|
Post by Deleted on Sept 9, 2009 15:08:04 GMT
voted!
we have 46.9%!!
|
|
|
Post by evostokie on Sept 9, 2009 15:20:49 GMT
done
|
|
|
Post by Widget123 on Sept 9, 2009 15:29:29 GMT
done too...
|
|
|
Post by walrus on Sept 9, 2009 18:41:27 GMT
Bump, we've got to keep this going till Monday, problem is we're running out of oatcake voters.
|
|
|
Post by mattyd94 on Sept 9, 2009 18:45:26 GMT
i voted stoke
|
|
|
Post by imallstokedup on Sept 9, 2009 18:46:34 GMT
It's slipping !!
The Post/Vote on that site is by Red Devil Rooney, so there will be cheating anyway.
|
|
Bamford
Youth Player
heeeyy peter hoekstra....
Posts: 478
|
Post by Bamford on Sept 9, 2009 18:47:19 GMT
voted. almost 50-50
|
|
|
Post by RichieBarkerOut! on Sept 9, 2009 21:39:43 GMT
Top
|
|
|
Post by Olgrligm on Sept 9, 2009 22:00:26 GMT
So in the space of 2-3 hours we have lost a winning 13% margin. Maybe the website owners have realised that Sir Alex Ferguson is the manager of The Scumbags and that they are not allowed to let any other team win. If for some unimaginable reason that we were above them on the Sept 14th deadline then the deadline would be extended indefinately until The Scumbags were winning. Nothing changes! Before this thread was made, you could have said the exact same thing about Stoke. Except that any neutral with an elementary knowledge of football, not Premiership supporters or the majority of gloryhunters, can work out that: a) As football kits go, the Manchester United kit is a messy, messy abortion that rivals Hull's tiger shirt and Coventry's brown b) Stoke's shirt is a move back to their traditional kit, a proper footballing shirt. Still, you only have to look at the comments to see the calibre of some voters.
|
|
|
Post by stoke69 on Sept 9, 2009 22:09:03 GMT
voted
we on 48.7%
|
|
|
Post by twigginater on Sept 9, 2009 22:16:31 GMT
Before this thread was made, you could have said the exact same thing about Stoke. Except that any neutral with an elementary knowledge of football, not Premiership supporters or the majority of gloryhunters, can work out that: a) As football kits go, the Manchester United kit is a messy, messy abortion that rivals Hull's tiger shirt and Coventry's brown b) Stoke's shirt is a move back to their traditional kit, a proper footballing shirt. Still, you only have to look at the comments to see the calibre of some voters. Man Uniteds kit is based on thier kit from decades ago, so how is that not a move back to thier traditional kit? Is that something only football fans not premiership fans can answer?
|
|
|
Post by Bick on Sept 10, 2009 8:40:25 GMT
HOW ARE WE LOSING?!? Vote Vote Vote.
|
|
|
Post by Olgrligm on Sept 10, 2009 9:34:34 GMT
Except that any neutral with an elementary knowledge of football, not Premiership supporters or the majority of gloryhunters, can work out that: a) As football kits go, the Manchester United kit is a messy, messy abortion that rivals Hull's tiger shirt and Coventry's brown b) Stoke's shirt is a move back to their traditional kit, a proper footballing shirt. Still, you only have to look at the comments to see the calibre of some voters. Man Uniteds kit is based on thier kit from decades ago, so how is that not a move back to thier traditional kit? Is that something only football fans not premiership fans can answer? I said our traditional kit, I haven't noticed you playing with an awful v across your kit in the majority of seasons since you were founded. Face it, your kit is Vanessa Phelps and your club is Paris Hilton.
|
|
|
Post by stokeytot on Sept 10, 2009 11:29:51 GMT
Wohoo - we're now winning..... JUST! 50.4% -v- 49.6%
|
|
|
Post by madasasnake on Sept 10, 2009 11:47:53 GMT
Vote cast! Still just in the lead. I will vote later on the four other computers in the house!
|
|
|
Post by stokeytot on Sept 10, 2009 11:49:48 GMT
Vote cast! Still just in the lead. I will vote later on the four other computers in the house! I'll be voting from home later too - and have forwarded it to a few others
|
|
|
Post by Stoke_FaN_DaN on Sept 10, 2009 12:59:41 GMT
voted
|
|
|
Post by prem4stoke on Sept 10, 2009 13:12:42 GMT
I think you can only vote once right? I hope so as to get us quite a few votes I voted on around 20 PC's! winning 50.9% now
|
|
|
Post by vestanpance on Sept 10, 2009 13:15:53 GMT
I voted as well, we are 50.8% when i did so...
|
|
|
Post by stokietickerz2 on Sept 10, 2009 13:30:27 GMT
sum1 needs to point this on the bbc 606 forum so all the stokies on there who havent got the oatcake can vote too
|
|
|
Post by bgpotter on Sept 10, 2009 13:40:19 GMT
voted on both my pcs - we are winning 50.9!!!! Keep voting!
|
|
|
Post by Etain Tur-Mukan on Sept 10, 2009 13:52:07 GMT
Voted - still 50.9
|
|
|
Post by kiwi on Sept 10, 2009 14:06:11 GMT
51%- 49% now goaaaaarn stoke!
|
|
|
Post by wattie on Sept 10, 2009 15:17:56 GMT
Just voted we still in front with 51.2% .
|
|
|
Post by chad on Sept 10, 2009 15:21:59 GMT
Dont you just know theyll leave the voting open until Manure get in front !!!!!!!!
|
|
|
Post by stokeytot on Sept 10, 2009 18:23:17 GMT
Just voted from home pc - 51.8%
|
|
tetsuo
Youth Player
Posts: 290
|
Post by tetsuo on Sept 10, 2009 18:36:34 GMT
Done ;D
|
|
|
Post by lurcherman on Sept 10, 2009 18:54:37 GMT
Done I've forgot the score but we were winning
|
|
|
Post by shoey100 on Sept 10, 2009 18:57:33 GMT
Just voted 51.9% in favour of us ;D
|
|
|
Post by onmebonce on Sept 10, 2009 19:18:18 GMT
just voted and says 52% stoke
|
|