|
|
Post by You want salad on kebab boss? on Feb 23, 2008 18:22:42 GMT
These kind of challenges are happening week in week out all over the country, in no way am I saying that Martin Taylor deliberately meant to seriously hurt Eduardo, but no one can deny how high off the floor his studs were showing when he made contact with Eduardo's shin, I feels sorry for both parties concerned and I think everyone one from Stoke City will be wishing Eduardo the speediest of recoveries !!!!!
|
|
|
|
Post by serpico on Feb 23, 2008 18:41:27 GMT
Intentional or not it was recklessly high with studs showing, a long ban to make an example of him.
|
|
|
|
Post by Chunky Lover! on Feb 25, 2008 1:37:48 GMT
Simple red card offence, 3 game ban is all it should be
|
|
|
|
Post by Northy on Feb 25, 2008 15:16:21 GMT
A simple 3 game ban should suffice.
How high were sidibe's feet for his overhead kick ?
|
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 25, 2008 15:54:16 GMT
A simple 3 game ban should suffice. How high were sidibe's feet for his overhead kick ? Would that be the overhead kick that led to the ball receiving a double compound fracture of the leg; and the reality that being involved in professional football again is slim??? |
|
SCFC1863
Youth Player
Best Championship Team in the Midlands
Posts: 414
|
Post by SCFC1863 on Feb 25, 2008 19:25:23 GMT
3 game ban!
|
|
|
|
Post by StokieSC on Feb 26, 2008 14:07:20 GMT
I notice the press are going OTT on Taylor.
3 game ban then forget about it.
|
|
|
|
Post by Miniman on Feb 26, 2008 18:04:50 GMT
I think eduardo was too quick for taylor and Taylor didnt mean it (we hope) i think this is just a run of the mill, late challenge which ended in disaster...i think Dicko did the same against Ipswich on Satdee bu instead of tackling high, he hurt the player slightly...not saying Dicko is like Taylor but just shows how you become determined enough to slide very strongly into challenges...Dicko luckily got a touch on the ball meaning it wasnt necessarily a dirty foul....
|
|
|
|
Post by y_oh_y_delilah on Feb 27, 2008 19:35:23 GMT
It was simply a mistimed tackle thats all, so why should he be treated any differently from other players who mistime tackles?
|
|
