|
Post by cdf on Jul 9, 2023 18:23:12 GMT
The big big problem with this is that innocent people's names are getting put through the quagmire on all of this all through social media
|
|
|
Post by noustie on Jul 9, 2023 18:44:53 GMT
I am probably being very dense and/or naive but why would someone pay £35k for a few mucky pics, when I assume there are 1,000s, probably millions, available for free on the internet? Badger always told me that it's because of his niche fetishises which he couldn't find online. Tbf I doubt there's many video of young men dressing their willy up to look like an elephant while helicoptering the trunk to lion King anthems. Was a nice tidy earner for me when I was young too. I used to put florescent johnnies on, switch the lights off and add in light sabre noises over various parts of the Star Wars score. Got cancelled when I blacked up my erection and shook him angrily at camera as if he was delivering famous Darth Vader lines. Apologised profusely for my lack of cultural awareness but the damage was done. Now I only do it on May 4th for my wife when she dresses like Princess Leia and I chase her round the house whilst she fires back with a Nerf gun.
|
|
|
Post by thehartshillbadger on Jul 9, 2023 18:47:25 GMT
Badger always told me that it's because of his niche fetishises which he couldn't find online. Tbf I doubt there's many video of young men dressing their willy up to look like an elephant while helicoptering the trunk to lion King anthems. Was a nice tidy earner for me when I was young too. I used to put florescent johnnies on, switch the lights off and add in light sabre noises over various parts of the Star Wars score. Got cancelled when I blacked up my erection and shook him angrily at camera as if he was delivering famous Darth Vader lines. Apologised profusely for my lack of cultural awareness but the damage was done. Now I only do it on May 4th for my wife when she dresses like Princess Leia and I chase her round the house whilst she fires back with a Nerf gun. I thought we made a pact? What goes on in the Star Wars cosplay swinger club, stays in the Star Wars cosplay swinger club. Most disappointed😒
|
|
|
Post by gawa on Jul 9, 2023 18:49:24 GMT
Badger always told me that it's because of his niche fetishises which he couldn't find online. Tbf I doubt there's many video of young men dressing their willy up to look like an elephant while helicoptering the trunk to lion King anthems. Was a nice tidy earner for me when I was young too. I used to put florescent johnnies on, switch the lights off and add in light sabre noises over various parts of the Star Wars score. Got cancelled when I blacked up my erection and shook him angrily at camera as if he was delivering famous Darth Vader lines. Apologised profusely for my lack of cultural awareness but the damage was done. Now I only do it on May 4th for my wife when she dresses like Princess Leia and I chase her round the house whilst she fires back with a Nerf gun. Was it Badger you did the star wars scenes with? Did yous ever dual with your lightsabres? He keeps trying to invite me round every Thursday for ThorsDay. Something about cocktails slapping him while shouting its hammer time?
|
|
|
Post by thehartshillbadger on Jul 9, 2023 18:50:25 GMT
I used to put florescent johnnies on, switch the lights off and add in light sabre noises over various parts of the Star Wars score. Got cancelled when I blacked up my erection and shook him angrily at camera as if he was delivering famous Darth Vader lines. Apologised profusely for my lack of cultural awareness but the damage was done. Now I only do it on May 4th for my wife when she dresses like Princess Leia and I chase her round the house whilst she fires back with a Nerf gun. Was it Badger you did the star wars scenes with? Did yous ever dual with your lightsabres? He keeps trying to invite me round every Thursday for ThorsDay. Something about cocktails slapping him while shouting its hammer time? See above. It’s not all about you ya know
|
|
|
Post by noustie on Jul 9, 2023 18:52:18 GMT
I used to put florescent johnnies on, switch the lights off and add in light sabre noises over various parts of the Star Wars score. Got cancelled when I blacked up my erection and shook him angrily at camera as if he was delivering famous Darth Vader lines. Apologised profusely for my lack of cultural awareness but the damage was done. Now I only do it on May 4th for my wife when she dresses like Princess Leia and I chase her round the house whilst she fires back with a Nerf gun. I thought we made a pact? What goes on in the Star Wars cosplay swinger club, stays in the Star Wars cosplay swinger club. Most disappointed😒 Sorry Chewy 😞
|
|
|
Post by andystokey on Jul 9, 2023 18:52:54 GMT
Meanwhile Rupert Murdoch’s News Group have nicely taken the news agenda in a different direction with a game of "guess who". No doubt various parties will be relieved at the timing.
By the way belated congratulations to George Osborne by the way, friend of Rupert Murdoch who after chatting off the record four times with him famously cut funding to the BBC by 20%.
|
|
|
Post by thehartshillbadger on Jul 9, 2023 18:58:01 GMT
I thought we made a pact? What goes on in the Star Wars cosplay swinger club, stays in the Star Wars cosplay swinger club. Most disappointed😒 Sorry Chewy 😞 BLOCKED!
|
|
|
Post by starkiller on Jul 9, 2023 18:59:28 GMT
The big big problem with this is that innocent people's names are getting put through the quagmire on all of this all through social media Well the answer to this is simple. BBC have been covering up for each other for decades. The list of who we know about historically is appalling, nevermind those suppressed. The BBC know who it is. Maybe it should be headline news. On the fuckimg BBC. That might restore a little bit of journalistic integrity to this cunt of an organisation.
|
|
|
Post by andystokey on Jul 9, 2023 19:05:07 GMT
The big big problem with this is that innocent people's names are getting put through the quagmire on all of this all through social media Well the answer to this is simple. BBC have been covering up for each other for decades. The list of who we know about historically is appalling, nevermind those suppressed. The BBC know who it is. Maybe it should be headline news. On the fuckimg BBC. That might restore a little bit of journalistic integrity to this cunt of an organisation. Every newspaper in Britain also knows, as probably does every Cabinet member. Why wouldn't they publish and break the story? The BBC are getting properly dry bummed by this anonymous story by a Murdoch Conservative paper. Think.... who gains?
|
|
|
Post by starkiller on Jul 9, 2023 19:14:27 GMT
Well the answer to this is simple. BBC have been covering up for each other for decades. The list of who we know about historically is appalling, nevermind those suppressed. The BBC know who it is. Maybe it should be headline news. On the fuckimg BBC. That might restore a little bit of journalistic integrity to this cunt of an organisation. Every newspaper in Britain also knows, as probably does every Cabinet member. Why wouldn't they publish and break the story? The BBC are getting properly dry bummed by this anonymous story by a Murdoch Conservative paper. Think.... who gains? I have zero interest in party politics, or meaningless illusory left and right banners that people love to sit under. As I said, the BBC could end it immediately.
|
|
|
Post by lordb on Jul 9, 2023 19:34:47 GMT
The big big problem with this is that innocent people's names are getting put through the quagmire on all of this all through social media Well the answer to this is simple. BBC have been covering up for each other for decades. The list of who we know about historically is appalling, nevermind those suppressed. The BBC know who it is. Maybe it should be headline news. On the fuckimg BBC. That might restore a little bit of journalistic integrity to this cunt of an organisation. It is headline news on the BBC
|
|
|
Post by andystokey on Jul 9, 2023 19:34:47 GMT
Every newspaper in Britain also knows, as probably does every Cabinet member. Why wouldn't they publish and break the story? The BBC are getting properly dry bummed by this anonymous story by a Murdoch Conservative paper. Think.... who gains? I have zero interest in party politics, or meaningless illusory left and right banners that people love to sit under. As I said, the BBC could end it immediately. No they can't and you are being ridiculously naive if you think they can. For someone worried about the faceless cabal this is a gift for you. This is about the news and media sliding into a handful of individuals, mostly foreigners, who will be forever king makers. This isn't about right and left politics its about who owns the agenda. Everyone knows only those "chosen" by the private media giants become the "democratically" elected party (Blair, Cameron, Boris, ...). The Sun (News Corp) has snookered the BBC into another debate about the funding. Within 24h apparently the BBC are the villans yet the Sun could end this now and don't want to or can't either. Murdoch has way too much to gain to do anything but let this run a few days. They don't care about the presenter, the victim they care about the agenda. The Sun have sat on this story for weeks themselves and are dripping it out for maximum gain. Why didn't they publish themselves straight away in June and with a name if its in the public interest?
|
|
|
Post by felonious on Jul 9, 2023 19:36:17 GMT
I’m an advocate of not naming names in historical sex cases at least until they are formerly charged with anything. So how come the media were all over many celebrities accused or being investigated but not charged however this one is somehow different. Freddy Star, Jim Davidson, Cliff Richards were just a few of the celebrities that were dragged through the mud by our frenzied media without ever being charged. Subsequent pay outs?
|
|
|
Post by thehartshillbadger on Jul 9, 2023 19:37:48 GMT
I’m an advocate of not naming names in historical sex cases at least until they are formerly charged with anything. So how come the media were all over many celebrities accused or being investigated but not charged however this one is somehow different. Freddy Star, Jim Davidson, Cliff Richards were just a few of the celebrities that were dragged through the mud by our frenzied media without ever being charged. Subsequent pay outs? Cliff is an absolute saint👀
|
|
|
Post by starkiller on Jul 9, 2023 19:39:55 GMT
I have zero interest in party politics, or meaningless illusory left and right banners that people love to sit under. As I said, the BBC could end it immediately. No they can't and you are being ridiculously naive if you think they can. For someone worried about the faceless cabal this is a gift for you. This is about the news and media sliding into a handful of individuals, mostly foreigners, who will be forever king makers. This isn't about right and left politics its about who owns the agenda. Everyone knows only those "chosen" by the private media giants become the "democratically" elected party (Blair, Cameron, Boris, ...). The Sun (News Corp) has snookered the BBC into another debate about the funding. Within 24h apparently the BBC are the villans yet the Sun could end this now and don't want to or can't either. Murdoch has way too much to gain to do anything but let this run a few days. They don't care about the presenter, the victim they care about the agenda. The Sun have sat on this story for weeks themselves and are dripping it out for maximum gain. Why didn't they publish themselves straight away in June and with a name if its in the public interest? The BBC were given this info and evidence directly in May by the mother of the victim. It's the BBC itself that sat on it and instead of doing anything, partied with this paedo instead.
|
|
|
Post by andystokey on Jul 9, 2023 19:42:19 GMT
No they can't and you are being ridiculously naive if you think they can. For someone worried about the faceless cabal this is a gift for you. This is about the news and media sliding into a handful of individuals, mostly foreigners, who will be forever king makers. This isn't about right and left politics its about who owns the agenda. Everyone knows only those "chosen" by the private media giants become the "democratically" elected party (Blair, Cameron, Boris, ...). The Sun (News Corp) has snookered the BBC into another debate about the funding. Within 24h apparently the BBC are the villans yet the Sun could end this now and don't want to or can't either. Murdoch has way too much to gain to do anything but let this run a few days. They don't care about the presenter, the victim they care about the agenda. The Sun have sat on this story for weeks themselves and are dripping it out for maximum gain. Why didn't they publish themselves straight away in June and with a name if its in the public interest? The BBC were given this info and evidence directly in May by the mother of the victim. It's the BBC itself that sat on it and instead of doing anything, partied with this paedo instead. Do you really know what the BBC were given in May and what they did with it? Or did you just get that from the Sun?
|
|
|
Post by noustie on Jul 9, 2023 19:47:18 GMT
Given the difference in our respective weaponary this must be the first time you've managed to block anything!
|
|
|
Post by starkiller on Jul 9, 2023 19:47:29 GMT
The BBC were given this info and evidence directly in May by the mother of the victim. It's the BBC itself that sat on it and instead of doing anything, partied with this paedo instead. Do you really know what the BBC were given in May and what they did with it? Or did you just get that from the Sun? It makes no difference, the BBC know who it is, they could end all speculation immediately. They didn't wait around when Cliff Richard was being questioned.
|
|
|
Post by Seymour Beaver on Jul 9, 2023 19:47:51 GMT
The BBC were given this info and evidence directly in May by the mother of the victim. It's the BBC itself that sat on it and instead of doing anything, partied with this paedo instead. Do you really know what the BBC were given in May and what they did with it? Or did you just get that from the Sun? Would that be the same Sun who paid a 16 year old Samantha Fox to take her clothes of for photos?
|
|
|
Post by alsagerstokie on Jul 9, 2023 19:48:54 GMT
If people on here claim they know who it is. Just post the name. A person on a football forum is hardly going to get into trouble for it.
To save others having to come out and deny. The person should be outed to save the others.
|
|
|
Post by noustie on Jul 9, 2023 19:49:53 GMT
No they can't and you are being ridiculously naive if you think they can. For someone worried about the faceless cabal this is a gift for you. This is about the news and media sliding into a handful of individuals, mostly foreigners, who will be forever king makers. This isn't about right and left politics its about who owns the agenda. Everyone knows only those "chosen" by the private media giants become the "democratically" elected party (Blair, Cameron, Boris, ...). The Sun (News Corp) has snookered the BBC into another debate about the funding. Within 24h apparently the BBC are the villans yet the Sun could end this now and don't want to or can't either. Murdoch has way too much to gain to do anything but let this run a few days. They don't care about the presenter, the victim they care about the agenda. The Sun have sat on this story for weeks themselves and are dripping it out for maximum gain. Why didn't they publish themselves straight away in June and with a name if its in the public interest? The BBC were given this info and evidence directly in May by the mother of the victim. It's the BBC itself that sat on it and instead of doing anything, partied with this paedo instead. Is there not an email going around about George Osborne and Murdoch's lap dogs just happened to release this salacious squirrel coincidentally at the same time?
|
|
|
Post by starkiller on Jul 9, 2023 19:53:53 GMT
Do you really know what the BBC were given in May and what they did with it? Or did you just get that from the Sun? Would that be the same Sun who paid a 16 year old Samantha Fox to take her clothes of for photos? Equally wrong. I get labelled a conspiracy theorist, but it's considered acceptable to see everything as fake right wing/left wing politics that. I couldn't give a flying fuck about which rag is this and that, they're all globalist shitrags, which no-one has even bought for 15 years. They don't even do free films or CDs anymore.
|
|
|
Post by marylandstoke on Jul 9, 2023 19:56:50 GMT
The big big problem with this is that innocent people's names are getting put through the quagmire on all of this all through social media Just about to be put through the Quagmire
|
|
|
Post by andystokey on Jul 9, 2023 19:58:10 GMT
Do you really know what the BBC were given in May and what they did with it? Or did you just get that from the Sun? Would that be the same Sun who paid a 16 year old Samantha Fox to take her clothes of for photos? ...and did a countdown to Charlotte Church and Emma Watson turning 16. The implication being that millions of readers can share the "joke" of the desirability of underage girls. Not to mention the famous the "Sun fixed it for Jim" where they sent some teenage page 3 girls around with a medal even though they later admitted the knew in 1983 what he was up to.
|
|
|
Post by foster on Jul 9, 2023 19:58:50 GMT
The big big problem with this is that innocent people's names are getting put through the quagmire on all of this all through social media Just about to be put through the Quagmire View AttachmentGiggity giggity!
|
|
|
Post by lordb on Jul 9, 2023 20:02:50 GMT
Would that be the same Sun who paid a 16 year old Samantha Fox to take her clothes of for photos? Equally wrong. People accuse me of being a conspiracy theorist, which I'm not, but it's acceptable to see everything as fake right wing/left wing that. I couldn't give a flying fuck about which rag is this and that, they're all globalist shitrags, which no-one has even bought for 15 years. They don't even do free films or CDs anymore. Ok But you did use their line, their truth. Now just because it's in the Sun doesn't mean for absolute certainty that's a lie but is reasonable not to trot out what they have said without secondary evidence
|
|
|
Post by andystokey on Jul 9, 2023 20:06:16 GMT
Do you really know what the BBC were given in May and what they did with it? Or did you just get that from the Sun? It makes no difference, the BBC know who it is, they could end all speculation immediately. They didn't wait around when Cliff Richard was being questioned. Riches & Ors v News Group Newspapers Ltd. Bercow vs. McAlpine Do you think the BBC should break the law?
|
|
|
Post by alsagerstokie on Jul 9, 2023 20:19:01 GMT
I've just been sent this. Just banter but if Admin want to delete it that's fine
|
|
domjon
Academy Starlet
Posts: 128
|
Post by domjon on Jul 9, 2023 20:38:40 GMT
A crack head aswell apparently. Whodathunkit
|
|