|
Patto
Jan 29, 2008 7:07:52 GMT
Post by markscfc72 on Jan 29, 2008 7:07:52 GMT
from todays sun
NORWICH are ready to bid £850,000 for Scunthorpe hitman Martin Paterson.
The Iron will cash in on the Northern Irish ace, 20, even though they are in the Championship drop zone.
Scunthorpe paid Stoke £450,000 for him last year
|
|
|
Patto
Jan 29, 2008 7:15:38 GMT
Post by BeauTDSC on Jan 29, 2008 7:15:38 GMT
Mark , Did we have a sell on clause for Patto ? i,m sure we did .
|
|
|
Patto
Jan 29, 2008 7:19:02 GMT
Post by Lakeland Potter on Jan 29, 2008 7:19:02 GMT
20% sell on
|
|
|
Patto
Jan 29, 2008 7:25:35 GMT
Post by nathan on Jan 29, 2008 7:25:35 GMT
So we're looking at 175k.....
Then again, I can't see it happening. The source doesn't exactly instill confidence in you.
|
|
|
Patto
Jan 29, 2008 7:25:40 GMT
Post by BeauTDSC on Jan 29, 2008 7:25:40 GMT
£170.000 ching ching
|
|
|
Patto
Jan 29, 2008 7:47:08 GMT
Post by Lakeland Potter on Jan 29, 2008 7:47:08 GMT
The story sounds very believable to me. Scunny couldn't hope to hang on to Pato if/when they get relegated so they might be tempted to sell now and try to strengthen the side enough to try to avoid the drop or have a bit of cash to rebuild for Div 1. Remember also, that by selling early, they avoid a few of the staged payments they would have to pay us every 15 games.
|
|
timmis
Youth Player
HUGHES OUT!
Posts: 459
|
Patto
Jan 29, 2008 8:15:06 GMT
Post by timmis on Jan 29, 2008 8:15:06 GMT
he never impressed me that much stoke. jumped up little cock in my opinion!
|
|
|
Patto
Jan 29, 2008 9:01:20 GMT
Post by Stick It On Cort's Head on Jan 29, 2008 9:01:20 GMT
450,000 for patto
good business for stoke
another 450,000 into the coffers
|
|
|
Patto
Jan 29, 2008 9:04:30 GMT
Post by DansViews on Jan 29, 2008 9:04:30 GMT
I actually preffered him to Parkin/Pericard.. would sooner he stayed and them two went, much more of an exciting prospect.
|
|
|
Patto
Jan 29, 2008 9:08:29 GMT
Post by Onneravineet on Jan 29, 2008 9:08:29 GMT
£450k for Patto!? It wasn't that much was it? I thought it was lower than that? Or am I getting confused, was Rudgey after £700k or something? Help I'm going mad!
|
|
|
Patto
Jan 29, 2008 9:23:04 GMT
Post by mikeyb99 on Jan 29, 2008 9:23:04 GMT
I can't see Pato moving half-way through the season. I expect Scunny will be holding out for around the million mark anyway if/when he does leave.
Would certainly prefer him to Parkin/Pericard. If he hadn't formerly been a Stoke player we would all be hoping our Tone would be signing him, bearing in mind his number of goals in a poor team and a not over-inflated transfer fee!
|
|
|
Patto
Jan 29, 2008 9:25:18 GMT
Post by u2oxeterstokie on Jan 29, 2008 9:25:18 GMT
Pato went to Scunny for £450000, Norwich are reported to be after him for £850000, Stoke to get a 20% sell on fee which is £170000. Does that help?
|
|
|
Patto
Jan 29, 2008 9:25:36 GMT
Post by simpson on Jan 29, 2008 9:25:36 GMT
I was speaking to him in Zenn the other week and he said he`s loving it at Scunny because he`s playing everyweek but told me mate he didnt like the club because there at the bottom and playing wank every week.
|
|
|
Patto
Jan 29, 2008 9:25:38 GMT
Post by ceejays on Jan 29, 2008 9:25:38 GMT
£305000 with 20% sell on = £475000
|
|
|
Patto
Jan 29, 2008 9:27:50 GMT
Post by Onneravineet on Jan 29, 2008 9:27:50 GMT
U2ox.. cheers
|
|
|
Patto
Jan 29, 2008 9:35:00 GMT
Post by Onneravineet on Jan 29, 2008 9:35:00 GMT
Yes it says on SCFC main site that we got £305k plus appearance fees of potentially £120k plus the 20% that people are mentioning.
What was the £120k linked to??? Will we still get it or have we qualified already?
|
|
|
Patto
Jan 29, 2008 9:35:48 GMT
Post by FullerMagic on Jan 29, 2008 9:35:48 GMT
I think the fee was an initial 275k then £30,000 every 15 games up to a maximum of £425k. Plus 250k if Scunny go up Plus a 20% sell-on
|
|
|
Patto
Jan 29, 2008 9:41:40 GMT
Post by mikeyb99 on Jan 29, 2008 9:41:40 GMT
I can forgive Rudgey for forgetting to insert that sell-on clause to Ade's deal now, seems like one quick touch of the dementia in that tribunal and you'd have no idea what the actual fee was!
|
|
|
Patto
Jan 29, 2008 9:44:10 GMT
Post by robin1302 on Jan 29, 2008 9:44:10 GMT
if Scunny go down this season, and then next come straight back up next, do we still get the £250k then? ;D or does it have to be promotion to the premiership?
|
|
|
Patto
Jan 29, 2008 10:09:56 GMT
Post by FullerMagic on Jan 29, 2008 10:09:56 GMT
Norwich local paper say Scunny have rejected the bid.
Norwich Paterson bid rejected by Iron
29 January 2008 09:42
Scunthorpe United have rejected a rumoured £850,000 bid from Norwich City for striker Martin Paterson.
Paterson has scored 11 times in all competitions this season, earning three yellow cards.
Martin Paterson is in-line to make his first international start for Northern Ireland under former Canaries manager Nigel Worthingon in next month's friendly against Bulgaria.
|
|
|
Patto
Jan 29, 2008 10:12:29 GMT
Post by Done it for scfcbuxton on Jan 29, 2008 10:12:29 GMT
We should have sneaked in an international cap payment. At the start of the season we could have done with everyone thinking he was English only, then when he gets called up for NI Scunny pay up.
Why is anyone bothered that he has three yellow cards
|
|
|
Patto
Jan 29, 2008 10:28:16 GMT
Post by mark71 on Jan 29, 2008 10:28:16 GMT
The sell on fee only applies to the profit made from a sale. ie player sold for £400k with 20% sell on fee. Player then sold for £800k the 20% would only be calculated on the £400k profit, in this case £80k.
|
|
|
Patto
Jan 29, 2008 11:03:55 GMT
Post by lordb on Jan 29, 2008 11:03:55 GMT
HMMM,nippy goalscorer proven @ this level. young with no injury record & works aaaarrd.
anyone think of a team that could do with someone like that?
according to SCFC we were 'bitterley disapointed' that he didnt sign a new deal.
buy him back & play him UPFRONT,not wide right like TP did (guess what he wasnt any good there).
OK its not going to happen,not least because TP will not play small strikers but I still find the whole thing annoying.
|
|
|
Patto
Jan 29, 2008 11:29:52 GMT
Post by congletonstokie on Jan 29, 2008 11:29:52 GMT
Sky sports have also confirmed that scunny have rejected norwich bid!
|
|
|
Patto
Jan 29, 2008 13:50:45 GMT
Post by MrMagic on Jan 29, 2008 13:50:45 GMT
Its absolutely infuriating that we are talking about needing a decent striker to compliment the existing team, when we had one and let him slip through our grasp.
Disgracefully poor management however you dress it up.
|
|
chewytunstall
Academy Starlet
My mum always told me never talk to strangers!
Posts: 225
|
Patto
Jan 29, 2008 14:52:03 GMT
Post by chewytunstall on Jan 29, 2008 14:52:03 GMT
Found his level
|
|
|
Patto
Jan 29, 2008 15:13:47 GMT
Post by lordb on Jan 29, 2008 15:13:47 GMT
what the CCC?
where we play like?
|
|
|
Patto
Jan 30, 2008 15:58:34 GMT
Post by FullerMagic on Jan 30, 2008 15:58:34 GMT
Still no hint of incomings.... 4PM UPDATE: STOKE HOPING FOR PATERSON WINDFALL Be the first reader to comment on this story 15:47 - 30 January 2008 Stoke City are licking their lips at the prospect of receiving a £170,000 windfall on transfer deadline day tomorrow - as they wait to see if Scunthorpe striker Martin Paterson is sold to Norwich City in a rumoured £850,000 move.Twenty-year-old Paterson was sold by Stoke to Scunthorpe last summer and the Tunstall-born forward has gone on to bag 11 goals for his new club this season. In December, a transfer tribunal ruled that Paterson's deal to Scunthorpe must include a 20 per cent sell-on clause in Stoke's favour. That would mean the Potters would pocket an extra £170,000 if Paterson made the switch to East Anglia, if the transfer fee is confirmed as being £850,000. December's tribunal also ruled that Scunthorpe must make an initial payment of £275,000 to Stoke for Paterson, and then £30,000 for every 15 appearances he makes for them up to 75 games. Paterson has made 30 appearances so far for Scunthorpe netting Stoke a further £60,000. With £335,000 already banked, Stoke will earn a total of £505,000 from the Paterson deal if he decides to jump ship to Norwich, again at the rumoured price. Paterson would not comment on the speculation surrounding his future today when contacted by The Sentinel. But Norwich boss, Glenn Roeder said this week: "I don't like talking about other clubs' players. "But he (Paterson) is a player who has done particularly well, since he left Stoke and went to Scunthorpe. "I think it would be wrong to talk about Martin Paterson while he is a Scunthorpe player - but I've been impressed with what he's achieved so far in the Championship." And Stoke could be in line to net even more cash if speculation in the national media concerning the future of Wolves midfielder Karl Henry is to be trusted. Stoke sold 25-year-old Henry to Wolves in August 2006 for an initial fee of £100,000, with a 15 per cent sell-on clause attached. In the last week, Henry has been linked with a £2.5m move to Premiership outfit Reading and if that deal were to go through, Stoke would rake in a further £375,000. However, it seems unlikely Henry will make the switch to Berkshire after his agent Eric Walters today told The Sentinel that he had not been engaged in any contact with Wolves over a proposed move. Meanwhile, Stoke defender Ryan Shawcross is hoping to repeat his opening-day goal at Cardiff when the Welshmen roll into the Britannia Stadium this weekend. Fresh from last night's 1-0 defeat at Charlton, Shawcross said: "We are now going into Saturday's game needing a big three points and we've got to get our fans behind us. "Cardiff are on a bit of a roll and looking like a good team, but we are at home and our home record recently has been decent." Shawcross and his fellow defenders will have to dust themselves down after a severe work out during last night's 1-0 defeat at Charlton. "It was a tough, tough game," admitted the 20-year-old defender. "They had two big lads up front and it was a battle for us at the back. "It was a big test for me and the back four, but I think we did well and limited them to just a few chances." Andy Griffin will be available for Saturday's lunchtime visit of Cardiff (12.30pm), but faces a one-match ban from the trip to Wolves seven days later after picking up his fifth booking of the season last night.
|
|
|
Patto
Jan 30, 2008 16:08:53 GMT
Post by jezzascfc on Jan 30, 2008 16:08:53 GMT
You'd think that if there was even a sniff of a decent signing in the next day or so the Sentinel would be all over it like a rash, but not a dicky bird. Seems it's the loan market in Feb for us now (unless TP has been working under the radar!).
|
|
|
Patto
Jan 30, 2008 16:52:09 GMT
Post by muckakev on Jan 30, 2008 16:52:09 GMT
Just seen on Setanta sports news that a figure of £5m mentioned for pato.
|
|