|
Post by StokieSC on Dec 18, 2007 12:22:09 GMT
Which one came first? Our Newcastle, home of fine estates such as Knutton, Ches and Crackley, or the North East Newcastle home to Ant and Dec, Jimmy Nail and Newcy Brown?
|
|
WurstBoy
Youth Player
Please leave your message after the beep. Rebekah will respond later.
Posts: 496
|
Post by WurstBoy on Dec 18, 2007 12:43:51 GMT
Newcastle-upon-Tyne is around 1000 years older than Newcastle-under-Lyme
NuT was founded around 200AD and NuL around 1200AD
|
|
dad1
Academy Starlet
Posts: 204
|
Post by dad1 on Dec 18, 2007 20:58:16 GMT
To be pedantic, there isn't much in it actually.
Whilst there was a Roman settlement in what is now NuT, dating, as wurstboy said, from around the 2nd century AD, NEWCASTLE did not exist until the castle was built in around 1080 (the 11th century)
NuL grew up around the 12th century castle. But like NuT there were settlements in the area prior to this, including the Roman camp at Chesterton.
Hence probably less than 100 years difference.
|
|
|
Post by Pretty Little Boother on Dec 19, 2007 11:12:09 GMT
To answer properly, not like the two nerds above, I will say ours- because theirs is wank.
|
|
|
Post by daverichards on Dec 24, 2007 16:22:34 GMT
On the basis that the tyneside variety didn't get its "new" castle till the normans arrived ... fuck all in it
|
|
|
Post by StokieSC on Dec 24, 2007 17:03:19 GMT
Wheres the Castle in our Newcastle?
|
|
|
Post by daverichards on Dec 24, 2007 18:44:52 GMT
down by Pool Dam go past the Dancing octopus chippy, chuck a right into silverdale Rd, and its at the end of the parking spaces on the left handside , all you'll see is the earthen mound where the old keep was, not that big as it was a wooden castle like this en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Motte-and-bailey
|
|
|
Post by Rebelliousjukebox on Dec 24, 2007 23:53:25 GMT
|
|