|
|
Post by rhodesy on Feb 28, 2008 23:12:39 GMT
Deserved a red? I don't think so. Just because he broke his leg the disciplinary should change? Not a red in the championship. Barely a yellow. You would feel hard done by if you got one for that tackle. Look at the pictures. Taylor is looking at the ball (which is probably clumsy). But not intentional and not a sending off. Taylor was unlucky to catch him in the shin could just have easily been in the side on his leg and caused no damage. Not for the squeamish  |
|
|
|
Post by trend....... on Feb 28, 2008 23:14:05 GMT
fucking 'el ... not this ....AGAIN.
|
|
|
|
Post by rhodesy on Feb 28, 2008 23:14:17 GMT
Taylor is not looking at where his legs are just at the ball
|
|
|
|
Post by bayernoatcake on Feb 28, 2008 23:17:38 GMT
Studs showing=red-dems da rules!
|
|
|
|
Post by trend....... on Feb 28, 2008 23:19:41 GMT
who gives a steaming turd?
he got sent off. end of.
|
|
peadar87
Academy Starlet
Stoke City and Bray Wanderers. Because one relegation battle a season just isn't enough!
Posts: 206
|
Post by peadar87 on Feb 28, 2008 23:21:00 GMT
He broke Eduardo's leg, therefore the tackle was dangerous, therefore he should have been sent off.
|
|
|
|
Post by miffmister on Feb 28, 2008 23:23:17 GMT
yellow at worst.
|
|
|
|
Post by spitthedog on Feb 28, 2008 23:28:32 GMT
if that is not a red, i don't know what is?
studs in someone's shin is dangerous as was proved by the injury, whether it is intentional or not
|
|
|
|
Post by bromleystoke on Feb 29, 2008 0:56:35 GMT
look at the photo its a red
|
|
|
|
Post by dazthestokie69 on Feb 29, 2008 7:49:28 GMT
i think it deserved the red but i dont think it deliberate. The stick he's getting is unreal and there was even pictures of him tackling while in training
|
|
|
|
Post by Northy on Feb 29, 2008 8:06:18 GMT
it was studs up, full onto a leg it was a straight red.
|
|
|
|
Post by Adster on Feb 29, 2008 8:12:03 GMT
but wasnt the cort tackle like this, i mean he need stitches in his ankle, so surely studs must have hit his ankle, did he get sent off? did he fuck ;D
|
|
|
|
Post by Norfolkstokie in manchester on Feb 29, 2008 9:19:40 GMT
It doesn't matter where he's looking- makes no difference, studs up like that = red card
|
|
|
|
Post by PONTAFCE on Feb 29, 2008 9:22:03 GMT
not this again you must be pissed if you think it wasnt a straight red,studs high and leg snapped i think if the ref aint have give him a red there would of been hell up.
|
|
|
|
Post by realstokebloke on Feb 29, 2008 9:50:47 GMT
Red.
End of.
|
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 29, 2008 9:52:23 GMT
That deserved a red card - end of.
I can't see what chance referees have when certain supporters expect them to not only look at the point of impact but what the player is looking at at the time. We'd need refs with eyes like Marty Feldman.
How do you know he was 'unlucky to catch him on the shin'? He 'could' have caught him on the side of his leg and caused no damage but he didn't did he?
If somebody clouts Fuller with a full studded shin hit in the near future I fully expect you to stick up for the opposition player.
As if.
|
|
|
|
Post by soicowboy on Feb 29, 2008 9:53:42 GMT
Was a straight red, Taylor didn't argue
Sure he didn't mean it but was late, high and wreckless. Not really an argument
|
|
|
|
Post by realstokebloke on Feb 29, 2008 9:58:02 GMT
We'd need refs with eyes like Marty Feldman.
Have a korma for making me giggle. |
|
|
|
Post by mcf on Feb 29, 2008 11:47:56 GMT
Just a stern word would have done.
Well said Rhodesy.
|
|
|
|
Post by soicowboy on Feb 29, 2008 11:49:23 GMT
That explains why Birmingham haven't appealed then ??? ???
|
|
|
|
Post by wardrobe monster on Feb 29, 2008 11:59:08 GMT
I reckon it was Eduardo's complete over-reaction that got Taylor sent off, lying on the floor with his ankle hanging off. These bloody eastern Europeans are spoiling the game with their unprofessional attitude.
|
|
|
|
Post by y_oh_y_delilah on Feb 29, 2008 13:34:38 GMT
Shirley, it was a foul by Eduardo! He could have seriously damaged Martin Taylors foot by putting his shin between the player and the ball.
|
|
|
|
Post by kidsgrovepotter on Feb 29, 2008 14:00:57 GMT
soicowboy i agree birmingham havnt evan bothered to appeal, he did not intend to hurt eduardo but at the end of the day for a tackle like that what else can the ref do other then send him off.
i think if the ref had given a yellow taylor would consider him self a very lucky man.
|
|
|
|
Post by rhodesy on Feb 29, 2008 16:57:34 GMT
Eduardos studs could have not been in the ground which would then have caused no damage
|
|
|
|
Post by trend....... on Feb 29, 2008 17:01:14 GMT
bloody 'el ...... let it go.......................... it does... not... matter...
|
|
|
|
Post by Irish Stokie on Feb 29, 2008 17:03:19 GMT
Shin high and studs up, thats a red card in my book.
;D ;D ;D ;D @ wardrobe monster
|
|
|
|
Post by soicowboy on Feb 29, 2008 19:00:08 GMT
Wardrobe have some Karma ;D
|
|
|
|
Post by AlliG on Feb 29, 2008 20:12:50 GMT
Typical one footed defenders challenge.
Tackling with the wrong foot in that position is always going to leave the risk of a bad challenge if he misses the ball, which is what happened here.
If he had gone in with his left foot even if he had missed the ball the challenge wouldn't have looked half as bad and would have been less likely to cause the injury it did.
It might not have been as bad a challenge as some of the two footed lunges seen recently, but it was still a full set of studs half way up the shin and the ref quite rightly gave him a red card.
|
|
|
|
Post by r10ryx on Feb 29, 2008 20:20:40 GMT
its a red in my book....
|
|
|
|
Post by n01stokie on Feb 29, 2008 22:21:32 GMT
|
|
