|
|
Post by kjpt140v on Mar 18, 2023 19:37:48 GMT
Bonham 7
Sterling 8
Tuanzebe 8
Wilmot 7
Fox 6
Pearson 7
Laurent 8
Smallbone 6
Hoever 7
Brown 6
Campbell 7
Baker 6
Tymon 6
Referee my first ever 1.
|
|
|
|
Post by AlbertTatlock on Mar 18, 2023 19:39:49 GMT
Bonham 8 Sterling 9 MOM Tuanzebe 8 Wilmot 7 Fox 6 Pearson 7 Laurent 8 Smallbone 7 Hoever 7 Brown 6 Campbell 7 Baker 6 Tymon 6 Gouranga.  |
|
|
|
Post by spitthedog on Mar 18, 2023 19:42:57 GMT
Bonham 6 - didn't have anything to do, which is a good sign
Sterling 7 - another solid game
Tuanzebe 8 - immense, too good for this level
Wilmot 7 - thinks he's Franz Beckenbaeur and he just isn't, but was generally ok
Fox 7 - solid enough
Pearson 7 - excellent again
Laurent 7 - played well overall but looked knackered towards the end and wasn't able to end the game strongly.
Smallbone 5 - too quiet, disappointing, needed to get further forward and more involved
Hoever 6 - didn't go for him today
Brown 4 - simply not good enough, the misplaced pass for Campbell to go through was pathetic, the headed miss was unforgivable
Campbell 7 - another solid display, I feel sorry for him (having to play with Brown who has no footballing intelligence.) Can play better though.
|
|
|
|
Post by boniek on Mar 18, 2023 21:35:41 GMT
Bonham 7
Sterling 8 motm
Fox 7
Tuanzebe 7
Wilmot 7
Pearson 8
Laurent 7
Smallbone 6
Hoever 6
Brown 6. He’s frustrating. Great pressing and popping up in dangerous positions but lacking in technical skill.
Campbell 7
———————————————-
Tymon n/a
Baker 5
|
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 18, 2023 22:26:03 GMT
Glad to see Bonham getting 7s 7.5
He did very well when sargent was through after 5 mins
He came and collected crosses and set pieces instead of ' leave it for someone else '
He joined us for pennies from Gillingham as back up, our number 2 keeper, and wasn't meant to have played the amount of games he has .
With Bursik failing to inspire confidence and sarkic getting injured , he has had to come in and show he is brave and decent squad player on quite a few occasions this season.
Nobody thinks he is a top number 1 championship keeper, but he is on relatively low wages and as our number 2 keeper,comes in and shows he is a reliable squad player for us, quite regularly.
I can't help but like him .
Begovic , Sorensen class , he ain't, but he always does his best when called upon.
I wish we had a relatively lowly paid second string striker on the books to come in and play at Bonham's level, when needed.
We would be a lot higher up the table if such an imaginary player actually existed for us .
|
|
|
|
Post by prestwichpotter on Mar 18, 2023 22:35:56 GMT
Bonham 7
Sterling 7
Tuanzabe 7
Wilmot 7
Fox 6
Pearson 8
Laurent 8
Smallbone 6
Hoever 6
Brown 6
Campbell 7
Baker 6
Tymon 6
|
|
|
|
Post by iamstokie on Mar 19, 2023 7:41:00 GMT
Bonham - 6 Sterling - 8 MOM Tuanzebe - 7 Wilmot - 6 Fox - 6 Pearson - 8 Laurent - 7 Smallbone - 7 Hoever - 7 Brown - 4 Campbell - 7 why 4 for brown Probably because he was shit |
|
|
|
Post by ravey123 on Mar 19, 2023 8:10:23 GMT
Bonham 7 nothing to do really but looks a bit more assured and his catching was excellent
Sterling 7 solid and hardly ever beaten. I actually think he looks better on the left
Wilmott 8.5 MOM the odd stray pass to someone in the crude but solid in defence. Looks better in the left of a two
Tuanzebe 8 this gut is a beast and looks as if he is playing in first gear. If it wasn’t for his back injury he’d be playing for England by now
Fox 7 solid defensively but didn’t offer a great deal going forward
Pearson 8 sometime it seems like there is more than 1 of him in the pitch. He seems to cover everyone else and thinks 2 or 3 passes ahead of others
Laurent 8 turning into the player we thought we signed. He’s looked a class act this last month or so
Smallbone 7 thought it was one of his quieter games and should have scored first half
Hoever 6 don’t think the position further forward suits him but a couple of decent runs
Brown 6 can’t fault his effort but not one of his best games
Campbell 8 fantastic first half but they tried to nullify his threat second half. A couple of superb track backs and tackles though
Tymon 5 did he do anything in his 10 minutes
Baker 6 no real impact
Neil 9 he is turning us around. I feared he was resorting to a back 5 when I saw the teamsheet but credit to him for keeping to the formation by playing Hoever as a right sided attacker.
|
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 19, 2023 9:12:18 GMT
Bonham 7
Sterling 7
Wilmot 6
Tuanzebe 8
Fox 6
Pearson 8
Laurent 7
Hoever 6
Smallbone 6
Brown 6
Campbell 8
Subs - Can't be arsed.
|
|
|
|
Post by middleoftheboothen on Mar 19, 2023 9:57:38 GMT
Bonham 6 - didn't have anything to do, which is a good sign Sterling 7 - another solid game Tuanzebe 8 - immense, too good for this level Wilmot 7 - thinks he's Franz Beckenbaeur and he just isn't, but was generally ok Fox 7 - solid enough Pearson 7 - excellent again Laurent 7 - played well overall but looked knackered towards the end and wasn't able to end the game strongly. Smallbone 5 - too quiet, disappointing, needed to get further forward and more involved Hoever 6 - didn't go for him today Brown 4 - simply not good enough, the misplaced pass for Campbell to go through was pathetic, the headed miss was unforgivable Campbell 7 - another solid display, I feel sorry for him (having to play with Brown who has no footballing intelligence.) Can play better though. Not knocking you as it's your opinion obviously but you've given Wilmot a 7 stating he was ok and Pearson the same describing him as excellent. Surely Pearson warrants a higher mark mate. I don't do the ratings by the way I just like reading through them to see how everyone else saw the game. |
|
|
|
Post by leesandfordstoupe on Mar 19, 2023 10:03:01 GMT
Bonham 7.5 Sterling 7.5 Wilmott 6 Tuanzebe 8 5 MOM Fox 7.5 Hoever 6.5 Laurent 8 Pearson 7.5 Smallbone 7 Brown 7.5 Campbell 6.5 Baker 7 Tymon N/A Bonham, Brown and Sterling all rated the same. Utterly bizarre Agenda riven Brown was better than Campbell really |
|
|
|
Post by leesandfordstoupe on Mar 19, 2023 10:08:08 GMT
Bonham 7 Sterling 7 Tuanzabe 7 Wilmot 7 Fox 6 Pearson 8 Laurent 8 Smallbone 6 Hoever 6 Brown 6 Campbell 7 Baker 6 Tymon 6 That’s about where I see it. Don’t get where all the Tuanzebe getting significantly higher marks than Wilmot are coming from other than biased opinion. Perhaps add an extra .5 on Laurent as he was most impressive just lacking that final ball. |
|
|
|
Post by leesandfordstoupe on Mar 19, 2023 10:11:13 GMT
Bonham 6 - didn't have anything to do, which is a good sign Sterling 7 - another solid game Tuanzebe 8 - immense, too good for this level Wilmot 7 - thinks he's Franz Beckenbaeur and he just isn't, but was generally ok Fox 7 - solid enough Pearson 7 - excellent again Laurent 7 - played well overall but looked knackered towards the end and wasn't able to end the game strongly. Smallbone 5 - too quiet, disappointing, needed to get further forward and more involved Hoever 6 - didn't go for him today Brown 4 - simply not good enough, the misplaced pass for Campbell to go through was pathetic, the headed miss was unforgivable Campbell 7 - another solid display, I feel sorry for him (having to play with Brown who has no footballing intelligence.) Can play better though. Not knocking you as it's your opinion obviously but you've given Wilmot a 7 stating he was ok and Pearson the same describing him as excellent. Surely Pearson warrants a higher mark mate. I don't do the ratings by the way I just like reading through them to see how everyone else saw the game. Means Wilmot was very good but I just can’t bring myself to say it. |
|
|
|
Post by middleoftheboothen on Mar 19, 2023 10:13:55 GMT
Not knocking you as it's your opinion obviously but you've given Wilmot a 7 stating he was ok and Pearson the same describing him as excellent. Surely Pearson warrants a higher mark mate. I don't do the ratings by the way I just like reading through them to see how everyone else saw the game. Means Wilmot was very good but I just can’t bring myself to say it. Yeah seems strange. I mean personally I thought they were both excellent and both deserved an 8. Pearson maybe shaded it but I thought Wilmot had a really solid game and didn't put a foot wrong mate. |
|
|
|
Post by prestwichpotter on Mar 19, 2023 10:17:49 GMT
Bonham 7 Sterling 7 Tuanzabe 7 Wilmot 7 Fox 6 Pearson 8 Laurent 8 Smallbone 6 Hoever 6 Brown 6 Campbell 7 Baker 6 Tymon 6 That’s about where I see it. Don’t get where all the Tuanzebe getting significantly higher marks than Wilmot are coming from other than biased opinion. Perhaps add an extra .5 on Laurent as he was most impressive just lacking that final ball. Tuanzabe was very good in the main, but he also stepped out of position on a couple of occasions when they slid balls in between the full back and where he should have been. His distribution I would say was better than Wilmot's but I thought they were both decent....... |
|
|
|
Post by leesandfordstoupe on Mar 19, 2023 10:25:54 GMT
That’s about where I see it. Don’t get where all the Tuanzebe getting significantly higher marks than Wilmot are coming from other than biased opinion. Perhaps add an extra .5 on Laurent as he was most impressive just lacking that final ball. Tuanzabe was very good in the main, but he also stepped out of position on a couple of occasions when they slid balls in between the full back and where he should have been. His distribution I would say was better than Wilmot's but I thought they were both decent....... His distribution is still a lot less ambitious than Wilmot’s therefore will execute a higher percentage but with less penetration. I personally like players who are very ambitious on the ball Hoever is similarly ambitious so it will not be completed as often but when it does it’s effect is likely to be greater. Good to see Tuanzebe being willing to surge forward with the ball breaking their line just not sure he’s got that much vision when he’s done it. |
|
|
|
Post by CBUFAWKIPWH on Mar 19, 2023 10:35:39 GMT
Bonham, Brown and Sterling all rated the same. Utterly bizarre Agenda riven Brown was better than Campbell really I don't think Brown is better than Campbell I just thought Brown contributed far more than Campbell yesterday. If I was marking according to an agenda I would have marked Campbell higher than Brown. Presumably you think Campbell is better than Brown - so who exactly has the agenda? |
|
|
|
Post by CBUFAWKIPWH on Mar 19, 2023 10:37:42 GMT
Tuanzabe was very good in the main, but he also stepped out of position on a couple of occasions when they slid balls in between the full back and where he should have been. His distribution I would say was better than Wilmot's but I thought they were both decent....... His distribution is still a lot less ambitious than Wilmot’s therefore will execute a higher percentage but with less penetration. I personally like players who are very ambitious on the ball Hoever is similarly ambitious so it will not be completed as often but when it does it’s effect is likely to be greater. Good to see Tuanzebe being willing to surge forward with the ball breaking their line just not sure he’s got that much vision when he’s done it. So despite Wilmott continually making cock ups you rate him quite highly because he suits your - oh what do you call it? Oh yes - agenda. |
|
|
|
Post by bayernoatcake on Mar 19, 2023 10:45:03 GMT
Tuanzabe was very good in the main, but he also stepped out of position on a couple of occasions when they slid balls in between the full back and where he should have been. His distribution I would say was better than Wilmot's but I thought they were both decent....... His distribution is still a lot less ambitious than Wilmot’s therefore will execute a higher percentage but with less penetration. I personally like players who are very ambitious on the ball Hoever is similarly ambitious so it will not be completed as often but when it does it’s effect is likely to be greater. Good to see Tuanzebe being willing to surge forward with the ball breaking their line just not sure he’s got that much vision when he’s done it. Less ambition? Did you miss the 2/3 cross diagonal pings he did to Campbell? 🤣 |
|
|
|
Post by HarryTheHat on Mar 19, 2023 12:00:16 GMT
His distribution is still a lot less ambitious than Wilmot’s therefore will execute a higher percentage but with less penetration. I personally like players who are very ambitious on the ball Hoever is similarly ambitious so it will not be completed as often but when it does it’s effect is likely to be greater. Good to see Tuanzebe being willing to surge forward with the ball breaking their line just not sure he’s got that much vision when he’s done it. So despite Wilmott continually making cock ups you rate him quite highly because he suits your - oh what do you call it? Oh yes - agenda. You just don't like Wilmot mate, admit it |
|
|
|
Post by bayernoatcake on Mar 19, 2023 12:15:20 GMT
So despite Wilmott continually making cock ups you rate him quite highly because he suits your - oh what do you call it? Oh yes - agenda. You just don't like Wilmot mate, admit it I wish this whole agenda shite would go away. It’s only natural to not like certain players and how they play. It’s not an agenda, it’s just personal taste. |
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 19, 2023 13:50:10 GMT
You just don't like Wilmot mate, admit it I wish this whole agenda shite would go away. It’s only natural to not like certain players and how they play. It’s not an agenda, it’s just personal taste. Well said. It's absolute bollocks. |
|
|
|
Post by leesandfordstoupe on Mar 19, 2023 14:43:16 GMT
Agenda riven Brown was better than Campbell really I don't think Brown is better than Campbell I just thought Brown contributed far more than Campbell yesterday. If I was marking according to an agenda I would have marked Campbell higher than Brown. Presumably you think Campbell is better than Brown - so who exactly has the agenda? I simply thought Campbell was far better than Brown on the day. I'm not sure what Brown contributed that he didn't make a pigs ear of as per. It wasn't even a good game with Brownvision. |
|
|
|
Post by leesandfordstoupe on Mar 19, 2023 14:45:00 GMT
His distribution is still a lot less ambitious than Wilmot’s therefore will execute a higher percentage but with less penetration. I personally like players who are very ambitious on the ball Hoever is similarly ambitious so it will not be completed as often but when it does it’s effect is likely to be greater. Good to see Tuanzebe being willing to surge forward with the ball breaking their line just not sure he’s got that much vision when he’s done it. Less ambition? Did you miss the 2/3 cross diagonal pings he did to Campbell? 🤣 Not at all Jagielka played a really good ball one game too. Wilmot does it a dozen times a game. |
|
|
|
Post by bayernoatcake on Mar 19, 2023 14:50:38 GMT
Less ambition? Did you miss the 2/3 cross diagonal pings he did to Campbell? 🤣 Not at all Jagielka played a really good ball one game too. Wilmot does it a dozen times a game. That just isn’t true 😂😂 |
|
|
|
Post by thehartshillbadger on Mar 19, 2023 15:01:19 GMT
Not at all Jagielka played a really good ball one game too. Wilmot does it a dozen times a game. That just isn’t true 😂😂 Ben Beckenbauer they call him |
|
|
|
Post by maine on Mar 19, 2023 15:05:39 GMT
Bonham 7
Sterling 7
Tuanzabe 8
Wilmot 7
Fox 6
Pearson 8 MOM
Laurent 7
Smallbone 6
Hoever 7
Brown 5
Campbell 7
Baker 6
Tymon 6
|
|
|
|
Post by leesandfordstoupe on Mar 19, 2023 15:42:51 GMT
Ben Beckenbauer they call him He's certainly the defender in the Stoke squad that all the other defenders look to to progress the ball. |
|
|
|
Post by leesandfordstoupe on Mar 19, 2023 16:04:20 GMT
His distribution is still a lot less ambitious than Wilmot’s therefore will execute a higher percentage but with less penetration. I personally like players who are very ambitious on the ball Hoever is similarly ambitious so it will not be completed as often but when it does it’s effect is likely to be greater. Good to see Tuanzebe being willing to surge forward with the ball breaking their line just not sure he’s got that much vision when he’s done it. So despite Wilmott continually making cock ups you rate him quite highly because he suits your - oh what do you call it? Oh yes - agenda. No it would be an agenda if I couldn't/wouldn't see his mistakes or blamed someone else for them. There is no agenda just a preference for a particular type of player ie pro active defensively, ambitious on the ball. It becomes an agenda when you mark a player down for mistakes they've made in previous games. Wilmot was every bit as good as Taunzebe yesterday. If Fox had scored and made an assist yesterday as well as being defensively sound I'd be scoring him an 8 minimum. It wouldn't mean I like him as a player or expect it to happen again this side of Christmas. |
|
