|
|
Post by Deleted on May 13, 2016 19:34:20 GMT
Hope you watching Shaq ...thats how you come inside and shoot Just like he did against Newcastle you mean? |
|
|
|
Post by towraytek on May 13, 2016 19:37:23 GMT
I'd love an away day at Hillsborough. We got a nil nil there didn't we first match after we went up in 1993?
Them and Derby in the play off final and I don't care who wins, good day out either way
Ek
|
|
|
|
Post by towraytek on May 13, 2016 19:39:26 GMT
It looks like Foresteiri is offside when the goalie kicks the ball out and then runs back onside. Key point is that if no-one then touches it before he receives it he's off side. Its either a very smart piece of liner work or a shocking mistake. TV at half time should show one way or the other. Ek No-one did touch it. He's offside then Paul is he not, and its good work by the official.. one of them anyway! Ek |
|
|
|
Post by milky on May 13, 2016 19:39:58 GMT
I'd love an away day at Hillsborough. We got a nil nil there didn't we first match after we went up in 1993? Them and Derby in the play off final and I don't care who wins, good day out either way Ek 2002 I think..Quitteralls first game and possibly Kris Commons debut ? |
|
|
|
Post by Paul Spencer on May 13, 2016 19:41:31 GMT
He's offside then Paul is he not, and its good work by the official.. one of them anyway! Ek No because BOTH of them initially give the goal. What (or who) made them change their minds? |
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on May 13, 2016 19:41:43 GMT
Really hoping Wednesday come up
|
|
|
|
Post by towraytek on May 13, 2016 19:46:40 GMT
He's offside then Paul is he not, and its good work by the official.. one of them anyway! Ek No because BOTH of them initially give the goal. What (or who) made them change their minds? Clarified at half time for me. Liner says he's off if no-one else touched it and ref says no-one did so he's offside and that's that. Ek |
|
|
|
Post by liam007 on May 13, 2016 19:48:47 GMT
Think they got it right but it took me 4 or 5 times to see it.Fairplay to the linesman who only got a split second to make a decision.Who really would be a official nowadays with all the tv coverage and angles.
|
|
|
|
Post by Paul Spencer on May 13, 2016 19:48:49 GMT
No because BOTH of them initially give the goal. What (or who) made them change their minds? Clarified at half time for me. Liner says he's off if no-one else touched it and ref says no-one did so he's offside and that's that. Ek So why did Marriner give the goal initially - what prompted him to go and have a word with the liner? |
|
|
|
Post by liam007 on May 13, 2016 19:51:37 GMT
Clarified at half time for me. Liner says he's off if no-one else touched it and ref says no-one did so he's offside and that's that. Ek So why did Marriner give the goal initially - what prompted him to go and have a word with the liner? Agreed very strange,took so long and i personally really struggled until the 4th or 5th view and understood they made the right decision. |
|
|
|
Post by werrington on May 13, 2016 19:51:57 GMT
Clarified at half time for me. Liner says he's off if no-one else touched it and ref says no-one did so he's offside and that's that. Ek So why did Marriner give the goal initially - what prompted him to go and have a word with the liner? Brighton player may have told him mate ? |
|
|
|
Post by milky on May 13, 2016 19:53:52 GMT
No because BOTH of them initially give the goal. What (or who) made them change their minds? Clarified at half time for me. Liner says he's off if no-one else touched it and ref says no-one did so he's offside and that's that. Ek Both initially gave the goal and it took a long time for one of them(or someone ) to decide there was a problem. Right decision but if the lino had his doubts he shouldn't be running back to the half way line surely ?? |
|
|
|
Post by Paul Spencer on May 13, 2016 19:54:22 GMT
So why did Marriner give the goal initially - what prompted him to go and have a word with the liner? Brighton player may have told him mate ? That's what I'm hinting at mate but didn't want to be labelled a conspiracy theorist - glad you said it! |
|
|
|
Post by towraytek on May 13, 2016 19:57:54 GMT
Clarified at half time for me. Liner says he's off if no-one else touched it and ref says no-one did so he's offside and that's that. Ek So why did Marriner give the goal initially - what prompted him to go and have a word with the liner? I'd like to see what exactly the ref does after the 'goal' is 'scored'. The cameras are all on the players. However the decision that was arrived at appears to be correct. Ek |
|
|
|
Post by walton corner on May 13, 2016 20:09:25 GMT
Hope you watching Shaq ...thats how you come inside and shoot Just like he did against Newcastle you mean? ....cant remember him doing that ,I remember him shooting from around the middle and the goalie made a mess of it ... |
|
|
|
Post by liam007 on May 13, 2016 20:20:26 GMT
Get in ....again. Get money on 'em to win the play-offs.
|
|
|
|
Post by Olgrligm on May 13, 2016 20:24:28 GMT
That thing with the flashes on the phones looks impressive. I noticed that Leicester do it, too.
|
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on May 13, 2016 20:32:54 GMT
Brighton player may have told him mate ? That's what I'm hinting at mate but didn't want to be labelled a conspiracy theorist - glad you said it! No conspiracy theory. I saw the left back virtually drag him over to the linesman! |
|
|
|
Post by Olgrligm on May 13, 2016 20:47:21 GMT
Again, this all requires the referee and linesman to go 'oooh, that's a good point, I never thought that the player might not have touched it, better give it as offside'. That's just downright incompetent!
|
|
|
|
Post by chesterfieldstokie on May 13, 2016 20:50:42 GMT
Again, this all requires the referee and linesman to go 'oooh, that's a good point, I never thought that the player might not have touched it, better give it as offside'. That's just downright incompetent! Perhaps the linesman and the ref discussed it through the mic and headphones!! |
|
|
|
Post by auntiegeorge on May 14, 2016 6:43:32 GMT
I have a mate up in Mansfield who is positively gooing in his pants at the moment. He's supported Wednesday since he was 4 and he's 52 now. He phoned me up today and said that no team has recovered from being 2 down in the Championship playfoffs. I don't know if that's true, but I really hope we'll be hosting them next season at the bet365 stadium.
|
|
|
|
Post by Northy on May 14, 2016 6:48:31 GMT
I'd love an away day at Hillsborough. We got a nil nil there didn't we first match after we went up in 1993? Them and Derby in the play off final and I don't care who wins, good day out either way Ek 2002 we took about 6000 up there for it? |
|
|
|
Post by RAF on May 14, 2016 7:35:57 GMT
Well chuffed for Wednesday, can't stand Brighton fans and hopefully will see them crying in the stands again next week.
'We play football the right way' perrenial failure Spunk Puffins.
H
|
|
|
|
Post by Waggy on May 14, 2016 7:47:38 GMT
Another ground with a f**king moron bashing a big drum? It's just wrong. You wont be saying that next season when the upper tier band are here. Im on the drum |
|
|
|
Post by mrcholmondleywarner on May 15, 2016 20:32:20 GMT
Another ground with a f**king moron bashing a big drum? It's just wrong. You wont be saying that next season when the upper tier band are here. Im on the drum I think Trevor might have something to say about that. Won't you just end up spilling your coffee? |
|
|
|
Post by Waggy on May 16, 2016 8:56:25 GMT
You wont be saying that next season when the upper tier band are here. Im on the drum I think Trevor might have something to say about that. Won't you just end up spilling your coffee? Trevor will be blowing his trumpet while i bang the drums |
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on May 16, 2016 18:55:40 GMT
What a game already, Sidwell controlling things for Brighton.
|
|
|
|
Post by spiderpuss on May 16, 2016 19:05:52 GMT
hell of a confusing set of strips going on out there. Good game (as usual for play-offs) going on.
|
|
|
|
Post by spiderpuss on May 16, 2016 19:07:22 GMT
That's made a game of it.
|
|
