|
|
Post by mcf on Mar 16, 2009 7:35:16 GMT
Who on earth was that with you Davef? I've never seen such a display of chidish petulance since I last saw a wankstain throw his toys out of the pram. Fair play to Rimmer who tried to make him see reason.  The extreme wankstain must post on here because he knew all of the terms - unless he's just spent too much time knocking around the Haters. |
|
|
|
Post by OldStokie on Mar 16, 2009 7:45:30 GMT
Top o' the mornin to ya, Merk.  OS. |
|
|
|
Post by mcf on Mar 16, 2009 7:52:41 GMT
Morning OS This bloke would have made you proud.  |
|
|
|
Post by OldStokie on Mar 16, 2009 7:57:10 GMT
I wish I had been there. I'd have bought him a pint. Gotta go now to take Tone's kids to skool. Have a nice day fishing.  OS. |
|
|
|
Post by Lakeland Potter on Mar 16, 2009 7:57:46 GMT
Merk, I was on row 11 of the lower tier - was it you about 7 rows in front of us?
|
|
|
|
Post by mcf on Mar 16, 2009 9:43:19 GMT
More than likely, they were only 3/4 rows back from the front. Around seats 34-40. It was embarrassing for the more mild mannered Stokies that were in attendance. What these wankstains get up to in their own homes is their business but when they are out on tour representing our good name..... |
|
|
|
Post by winger on Mar 16, 2009 10:22:40 GMT
I'm setting up a Moderate wing of Wankstains, the SDP (Socialists Dig Pulis) for those like who are starting to think like me : Pulis is a pretty good bloke with great eyebrows.
|
|
|
|
Post by Lakeland Potter on Mar 16, 2009 10:34:07 GMT
Yes I was in seat 37 so you were just a few seats in front, Merk.
|
|
|
|
Post by RAF on Mar 16, 2009 10:40:33 GMT
Now we have established where you were sat and it was indeed Merkin who you saw can we please move on with something interesting you pair of boring clowns?
H
|
|
|
|
Post by winger on Mar 16, 2009 10:49:50 GMT
Excellent comment there RAF. The only thing that has stopped me loving Pulis over the years is the sheer unadultrated dreariness of the Rimmers. Like trying to fancy Edwina Curry, it's impossible to imagine joining their number.
|
|
|
|
Post by cousindupree on Mar 16, 2009 11:06:26 GMT
Is this a thread or just a private conversation....couldn't you pick up the phone or use messenger.....shit bin please admin
|
|
|
|
Post by mcf on Mar 16, 2009 11:15:49 GMT
Says the guy with a sick and twisted fetish for a rancid cooking bint.
RAF - LP didn't see me you thick cunt - that is why he is establishing where I was. It was important to double check that the embarrassing hullabaloo that we witnessed was one and the same.
dupree's cousin - do one. We are awating an answer from admin as to the identity of this wankstain so we can tell him to 'fuck off down the vale'
|
|
|
|
Post by RAF on Mar 16, 2009 11:28:13 GMT
I think that pretty much establishes that he saw you , you thick ****.
Either that or it was some other fat cunter that was eclipsing the sun.
H
|
|
|
|
Post by mcf on Mar 16, 2009 11:38:52 GMT
LP can tell us himself as to whether it was
a) me
b) the wankstain and the rimmer
that he heard/saw?
secret message on
<< !!!! PL reswna eht si b >>
secret message off
|
|
|
|
Post by winger on Mar 16, 2009 11:52:04 GMT
Ooh shit bin please teacher. It's johnny come latelys with your attitude that have destroyed the true function of this board dupree.
I mean look at this thrilling analysis of yours here. I only wish I had a mind of such startling originality.
The 6 pointers..
M'boro (H)
Brazil (A)
Newcastle (H)
Blackburn (H)
Hull (A)
They will all be incredibly tense and tight but I see the home games as must win and away as must not lose. But will TP see it that way.....I fear he might just err on the side of caution which might result in draws....In fairness though 5 draws might not be a disaster......ok i haven't a clue really!
|
|
|
|
Post by Lakeland Potter on Mar 16, 2009 12:03:51 GMT
Actually, mcf and RAF, the answer is mostly b) (The Wankstain and the Rimmer) but with a small element of a) thrown in - i.e. I did see the back of someone's head which COULD have been mcf's. And he has now pretty much confirmed it was the back of his head. ;D
|
|
|
|
Post by MarkWolstanton on Mar 16, 2009 12:13:23 GMT
I'm setting up a Moderate wing of Wankstains, the SDP (Socialists Dig Pulis) for those like who are starting to think like me : Pulis is a pretty good bloke with great eyebrows. Do keep up Winger old boy. The new political home for us that have got past the "think where we were two years ago, he can do no wrong" barrier is the Pulis Tolerating Knobsack faction. |
|
|
|
Post by Davef on Mar 16, 2009 12:16:45 GMT
There were my good mates, werrington and mark71scfc. An away game wouldn't be the same without those two kicking it off. Don't worry though, they'd kissed and made up by the time they hit the town on Saturday night. |
|
|
|
Post by sheikhmomo on Mar 16, 2009 12:25:31 GMT
the wankstain and the rimmer Was that the B side to the Bartender and the Thief? |
|
|
|
Post by mcf on Mar 16, 2009 13:11:21 GMT
Which one was the wankstain Dave? ..and its Pulis Tolerating Jizzsacks!!! |
|
|
|
Post by Davef on Mar 16, 2009 13:22:35 GMT
werrington's the PHW...and I taught him all he knows |
|
|
|
Post by mcf on Mar 16, 2009 13:46:35 GMT
Fucking hell....he made you look indifferent. ;D
|
|
|
|
Post by OldStokie on Mar 16, 2009 13:58:45 GMT
Dave, tell Werrington that there's a double whisky waiting for him from me. Anyone who can upset Merk big style must be worth it. Oi, winger, you tool, don't count me in with your SDP wallahs. I'm firmly a PHW and cannot be swayed by an eyebrow fetish, which is the sickest thing I've ever heard...even from you who professes to know all there is to know about the subtle techniques of ice docking.  OS. |
|
|
|
Post by mcf on Mar 16, 2009 14:55:04 GMT
I was amazed and amused OS.
Only the score upset me.
Its bad enough to suffer tough away games and losses as is, without hearing the inane ramblings of the Wankstains.
|
|
|
|
Post by winger on Mar 16, 2009 15:16:18 GMT
Tone is ace* : you can't expect the A plan of going two or three down to bring us a point out of every away game, but the hit rate remains triffic.
* Try and keep up with my highbrow irony OS.
|
|
|
|
Post by Will_75 on Mar 16, 2009 16:14:26 GMT
eyebrow hirony?
|
|
|
|
Post by OldStokie on Mar 16, 2009 17:49:31 GMT
Hello Will. Merk..."the inane ramblings of the Wankstains." Brilliant! That could quite easily be changed to "The Inane Ramblings of a Wankstain" and would be a great title for winger's new book about this season. OS. |
|
|
|
Post by rhodesy on Mar 16, 2009 18:14:17 GMT
To be fair the wankstain was pissed as he must have mentioned a million times. That may account for his foolish acts.
|
|
|
|
Post by OldStokie on Mar 16, 2009 18:24:29 GMT
Oi, young Merk, be careful! The last time I was with your pater he was as drunk as the proverbial skunk. Merks who live in ale houses shouldn't throw beer glasses. OS. |
|
|
|
Post by werrington on Mar 16, 2009 18:30:46 GMT
That would be me then ;D..........;ll toe the party line in future...it was shite 1st half though and as the MAJORITY of the support was singing attack attack attack!! ill rest my case...if you were happy then the 1st half then that was rimming of the highest order |
|
