|
Post by Smudge_SCFC on Sept 21, 2009 12:56:40 GMT
It would be nice if those who dare to suggest that team selection and tactics are sometimes erroneous, especially if they've spent time and money to witness it, were not just classed as moaners or PHWs. This is aimed more squarely out of those who make a habit out of moaning. Those you ONLY see when something goes against us.
|
|
|
Post by Mr Jon on Sept 21, 2009 13:22:49 GMT
No. Sod off! (replying to the room for an argument question....obviously)
|
|
|
Post by Paul Spencer on Sept 21, 2009 13:44:45 GMT
I think Smudge's original post is correct in essence.
I ignore threads (don't even open them) started by Spiderman/fromafar etc because I find them usually to be utter attention seeking nonsense.
For exactly the same reason I try to ignore posts from mcf and slangking.
I actually find the ultra rimmers to be more annoying than the ultra PHW's due to them bing more difficult to avoid as they seem all too prepared to trawl threads looking for posts to respond to with their blinkered bile.
|
|
|
Post by Lakeland Potter on Sept 21, 2009 13:47:49 GMT
I find Ultra PHW's to be worse than the Ultra Rimmers. But that might be because I am an Ultra Rimmer - allegedly! ;D
|
|
|
Post by Paul Spencer on Sept 21, 2009 13:50:23 GMT
I find Ultra PHW's to be worse than the Ultra Rimmers. But that might be because I am an Ultra Rimmer - allegedly! ;D I wouldn't consider you to be an ultra rimmer at all John, you seem to present a good deal of reasoned debate from where I'm sitting.
|
|
|
Post by stokiekarl619 on Sept 21, 2009 13:53:40 GMT
I agree with the original post. It's so irksome when the negative threads pop up...NOT because I can't handle critiscm or because I'm a Pulis lover it's because it's the same old people making the same old points over and over again and they never have anything good to say about the team. I have time for people who use reasoned debate and can appreciate the good as well as moan about that bad but the ususal suspects I have no time for. Outside this board if I knew someone who only moaned and whinged It would drive me potty and I'd avoid them. However, this will continue forever...Stoke will lose, the PHW will come out, the defenders will have a go at the PHW and then a group of people will defend them criticising by saying they are entitled to their opinion. Which is fair enough. I just won't read their threads because it's like listening to Victor Meldrew
|
|
|
Post by Lakeland Potter on Sept 21, 2009 13:53:54 GMT
I find Ultra PHW's to be worse than the Ultra Rimmers. But that might be because I am an Ultra Rimmer - allegedly! ;D I wouldn't consider you to be an ultra rimmer at all John, you seem to present a good deal of reasoned debate from where I'm sitting. All us rimmers do, Paul!
|
|
|
Post by mcf on Sept 21, 2009 13:54:15 GMT
You can call my posts attention seeking all you want Paul but to say that they are nonsense really hurts my feelings. I would say that you find them more annoying because they are smug and condescending against the fucking retards that said Pulis would do fuck all for us. I'm a great mind reader like that.
|
|
|
Post by Paul Spencer on Sept 21, 2009 14:01:57 GMT
You can call my posts attention seeking all you want Paul but to say that they are nonsense really hurts my feelings. I would say that you find them more annoying because they are smug and condescending against the fucking retards that said Pulis would do fuck all for us. I'm a great mind reader like that. I find your posts annoying mcf because in the main I think they often offer very little constructively to the threads that they appear on and seem to me to be pretty much nothing more than attention seeking, often presented in a very (and in my humble opinion - pointlessly) agressive manner. Having said that, you've just added a rather well balanced post (the first in ages) to the It's All Pulis's Fault thread which I completely (I've been defending Pulis's tactics all weekend) agree with, that is up until the very last paragraph (you just couldn't help yourself) which is of course ... utter nonsense.
|
|
|
Post by ChrisEvans on Sept 21, 2009 14:30:23 GMT
Smudge - Are you just after attention starting this thread? ;D
If so, everyone ignore it..........
|
|
|
Post by mcf on Sept 21, 2009 15:01:44 GMT
Too right Paul I'm not aiming to be constructive. I'm aiming to annoy the fuckcunts that tried to belittle my take on all things Tony Pulis over the last few years. I'm certainly not posting to keep you happy. My last line makes perfect sense to me. I wouldn't hire a decorator and then tell him how to paint. I'd tell him the colour I wanted and then tell him not to bother me until he'd finished the job and the paint was dry. The manager has earned the right to go about his job however he wants for my money.
|
|
|
Post by Paul Spencer on Sept 21, 2009 15:10:08 GMT
I'm not aiming to be constructive. I'm aiming to annoy the fuckcunts that tried to belittle my take on all things Tony Pulis over the last few years. And I was explaining why I find your's (and slangking's) posts to be just as ridiculous as Spiderman's and fromafar's. I don't think that that pair aim to be particularly constructive either.
|
|
|
Post by mumf14 on Sept 21, 2009 15:12:33 GMT
I can name all the Bossfat rimmers on one jar of Vaseline if it helps..?
.....Ultra Bossfatters TAKE NOTE..
|
|
|
Post by mcf on Sept 21, 2009 15:16:33 GMT
Non constructive posts is one thing, but calling them nonsense is another.
I fail to understand how my and AGSF's posts can be nonsense when we have backed the right horse for the last 3-4 years?
You do know what nonsense means don't you?
|
|
|
Post by Paul Spencer on Sept 21, 2009 15:30:05 GMT
Non constructive posts is one thing, but calling them nonsense is another. I fail to understand how my and AGSF's posts can be nonsense when we have backed the right horse for the last 3-4 years? You do know what nonsense means don't you? They're nonsense, in my opinion Merk because they seem completely and utterly blinkered in exactly the same way that Lord Eff's and Spiderman's are etc. I was dissapointed when Pulis left and was (one of the few who was) pleased about his return, but that doesn't stop me engaging in rational debate presented by other posters on this messageboard who aren't daft enough to think they have to back him 100% on every decision he makes due to having (apparently) once won some silly war on an internet messageboard back in the day. If (as you have just stated) you really are here to be deconstructive and to rub peoples noses up the wrong way and can see no reason to criticise Pulis per se, then I really see you as being no different to the Spiderman's of this world in terms of what you have to offer this board. Of course I really do appreciate that you don't give a fuck what I think.
|
|
|
Post by Beardy200 on Sept 21, 2009 15:36:37 GMT
I fail to understand how my and AGSF's posts can be nonsense when we have backed the right horse for the last 3-4 years? Because you rarely have anything to say on individual threads apart from slagging off any criticism of Pulis? Instead you just choose to remind everyone of this horse you correctly backed 3-4 years ago. And for the record i'm a self-confessed rimmer and still find the pair of you incredibly condescending.
|
|
|
Post by Davef on Sept 21, 2009 15:46:07 GMT
You can think what you like Merk, my criticism of TP during the Binary Season and my reluctance to welcome him (and Peter Coates) back with open arms was not done in an attempt to piss you or anybody else off. They were my opinions, pure and simple. If you really think you're bothering me with your little rants now mate, you're sadly mistaken. I'm enjoying watching Stoke again, and much of that is down to how TP has built and developed this team. I've done my time as a Stoke fan and watched enough shit over the years to have the right to an opinion on things. However, I don't need to repeatedly get on my knees and beg for forgiveness from you or other like-minded people because I was wrong to think Tony Pulis couldn't bring us to the level we are now. But if it makes you feel better, carry on.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 21, 2009 15:49:21 GMT
I fail to understand how my and AGSF's posts can be nonsense when we have backed the right horse for the last 3-4 years? Some of the thickest people imaginable also backed Pulis to do well at Stoke simply because they support Stoke and Pulis was the manager - that's all. Their belief wasn't supported by a single coherent argument as to how the world's least creative manager would one day take us into the Premier League. The same thick twats now look down on the rest of us knowing that their superior footballing knowledge eventually shone through in the end (whilst shouting 'wanker' at Ronaldo for 90 minutes or falling asleep for long periods of each match)
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 21, 2009 15:49:26 GMT
You can think what you like Merk, my criticism of TP during the Binary Season and my reluctance to welcome him (and Peter Coates) back with open arms was not done in an attempt to piss you or anybody else off. They were my opinions, pure and simple. If you really think you're bothering me with your little rants now mate, you're sadly mistaken. I'm enjoying watching Stoke again, and much of that is down to how TP has built and developed this team. I've done my time as a Stoke fan and watched enough shit over the years to have the right to an opinion on things. However, I don't need to repeatedly get on my knees and beg for forgiveness from you or other like-minded people because I was wrong to think Tony Pulis couldn't bring us to the level we are now. But if it makes you feel better, carry on.
|
|
|
Post by mcf on Sept 21, 2009 16:07:13 GMT
I must have touched a nerve. Of course you are entitled to your opinion Davef, if you didn't, I'd have nothing to laugh at. Don't play the innocent game with me either - I've seen enough of your posts and comments flying about things I've posted. Would you like an example? Try the Lee Hendrie thing that you and MarkW were sniggering about. I'm sure you remember. It's more than enough for me just to see you admit you were wrong. Paul I've openly posted where I think Tony Pulis has made mistakes. There are times when I'd like a little more of a moan myself, but then when you come on this board and see the utter, over the top garbage that gets posted, then I always end up defending him.
|
|
|
Post by trebor63 on Sept 21, 2009 16:19:21 GMT
I find Ultra PHW's to be worse than the Ultra Rimmers. But that might be because I am an Ultra Rimmer - allegedly! ;D I wouldn't consider you to be an ultra rimmer at all John, you seem to present a good deal of reasoned debate from where I'm sitting. You must be sitting in the local nut house ;D ;D ;D As a confirmed rimmer myself I don't mind any constructive critisicm but like most on here the confirmed we hate anything and everything TP does brigade merely drive us middle of the road rimmers into being radical rimmers! As smudge says best to ignore them but its easier said than done! But Hudsongod Spiderman Fromafar Lordeff DadofSam will keep sticking the boot in at every opportunity and will blindly ignore the incredible progress we've made simply cos they're not big enough to admit they called it wrong a couple of years ago!
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 21, 2009 16:23:20 GMT
Spot on trebor i just wish more people on this board were as level headed as you because every response you make i find myself agreeing with.
|
|
|
Post by slangking on Sept 21, 2009 16:27:52 GMT
I mostly try to avoid your posts because you are a boring bastud, no offence. And anyway me and mcf have been on here for years, you are so dreary I can't think who the fcuk you are. I think Smudge's original post is correct in essence. I ignore threads (don't even open them) started by Spiderman/fromafar etc because I find them usually to be utter attention seeking nonsense. For exactly the same reason I try to ignore posts from mcf and slangking. I actually find the ultra rimmers to be more annoying than the ultra PHW's due to them bing more difficult to avoid as they seem all too prepared to trawl threads looking for posts to respond to with their blinkered bile.
|
|
|
Post by ColonelMustard on Sept 21, 2009 16:40:16 GMT
70's mcf buys a v200 80's mcf invests in a betamax, a dragon 32 a sinclair c5 and shares in delorean 90's it's all about minidisc and preparing for the millenium bug 00's shares in enron and leman brothers The man who takes being right about things in his stride.
|
|
|
Post by mcf on Sept 21, 2009 16:43:59 GMT
Very good Colonel I do take being right in my stride. It's laughing at the people that were wrong that makes me produce little wee patches.
|
|
|
Post by guernseydave on Sept 21, 2009 16:46:47 GMT
So can I call Pulis a twat or not ? This is all so cuntfusing my head hurts. GD P.S Did anyone ever can a refund for their True Smug/Idiocy cards
|
|
|
Post by spitthedog on Sept 21, 2009 16:46:56 GMT
The Pulis Hating Wankstains did this to themselves. They put themselves well and truly in the corner and are now unable to get out as the Rimmers surround them and laugh their bollocks off right in front of their faces. We laugh at the supposed tactical insight and game by game analysis by the very people who said SuperTone would produce fuck all. We smile at the likes of Trouserdog who now claim that it is always the ways that people moan but rarely compliment. Since you like quotes so much Smudge..here's one for you and a good portion of the audience on here... You reap what you sow. A classic case of a post that no-one should reply to......and look what I just did
|
|
|
Post by Davef on Sept 21, 2009 16:48:13 GMT
Genuinely can't remember the Hendrie thing mcf. Go one, remind me, I'm sure you'll come out smelling of roses.
|
|
|
Post by mcf on Sept 21, 2009 16:52:38 GMT
I'll let it go Dave - you've suffered enough these last 2 years.
|
|
|
Post by Davef on Sept 21, 2009 16:53:28 GMT
I'll let it go Dave - you've suffered enough these last 2 years. You mean Rivals is no more and you can't find the thread.
|
|