|
|
Post by ilforddave on Dec 4, 2007 13:34:29 GMT
That new site is really bad, no edit function, threads staying where they are , and not going to the top of the board when they get replied too ...... no smiles , no links, no pics, no avatars .... its utter gash, it would have looked gash 8 odd years ago
|
|
|
|
Post by Vestan Pance on Dec 4, 2007 13:37:04 GMT
All i really wanted was a continuation of the old one, perhaps with an avatar to personalise your ID.
It's no good Smudge defending the indefensible. It's tripe.
|
|
|
|
Post by TheWiseMaster on Dec 4, 2007 13:38:12 GMT
Rivals will be all about Murdoch's requirements = blanket advertising ??? ???
|
|
|
|
Post by ilforddave on Dec 4, 2007 13:40:34 GMT
I feel abit sorry for him to be honest, he's built that site up over the years, and now its all starting to goto pot . He doesn't have time to update it as he liked to in the past, and people were starting to moan about that despite it being a free site, and then rivals go and foist an unworkable abomination of a messageboard on all the sites. It must be driving him crazy that they would release that in that state .
We should just get to use this place till they have completed that site, and then see what its like . In its current state it will drive people away from the oatcake
|
|
|
|
Post by Vestan Pance on Dec 4, 2007 13:47:04 GMT
Fair comment. I feel for Smudge, however I feel for the community more. There are people in far flung reaches who used that board as a sanctuary for all things Stoke, and it is unusable.
I'd back Smudge all day, but that is crap and is literally Weeks IMHO away from being a usable alternative to the old one.
|
|
|
|
Post by ilforddave on Dec 4, 2007 14:04:19 GMT
The really sad thing is, despite so many people jumping ship, its still the most popular championship site on rivals ..... every site must be shedding posters at the same rate as the oatcake
|
|
