|
Post by salopstick on Oct 16, 2013 14:47:28 GMT
Mr Mitchell was reported to have been earning around £70,000 in his post at the Central Office of Information. Later he told Sky News that his new job was being paid for by a "generous financial backer who wishes to remain anonymous". He was not receiving money from Mr or Mrs McCann or the Find Madeleine appeal. www.mccannfiles.com/id255.htmlmore than £70K a year to brief the media on the mccanns - nice work if you can get it
|
|
|
Post by salopstick on Oct 16, 2013 14:52:50 GMT
|
|
|
Post by stayingupfor Sexualchocolate on Oct 16, 2013 15:08:14 GMT
|
|
|
Post by salopstick on Oct 16, 2013 15:14:43 GMT
|
|
|
Post by Pedropotter on Oct 16, 2013 15:23:12 GMT
(in a New York accent....) I aint got time to read that man! I'm working on other leads .... condense the info and get back to me. By the way, check out the neighbours, local businesses, anywhere they go regularly, see what you can find out. We need to nail these bastards.
|
|
|
Post by countofmontecristo on Oct 16, 2013 15:26:43 GMT
(in a New York accent....) I aint got time to read that man! I'm working on other leads .... condense the info and get back to me. By the way, check out the neighbours, local businesses, anywhere they go regularly, see what you can find out. We need to nail these bastards. Ten Four Chief
|
|
|
Post by salopstick on Oct 16, 2013 15:31:28 GMT
(in a New York accent....) I aint got time to read that man! I'm working on other leads .... condense the info and get back to me. By the way, check out the neighbours, local businesses, anywhere they go regularly, see what you can find out. We need to nail these bastards. in a nutshell - lets fleece the public and get them to help pay our legal bills and mortgage
|
|
|
Post by Pedropotter on Oct 16, 2013 15:33:43 GMT
(in a New York accent....) I aint got time to read that man! I'm working on other leads .... condense the info and get back to me. By the way, check out the neighbours, local businesses, anywhere they go regularly, see what you can find out. We need to nail these bastards. in a nutshell - lets fleece the public and get them to help pay our legal bills and mortgage GRRRRRRRRRRRR!
|
|
|
Post by drjeffsdiscobarge on Oct 16, 2013 15:55:17 GMT
Count - if you have a read of the link (it's a long 'un mind!) provided earlier www.cwporter.com/mccann.htm there are discussions of a lot of the points you have raised. While this is obviously only one man's point of view, like the McCann Files site, a lot of it is based on previous media reports or witness statements. The thing that struck me most about reading the CWPorter page was how much of what was said on Panorama the other night was discreditted in his pamphlet several years ago. The McCann's are more than likely completely 'innocent' (ahem) but they come across as heartless bastards at best. If my child was abducted and members of the public were sending money that most of them could probably ill afford to give, I would probably break down in tears at the generosity of it all... Likewise, as the anniversary of my child being abducted approached, I would probably be fairly emotional...
|
|
|
Post by cartman123 on Oct 16, 2013 16:18:04 GMT
This guy was the lead investigator who was prosecuted by the McCanns using the Maddie fund. He seems certain that Madeline was killed in the apartment that night.
|
|
|
Post by cartman123 on Oct 16, 2013 18:22:52 GMT
|
|
|
Post by salopstick on Oct 16, 2013 19:12:03 GMT
This guy was the lead investigator who was prosecuted by the McCanns using the Maddie fund. He seems certain that Madeline was killed in the apartment that night. So it could have happened any time after 1730 and the rest was a charade
|
|
choc
Academy Starlet
Posts: 149
|
Post by choc on Oct 16, 2013 19:41:35 GMT
Fox News talking to Wendy Murphy speaking her mind on this case. I don't think the presenter was prepared for it!
|
|
|
Post by padders01 on Oct 16, 2013 19:43:27 GMT
This guy was the lead investigator who was prosecuted by the McCanns using the Maddie fund. He seems certain that Madeline was killed in the apartment that night. So it could have happened any time after 1730 and the rest was a charade That video has soooooo many different stories than the Crimewatch one!!! It's all very strange
|
|
|
Post by salopstick on Oct 16, 2013 19:52:21 GMT
Fox News talking to Wendy Murphy speaking her mind on this case. I don't think the presenter was prepared for it! People are not buying the lie
|
|
|
Post by harrysburrow on Oct 16, 2013 19:56:45 GMT
That's a 50 minute programme, the content of which was almost completely omitted by Crimewatch.
|
|
|
Post by cartman123 on Oct 16, 2013 20:16:30 GMT
I'm sorry, but the more I see this Gerry guy the more I think he's actually a psychopath? Maybe he's manipulating Kate? Stuff like that happens all the time. Look at women who stay in abusive relationships. He says Cadaver dogs are unreliable? The dogs that were used in this investigation have never been wrong. There's something really off about this guy. Hope the police nail him.
|
|
|
Post by dutchstokie on Oct 16, 2013 20:20:49 GMT
Count - if you have a read of the link (it's a long 'un mind!) provided earlier www.cwporter.com/mccann.htm there are discussions of a lot of the points you have raised. While this is obviously only one man's point of view, like the McCann Files site, a lot of it is based on previous media reports or witness statements. The thing that struck me most about reading the CWPorter page was how much of what was said on Panorama the other night was discreditted in his pamphlet several years ago. The McCann's are more than likely completely 'innocent' (ahem) but they come across as heartless bastards at best. If my child was abducted and members of the public were sending money that most of them could probably ill afford to give, I would probably break down in tears at the generosity of it all... Likewise, as the anniversary of my child being abducted approached, I would probably be fairly emotional... To me that first photo of the guilty couple looks photoshoppd.......just on the point of financial checks, were the guilty couple in any kind of financial difficulties at the time? I know they have both well paying jobs......cant think of reading about any anywhere
|
|
|
Post by Pedropotter on Oct 16, 2013 21:06:50 GMT
[/div][/quote]To me that first photo of the guilty couple looks photoshoppd...... [/quote] Hey, its a good job we have got you on the case.
|
|
|
Post by cartman123 on Oct 17, 2013 15:04:42 GMT
www.gov.uk/law-on-leaving-your-child-home-aloneSo even if you don't believe they killed Madeline, which I do, then they can still be prosecuted for leaving their children alone. I find it amazing how they haven't been charged for negligence. If this was a working class family they would've been torn apart by the media. Fucking joke it is. My only sympathy is with Madeline, not these two cunts.
|
|
|
Post by britsabroad on Oct 17, 2013 15:20:03 GMT
www.gov.uk/law-on-leaving-your-child-home-aloneSo even if you don't believe they killed Madeline, which I do, then they can still be prosecuted for leaving their children alone. I find it amazing how they haven't been charged for negligence. If this was a working class family they would've been torn apart by the media. Fucking joke it is. My only sympathy is with Madeline, not these two cunts. Im sure there is a simple explanation for this, but what does it matter what UK law/UK police think? This crime was committed in Portugal, so this is a case for Portuguese police to solve according to their own laws?
|
|
|
Post by cartman123 on Oct 17, 2013 15:24:22 GMT
www.gov.uk/law-on-leaving-your-child-home-aloneSo even if you don't believe they killed Madeline, which I do, then they can still be prosecuted for leaving their children alone. I find it amazing how they haven't been charged for negligence. If this was a working class family they would've been torn apart by the media. Fucking joke it is. My only sympathy is with Madeline, not these two cunts. Im sure there is a simple explanation for this, but what does it matter what UK law/UK police think? This crime was committed in Portugal, so this is a case for Portuguese police to solve according to their own laws? So why did British police get involved and hinder the operation?
|
|
|
Post by lawrieleslie on Oct 17, 2013 15:46:05 GMT
Why are the McCanns above suspicion is what bugs me the most. Is it because they have already successfully won half a million in compensation from the Daily Express and are suing the Portugese police officer and people are now frightened to say anything publicly? The Scotland Yard detective said on Crimewatch that they were turning the clock back to zero and accepting nothing. So why are they accepting that the forensic evidence found by Eddie and Keela is not deemed to be at all incriminating. Why are they accepting that the 15/19 DNA match on samples found in the apartment and in the car is insufficient to put the McCanns under suspicion. I really hope that this detective is actually homing in on the parents but is treading carefully to make sure he leaves no stone unturned and leaving us in no doubt that the McCanns are responsible for their daughters death. Finally I am surprised that body language experts and psychologists have not been given an airing in the media as I am sure they will have been watching the McCanns carefully during interviews over the last few years. Or are they too scare of being sued?
|
|
|
Post by britsabroad on Oct 17, 2013 15:46:08 GMT
Im sure there is a simple explanation for this, but what does it matter what UK law/UK police think? This crime was committed in Portugal, so this is a case for Portuguese police to solve according to their own laws? So why did British police get involved and hinder the operation? Its a genuine question I am asking. I get that they can go and provide help, but beyond that surely its nothing to do with them? I know some crimes can cross borders, but i always thought the list was very small.
|
|
|
Post by lawrieleslie on Oct 17, 2013 18:40:04 GMT
Yes they are assisting the Portugese JP. There are 6 Portugese detectives but you would think, from the Crimewatch programme, that the British police were leading the investigation.
|
|
|
Post by lawrieleslie on Oct 17, 2013 19:29:50 GMT
What is the origin of Kate McCanns artist impression. Not seen this before mate. That is scary.
|
|
|
Post by Yorkshirepotter on Oct 18, 2013 6:54:50 GMT
|
|
|
Post by harrysburrow on Oct 18, 2013 10:48:02 GMT
What I can't fathom, having now read a lot of this stuff, is why all the info regarding dogs, DNA and blood traces seems to have always taken a back seat? Maddie's blood under tiles and near the window, blood and DNA traces in the car. For all this stuff to be explained by nose bleeds, nappies and meat from the supermarket and for it to be totally irrelevant to the Latest Crimewatch programme - I just don't get it?
|
|
|
Post by countofmontecristo on Oct 18, 2013 12:10:12 GMT
What I can't fathom, having now read a lot of this stuff, is why all the info regarding dogs, DNA and blood traces seems to have always taken a back seat? Maddie's blood under tiles and near the window, blood and DNA traces in the car. For all this stuff to be explained by nose bleeds, nappies and meat from the supermarket and for it to be totally irrelevant to the Latest Crimewatch programme - I just don't get it? All the circumstantial evidence from the dogs etc seems to be explainable by cross-contamination (and has been done to death further up the thread). Otherwise it could only mean the McCanns were guilty so there would be no Crimewatch program 'cos they'd already be in jail! I guess that's why they didn't cover it - plus of course the idea of Crimewatch is to uncover further leads and suspects. If no real new evidence is uncovered after this latest effort the focus may well switch back to the McCanns.
|
|
|
Post by cartman123 on Oct 18, 2013 12:18:19 GMT
What I can't fathom, having now read a lot of this stuff, is why all the info regarding dogs, DNA and blood traces seems to have always taken a back seat? Maddie's blood under tiles and near the window, blood and DNA traces in the car. For all this stuff to be explained by nose bleeds, nappies and meat from the supermarket and for it to be totally irrelevant to the Latest Crimewatch programme - I just don't get it? All the circumstantial evidence from the dogs etc seems to be explainable by cross-contamination (and has been done to death further up the thread). Otherwise it could only mean the McCanns were guilty so there would be no Crimewatch program 'cos they'd already be in jail! I guess that's why they didn't cover it - plus of course the idea of Crimewatch is to uncover further leads and suspects. If no real new evidence is uncovered after this latest effort the focus may well switch back to the McCanns. That's rubbish. Are you saying the investigators planted the blood under the tiles? Come on eh. Gerry McCann once smugly remarked, "find a body and prove we did it". This fucker is guilty, in my opinion. The Portuguese police were right from the start. And why did Gerry McCann say Cadaver dogs are unreliable? These dogs were used in 200 investigations and not once have they been wrong. They picked up the smell of death in that apartment. Madeline McCann was that dead body. Proving it is a different matter. Without a body it's very difficult to convict someone.
|
|