|
Post by bayernoatcake on May 15, 2023 19:37:03 GMT
I couldn’t give a monkeys how we do it. Xg is bollocks though. Genuinely what do you think xG is? Bollocks
|
|
|
Post by mrcoke on May 15, 2023 21:44:51 GMT
Pleased with Wilmot signing a new contract. He's good and a trier, and a good club professional to have on board.
Souttar was also excellent and I'd take him back if he became available, but I would not put him on a pedestal, we played our best football last season after he had gone. Hitting long balls is OK to the right sort of players, but we don't have them.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on May 16, 2023 9:54:32 GMT
Genuinely what do you think xG is? Bollocks I walked into that My point was going to be that xG is just a tool, like any other stat. It's a good way to tell how good a chance is beyond just looking at shots, goals, or shots on target.
|
|
|
Post by wakefieldstokie on May 16, 2023 10:03:29 GMT
I laughed out loud in the car this morning. Radio stoke reporting that Ben Wilmott says we are geared up for the premier league!
We don’t have any bloody players Ben!🤣
The club really are hanging all their promo on Wilmott- he’s every where at the mo
|
|
|
Post by nottsover60 on May 16, 2023 10:07:32 GMT
I walked into that My point was going to be that xG is just a tool, like any other stat. It's a good way to tell how good a chance is beyond just looking at shots, goals, or shots on target. It also isn't the sort of stat Potterlytics is looking at. I can understand the dislike of xG etc because it looks at what could have happened. In the piece I am referring to Potterlytics looks at what Wilmot actually did during the season - things like interceptions, passing, what sort of passes, etc. It doesn't deny his mistakes but claims they are diminishing by looking at what actually happened rather than biased memory.
|
|