|
Appeal
Aug 31, 2015 12:23:14 GMT
Post by sheikhmomo on Aug 31, 2015 12:23:14 GMT
No. We run the risk of an extra match ban for a frivolous appeal if we do. One of the games is the match at Fulham so in effect we're only losing the players for two Premier League games. An appeal could make that three. Do they still apply this rule? Can't remember the last time it was applied despite Chelsea continually challenging the most obvious red cards. I guess if the FA did decide to start using it again we might be seen as a suitable candidate to make an example of.
|
|
|
Appeal
Aug 31, 2015 12:47:05 GMT
Post by loosestools on Aug 31, 2015 12:47:05 GMT
After watching the sunday supplement and every one of the journo's said Afellay shoudn't have been sent off as there is no rule that says you can't raise your hands, i thought i'd have a quick look up. From what i found it says you can raise your hands to a players face. It's just if the ref see's it as violent conduct. Bit of a difference between a punch or a good slap to a little flick which is why the journo's were saying he shouldn't have gone. So effectively we could appeal on the grounds that it was not violent conduct? See Daily Mail - Graham Poll: Affally correctly sent off for striking Gardner Garder could also have been dismissed - he brought Affellay down from behind and appeared to flick him on the cheek prompting Affellay's reaction . So its the difference between a strike and a flick!
No dispute over Adam when he deliberately stood on Dawsons leg .
Dont bother appealing the kangaroo court has already sat and the black cap has already been installed on the FA's fat head.
|
|
|
Appeal
Aug 31, 2015 13:39:21 GMT
Post by gonk on Aug 31, 2015 13:39:21 GMT
So effectively we could appeal on the grounds that it was not violent conduct? See Daily Mail - Graham Poll: Affally correctly sent off for striking Gardner Garder could also have been dismissed - he brought Affellay down from behind and appeared to flick him on the cheek prompting Affellay's reaction . So its the difference between a strike and a flick!
No dispute over Adam when he deliberately stood on Dawsons leg .
Dont bother appealing the kangaroo court has already sat and the black cap has already been installed on the FA's fat head. Shows how much that twat knows,just said on H&J Huth should have been the 3rd player sent off for Stoke.
|
|
|
Appeal
Aug 31, 2015 13:53:56 GMT
Post by loosestools on Aug 31, 2015 13:53:56 GMT
And Maurice Setters should get a retrospective ban for nearly killing half of Stoke's opponents in the late 60's/early 70's, come on FA pile it on us, you know you want to.
|
|
|
Post by sportsman on Aug 31, 2015 13:59:07 GMT
See Daily Mail - Graham Poll: Affally correctly sent off for striking Gardner Garder could also have been dismissed - he brought Affellay down from behind and appeared to flick him on the cheek prompting Affellay's reaction . So its the difference between a strike and a flick!
No dispute over Adam when he deliberately stood on Dawsons leg .
Dont bother appealing the kangaroo court has already sat and the black cap has already been installed on the FA's fat head. Shows how much that twat knows,just said on H&J Huth should have been the 3rd player sent off for Stoke. Yeh, just heard that. The pillock was so intent on anything stoke that he forgot as Huth has left us! Even H & J said Afellay shouldn't have gone, but no Mr Poll has to give it the can't do it line. Let's wait for the next player at a big club to do it and see what happens.
|
|
|
Appeal
Aug 31, 2015 14:14:07 GMT
Post by fentonstokie1 on Aug 31, 2015 14:14:07 GMT
Shows how much that twat knows,just said on H&J Huth should have been the 3rd player sent off for Stoke. Yeh, just heard that. The pillock was so intent on anything stoke that he forgot as Huth has left us! Even H & J said Afellay shouldn't have gone, but no Mr Poll has to give it the can't do it line. Let's wait for the next player at a big club to do it and see what happens. You know what will happen, a warning or yellow maximum.
|
|
|
Appeal
Aug 31, 2015 15:00:33 GMT
Post by Billybigbollox on Aug 31, 2015 15:00:33 GMT
Both have just been looked at on Ref watch on SSN and Dermot Gallagher says both were reds. I don't think we should risk it. He's shite like all the rest.
|
|
|
Post by Malcolm Clarke on Sept 1, 2015 20:45:32 GMT
No. We run the risk of an extra match ban for a frivolous appeal if we do. One of the games is the match at Fulham so in effect we're only losing the players for two Premier League games. An appeal could make that three. Do they still apply this rule? Can't remember the last time it was applied despite Chelsea continually challenging the most obvious red cards. I guess if the FA did decide to start using it again we might be seen as a suitable candidate to make an example of. The rule is still there but you are right that it isn't often invoked. It can be invoked for appeals which a Commission decides have no reasonable prospect of success or are an abuse of process. The latter was designed to prevent lodging an appeal to enable a player to play in the next game, pending the appeal being heard. But under the fast track system now used, appeals are heard before the next game anyway, so it's become effectively redundant.
|
|
|
Appeal
Sept 1, 2015 20:52:29 GMT
via mobile
Post by Deleted on Sept 1, 2015 20:52:29 GMT
Pointless trying to appeal. Afellays is a defo red, although common sense should have prevailed and both of them got a yellow. And Charlie's is a red all day long. He k owd what he's doing there. But again if common sense had of prevailed on the Afellay situation Charlie wouldn't have lost his marbles
|
|
|
Appeal
Sept 1, 2015 21:05:15 GMT
via mobile
Post by Ayupshag on Sept 1, 2015 21:05:15 GMT
What pisses me off about the Affelay red is would that cunt Oliver dish out the same card to Rooney or Costa? Not a fuckin chance
|
|
|
Appeal
Sept 1, 2015 23:56:07 GMT
Post by whereami on Sept 1, 2015 23:56:07 GMT
I wonder how the linesman on Saturday and this one from a few years back would fare in a race? Seems like the older one wasnt quite so quick out of the mark flapping his flappy flag around
As far as I remember Rooney was not given a ban for violent conduct after the game. Come to think of it, neither was Ronaldo in the same game...
Easily a metatarsal breaker that one if he connected.
2 games, 2 possible red card offenses for 1 team in each, one team gets 2 red cards while one gets nowt. If it were up to me I'd appeal both and ask directly which incidents show violent conduct, and ask the FA to explain their decision.
*sorry I forgot Wilko got sent off in the same game vs manu after this. chuck that in as well, make them show their workings out like its a GCSE maths test.
|
|