|
Rooney
Mar 23, 2009 19:03:27 GMT
Post by Sparkiee on Mar 23, 2009 19:03:27 GMT
One match ban.
No penalty for hitting the corner flag as the "Ref didn't see it"
*spit*
|
|
|
Rooney
Mar 23, 2009 19:06:16 GMT
Post by onlyonesirstan on Mar 23, 2009 19:06:16 GMT
What is it with Man fcuking Utd. Vidic only gets a 2 match ban for a sending off , when everyone else gets 3. Can someone please explain the rules for two yellow cards in a match and a straight red card.
|
|
|
Rooney
Mar 23, 2009 19:08:55 GMT
Post by muckakev on Mar 23, 2009 19:08:55 GMT
Shrek = wanker
End of.
|
|
|
Rooney
Mar 23, 2009 19:14:23 GMT
Post by walrus on Mar 23, 2009 19:14:23 GMT
What is it with Man fcuking Utd. Vidic only gets a 2 match ban for a sending off , when everyone else gets 3. Can someone please explain the rules for two yellow cards in a match and a straight red card. This might not be spot on but this is what my understanding of the rules is: 2 yellows - one match ban foul and abusive language - one match ban denying a clear goalscoring opportunity - one match ban anything else - three match ban For every previous red card in the season, one match is added to the ban. So Vidic gets a one match ban for denying a clear goalscoring opportunity, plus one more as he was sent of previously this season, making a total of a two match ban. That may be bullshit. Can someone confirm/prove wrong?
|
|
|
Rooney
Mar 23, 2009 19:43:57 GMT
Post by jacka118 on Mar 23, 2009 19:43:57 GMT
Ronaldo was filth in that game
I cant believe he didnt get sent off
Hes the only player in the league that wudnt get sent off for what he did in that match
Disgrace...makes me sick...
|
|
Banega23
Youth Player
kick and rush...
Posts: 462
|
Rooney
Mar 23, 2009 19:51:05 GMT
Post by Banega23 on Mar 23, 2009 19:51:05 GMT
What did Rooney do that was so wrong? I mean he was, afterall, throwing the ball to get the play going again as quick as possible. I can't quite see the problem. And with regards to hitting the corner flag; Come on, Cahill does that every time he scores a goal.
|
|
|
Rooney
Mar 23, 2009 19:53:56 GMT
Post by trebor63 on Mar 23, 2009 19:53:56 GMT
Its my policy to not allow ManUre on my telly so I never actually see them against other teams but I have customers who support Bolton Blackburn Man City and Everton and each and everyone one of them swear that Rowanko should have been sent off in their marches! He should have also been sentr off against us and by the sound of it also on Saturday!
How does the tosser get away with it? And would she get away with it if she played for any other team?
|
|
|
Rooney
Mar 23, 2009 20:52:35 GMT
Post by Deleted on Mar 23, 2009 20:52:35 GMT
What did Rooney do that was so wrong? I mean he was, afterall, throwing the ball to get the play going again as quick as possible. I can't quite see the problem. And with regards to hitting the corner flag; Come on, Cahill does that every time he scores a goal. Rooney petulantly threw the ball as hard as he could. That's dissent. Dissent = yellow card. If Styles can give Clive Clarke a second yellow at Priestfields for dropping the ball, then Rooney certainly deserved one for his petulance. If Man Yoo had taken the free kick from where they were supposed to it wouldn't have happened.
|
|
|
Rooney
Mar 23, 2009 20:55:22 GMT
Post by scfc75 on Mar 23, 2009 20:55:22 GMT
One match ban. No penalty for hitting the corner flag as the Ref didn't see it*spit* The ref didn't see SWP kick out at Delap either but he still got a 3 match ban retrospectively based on the TV evidence. Yet again Man Utd are above the law.
|
|
|
Rooney
Mar 23, 2009 20:59:44 GMT
Post by markfitdt on Mar 23, 2009 20:59:44 GMT
What did Rooney do that was so wrong? I mean he was, afterall, throwing the ball to get the play going again as quick as possible. I can't quite see the problem. And with regards to hitting the corner flag; Come on, Cahill does that every time he scores a goal. no offence banega but Rooney got exactly what he deserved - he wasnt throwing the ball back to start play - he was having a tantrum because they tried to take a quick free kick from nowhere near where the offence took place. The way he threw the ball into the ground was laughable. He isnt used to not getting his own way - it was almost like being a kid and wanting to take your ball home in a strop.
|
|
Banega23
Youth Player
kick and rush...
Posts: 462
|
Rooney
Mar 23, 2009 21:01:01 GMT
Post by Banega23 on Mar 23, 2009 21:01:01 GMT
What did Rooney do that was so wrong? I mean he was, afterall, throwing the ball to get the play going again as quick as possible. I can't quite see the problem. And with regards to hitting the corner flag; Come on, Cahill does that every time he scores a goal. Rooney petulantly threw the ball as hard as he could. That's dissent. Dissent = yellow card. If Styles can give Clive Clarke a second yellow at Priestfields for dropping the ball, then Rooney certainly deserved one for his petulance. If Man Yoo had taken the free kick from where they were supposed to it wouldn't have happened. I don't care about what has gone before, it doesn't have any significance on how this decision was made. Throwing the ball as hard as you can isn't dissent. If he was doing it to waste time, or because he opposed a decision that was made, then that's dissent. He was throwing it so they could get on with the game as quickly as possible.
|
|
|
Rooney
Mar 23, 2009 21:03:10 GMT
Post by march4 on Mar 23, 2009 21:03:10 GMT
Violent behaviour surely. He threw the ball as hard as he could at the ref.
Rory kicked the ball at SWP and got 3 games.
|
|
|
Rooney
Mar 23, 2009 21:03:15 GMT
Post by Corporal Clegg on Mar 23, 2009 21:03:15 GMT
Rooney did go well OTT didnt he, and he gave the ref a mouthful as he was leaving the pitch too
|
|
|
Rooney
Mar 23, 2009 21:04:52 GMT
Post by Deleted on Mar 23, 2009 21:04:52 GMT
Rooney petulantly threw the ball as hard as he could. That's dissent. Dissent = yellow card. If Styles can give Clive Clarke a second yellow at Priestfields for dropping the ball, then Rooney certainly deserved one for his petulance. If Man Yoo had taken the free kick from where they were supposed to it wouldn't have happened. I don't care about what has gone before, it doesn't have any significance on how this decision was made. Throwing the ball as hard as you can isn't dissent. If he was doing it to waste time, or because he opposed a decision that was made, then that's dissent. He was throwing it so they could get on with the game as quickly as possible. If you watch the incident it's clearly a petulant reaction to the referee making them take the free kick again from the correct place. Look at the expression on his face, his body language, the force at which he hurls the ball. He's hardly saying "pip pip lads,let's jolly well crck on with the game". It's a frustrated tantrum because he hasn't got his own way.
|
|
Banega23
Youth Player
kick and rush...
Posts: 462
|
Rooney
Mar 23, 2009 21:12:18 GMT
Post by Banega23 on Mar 23, 2009 21:12:18 GMT
What did Rooney do that was so wrong? I mean he was, afterall, throwing the ball to get the play going again as quick as possible. I can't quite see the problem. And with regards to hitting the corner flag; Come on, Cahill does that every time he scores a goal. no offence banega but Rooney got exactly what he deserved - he wasnt throwing the ball back to start play - he was having a tantrum because they tried to take a quick free kick from nowhere near where the offence took place. The way he threw the ball into the ground was laughable. He isnt used to not getting his own way - it was almost like being a kid and wanting to take your ball home in a strop. No, acting like a kid is Ronaldo remonstrating with the referee inbetween bouts of being completely ineffective. Okay, Rooney was clearly wound up and angry but that does not warrant a yellow card. Surely a player chanelling anger into being eager to get on with the game is better than him running round making piss poor excuses for tackles (see Ronaldo)?
|
|
|
Rooney
Mar 23, 2009 21:16:57 GMT
Post by markfitdt on Mar 23, 2009 21:16:57 GMT
no offence banega but Rooney got exactly what he deserved - he wasnt throwing the ball back to start play - he was having a tantrum because they tried to take a quick free kick from nowhere near where the offence took place. The way he threw the ball into the ground was laughable. He isnt used to not getting his own way - it was almost like being a kid and wanting to take your ball home in a strop. No, acting like a kid is Ronaldo remonstrating with the referee inbetween bouts of being completely ineffective. Okay, Rooney was clearly wound up and angry but that does not warrant a yellow card. Surely a player chanelling anger into being eager to get on with the game is better than him running round making piss poor excuses for tackles (see Ronaldo)? we will have to agree to disagree on this but throwing a ball aggressively in the direction of the referee - which is what Rooney did deserved a booking in my opinion. My Man U supporting workmate today said Rooney got what he deserved without question for what that is worth. You cannot deny that Rooney has always and will always had issues controlling his temper. Agree with you about Ronaldo though - trying to referee the game himself! w**ker.
|
|
|
Rooney
Mar 23, 2009 21:17:07 GMT
Post by bayernoatcake on Mar 23, 2009 21:17:07 GMT
If the ref didn't see it surely the FA can act or do they make the rules up as they go along?
|
|
|
Rooney
Mar 23, 2009 21:22:25 GMT
Post by Deleted on Mar 23, 2009 21:22:25 GMT
no offence banega but Rooney got exactly what he deserved - he wasnt throwing the ball back to start play - he was having a tantrum because they tried to take a quick free kick from nowhere near where the offence took place. The way he threw the ball into the ground was laughable. He isnt used to not getting his own way - it was almost like being a kid and wanting to take your ball home in a strop. No, acting like a kid is Ronaldo remonstrating with the referee inbetween bouts of being completely ineffective. Okay, Rooney was clearly wound up and angry but that does not warrant a yellow card. Surely a player chanelling anger into being eager to get on with the game is better than him running round making piss poor excuses for tackles (see Ronaldo)? Directing your anger towards the referee = dissent = yellow card. It really is that simple.
|
|
|
Rooney
Mar 23, 2009 21:33:58 GMT
Post by harrysburrow on Mar 23, 2009 21:33:58 GMT
I know one thing. If we the ref on Boxing Day had handled the game in similar fashion, we'd have got the point we deserved.
|
|
|
Rooney
Mar 23, 2009 22:26:20 GMT
Post by sirpineapple89 on Mar 23, 2009 22:26:20 GMT
...meanwhile, Glen Whelan has received an eight match ban for his slightly mis-timed tackle on the half way line for which he got booked despite it being his first offence.
The FA are fucking bottlers.
|
|
|
Rooney
Mar 23, 2009 22:37:34 GMT
Post by Malex on Mar 23, 2009 22:37:34 GMT
It's bizarre, if Man U were 2-0 up and he had held on to the ball for a while and took his time giving it back he could have been done for time-wasting!
Still, the FA don't want to upset Rooney too much as he's featuring for England soon so they want to keep him happy
|
|
|
Rooney
Mar 24, 2009 9:49:06 GMT
Post by euan ouzami on Mar 24, 2009 9:49:06 GMT
It is good news though.
Much as I dislike the tosser we don't want Rooney out for Sunderland and Portsmouth games
|
|
|
Rooney
Mar 24, 2009 10:01:39 GMT
Post by Stokester on Mar 24, 2009 10:01:39 GMT
Ronaldo was just pathetic that game. At one point he looked like he was actually going to cry and not going over to the ref when called = wanker!
I really hope refs start cracking down on his and Rooney's antics, doubt it will happen though.
|
|
|
Rooney
Mar 24, 2009 12:07:26 GMT
Post by assessornum1 on Mar 24, 2009 12:07:26 GMT
Ronaldo says he is being kicked out of the game, whispered words soon, he will then get foul after penalty after foul. Thats how it works end of
|
|
|
Rooney
Mar 24, 2009 13:04:27 GMT
Post by risa on Mar 24, 2009 13:04:27 GMT
Pricks like Rooney, Ronaldo, A Cole etc have a lot to answer for.
I play footy each Sunday afternoon at Dimensions and there are a lot of kids up there playing footy and practicing different things. Last week I saw some young lads aged about 13-14 practicing free-kicks andt they were all stepping back from the ball, standing with their legs wide apart, then taking a deep breath. Its similar to what Ronaldo does - they were copying him!
Kids playing footy these days copy the professionals in everything they do so don't be amazed if its not too long before kids start punching the corner flag in protest if they cannot get their own way in lads and dads games and on the school pitch. No wonder we have no really decent, well disciplined young stars coming through the ranks.
|
|
|
Rooney
Mar 24, 2009 14:26:55 GMT
Post by lew86 on Mar 24, 2009 14:26:55 GMT
Simply fucking disgraceful.
|
|
|
Rooney
Mar 24, 2009 19:33:40 GMT
Post by walrus on Mar 24, 2009 19:33:40 GMT
I don't agree that Ronaldo should have been sent off against Fulham. When considering whether to book a player for a bad challenge, or to sent them off for serious foul play, referees are asked to consider the following:
How high was the tackle How late was the tackle How fast was each of the players move, and as a result, how likely was injury to result If studs are up
Ronaldo's tackle was in my opinion therefore only a booking, as it wasn't that high, the ball was still actually there to be won with a decent tackle, and neither player was moving too quickly, lessening the likelihood of injury. I see it as only a bad tackle, worthy of a yellow, rather than serious foul play, worthy of a red. I suppose it's all a matter of opinion really though.
Rooney on the other hand, definite red. Where's the respect in that?
|
|
|
Rooney
Mar 24, 2009 19:35:03 GMT
Post by Deleted on Mar 24, 2009 19:35:03 GMT
I don't agree that Ronaldo should have been sent off against Fulham. When considering whether to book a player for a bad challenge, or to sent them off for serious foul play, referees are asked to consider the following: How high was the tackle How late was the tackle How fast was each of the players move, and as a result, how likely was injury to result If studs are up Ronaldo's tackle was in my opinion therefore only a booking, as it wasn't that high, the ball was still actually there to be won with a decent tackle, and neither player was moving too quickly, lessening the likelihood of injury. I see it as only a bad tackle, worthy of a yellow, rather than serious foul play, worthy of a red. I suppose it's all a matter of opinion really though. Rooney on the other hand, definite red. Where's the respect in that? Ronaldo should have gone as well. Yellow for the tackle, yellow for the two or three clear instances of dissent he showed throughout the game. Pantsil should have walked as well.
|
|
|
Rooney
Mar 24, 2009 20:41:37 GMT
Post by jacka118 on Mar 24, 2009 20:41:37 GMT
Pantsil is a rite cheat, remember his dive in our game, wanker
|
|
|
Rooney
Mar 24, 2009 20:42:29 GMT
Post by walrus on Mar 24, 2009 20:42:29 GMT
Yeah, Pantsil's antics at the Brit were a disgrace. What did he do against the Shit? I didn't see it.
|
|