|
|
Pleb!
Nov 27, 2014 17:27:52 GMT
via mobile
Post by bathstoke on Nov 27, 2014 17:27:52 GMT
What a plebby thing to do, Calling coppers plebs, when we all know they is pigs!!!
For all the spin that Mitchell & his chums have put on this, the judge doesn't believe him & now we know why he hasn't been given his job back.
They're all guilty, just waiting to be caught...
|
|
|
|
Post by salopstick on Nov 27, 2014 17:35:36 GMT
A waste of time and effort.
A dick MP in a rush
Police with no common sense
Police sacked and in jail
The only winners lawyers
|
|
|
|
Pleb!
Nov 27, 2014 18:27:38 GMT
Post by starkiller on Nov 27, 2014 18:27:38 GMT
Word frequently used by royalty, the elite, private schooled politicians and the like, to describe the rest of us.
|
|
|
|
Pleb!
Nov 27, 2014 18:32:50 GMT
Post by nicholasjalcock on Nov 27, 2014 18:32:50 GMT
A waste of time and effort. A dick MP in a rush Police with no common sense Police sacked and in jail The only winners lawyers You're 100% right. Mitchell should have had the judgment to settle for the situation! Fool! |
|
|
|
Pleb!
Nov 27, 2014 18:59:28 GMT
Post by Deleted on Nov 27, 2014 18:59:28 GMT
A waste of time and effort. A dick MP in a rush Police with no common sense Police sacked and in jail The only winners lawyers What!? You don't think this shows the contempt the Tory Party has for the voter!? You amaze me  |
|
|
|
Pleb!
Nov 27, 2014 19:19:01 GMT
Post by salopstick on Nov 27, 2014 19:19:01 GMT
A waste of time and effort. A dick MP in a rush Police with no common sense Police sacked and in jail The only winners lawyers What!? You don't think this shows the contempt the Tory Party has for the voter!? You amaze me Considering police have been sacked and are in prison I'd say the whole episode is a sorry state of affairs on both sides |
|
|
|
Pleb!
Nov 27, 2014 19:26:12 GMT
Post by Deleted on Nov 27, 2014 19:26:12 GMT
A waste of time and effort. A dick MP in a rush Police with no common sense Police sacked and in jail The only winners lawyers A lack of common sense and stubborn pride shown by all parties , it was a storm in a teacup , it shouldn't have lead to a court case and job losses ....absolutely ridiculous . |
|
|
|
Pleb!
Nov 28, 2014 18:46:48 GMT
Post by robstokie on Nov 28, 2014 18:46:48 GMT
To be Honest, I have to laugh at how far Andrew Mitchell took the whole saga. The whole thing reeks of Naivety on Mr Mitchells part. If he had just admitted it straight out or even kept schtum for a while, it would have been long forgotten and he would have been able to salvage his reputation. Then again, if those rozzers had any common sense and flexibility about them, instead of being right fuckers with shite people skills, the whole thing wouldn't have happened in the first place Alas, the only winners are the Sun and the Lawyers. Again.
|
|
|
|
Pleb!
Nov 28, 2014 18:48:11 GMT
Post by Deleted on Nov 28, 2014 18:48:11 GMT
Good , good...
|
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 28, 2014 22:47:08 GMT
To be Honest, I have to laugh at how far Andrew Mitchell took the whole saga. The whole thing reeks of Naivety on Mr Mitchells part. If he had just admitted it straight out or even kept schtum for a while, it would have been long forgotten and he would have been able to salvage his reputation. Then again, if those rozzers had any common sense and flexibility about them, instead of being right fuckers with shite people skills, the whole thing wouldn't have happened in the first place Alas, the only winners are the Sun and the Lawyers. Again. Quite right, the daft twat should've owned up straight away, said he was knackered or pissed off about something, apologised for his language, said it was out of character and it would have been forgotten about in two days. Instead, it's dragged on for two years, perpetuated the impression that the Tories are the Nasty Party of privileged toffs and even had leading Torygraph writers condemning him," For a senior minister to call the people protecting him and his colleagues “plebs” would be no small matter. It would confirm every ghastly suspicion that the Tory party is led by people who really do believe themselves born to rule and therefore regard the police as no more than proletarian shock-troops at their beck and call. It would be a great scandal". Matthew D'Ancona. Idiot. |
|
|
|
Pleb!
Nov 28, 2014 23:09:07 GMT
Post by Deleted on Nov 28, 2014 23:09:07 GMT
To be Honest, I have to laugh at how far Andrew Mitchell took the whole saga. The whole thing reeks of Naivety on Mr Mitchells part. If he had just admitted it straight out or even kept schtum for a while, it would have been long forgotten and he would have been able to salvage his reputation. Then again, if those rozzers had any common sense and flexibility about them, instead of being right fuckers with shite people skills, the whole thing wouldn't have happened in the first place Alas, the only winners are the Sun and the Lawyers. Again. Quite right, the daft twat should've owned up straight away, said he was knackered or pissed off about something, apologised for his language, said it was out of character and it would have been forgotten about in two days. Instead, it's dragged on for two years, perpetuated the impression that the Tories are the Nasty Party of privileged toffs and even had leading Torygraph writers condemning him," For a senior minister to call the people protecting him and his colleagues “plebs” would be no small matter. It would confirm every ghastly suspicion that the Tory party is led by people who really do believe themselves born to rule and therefore regard the police as no more than proletarian shock-troops at their beck and call. It would be a great scandal". Matthew D'Ancona. Idiot. Yes quite right . |
|
|
|
Pleb!
Nov 29, 2014 12:59:01 GMT
Post by Huddysleftfoot on Nov 29, 2014 12:59:01 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by kidsgroveboxxy on Nov 29, 2014 23:55:46 GMT
Mitchell does look like the kind of person you would purposely cross the road to slap in the face though!
|
|
|
|
Pleb!
Nov 30, 2014 8:11:19 GMT
via mobile
Post by salopstick on Nov 30, 2014 8:11:19 GMT
do you believe thornberry' tweet to be harmless ignorance |
|
|
|
Pleb!
Nov 30, 2014 9:14:13 GMT
via mobile
Post by bathstoke on Nov 30, 2014 9:14:13 GMT
do you believe thornberry' tweet to be harmless ignorance She's a giddy council estate girl, who thought she was saying something about latent racists. She shouldn't have resigned... |
|
|
|
Pleb!
Nov 30, 2014 10:08:14 GMT
via mobile
Post by salopstick on Nov 30, 2014 10:08:14 GMT
do you believe thornberry' tweet to be harmless ignorance She's a giddy council estate girl, who thought she was saying something about latent racists. She shouldn't have resigned... You are probably right but by definition it wasn't "innocuous" The guy who made it (obviously not plagerous huddy) probably doesn't even know what it means |
|
|
|
Pleb!
Nov 30, 2014 10:13:42 GMT
Post by Huddysleftfoot on Nov 30, 2014 10:13:42 GMT
She's a giddy council estate girl, who thought she was saying something about latent racists. She shouldn't have resigned... You are probably right but by definition it wasn't "innocuous" The guy who made it (obviously not plagerous huddy) probably doesn't even know what it means Regardless of whether Thornberry was right or wrong (and I think the latter) the meme illustrates the hypocrisy of Cameron. |
|
|
|
Pleb!
Nov 30, 2014 10:45:42 GMT
via mobile
Post by salopstick on Nov 30, 2014 10:45:42 GMT
You are probably right but by definition it wasn't "innocuous" The guy who made it (obviously not plagerous huddy) probably doesn't even know what it means Regardless of whether Thornberry was right or wrong (and I think the latter) the meme illustrates the hypocrisy of Cameron. it also illustrates the thickness of its author. |
|
|
|
Pleb!
Nov 30, 2014 10:59:25 GMT
Post by Huddysleftfoot on Nov 30, 2014 10:59:25 GMT
Regardless of whether Thornberry was right or wrong (and I think the latter) the meme illustrates the hypocrisy of Cameron. it also illustrates the thickness of its author. Not really, I think you're missing the point. |
|
|
|
Pleb!
Nov 30, 2014 11:04:24 GMT
via mobile
Post by salopstick on Nov 30, 2014 11:04:24 GMT
it also illustrates the thickness of its author. Not really, I think you're missing the point. Not really I understand his point and the hypocrisy he believes is going on. He picked the wrong example and dismissed his own sides blunder as innocuous. In doing so he becomes as hypocritical as the point he is trying to prove. |
|
|
|
Pleb!
Nov 30, 2014 12:59:48 GMT
Post by Huddysleftfoot on Nov 30, 2014 12:59:48 GMT
Not really, I think you're missing the point. Not really I understand his point and the hypocrisy he believes is going on. He picked the wrong example and dismissed his own sides blunder as innocuous. In doing so he becomes as hypocritical as the point he is trying to prove. Compared to Mitchell's comments aimed at an on duty police offcier it's fair to say they are innocuous surely? In fact there's no comment on Thornberry's photo is there? |
|
|
|
Pleb!
Nov 30, 2014 13:44:42 GMT
via mobile
Post by salopstick on Nov 30, 2014 13:44:42 GMT
Not really I understand his point and the hypocrisy he believes is going on. He picked the wrong example and dismissed his own sides blunder as innocuous. In doing so he becomes as hypocritical as the point he is trying to prove. Compared to Mitchell's comments aimed at an on duty police offcier it's fair to say they are innocuous surely? In fact there's no comment on Thornberry's photo is there? Exactly. The meme author decided not to include thornberrys comment. Tell half his story to amplify the Mitchell story. |
|
|
|
Pleb!
Nov 30, 2014 17:32:02 GMT
Post by Huddysleftfoot on Nov 30, 2014 17:32:02 GMT
Compared to Mitchell's comments aimed at an on duty police offcier it's fair to say they are innocuous surely? In fact there's no comment on Thornberry's photo is there? Exactly. The meme author decided not to include thornberrys comment. Tell half his story to amplify the Mitchell story. What was her comment? |
|
|
|
Pleb!
Nov 30, 2014 18:16:16 GMT
via mobile
Post by salopstick on Nov 30, 2014 18:16:16 GMT
Exactly. The meme author decided not to include thornberrys comment. Tell half his story to amplify the Mitchell story. What was her comment? So you posting shit memes about stories you don't even know. Not like you. She posted the pic of the flags with. "Image from #Rochester" on the day of the Rochester by-election. Make your own interpretation of what she means but the labour party and miliband and were not happy with her snobbery. The difference between her and Mitchell (and mellow) is the two blokes were arguably provoked still not acceptable and endemic of the political classes where she chooses to attack the working class voters her party says it represents. |
|
|
|
Pleb!
Dec 1, 2014 0:21:19 GMT
Post by Huddysleftfoot on Dec 1, 2014 0:21:19 GMT
So you posting shit memes about stories you don't even know. Not like you. She posted the pic of the flags with. "Image from #Rochester" on the day of the Rochester by-election. Make your own interpretation of what she means but the labour party and miliband and were not happy with her snobbery. The difference between her and Mitchell (and mellow) is the two blokes were arguably provoked still not acceptable and endemic of the political classes where she chooses to attack the working class voters her party says it represents. So no comment then? Thought you swore there was a "comment"? What was it exactly? |
|
|
|
Pleb!
Dec 1, 2014 7:16:31 GMT
via mobile
Post by salopstick on Dec 1, 2014 7:16:31 GMT
So you posting shit memes about stories you don't even know. Not like you. She posted the pic of the flags with. "Image from #Rochester" on the day of the Rochester by-election. Make your own interpretation of what she means but the labour party and miliband and were not happy with her snobbery. The difference between her and Mitchell (and mellow) is the two blokes were arguably provoked still not acceptable and endemic of the political classes where she chooses to attack the working class voters her party says it represents. So no comment then? Thought you swore there was a "comment"? What was it exactly? Can you not read "Image from #rochester" |
|
|
|
Pleb!
Dec 1, 2014 10:34:26 GMT
Post by Huddysleftfoot on Dec 1, 2014 10:34:26 GMT
So no comment then? Thought you swore there was a "comment"? What was it exactly? Can you not read "Image from #rochester" I fail to see how that is in any way abusive. It took the Sun (Murdoch Tory rag as you know) to make something of it. Incidentally the author of the meme is dyslexic like you and you're not thick are you? |
|
|
|
Pleb!
Dec 1, 2014 10:54:48 GMT
via mobile
Post by salopstick on Dec 1, 2014 10:54:48 GMT
Can you not read "Image from #rochester" I fail to see how that is in any way abusive. It took the Sun (Murdoch Tory rag as you know) to make something of it. Incidentally the author of the meme is dyslexic like you and you're not thick are you? I didn't say it was abusive. But it is offensive maybe not to you but certainly to the house owner, people of Rochester and others who like to fly a flag from their house. |
|
|
|
Pleb!
Dec 3, 2014 10:10:59 GMT
Post by Huddysleftfoot on Dec 3, 2014 10:10:59 GMT
|
|
|
|
Pleb!
Dec 3, 2014 10:25:07 GMT
Post by salopstick on Dec 3, 2014 10:25:07 GMT
I cant read it, I do not subscribe to Sun+
|
|
