|
Post by cobhamstokey on Mar 12, 2024 7:57:50 GMT
I don’t like him or his politics but I’d never be abusive about him. There’s a difference to that and calling him a f’ing idiot etc Is describing him as a "snivelling, slimey, good for fuck all, irresponsible, self centred prick" ok? I made that comment? I’d be very surprised. When was that and how far back did you have to dig?
|
|
|
Post by felonious on Mar 12, 2024 7:59:08 GMT
I'm in a hotel in a little town called Almelo in the Netherlands, they are talking about it on the TV, but I haven't a clue what is being said Just get yerself on here Paul Spencer has all the goss, even citing the Daily Mail now
|
|
|
Post by LGH87 on Mar 12, 2024 8:03:24 GMT
The Royal Family bootlicker has spoken........ To be fair I’m not as big a fan as you think (bit of a wind up). I just don’t get the hate of people who have zero impact on your life and that you’ve never met and actually do little wrong. Their only fault is they were born into money. So you agree with the activities of Andrew? Ok
|
|
|
Post by cobhamstokey on Mar 12, 2024 8:14:42 GMT
To be fair I’m not as big a fan as you think (bit of a wind up). I just don’t get the hate of people who have zero impact on your life and that you’ve never met and actually do little wrong. Their only fault is they were born into money. So you agree with the activities of Andrew? Ok I wasn’t talking about Andrew I was talking about those in the photos. You could pick any group from society and find one bad egg (sometimes more). That’s like saying it’s OK to call nurses “fucking idiots” because of Lucy Letby etc. So no I don’t like Andrew but it would be bigoted to judge all his family based on him.
|
|
|
Post by elystokie on Mar 12, 2024 8:20:35 GMT
Is describing him as a "snivelling, slimey, good for fuck all, irresponsible, self centred prick" ok? I made that comment? I’d be very surprised. When was that and how far back did you have to dig? You didn't make the comment but you 'liked' it which would indicate quite strongly that you condone it. Just go on the London thread and search for Khan 🙂
|
|
|
Post by cobhamstokey on Mar 12, 2024 8:33:56 GMT
I made that comment? I’d be very surprised. When was that and how far back did you have to dig? You didn't make the comment but you 'liked' it which would indicate quite strongly that you condone it. Just go on the London thread and search for Khan 🙂 So I didn’t make the comment then? "snivelling, slimey, good for fuck all, irresponsible, self centred prick" back in October. Must have taken some digging that (obviously you couldn’t find something I’d actually said myself (and you never will) so liking something would be a nice consolation prize unlike Prestwich who made the comment directly. In relation to liking posts I generally do it on the theme and on occasions part of the thread word for word so yes I do think he’s irresponsible and self centred. I’ve unliked it now as I didn’t want to cause any confusion.
|
|
|
Post by thehartshillbadger on Mar 12, 2024 8:35:19 GMT
I made that comment? I’d be very surprised. When was that and how far back did you have to dig? You didn't make the comment but you 'liked' it which would indicate quite strongly that you condone it. Just go on the London thread and search for Khan 🙂 I see it took prestwichpotter 3.2 seconds to like your post, have you got your hand up his back or something?
|
|
|
Post by thehartshillbadger on Mar 12, 2024 8:36:44 GMT
You didn't make the comment but you 'liked' it which would indicate quite strongly that you condone it. Just go on the London thread and search for Khan 🙂 So I didn’t make the comment then? "snivelling, slimey, good for fuck all, irresponsible, self centred prick" back in October. Must have taken some digging that (obviously you couldn’t find something I’d actually said myself (and you never will) so liking something would be a nice consolation prize unlike Prestwich who made the comment directly. In relation to liking posts I generally do it on the theme and on occasions part of the thread word for word so yes I do think he’s irresponsible and self centred. I’ve unliked it now as I didn’t want to cause any confusion. He must like reading my “load of bollocks” posts after all😀
|
|
|
Post by felonious on Mar 12, 2024 8:39:37 GMT
I made that comment? I’d be very surprised. When was that and how far back did you have to dig? You didn't make the comment but you 'liked' it which would indicate quite strongly that you condone it. Just go on the London thread and search for Khan 🙂 What a "snivelling, slimey, good for fuck all, irresponsible" post it was then
|
|
|
Post by elystokie on Mar 12, 2024 8:47:40 GMT
You didn't make the comment but you 'liked' it which would indicate quite strongly that you condone it. Just go on the London thread and search for Khan 🙂 So I didn’t make the comment then? "snivelling, slimey, good for fuck all, irresponsible, self centred prick" back in October. Must have taken some digging that (obviously you couldn’t find something I’d actually said myself (and you never will) so liking something would be a nice consolation prize unlike Prestwich who made the comment directly. In relation to liking posts I generally do it on the theme and on occasions part of the thread word for word so yes I do think he’s irresponsible and self centred. I’ve unliked it now as I didn’t want to cause any confusion. It took very little digging, I vaguely remembered the comment and who liked it - it's simple enough to do a quick search. Good to see you've changed your mind 🙂
|
|
|
Post by elystokie on Mar 12, 2024 8:48:46 GMT
You didn't make the comment but you 'liked' it which would indicate quite strongly that you condone it. Just go on the London thread and search for Khan 🙂 What a "snivelling, slimey, good for fuck all, irresponsible" post it was then You've lost me, which post are you referring to?
|
|
|
Post by elystokie on Mar 12, 2024 8:49:57 GMT
You didn't make the comment but you 'liked' it which would indicate quite strongly that you condone it. Just go on the London thread and search for Khan 🙂 I see it took prestwichpotter 3.2 seconds to like your post, have you got your hand up his back or something? Haha we are kind of making the same point 😄
|
|
|
Post by elystokie on Mar 12, 2024 8:51:11 GMT
So I didn’t make the comment then? "snivelling, slimey, good for fuck all, irresponsible, self centred prick" back in October. Must have taken some digging that (obviously you couldn’t find something I’d actually said myself (and you never will) so liking something would be a nice consolation prize unlike Prestwich who made the comment directly. In relation to liking posts I generally do it on the theme and on occasions part of the thread word for word so yes I do think he’s irresponsible and self centred. I’ve unliked it now as I didn’t want to cause any confusion. He must like reading my “load of bollocks” posts after all😀 I read it so I must like it? Is that how it works? I was completely unaware 😂
|
|
|
Post by cobhamstokey on Mar 12, 2024 9:01:13 GMT
So I didn’t make the comment then? "snivelling, slimey, good for fuck all, irresponsible, self centred prick" back in October. Must have taken some digging that (obviously you couldn’t find something I’d actually said myself (and you never will) so liking something would be a nice consolation prize unlike Prestwich who made the comment directly. In relation to liking posts I generally do it on the theme and on occasions part of the thread word for word so yes I do think he’s irresponsible and self centred. I’ve unliked it now as I didn’t want to cause any confusion. It took very little digging, I vaguely remembered the comment and who liked it - it's simple enough to do a quick search. Good to see you've changed your mind 🙂 Crikey that’s some memory you’ve got. I can barely remember what happened yesterday
|
|
|
Post by felonious on Mar 12, 2024 9:02:02 GMT
What a "snivelling, slimey, good for fuck all, irresponsible" post it was then You've lost me, which post are you referring to? I read your post in good faith i didn't realise therefore that he didn't actually write those words.... perhaps in future you should be a little more careful with what you post.
|
|
|
Post by cobhamstokey on Mar 12, 2024 9:04:07 GMT
You've lost me, which post are you referring to? I read your post in good faith i didn't realise therefore that he didn't actually write those words.... perhaps in future you should be a little more careful with what you post. I’m asking that it goes to VAR and that it was an accidental slip of my finger that liked it
|
|
|
Post by elystokie on Mar 12, 2024 9:05:00 GMT
It took very little digging, I vaguely remembered the comment and who liked it - it's simple enough to do a quick search. Good to see you've changed your mind 🙂 Crikey that’s some memory you’ve got. I can barely remember what happened yesterday Quite surprising really given that the general perception of people that use cannabis is the polar opposite 😄
|
|
|
Post by cobhamstokey on Mar 12, 2024 9:07:08 GMT
Crikey that’s some memory you’ve got. I can barely remember what happened yesterday Quite surprising really given that the general perception of people that use cannabis is the polar opposite 😄 I knew that weed would slip in somewhere it’s called the natural ageing process either that or i’m losing my marbles.
|
|
|
Post by elystokie on Mar 12, 2024 9:07:25 GMT
You've lost me, which post are you referring to? I read your post in good faith i didn't realise therefore that he didn't actually write those words.... perhaps in future you should be a little more careful with what you post. I never indicated in the post that he wrote it, I asked if he thought the comment was ok. Maybe you should be a little more careful about jumping to conclusions before you have all the facts 😉
|
|
|
Post by prestwichpotter on Mar 12, 2024 9:07:34 GMT
It took very little digging, I vaguely remembered the comment and who liked it - it's simple enough to do a quick search. Good to see you've changed your mind 🙂 Crikey that’s some memory you’ve got. I can barely remember what happened yesterday That explains why you post the same thing on literally every thread about how you’re not political, why people shouldn’t care about something that doesn’t affects them directly, how we should all be kind to one another (unless it’s footballer who has a bad game or a politician you don’t like even though you don’t do politics). It all makes sense now……
|
|
|
Post by elystokie on Mar 12, 2024 9:09:03 GMT
Quite surprising really given that the general perception of people that use cannabis is the polar opposite 😄 I knew that weed would slip in somewhere it’s called the natural ageing process either that or i’m losing my marbles. It was an open goal to be fair 😉
|
|
|
Post by thehartshillbadger on Mar 12, 2024 9:45:34 GMT
I read your post in good faith i didn't realise therefore that he didn't actually write those words.... perhaps in future you should be a little more careful with what you post. I’m asking that it goes to VAR and that it was an accidental slip of my finger that liked it It’s only natural to like my posts Cobs, you’re one of many😉
|
|
|
Post by PotteringThrough on Mar 12, 2024 9:49:27 GMT
Such a bizarre thing to do. If they’d not posted a picture would anyone be bothered?
As it is I’m now fully invested in the conspiracy stories about the whole shenanigans & eagerly awaiting the next instalment.
|
|
|
Post by noustie on Mar 12, 2024 10:06:49 GMT
Such a bizarre thing to do. If they’d not posted a picture would anyone be bothered? As it is I’m now fully invested in the conspiracy stories about the whole shenanigans & eagerly awaiting the next instalment. Apparently a couple of the US networks (CNN?) are auditing previous pictures to see if this has been a regular occurrence - whole thing is absolutely mental. It's like the Chuckle Brothers have been employed to co-ordinate the royal media response.
|
|
|
Post by LGH87 on Mar 12, 2024 10:41:07 GMT
Such a bizarre thing to do. If they’d not posted a picture would anyone be bothered? As it is I’m now fully invested in the conspiracy stories about the whole shenanigans & eagerly awaiting the next instalment. I didn't even know she'd not been seen in public since december until the other day and now I'm fully invested in it since this "photo".
|
|
|
Post by Paul Spencer on Mar 12, 2024 10:53:34 GMT
Whatever people think of the Royal Family, William and Kate have been nigh on flawless over the years and as a minimum, deserve respect and their privacy for a short period while the Princess recovers from illness. To be fair, this whole level of attention wouldn't be happening if THEY hadn't released the picture. I saw the picture when it was first started doing the rounds on Sunday morning and I didn't give it a second thought (I certainly couldn't have named any of the children in it) but by the end of the day, I'd started a thread about it on the Oatcake! There must be 100's of thousands of people in this country alone, in a similar position, there'd be a very similar reaction if (say) Sunak's wife had had an operation and then they too had released a dodgy family picture. As LGH says above, I didn't even realise (or care) that she hadn't been seen in public for months until Sunday evening. There's no chicken or egg situation here, this whole furore is entirely of their own making.
|
|
|
Post by noustie on Mar 12, 2024 11:27:00 GMT
Whatever people think of the Royal Family, William and Kate have been nigh on flawless over the years and as a minimum, deserve respect and their privacy for a short period while the Princess recovers from illness. To be fair, this whole level of attention wouldn't be happening if THEY hadn't released the picture. I saw the picture when it was first started doing the rounds on Sunday morning and I didn't give it a second thought (I certainly couldn't have named any of the children in it) but by the end of the day, I'd started a thread about it on the Oatcake! There must be 100's of thousands of people in this country alone, in a similar position, there'd be a very similar reaction if (say) Sunak's wife had had an operation and then they too had released a dodgy family picture. As LGH says above, I didn't even realise (or care) that she hadn't been seen in public for months until Sunday evening. There's no chicken or egg situation here, this whole furore is entirely of their own making. It was basically an increasing number of twitter users who could easily have been discounted as screwball but this picture has just drawn attention to something where arms n legs are growing all over the shop. This photo has just drawn attention to a whole scenario that is looking increasingly weird and the response has been about as much use as throwing petrol on a fire.
|
|
|
Post by callas12 on Mar 12, 2024 11:36:53 GMT
As small & insignificant that the circumstances of this photo were initially on the normality side of things, it's very nature and release to the media invariably and quite rightly throws up more questions than it does answers.
& it definitely resonates to other Royal Family related incidents of note, moat notably bringing back into focus the circumstances of Princess Diana's car crash and her subsequent death, with the different mysteries & theories that that set of events through up.
Diana's bodyguard Trevor Rees-Jones the sole survivor of that crash always states he has no recollection of what happened during the collision due to the injuries he sustained & whilst this may well be the case, it does make you 🤔 exactly what he does or doesn't recall from that incident & if there were more powers at play behind the scenes concerning that.
Sometimes in events such as these, when suspicions of something grow & aren't put to bed with a reasonable or plausible reason, theories emerge & gain traction, it's only natural and human nature, as we're seeing on here, a quite simple looking photo on the outset, could be hiding something or nothing. 'Something's definitely more exciting to focus on than 'nothing'. But something I've found in life, is a level of suspicion is generally there for a reason and with good cause, & unless resolved quickly, only increases and adds to the suspicion levels!
Sure this won't be the last we hear of photo-'gate'..
|
|
|
Post by flea79 on Mar 12, 2024 11:54:43 GMT
Kensington Palace just released this photo of Kate from this week so quit it with the conspiracy nonsense.
|
|
|
Post by prestwichpotter on Mar 12, 2024 11:56:10 GMT
Kensington Palace just released this photo of Kate from this week so quit it with the conspiracy nonsense. You can tell it's old......................William has too much hair.
|
|