|
Post by lastoftheldk on Feb 1, 2016 20:30:59 GMT
I thought he was one of the Harrys.
|
|
|
Post by partickpotter on Feb 1, 2016 20:54:31 GMT
Unlike ************** to jump before he was pushed.
But he'll be back.
|
|
|
Post by Skankmonkey on Feb 1, 2016 21:14:12 GMT
I much prefer his more outlandish creations. How about a Hizb-ut-Tahrir activist persona called Alky Leafer or summat similar. That would liven things up a bit. It would be a short "bit" admittedly...
|
|
|
Post by harryburrows on Feb 1, 2016 23:09:58 GMT
He was a ************** , normally gives his characters a couple of months though
|
|
|
Post by rogerjonesisgod on Feb 1, 2016 23:50:58 GMT
The VPN probably went down for mudflaps.
Anyway, if you need a ************** fix you've always got;
will, eveningfog, manmarking, nietzsche, riccochet, Shawcross for England, HumphreyPicklewilly, tonybaloney, planet, samba, Al Dente, hearttohartshill, brilittle, deanossisterspants, adoptedessexstokie, Riproaringpotter, Rudy Kloptik, rayweirdun, whitey, boiler, Honky, tideswell, Redwhiteandblue, Papist, Lesbian Jane, essexstokey, rat, flashman ......
|
|
|
Post by Skankmonkey on Feb 2, 2016 0:39:27 GMT
The VPN probably went down for mudflaps. Anyway, if you need a ************** fix you've always got; skankmonkey, will, eveningfog, mickmillslovechild (the new one) ...... Again, no you haven't chum.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 2, 2016 0:46:20 GMT
I did at one time think Skankmonkey was **************, I even pm'd him, but I am 100% certain it is not **************.
|
|
|
Post by Skankmonkey on Feb 2, 2016 0:51:50 GMT
I did at one time think Skankmonkey was **************, I even pm'd him, but I am 100% certain it is not **************. Don't recall a pm mate but thanks for the support. Much appreciated. :-)
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 2, 2016 2:40:39 GMT
I did at one time think Skankmonkey was **************, I even pm'd him, but I am 100% certain it is not **************. Don't recall a pm mate but thanks for the support. Much appreciated. :-) I might have asked ************** if he was you in that case. ************** is OK, but once he goes off on a rant there is simply no reasoning with him, he will never see both sides of an argument, and sadly we have fell out over it...Oh well, I suppose that's why you should never discus politics with a friend...
|
|
|
Post by Skankmonkey on Feb 2, 2016 10:06:17 GMT
Don't recall a pm mate but thanks for the support. Much appreciated. :-) I might have asked ************** if he was you in that case. ************** is OK, but once he goes off on a rant there is simply no reasoning with him, he will never see both sides of an argument, and sadly we have fell out over it...Oh well, I suppose that's why you should never discus politics with a friend... Again, thanks for the post shanghai. I appreciate it greatly. I just want to be considered a twat in my own right and not as a figment of someone elses imagination. With regard to politics on here I keep out of it largely nowadays. I go by what stokeharry used to say - "90% of the stuff written on message boards is bullshit" and that "nobody ever changed anybodys mind about anything serious by arguing on a football message board" - so I don't bother. Probably a good thing as I might be even more of a "lefty tree hugging apologist" than your ex-friend. Thanks again.
|
|
|
Post by followyoudown on Feb 2, 2016 14:18:35 GMT
I might have asked ************** if he was you in that case. ************** is OK, but once he goes off on a rant there is simply no reasoning with him, he will never see both sides of an argument, and sadly we have fell out over it...Oh well, I suppose that's why you should never discus politics with a friend... Again, thanks for the post shanghai. I appreciate it greatly. I just want to be considered a twat in my own right and not as a figment of someone elses imagination. :-) With regard to politics on here I keep out of it largely nowadays. I go by what stokeharry used to say - "90% of the stuff written on message boards is bullshit" and that "nobody ever changed anybodys mind about anything serious by arguing on a football message board" - so I don't bother. Probably a good thing as I might be even more of a "lefty tree hugging apologist" than your ex-friend. ;-) Thanks again. Wasn't stokeharry a ************** then too was there ever a definite consensus on that ?
|
|
|
Post by partickpotter on Feb 2, 2016 14:36:20 GMT
Again, thanks for the post shanghai. I appreciate it greatly. I just want to be considered a twat in my own right and not as a figment of someone elses imagination. :-) With regard to politics on here I keep out of it largely nowadays. I go by what stokeharry used to say - "90% of the stuff written on message boards is bullshit" and that "nobody ever changed anybodys mind about anything serious by arguing on a football message board" - so I don't bother. Probably a good thing as I might be even more of a "lefty tree hugging apologist" than your ex-friend. ;-) Thanks again. Wasn't stokeharry a ************** then too was there ever a definite consensus on that ? The MO was very similar - but I'm sure someone said they weren't one and the same.
|
|
|
Post by Skankmonkey on Feb 2, 2016 15:03:41 GMT
Again, thanks for the post shanghai. I appreciate it greatly. I just want to be considered a twat in my own right and not as a figment of someone elses imagination. :-) With regard to politics on here I keep out of it largely nowadays. I go by what stokeharry used to say - "90% of the stuff written on message boards is bullshit" and that "nobody ever changed anybodys mind about anything serious by arguing on a football message board" - so I don't bother. Probably a good thing as I might be even more of a "lefty tree hugging apologist" than your ex-friend. ;-) Thanks again. Wasn't stokeharry a ************** then too was there ever a definite consensus on that ? I didn't consider him to be. The odd bits of personal info he posted were convincing enough for me. Having said that, ************** fooled me big time early on when I first started posting so what do I know!
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 3, 2016 0:42:34 GMT
Wasn't stokeharry a ************** then too was there ever a definite consensus on that ? I didn't consider him to be. The odd bits of personal info he posted were convincing enough for me. Having said that, ************** fooled me big time early on when I first started posting so what do I know! Deff Not the same In fact StokeHarry was something of an anticliff in many ways...
|
|
|
Post by Skankmonkey on Feb 3, 2016 12:05:51 GMT
I didn't consider him to be. The odd bits of personal info he posted were convincing enough for me. Having said that, ************** fooled me big time early on when I first started posting so what do I know! Deff Not the same In fact StokeHarry was something of an anticliff in many ways... He was a spiky character and, outside of football and oatcake fillings, I didn't agree with much of anything he said but I liked him. He liked to wind people up but I couldn't work out whether he actually enjoyed the arguing or it had just become a habit. He certainly gave as good as he got anyway. He had a subtle dry sense of humour.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 3, 2016 12:25:10 GMT
Deff Not the same In fact StokeHarry was something of an anticliff in many ways... He was a spiky character and, outside of football and oatcake fillings, I didn't agree with much of anything he said but I liked him. He liked to wind people up but I couldn't work out whether he actually enjoyed the arguing or it had just become a habit. He certainly gave as good as he got anyway. He had a subtle dry sense of humour. We used to wind certain posters up together, and PM each other once the blue paper had been lit... He is on here, but can't tell u who he is...One of only a handful of posters I'd happily have a beer with when I am next in UK...
|
|
|
Post by Gordon Marshall on Feb 4, 2016 8:36:03 GMT
He was a spiky character and, outside of football and oatcake fillings, I didn't agree with much of anything he said but I liked him. He liked to wind people up but I couldn't work out whether he actually enjoyed the arguing or it had just become a habit. He certainly gave as good as he got anyway. He had a subtle dry sense of humour. We used to wind certain posters up together, and PM each other once the blue paper had been lit... He is on here, but can't tell u who he is...One of only a handful of posters I'd happily have a beer with when I am next in UK... Would you seriously meet up with posters on here. I hope you have met them before.
|
|
|
Post by nietzsche on Feb 4, 2016 9:18:15 GMT
************** rules the board! He has got you all mesmerised, confused but obsessed. Remember his arch enemy, Mumf. Now he was a good, sadly missed poster. Shame.
|
|
|
Post by Northy on Feb 4, 2016 12:25:45 GMT
************** rules the board! He has got you all mesmerised, confused but obsessed. Remember his arch enemy, Mumf. Now he was a good, sadly missed poster. Shame. hows it going **************
|
|
|
Post by manmarking on Feb 4, 2016 12:31:01 GMT
************** rules the board! He has got you all mesmerised, confused but obsessed. Remember his arch enemy, Mumf. Now he was a good, sadly missed poster. Shame. Mumf was invaluable for animal advice but, like so many bullies, couldn't hack the sort of rough and tumble he liked to dish out himself. That's why he ragequit on me. He'd do well to learn some humility and self-awareness before returning. Agree about ************** entirely. There are a couple of posters that I think are definitely him but I find the paranoia and the wild guesswork far too amusing to share my honest opinions on that. The boards are all the better for the **************s, real or fake.
|
|
|
Post by nietzsche on Feb 4, 2016 12:56:36 GMT
************** rules the board! He has got you all mesmerised, confused but obsessed. Remember his arch enemy, Mumf. Now he was a good, sadly missed poster. Shame. Mumf was invaluable for animal advice but, like so many bullies, couldn't hack the sort of rough and tumble he liked to dish out himself. That's why he ragequit on me. He'd do well to learn some humility and self-awareness before returning. Agree about ************** entirely. There are a couple of posters that I think are definitely him but I find the paranoia and the wild guesswork far too amusing to share my honest opinions on that. The boards are all the better for the **************s, real or fake. Not sure that I would not call Mumf a bully,within the context of messageboard etiquette.He was passionate, an original and funny. Many , many others have been more derogatory to others and many more have had ulterior agendas. It is just with Mumf being such a prominent character that he attracted more attention. To a degree we are all anonymous on message boards, some become more personal than others to win their arguments. With Mumf what you saw is what you got....at least he did not have to resort to the duplicity of multile identities. For me the board is much much poorer without Mumf
|
|
|
Post by The Drunken Communist on Feb 4, 2016 13:09:11 GMT
Logging in on different accounts to talk to yourself about yourself, classic **************
|
|
|
Post by manmarking on Feb 4, 2016 13:13:56 GMT
Mumf was invaluable for animal advice but, like so many bullies, couldn't hack the sort of rough and tumble he liked to dish out himself. That's why he ragequit on me. He'd do well to learn some humility and self-awareness before returning. Agree about ************** entirely. There are a couple of posters that I think are definitely him but I find the paranoia and the wild guesswork far too amusing to share my honest opinions on that. The boards are all the better for the **************s, real or fake. Not sure that I would not call Mumf a bully,within the context of messageboard etiquette.He was passionate, an original and funny. Many , many others have been more derogatory to others and many more have had ulterior agendas. It is just with Mumf being such a prominent character that he attracted more attention. To a degree we are all anonymous on message boards, some become more personal than others to win their arguments. With Mumf what you saw is what you got....at least he did not have to resort to the duplicity of multile identities. For me the board is much much poorer without Mumf I think he was perfectly reasonable if you happened to agree with everything he said to the letter, but was incapable of having a discussion with dissenters without getting personal and often fairly ugly. Anyhoo, fear not, he may well still be posting - multiple ids seems to be the norm these days
|
|
|
Post by manmarking on Feb 4, 2016 13:15:24 GMT
Logging in on different accounts to talk to yourself about yourself, classic ************** cf. previous post about wild guesswork and paranoia
|
|
|
Post by nietzsche on Feb 4, 2016 17:49:52 GMT
Not sure that I would not call Mumf a bully,within the context of messageboard etiquette.He was passionate, an original and funny. Many , many others have been more derogatory to others and many more have had ulterior agendas. It is just with Mumf being such a prominent character that he attracted more attention. To a degree we are all anonymous on message boards, some become more personal than others to win their arguments. With Mumf what you saw is what you got....at least he did not have to resort to the duplicity of multile identities. For me the board is much much poorer without Mumf I think he was perfectly reasonable if you happened to agree with everything he said to the letter, but was incapable of having a discussion with dissenters without getting personal and often fairly ugly. Anyhoo, fear not, he may well still be posting - multiple ids seems to be the norm these days The perfectly reasonable argument works both ways. Some were just as "nasty" to him , just because they did not agree with him.
|
|
|
Post by nietzsche on Feb 4, 2016 18:11:38 GMT
Logging in on different accounts to talk to yourself about yourself, classic ************** Don't know about Manmarking, but I do not think that I am **************
|
|
|
Post by Skankmonkey on Feb 5, 2016 12:27:46 GMT
Logging in on different accounts to talk to yourself about yourself, classic ************** Don't know about Manmarking, but I do not think that I am **************
Then sir, I declare you to be the famous Kolley Kibber and I hereby claim my £5 reward.
|
|
|
Post by ihaveadream on Feb 5, 2016 13:37:23 GMT
Don't know about Manmarking, but I do not think that I am **************
Then sir, I declare you to be the famous Kolley Kibber and I hereby claim my £5 reward.
Brighton Rock?
|
|
|
Post by Skankmonkey on Feb 5, 2016 14:11:47 GMT
Then sir, I declare you to be the famous Kolley Kibber and I hereby claim my £5 reward.
Brighton Rock? Bang on! :-) Another fictional character... ;-)
|
|
|
Post by nietzsche on Feb 5, 2016 19:20:31 GMT
Bang on! :-) Another fictional character... ;-) Aren't we all? Especially the Cliffies.
|
|