
|
|
|
Post by spitthedog on Nov 21, 2017 0:26:49 GMT
Crouch's entry had the effect of us giving up possession of the ball, inviting pressure and sitting back. Long balls that came straight back usually. How is that slowing the game down?
|
|
|
Post by potterglen on Nov 21, 2017 4:17:00 GMT
Its the worst part of his management, he doesn't have a clue. Don't forget Zonal marking......................... As if!
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 21, 2017 5:56:48 GMT
Crouch's entry had the effect of us giving up possession of the ball, inviting pressure and sitting back. Long balls that came straight back usually. How is that slowing the game down? Bang on. He scores goals, granted, but his very presence manages to turn us into a clueless, brainless, mess, when we have the ball. And it doesn't need to.
|
|
|
Post by greyman on Nov 21, 2017 6:13:54 GMT
Is he on some kind of bonus if he doesn’t use them? One again tonight and in truth one that killed our attacking threat.If you’re bringing Crouch on the last player you take off is Shaqiri FFS. Yes he was doing his usual 2nd half prancing around(and as for his free kick😡) but he’s the man to supply the crosses🙄 Clampdown from the owner and CEO on appearance money. Even by your standards, that's stupid. Bravo.
|
|
|
Post by hanibal7 on Nov 21, 2017 6:23:18 GMT
Computer managers again.We haven't a clue why Hughes took off Shaq, maybe to give us extra height with Brighton corners, maybe Shaq carrying injury. Crouch has come on as sub and scored without Shaq, moaning all the fkn time, with no clue, classic Stoke numbnuts.
|
|
|
Post by hanibal7 on Nov 21, 2017 6:25:07 GMT
Crouch's entry had the effect of us giving up possession of the ball, inviting pressure and sitting back. Long balls that came straight back usually. How is that slowing the game down? Bang on. He scores goals, granted, but his very presence manages to turn us into a clueless, brainless, mess, when we have the ball. And it doesn't need to. scores goals granted ???? Do I need to continue,
|
|
|
Post by hanibal7 on Nov 21, 2017 6:26:56 GMT
Clampdown from the owner and CEO on appearance money. Even by your standards, that's stupid. Bravo. Numbnuts out of the asylums, I am speechless unless Elvis is alive
|
|
|
Post by Pugsley on Nov 21, 2017 6:29:25 GMT
Clampdown from the owner and CEO on appearance money. Even by your standards, that's stupid. Bravo. Thank you for reminding me I should use smiley faces when trying to lighten the mood.
|
|
|
Post by Pugsley on Nov 21, 2017 6:33:00 GMT
You mean like the last home game? Or the Southampton game? What about the Hawthorns? Did Crouch start there? I can only imagine what you'd be like if TP only had one plan and it was a bit shit. I'd be like I am now mate, questioning the manager and his tactics. The facts are that his substitutions for Crouch have made a positive impact on results.
|
|