|
Post by stokiekm on Aug 10, 2017 13:51:30 GMT
Out of interest did Dave day Fletcher was joining in here? If so any idea when?
|
|
|
Post by GeneralFaye on Aug 10, 2017 13:52:44 GMT
Out of interest did Dave day Fletcher was joining in here? If so any idea when? It doesn't matter, if he did then it would've been a figment of the imagination of any person who saw him say it.
|
|
|
Post by Trouserdog on Aug 10, 2017 13:55:06 GMT
You genuinely think he hasn't a clue what he's talking about? Hes got a number of signings right After proper information is leaked on the player? A lot of people have done this, it's not hard to look around on social media and just be vague with what you're talking about. You have to be a complete dip shit to believe him with his transfer talk. It's pretty clear that davesviews is someone at the club. There were people on here who knew about the Fletcher deal before any social media had picked up on it, with davesviews being the original source of the info. I'm pretty sure that 'dave' is Keith Humphreys, but that's just me joining the dots. I don't know for certain, it just makes sense with everything he's said so far. If 'dave' is someone as high up as that, then it also explains why he can't be too specific in terms of giving names when discussing transfers. Making it public knowledge that we're about to sign Player X could leave him looking pretty stupid if that info then spreads all over social media (which it would do) and another club is alerted to Player X's availability and gazumps us. I think the davesviews thing is used by the board to reassure fans that we are in the market for players and that things are happening beyond what's being reported in the press. It makes sense to do this using a psuedonym otherwise we could end up with a situation like Smurf at The vale, where things get personal and nasty, and we have to suffer the embarrassing situation of members of the board getting into slanging matches with fans.
|
|
|
Post by Pretty Little Boother on Aug 10, 2017 13:55:53 GMT
I'm not delving into the argument about whether or not Dave is the Oracle; but I don't understand why he trusts the clique with names and keeps them secret from everyone else?
I'm assuming you're all strangers to each other, so what are the the critera you have to fulfil in order to prove yourself? Do you have to pay him or complete some sort of brutal hazing ritual?
Or is it all creepy and secretive like the Masons or Stonecutters...
|
|
|
Post by riccyfuller93 on Aug 10, 2017 13:57:00 GMT
After proper information is leaked on the player? A lot of people have done this, it's not hard to look around on social media and just be vague with what you're talking about. You have to be a complete dip shit to believe him with his transfer talk. It's pretty clear that davesviews is someone at the club. There were people on here who knew about the Fletcher deal before any social media had picked up on it, with davesviews being the original source of the info. I'm pretty sure that 'dave' is Keith Humphreys, but that's just me joining the dots. I don't know for certain, it just makes sense with everything he's said so far. If 'dave' is someone as high up as that, then it also explains why he can't be too specific in terms of giving names when discussing transfers. Making it public knowledge that we're about to sign Player X could leave him looking pretty stupid if that info then spreads all over social media (which it would do) and another club is alerted to Player X's availability and gazumps us. I think the davesviews thing is used by the board to reassure fans that we are in the market for players and that things are happening beyond what's being reported in the press. It makes sense to do this using a psuedonym otherwise we could end up with a situation like Smurf at The vale, where things get personal and nasty, and we have to suffer the embarrassing situation of members of the board getting into slanging matches with fans. I'm not asking him to give out his personal information on himself, but if he's willing to give us his info on players that are linked then just give a name or don't say anything. Otherwise, it's just useless information and it makes him come across as a massive wind up merchant.
|
|
|
Post by Edward Tattsyrup on Aug 10, 2017 13:57:08 GMT
Everyone....a sweeping statement. You're not speaking for me, just in case you were wondering. Okay. Everyone except you. and me, i'm happy with Daves participation
|
|
|
Post by riccyfuller93 on Aug 10, 2017 13:58:10 GMT
Okay. Everyone except you. and me, i'm happy with Daves participation Guess you're happy with mine as well then as I can give you the same bollocks about players.
|
|
|
Post by GeneralFaye on Aug 10, 2017 13:58:42 GMT
I'm not delving into the argument about whether or not Dave is the Oracle; but I don't understand why he trusts the clique with names and keeps them secret from everyone else? I'm assuming you're all strangers to each other, so what are the the critera you have to fulfil in order to prove yourself? Do you have to pay him or complete some sort of brutal hazing ritual? Or is it all creepy and secretive like the Masons or Stonecutters... The truth? I randomly messaged him in a normal way and he responded.. I know people want it to be something weirdly sordid but it isn't.
|
|
|
Post by Pretty Little Boother on Aug 10, 2017 13:58:49 GMT
After proper information is leaked on the player? A lot of people have done this, it's not hard to look around on social media and just be vague with what you're talking about. You have to be a complete dip shit to believe him with his transfer talk. It's pretty clear that davesviews is someone at the club. There were people on here who knew about the Fletcher deal before any social media had picked up on it, with davesviews being the original source of the info. I'm pretty sure that 'dave' is Keith Humphreys, but that's just me joining the dots. I don't know for certain, it just makes sense with everything he's said so far. If 'dave' is someone as high up as that, then it also explains why he can't be too specific in terms of giving names when discussing transfers. Making it public knowledge that we're about to sign Player X could leave him looking pretty stupid if that info then spreads all over social media (which it would do) and another club is alerted to Player X's availability and gazumps us. I think the davesviews thing is used by the board to reassure fans that we are in the market for players and that things are happening beyond what's being reported in the press. It makes sense to do this using a psuedonym otherwise we could end up with a situation like Smurf at The vale, where things get personal and nasty, and we have to suffer the embarrassing situation of members of the board getting into slanging matches with fans. But it's only a screencap away from being shared, so how does DV know who to trust with this information?
|
|
|
Post by nott1 on Aug 10, 2017 13:59:15 GMT
Is it cut off time for signings to be able to play on Saturday today?
|
|
|
Post by Edward Tattsyrup on Aug 10, 2017 14:00:29 GMT
and me, i'm happy with Daves participation Guess you're happy with mine as well then as I can give you the same bollocks about players. no problem at all, thats the point of a forum. so what transfer gosip you got?
|
|
|
Post by Pretty Little Boother on Aug 10, 2017 14:00:51 GMT
I'm not delving into the argument about whether or not Dave is the Oracle; but I don't understand why he trusts the clique with names and keeps them secret from everyone else? I'm assuming you're all strangers to each other, so what are the the critera you have to fulfil in order to prove yourself? Do you have to pay him or complete some sort of brutal hazing ritual? Or is it all creepy and secretive like the Masons or Stonecutters... The truth? I randomly messaged him in a normal way and he responded.. I know people want it to be something weirdly sordid but it isn't. I completely believe you, I just don't understand it, as that completely negates the point behind all the mysterious clues and cold reading that he gives!
|
|
|
Post by cobhamstokey on Aug 10, 2017 14:02:33 GMT
The truth? I randomly messaged him in a normal way and he responded.. I know people want it to be something weirdly sordid but it isn't. I completely believe you, I just don't understand it, as that completely negates the point behind all the mysterious clues and cold reading that he gives! I gave a funny handshake
|
|
|
Post by riccyfuller93 on Aug 10, 2017 14:03:22 GMT
Guess you're happy with mine as well then as I can give you the same bollocks about players. no problem at all, thats the point of a forum. so what transfer gosip you got? We're interested in several players. Other clubs are also monitoring them. We can confirm they have played football before.
|
|
|
Post by pottarius on Aug 10, 2017 14:06:08 GMT
I'm not delving into the argument about whether or not Dave is the Oracle; but I don't understand why he trusts the clique with names and keeps them secret from everyone else? I'm assuming you're all strangers to each other, so what are the the critera you have to fulfil in order to prove yourself? Do you have to pay him or complete some sort of brutal hazing ritual? Or is it all creepy and secretive like the Masons or Stonecutters... The truth? I randomly messaged him in a normal way and he responded.. I know people want it to be something weirdly sordid but it isn't. I read that as massaged him at first, would explain the PM thing
|
|
|
Post by Trouserdog on Aug 10, 2017 14:06:17 GMT
It's pretty clear that davesviews is someone at the club. There were people on here who knew about the Fletcher deal before any social media had picked up on it, with davesviews being the original source of the info. I'm pretty sure that 'dave' is Keith Humphreys, but that's just me joining the dots. I don't know for certain, it just makes sense with everything he's said so far. If 'dave' is someone as high up as that, then it also explains why he can't be too specific in terms of giving names when discussing transfers. Making it public knowledge that we're about to sign Player X could leave him looking pretty stupid if that info then spreads all over social media (which it would do) and another club is alerted to Player X's availability and gazumps us. I think the davesviews thing is used by the board to reassure fans that we are in the market for players and that things are happening beyond what's being reported in the press. It makes sense to do this using a psuedonym otherwise we could end up with a situation like Smurf at The vale, where things get personal and nasty, and we have to suffer the embarrassing situation of members of the board getting into slanging matches with fans. I'm not asking him to give out his personal information on himself, but if he's willing to give us his info on players that are linked then just give a name or don't say anything. Otherwise, it's just useless information and it makes him come across as a massive wind up merchant. That's what I mean- he can't give out the name of a transfer target because he, himself, is in a position of power (albeit a minor one these days) at the club. Bearpit and SLP aren't- they can throw names about willy nilly without any comeback on themselves other than the risk of looking silly when deals go pear shaped.
|
|
|
Post by GeneralFaye on Aug 10, 2017 14:08:41 GMT
The truth? I randomly messaged him in a normal way and he responded.. I know people want it to be something weirdly sordid but it isn't. I completely believe you, I just don't understand it, as that completely negates the point behind all the mysterious clues and cold reading that he gives! I'm guessing he gets shit loads of messages whenever he's online and decides who he thinks he can trust when replying to people. It's pretty obvious who would blab at the first sign of information and who wouldn't.
|
|
|
Post by GeneralFaye on Aug 10, 2017 14:09:48 GMT
I'm not asking him to give out his personal information on himself, but if he's willing to give us his info on players that are linked then just give a name or don't say anything. Otherwise, it's just useless information and it makes him come across as a massive wind up merchant. That's what I mean- he can't give out the name of a transfer target because he, himself, is in a position of power (albeit a minor one these days) at the club. Bearpit and SLP aren't- they can throw names about willy nilly without any comeback on themselves other than the risk of looking silly when deals go pear shaped. Even slp do their fare share of pm's before making things public.. Apparently.
|
|
|
Post by Gods on Aug 10, 2017 14:09:53 GMT
I'm not asking him to give out his personal information on himself, but if he's willing to give us his info on players that are linked then just give a name or don't say anything. Otherwise, it's just useless information and it makes him come across as a massive wind up merchant. That's what I mean- he can't give out the name of a transfer target because he, himself, is in a position of power (albeit a minor one these days) at the club.
Bearpit and SLP aren't- they can throw names about willy nilly without any comeback on themselves other than the risk of looking silly when deals go pear shaped. Do you know that Trousers, its a fact?
|
|
|
Post by Trouserdog on Aug 10, 2017 14:10:01 GMT
It's pretty clear that davesviews is someone at the club. There were people on here who knew about the Fletcher deal before any social media had picked up on it, with davesviews being the original source of the info. I'm pretty sure that 'dave' is Keith Humphreys, but that's just me joining the dots. I don't know for certain, it just makes sense with everything he's said so far. If 'dave' is someone as high up as that, then it also explains why he can't be too specific in terms of giving names when discussing transfers. Making it public knowledge that we're about to sign Player X could leave him looking pretty stupid if that info then spreads all over social media (which it would do) and another club is alerted to Player X's availability and gazumps us. I think the davesviews thing is used by the board to reassure fans that we are in the market for players and that things are happening beyond what's being reported in the press. It makes sense to do this using a psuedonym otherwise we could end up with a situation like Smurf at The vale, where things get personal and nasty, and we have to suffer the embarrassing situation of members of the board getting into slanging matches with fans. But it's only a screencap away from being shared, so how does DV know who to trust with this information? No idea...I'm not on his secret buddy list so I couldn't tell you! I can only assume that people who do receive the PMs don't screenshot it and shout it from the rooftops because a) they want to receive info in the future, and b) they don't want to risk scuppering any important transfer deals either!
|
|
|
Post by riccyfuller93 on Aug 10, 2017 14:11:05 GMT
I'm not asking him to give out his personal information on himself, but if he's willing to give us his info on players that are linked then just give a name or don't say anything. Otherwise, it's just useless information and it makes him come across as a massive wind up merchant. That's what I mean- he can't give out the name of a transfer target because he, himself, is in a position of power (albeit a minor one these days) at the club. Bearpit and SLP aren't- they can throw names about willy nilly without any comeback on themselves other than the risk of looking silly when deals go pear shaped. He's anonymous. What's the point of being anonymous then...
|
|
|
Post by riccyfuller93 on Aug 10, 2017 14:11:45 GMT
But it's only a screencap away from being shared, so how does DV know who to trust with this information? No idea...I'm not on his secret buddy list so I couldn't tell you! I can only assume that people who do receive the PMs don't screenshot it and shout it from the rooftops because a) they want to receive info in the future, and b) they don't want to risk scuppering any important transfer deals either! and c) they also like to pretend to be people on the internet.
|
|
|
Post by chad on Aug 10, 2017 14:12:31 GMT
FUCKING SIGN SOMEBODY FUCKIN ANYBODY
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 10, 2017 14:12:55 GMT
So anyhting happening ?
I have visions of him being shangheid
or at least, hes travelling to us from Lisbon in an old clapped out tramp steamer
via, the Azores
|
|
|
Post by Trouserdog on Aug 10, 2017 14:13:31 GMT
That's what I mean- he can't give out the name of a transfer target because he, himself, is in a position of power (albeit a minor one these days) at the club.
Bearpit and SLP aren't- they can throw names about willy nilly without any comeback on themselves other than the risk of looking silly when deals go pear shaped. Do you know that Trousers, its a fact? No mate, it's just me speculating. It makes sense to me that if dave is a member of the board, then that explains all the vagueness when talking about transfer targets.
|
|
|
Post by Edward Tattsyrup on Aug 10, 2017 14:18:43 GMT
no problem at all, thats the point of a forum. so what transfer gosip you got? We're interested in several players. Other clubs are also monitoring them. We can confirm they have played football before. oooooooooo, sounds exciting. thanks for the info.
|
|
|
Post by skelman on Aug 10, 2017 14:19:19 GMT
Is it cut off time for signings to be able to play on Saturday today? No - noon tomorrow
|
|
|
Post by stokiekm on Aug 10, 2017 14:20:52 GMT
Out of interest did Dave day Fletcher was joining in here? If so any idea when? It doesn't matter, if he did then it would've been a figment of the imagination of any person who saw him say it. Fair enough but was thinking there must have been a post on here so can check the date that he announced it. Without anything it's just another example of a nostradamus effect. People reading into a vague comment then saying fuck me, it was Fletcher he was talking about. That's all this is really.
|
|
|
Post by skelman on Aug 10, 2017 14:22:30 GMT
I completely believe you, I just don't understand it, as that completely negates the point behind all the mysterious clues and cold reading that he gives! I gave a funny handshake There's a few funny winkers on here too!
|
|
|
Post by Trouserdog on Aug 10, 2017 14:23:07 GMT
That's what I mean- he can't give out the name of a transfer target because he, himself, is in a position of power (albeit a minor one these days) at the club. Bearpit and SLP aren't- they can throw names about willy nilly without any comeback on themselves other than the risk of looking silly when deals go pear shaped. He's anonymous. What's the point of being anonymous then... If my theory's right then he'll have Peter Coates's blessing to post information within reason. If 'dave' suddenly gets pissed up one night and posts "HEY EVERYONE! WE'RE SIGNING BOB McFOOTBALLFACE TOMORROW FOR £20M!" then I imagine he'll have Denise's strap-on rammed up his rectum as soon as he next enters the building.
|
|