|
Post by dutchstokie on May 8, 2021 6:58:44 GMT
She’s not the sharpest knife in the drawer is Diane....
|
|
|
Post by hammered on May 9, 2021 23:36:50 GMT
So what can we conclude from this weeks election results whether MP, Mayor or Council?
Clearly other than in urban shitstains Labour is finished (for now). The working class have left the woke losers who simply pander to MSM narratives without any awareness, reasoning or perception of their transparent fakeness.
They simply have no obvious reason to exist since Boris took up their ground other than to retreat to Corbynism.
Both major parties are (financialy) influenced (corrupted) by corporate globalists - the man (or woman or trans etc) once their vote is cast simply an irrelevance in achieving their global masters control - Brexit assumed to achieve both political and financial independence in reality has simply made us a smaller and more managable piece of the jigsaw to oversee. The EU (21stC Babylon) was well worth breaking from but since the 2016 vote the globalist forces financing and running the planets infrastructure have upped their game, forced a genuine assault on democracy itself (Biden did not beat Trump) and imposed a cultural facism through Covid.
Your vote is actually worthless...
|
|
|
Post by ashleyscfc on May 10, 2021 0:38:43 GMT
So what can we conclude from this weeks election results whether MP, Mayor or Council? Clearly other than in urban shitstains Labour is finished (for now). The working class have left the woke losers who simply pander to MSM narratives without any awareness, reasoning or perception of their transparent fakeness. They simply have no obvious reason to exist since Boris took up their ground other than to retreat to Corbynism. Both major parties are (financialy) influenced (corrupted) by corporate globalists - the man (or woman or trans etc) once their vote is cast simply an irrelevance in achieving their global masters control - Brexit assumed to achieve both political and financial independence in reality has simply made us a smaller and more managable piece of the jigsaw to oversee. The EU (21stC Babylon) was well worth breaking from but since the 2016 vote the globalist forces financing and running the planets infrastructure have upped their game, forced a genuine assault on democracy itself (Biden did not beat Trump) and imposed a cultural facism through Covid. Your vote is actually worthless... Absolutely fucking bonkers
|
|
|
Post by essexstokey on May 10, 2021 11:50:19 GMT
|
|
|
Post by yeokel on May 10, 2021 12:54:46 GMT
Essex, when is the penny finally going to drop with you and your brethren that most people are not bothered by or interested in this sort of tittle-tattle? Most don’t give a toss about the PMs wall paper, his holiday destination or even who he sleeps with and shags. We are bothered about what he can do to help make our lives better, to help make our country better, safer, or more secure, to help those less fortunate than many of us on here, and to help put things in place so that the future is at least as good for our descendants as the present has been for most of us. That, surely, is the story of last weeks elections. We want to celebrate the ‘good’, not wallow in past failures. That the gov’t cocked up the initial response to Covid, Track n Trace, PPE, Eat Out to Help Out, and all their other balls-ups was trumped by the one thing they got right – The vaccine programme. Labour needs to learn this – don’t keep banging on about things (decoration, holidays, etc) that have little or no effect on people’s every day lives, we don’t give a toss. Tell us, instead, what you are going to do to make things even better, even safer, even more secure for us all in the future and when we hear a positive message that we can all buy in to, Labour might be in with a chance of getting back in to power. But, until then, the kind of bollocks that you, Huddy, et all post is merely white noise to most people’s lives.
|
|
|
Post by ashleyscfc on May 10, 2021 12:58:15 GMT
Right come on "Anti vaccine passport" lot... Good old boris, loves our civil liberties does boris... www.lbc.co.uk/news/queens-speech-compulsory-voter-photo-id-law-expected-to-be-included/Queen's Speech: Compulsory voter photo ID law expected to be included Tomorrow's Queen’s Speech is expected to include the introduction of a controversial measure aimed at tackling voter fraud, the need for Brits to bring photo ID if they want to cast a vote in an election. The proposals, which are expected to be announced on Tuesday, will also include tighter rules on voting and voter intimidation, and limits on the number of postal votes a person can hand in at a polling station on behalf of others. If the plans go ahead, voters will need to show photographic ID in order to vote in UK general elections, as well as local council elections in England and police and crime commissioner elections in England and Wales. Critics have said the plans would disadvantage ethnic minority voters and those on lower incomes. “Stealing someone’s vote is stealing their voice,” said minister for the constitution and devolution Chloe Smith, speaking in support of the plans. “Fraud, and the intent to intimidate or coerce a voter, are crimes. So this government is stamping out the space for such damage to take place in our elections.” However, the plans have been met with criticism, with claims that it would effectively remove the right to vote from millions of people. Data from the electoral commission has shown that nearly 3.5 million people currently do not have suitable ID. If the acceptable forms of ID were limited to just passports and driving licences, almost a quarter of the electorate would currently be unable to vote. According to civil rights group Liberty, young people and marginalised groups such as trans people and those without a fixed address are most likely to be harmed by the plans. The plans have also been opposed by the Conservative Party’s own MPs, with leading MP David Davis branding them “illiberal” and claiming they “impinge on people’s privacy and convenience”. With only one conviction of electoral fraud in 2019, Davis also argued that the plans are unnecessary, calling them a “solution in pursuit of a non-existent problem”. The Queen’s speech, which lays out the government’s plans for the next parliamentary session, is not expected to include the reforms to adult social care which were promised in the Conservative manifesto, a delay which Cabinet Office minister Michael Gove put down partly to a lack of cross-party support for the reforms. The speech, which will take place tomorrow, will be a smaller-scale event than usual due to Covid-19 regulations.
|
|
|
Post by peekay67 on May 10, 2021 13:05:17 GMT
No I can read fine thanks, think ‘caring for those less fortunate’ was my favourite part of that. If ever there was a board that shows that suggestion up for the nonsense it is... We definitely seem to be moving further and further towards just looking out for number one. Perhaps we should fully embrace it, move even further towards the American model, lower taxes more and make people pay directly for many more of the services they receive. And if they can't afford it, tough, they should be doing better at life. Exactly the way the NHS is heading. Well on its way to full privatisation. Welcome to US model health system. No idea why the Tories are not shouting this from the rooftops. But "he's doing his best", so that's okay. Strange times we are living in.
|
|
|
Post by Rednwhitenblue on May 10, 2021 13:05:27 GMT
Right come on "Anti vaccine passport" lot... Good old boris, loves our civil liberties does boris... www.lbc.co.uk/news/queens-speech-compulsory-voter-photo-id-law-expected-to-be-included/Queen's Speech: Compulsory voter photo ID law expected to be included Tomorrow's Queen’s Speech is expected to include the introduction of a controversial measure aimed at tackling voter fraud, the need for Brits to bring photo ID if they want to cast a vote in an election. The proposals, which are expected to be announced on Tuesday, will also include tighter rules on voting and voter intimidation, and limits on the number of postal votes a person can hand in at a polling station on behalf of others. If the plans go ahead, voters will need to show photographic ID in order to vote in UK general elections, as well as local council elections in England and police and crime commissioner elections in England and Wales. Critics have said the plans would disadvantage ethnic minority voters and those on lower incomes. “Stealing someone’s vote is stealing their voice,” said minister for the constitution and devolution Chloe Smith, speaking in support of the plans. “Fraud, and the intent to intimidate or coerce a voter, are crimes. So this government is stamping out the space for such damage to take place in our elections.” However, the plans have been met with criticism, with claims that it would effectively remove the right to vote from millions of people. Data from the electoral commission has shown that nearly 3.5 million people currently do not have suitable ID. If the acceptable forms of ID were limited to just passports and driving licences, almost a quarter of the electorate would currently be unable to vote. According to civil rights group Liberty, young people and marginalised groups such as trans people and those without a fixed address are most likely to be harmed by the plans. The plans have also been opposed by the Conservative Party’s own MPs, with leading MP David Davis branding them “illiberal” and claiming they “impinge on people’s privacy and convenience”. With only one conviction of electoral fraud in 2019, Davis also argued that the plans are unnecessary, calling them a “solution in pursuit of a non-existent problem”.The Queen’s speech, which lays out the government’s plans for the next parliamentary session, is not expected to include the reforms to adult social care which were promised in the Conservative manifesto, a delay which Cabinet Office minister Michael Gove put down partly to a lack of cross-party support for the reforms. The speech, which will take place tomorrow, will be a smaller-scale event than usual due to Covid-19 regulations. Hmmm, not sure David Davis has quite grasped which 'problem' this approach is designed to tackle! And while I have no problem with efforts to reduce fraud and crime, it does have the whiff of disenfranchising parts of the electorate which are least likely to vote Conservative! A bit like in the US where the numbers of ballot boxes varied dramatically according to whether you lived in a Republican or Democrat part of a Republican state!
|
|
|
Post by The Toxic Avenger on May 10, 2021 13:54:17 GMT
Essex, when is the penny finally going to drop with you and your brethren that most people are not bothered by or interested in this sort of tittle-tattle? Most don’t give a toss about the PMs wall paper, his holiday destination or even who he sleeps with and shags. We are bothered about what he can do to help make our lives better, to help make our country better, safer, or more secure, to help those less fortunate than many of us on here, and to help put things in place so that the future is at least as good for our descendants as the present has been for most of us. That, surely, is the story of last weeks elections. We want to celebrate the ‘good’, not wallow in past failures. That the gov’t cocked up the initial response to Covid, Track n Trace, PPE, Eat Out to Help Out, and all their other balls-ups was trumped by the one thing they got right – The vaccine programme. Labour needs to learn this – don’t keep banging on about things (decoration, holidays, etc) that have little or no effect on people’s every day lives, we don’t give a toss. Tell us, instead, what you are going to do to make things even better, even safer, even more secure for us all in the future and when we hear a positive message that we can all buy in to, Labour might be in with a chance of getting back in to power. But, until then, the kind of bollocks that you, Huddy, et all post is merely white noise to most people’s lives. I think that's likely true, but it's depressing that it is. Ideally, you want your leaders to have a bit of integrity, surely? I also seem to recall the media losing their shit when Diane Abbot drank a G&T on the tube, which is equally inconsequential to most people's lives...
|
|
|
Post by Rednwhitenblue on May 10, 2021 14:02:47 GMT
Essex, when is the penny finally going to drop with you and your brethren that most people are not bothered by or interested in this sort of tittle-tattle? Most don’t give a toss about the PMs wall paper, his holiday destination or even who he sleeps with and shags. We are bothered about what he can do to help make our lives better, to help make our country better, safer, or more secure, to help those less fortunate than many of us on here, and to help put things in place so that the future is at least as good for our descendants as the present has been for most of us. That, surely, is the story of last weeks elections. We want to celebrate the ‘good’, not wallow in past failures. That the gov’t cocked up the initial response to Covid, Track n Trace, PPE, Eat Out to Help Out, and all their other balls-ups was trumped by the one thing they got right – The vaccine programme. Labour needs to learn this – don’t keep banging on about things (decoration, holidays, etc) that have little or no effect on people’s every day lives, we don’t give a toss. Tell us, instead, what you are going to do to make things even better, even safer, even more secure for us all in the future and when we hear a positive message that we can all buy in to, Labour might be in with a chance of getting back in to power. But, until then, the kind of bollocks that you, Huddy, et all post is merely white noise to most people’s lives. I think that's likely true, but it's depressing that it is. Ideally, you want your leaders to have a bit of integrity, surely? I also seem to recall the media losing their shit when Diane Abbot drank a G&T on the tube, which is equally inconsequential to most people's lives... Not sure anybody gives much of a shit about integrity these days, do they?
|
|
|
Post by partickpotter on May 10, 2021 14:03:14 GMT
Essex, when is the penny finally going to drop with you and your brethren that most people are not bothered by or interested in this sort of tittle-tattle? Most don’t give a toss about the PMs wall paper, his holiday destination or even who he sleeps with and shags. We are bothered about what he can do to help make our lives better, to help make our country better, safer, or more secure, to help those less fortunate than many of us on here, and to help put things in place so that the future is at least as good for our descendants as the present has been for most of us. That, surely, is the story of last weeks elections. We want to celebrate the ‘good’, not wallow in past failures. That the gov’t cocked up the initial response to Covid, Track n Trace, PPE, Eat Out to Help Out, and all their other balls-ups was trumped by the one thing they got right – The vaccine programme. Labour needs to learn this – don’t keep banging on about things (decoration, holidays, etc) that have little or no effect on people’s every day lives, we don’t give a toss. Tell us, instead, what you are going to do to make things even better, even safer, even more secure for us all in the future and when we hear a positive message that we can all buy in to, Labour might be in with a chance of getting back in to power. But, until then, the kind of bollocks that you, Huddy, et all post is merely white noise to most people’s lives. I think that's likely true, but it's depressing that it is. Ideally, you want your leaders to have a bit of integrity, surely? I also seem to recall the media losing their shit when Diane Abbot drank a G&T on the tube, which is equally inconsequential to most people's lives... Same as wearing odd shoes. I mean, who cares?
|
|
|
Post by prestwichpotter on May 10, 2021 14:23:30 GMT
Essex, when is the penny finally going to drop with you and your brethren that most people are not bothered by or interested in this sort of tittle-tattle? Most don’t give a toss about the PMs wall paper, his holiday destination or even who he sleeps with and shags. We are bothered about what he can do to help make our lives better, to help make our country better, safer, or more secure, to help those less fortunate than many of us on here, and to help put things in place so that the future is at least as good for our descendants as the present has been for most of us. That, surely, is the story of last weeks elections. We want to celebrate the ‘good’, not wallow in past failures. That the gov’t cocked up the initial response to Covid, Track n Trace, PPE, Eat Out to Help Out, and all their other balls-ups was trumped by the one thing they got right – The vaccine programme. Labour needs to learn this – don’t keep banging on about things (decoration, holidays, etc) that have little or no effect on people’s every day lives, we don’t give a toss. Tell us, instead, what you are going to do to make things even better, even safer, even more secure for us all in the future and when we hear a positive message that we can all buy in to, Labour might be in with a chance of getting back in to power. But, until then, the kind of bollocks that you, Huddy, et all post is merely white noise to most people’s lives. I think that's likely true, but it's depressing that it is. Ideally, you want your leaders to have a bit of integrity, surely? I also seem to recall the media losing their shit when Diane Abbot drank a G&T on the tube, which is equally inconsequential to most people's lives... It was from M&S, she’s meant to be a socialist for God sake......
|
|
|
Post by partickpotter on May 10, 2021 14:47:14 GMT
I think that's likely true, but it's depressing that it is. Ideally, you want your leaders to have a bit of integrity, surely? I also seem to recall the media losing their shit when Diane Abbot drank a G&T on the tube, which is equally inconsequential to most people's lives... It was from M&S, she’s meant to be a socialist for God sake...... Indeed. What sort of socialist sends their child to a private school? Answer... one who can afford to.
|
|
|
Post by essexstokey on May 10, 2021 15:20:03 GMT
Essex, when is the penny finally going to drop with you and your brethren that most people are not bothered by or interested in this sort of tittle-tattle? Most don’t give a toss about the PMs wall paper, his holiday destination or even who he sleeps with and shags. We are bothered about what he can do to help make our lives better, to help make our country better, safer, or more secure, to help those less fortunate than many of us on here, and to help put things in place so that the future is at least as good for our descendants as the present has been for most of us. That, surely, is the story of last weeks elections. We want to celebrate the ‘good’, not wallow in past failures. That the gov’t cocked up the initial response to Covid, Track n Trace, PPE, Eat Out to Help Out, and all their other balls-ups was trumped by the one thing they got right – The vaccine programme. Labour needs to learn this – don’t keep banging on about things (decoration, holidays, etc) that have little or no effect on people’s every day lives, we don’t give a toss. Tell us, instead, what you are going to do to make things even better, even safer, even more secure for us all in the future and when we hear a positive message that we can all buy in to, Labour might be in with a chance of getting back in to power. But, until then, the kind of bollocks that you, Huddy, et all post is merely white noise to most people’s lives. For a start ot is not tittle tattle this and other allegations are being not only investigated by parliament but also the electoral commission onto corrupt practices within this government and breaches of ministerial code This is serious unless you and the Tories see and except millions of pounds of tax payers money going into the pockets of Tory senators and politicians How can we as a country criticize other countries for bribes and cronyism when the indications are ours is as bad if not worse
|
|
|
Post by prestwichpotter on May 10, 2021 16:11:04 GMT
It was from M&S, she’s meant to be a socialist for God sake...... Indeed. What sort of socialist sends their child to a private school? Answer... one who can afford to. Shocking. She wants to nationalise the trains as well but has the audacity to still use them. And how dare she drink water from her taps, she should drink her own urine until the water companies fall back into public ownership......
|
|
|
Post by partickpotter on May 10, 2021 16:26:32 GMT
Indeed. What sort of socialist sends their child to a private school? Answer... one who can afford to. Shocking. She wants to nationalise the trains as well but has the audacity to still use them. And how dare she drink water from her taps, she should drink her own urine until the water companies fall back into public ownership...... Ho, ho, ho. Let’s nationalise Xmas too.
|
|
|
Post by essexstokey on May 10, 2021 16:51:35 GMT
Shocking. She wants to nationalise the trains as well but has the audacity to still use them. And how dare she drink water from her taps, she should drink her own urine until the water companies fall back into public ownership...... Ho, ho, ho. Let’s nationalise Xmas too. No Christmas is cancelled as Santa's in prison for having to many ho ho hos 😁
|
|
|
Post by salopstick on May 10, 2021 17:16:05 GMT
Right come on "Anti vaccine passport" lot... Good old boris, loves our civil liberties does boris... www.lbc.co.uk/news/queens-speech-compulsory-voter-photo-id-law-expected-to-be-included/Queen's Speech: Compulsory voter photo ID law expected to be included Tomorrow's Queen’s Speech is expected to include the introduction of a controversial measure aimed at tackling voter fraud, the need for Brits to bring photo ID if they want to cast a vote in an election. The proposals, which are expected to be announced on Tuesday, will also include tighter rules on voting and voter intimidation, and limits on the number of postal votes a person can hand in at a polling station on behalf of others. If the plans go ahead, voters will need to show photographic ID in order to vote in UK general elections, as well as local council elections in England and police and crime commissioner elections in England and Wales. Critics have said the plans would disadvantage ethnic minority voters and those on lower incomes. “Stealing someone’s vote is stealing their voice,” said minister for the constitution and devolution Chloe Smith, speaking in support of the plans. “Fraud, and the intent to intimidate or coerce a voter, are crimes. So this government is stamping out the space for such damage to take place in our elections.” However, the plans have been met with criticism, with claims that it would effectively remove the right to vote from millions of people. Data from the electoral commission has shown that nearly 3.5 million people currently do not have suitable ID. If the acceptable forms of ID were limited to just passports and driving licences, almost a quarter of the electorate would currently be unable to vote. According to civil rights group Liberty, young people and marginalised groups such as trans people and those without a fixed address are most likely to be harmed by the plans. The plans have also been opposed by the Conservative Party’s own MPs, with leading MP David Davis branding them “illiberal” and claiming they “impinge on people’s privacy and convenience”. With only one conviction of electoral fraud in 2019, Davis also argued that the plans are unnecessary, calling them a “solution in pursuit of a non-existent problem”.The Queen’s speech, which lays out the government’s plans for the next parliamentary session, is not expected to include the reforms to adult social care which were promised in the Conservative manifesto, a delay which Cabinet Office minister Michael Gove put down partly to a lack of cross-party support for the reforms. The speech, which will take place tomorrow, will be a smaller-scale event than usual due to Covid-19 regulations. Hmmm, not sure David Davis has quite grasped which 'problem' this approach is designed to tackle! And while I have no problem with efforts to reduce fraud and crime, it does have the whiff of disenfranchising parts of the electorate which are least likely to vote Conservative! A bit like in the US where the numbers of ballot boxes varied dramatically according to whether you lived in a Republican or Democrat part of a Republican state! Is that any different to mass immigration of likely Labour voters?
|
|
|
Post by The battheader chronicles on May 10, 2021 23:03:23 GMT
So what can we conclude from this weeks election results whether MP, Mayor or Council? Clearly other than in urban shitstains Labour is finished (for now). The working class have left the woke losers who simply pander to MSM narratives without any awareness, reasoning or perception of their transparent fakeness. They simply have no obvious reason to exist since Boris took up their ground other than to retreat to Corbynism. Both major parties are (financialy) influenced (corrupted) by corporate globalists - the man (or woman or trans etc) once their vote is cast simply an irrelevance in achieving their global masters control - Brexit assumed to achieve both political and financial independence in reality has simply made us a smaller and more managable piece of the jigsaw to oversee. The EU (21stC Babylon) was well worth breaking from but since the 2016 vote the globalist forces financing and running the planets infrastructure have upped their game, forced a genuine assault on democracy itself (Biden did not beat Trump) and imposed a cultural facism through Covid. Your vote is actually worthless... You want me to go get you some tin foil chap?
|
|
|
Post by Huddysleftfoot on May 11, 2021 0:20:45 GMT
|
|
|
Post by Huddysleftfoot on May 11, 2021 0:39:38 GMT
|
|
|
Post by partickpotter on May 11, 2021 5:06:10 GMT
Could you explain the corruption involved here?
|
|
|
Post by yeokel on May 11, 2021 7:20:55 GMT
I don’t remember being asked if I held a driving licence when I cast my vote in 2017. Or is this crap simply a “wild guess” just as the ‘twit’ suggests?
|
|
|
Post by yeokel on May 11, 2021 7:31:25 GMT
An alternative headline might have read “Rishi Sunak’s wife helps Indian firm create 1000 new jobs in UK”.
|
|
|
Post by followyoudown on May 11, 2021 8:22:51 GMT
Could you explain the corruption involved here? Huddy explain are you new here ?
|
|
|
Post by followyoudown on May 11, 2021 8:25:55 GMT
I don’t remember being asked if I held a driving licence when I cast my vote in 2017. Or is this crap simply a “wild guess” just as the ‘twit’ suggests? This is correct and aren't most of those labour votes in 2017 now tory votes as proven by Hartlepool, simple way is for local councils to issue free photo ids might also help with benefit fraud, housing fraud and all those other things labour mps and councillors tend to get upto.
|
|
|
Post by Kilo on May 11, 2021 8:48:01 GMT
I don’t remember being asked if I held a driving licence when I cast my vote in 2017. Or is this crap simply a “wild guess” just as the ‘twit’ suggests? It might also 'suggest' that 30% of the labour votes were fake as they couldn't find any record of a driving licence. Statistics eh? Or it might suggest that in general, labour voters aren't clever enough to even be able to pass the driving test. Who knows?
|
|
|
Post by Huddysleftfoot on May 11, 2021 9:06:22 GMT
Just for clarity, I no longer engage with a few posters on here. I have no time for Tory bots and apologists. You know who you are.
|
|
|
Post by Huddysleftfoot on May 11, 2021 9:16:36 GMT
|
|
|
Post by Huddysleftfoot on May 11, 2021 9:20:48 GMT
|
|