|
|
Post by padders01 on Jan 21, 2004 10:19:19 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by padders01 on Jan 21, 2004 10:24:40 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by Rex on Jan 21, 2004 10:30:27 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by Admin on Jan 21, 2004 10:31:09 GMT
Well that percentage figure means jack all - we could improve ours by delcaring half of the John Smith's Stand unsafe, thus reducing the capacity and upping the % score. The overall average though tells a story... 15th in the division and a LOOOOOOOOONNNNNGGGGG way away from the 'big boys'.  Smudge PS ~ Wow Rex... unlike you to be plugging one of your own sites mate!!! ;D  |
|
|
|
Post by padders01 on Jan 21, 2004 10:35:57 GMT
LOL Smudge
Yeah 15th isnt good.
As i said in a post yesterday, there is no money in the area and before December we were fannying around in the bottom half of the table, may be now we are looking at the top of the half of the table and playing well then we might see some bigger attendances
The Scumsall game will attract 20,000+ but after that when prices go back up, how many will be there??
GG said we needed 16,000 a week to break even, we havent come close to that figure before Xmas!!
|
|
|
|
Post by Rex on Jan 21, 2004 10:40:17 GMT
Smudge
Well I thought it was time to remind people that it still exists, It is unusual I know ;D
Padders
Thats why the club are looking seriously at the prices for games, they want to raise the attendances, but from looking at the thread above I feel the people on this board want too many categories which if all were implemented would create havoc.
Why not have one price for all areas?
or is that too easy? ;D
Rex
|
|
|
|
Post by padders01 on Jan 21, 2004 10:42:36 GMT
Or as many Premiership clubs do, have different price categories for some games.
Something needs to be done!!!
|
|
