|
Post by heworksardtho on Jan 4, 2021 19:47:40 GMT
The Dam Busters was about our History real people real dogs ect. Grease is a musical, do you agree with changing history, in other news we had the lovely racist BLM spokeswoman spouting overly racist shit on Twitter and we had some on this board trying to protect her and her vile views. And here is the target audience ✅ 😁 To humour you with a responce, and as you have asked for my personal view. I, along with 99.99% of the population couldn't give 2 flying Boris' about a PG musical and wouldn't give it the time of day to dissect mild subliminal tones. The Dam Busters was a fantastic accomplishment in our history, one I imagine we are all proud of. Do I need to hear a dog called n**** in 2020 to fully embrace that story - not really, and especially not in a film when it is overwhelmingly accepted as a racist term. Not removing the Dog or it's unfortunate name from the History books as it is widely available, but it isn't necessary in the film. The idiot on Twitter was correctly banned and will have had a negative impact on the overall message which has this year, at least made some strides forward towards equality. **I believe the thread has gone and I am open to changing my view on this but I can't imagine anybody defending that viewpoint. I anticipate it moved very quickly from the individual (correctly condemned for her words) and more about Black Lives Matter. For the American audience they changed it from that to trigger
|
|
|
Post by crapslinger on Jan 4, 2021 19:48:02 GMT
The Dam Busters was about our History real people real dogs ect. Grease is a musical, do you agree with changing history, in other news we had the lovely racist BLM spokeswoman spouting overly racist shit on Twitter and we had some on this board trying to protect her and her vile views. And here is the target audience ✅ 😁 To humour you with a responce, and as you have asked for my personal view. I, along with 99.99% of the population couldn't give 2 flying Boris' about a PG musical and wouldn't give it the time of day to dissect mild subliminal tones. The Dam Busters was a fantastic accomplishment in our history, one I imagine we are all proud of. Do I need to hear a dog called n**** in 2020 to fully embrace that story - not really, and especially not in a film when it is overwhelmingly accepted as a racist term. Not removing the Dog or it's unfortunate name from the History books as it is widely available, but it isn't necessary in the film. The idiot on Twitter was correctly banned and will have had a negative impact on the overall message which has this year, at least made some strides forward towards equality. **I believe the thread has gone and I am open to changing my view on this but I can't imagine anybody defending that viewpoint. I anticipate it moved very quickly from the individual (correctly condemned for her words) and more about Black Lives Matter. Unsurprisingly really seen as she is a spokesperson for BLM and therefore inexorably linked, she doesn't want equality and as far as I am aware no one from BLM has condemned what she posted make of that what you will! what shall we change next so as not to offend maybe Enola Gay should have a name change , why change history it is what it is changing it is not an option.
|
|
|
Post by crapslinger on Jan 4, 2021 19:49:57 GMT
And here is the target audience ✅ 😁 To humour you with a responce, and as you have asked for my personal view. I, along with 99.99% of the population couldn't give 2 flying Boris' about a PG musical and wouldn't give it the time of day to dissect mild subliminal tones. The Dam Busters was a fantastic accomplishment in our history, one I imagine we are all proud of. Do I need to hear a dog called n**** in 2020 to fully embrace that story - not really, and especially not in a film when it is overwhelmingly accepted as a racist term. Not removing the Dog or it's unfortunate name from the History books as it is widely available, but it isn't necessary in the film. The idiot on Twitter was correctly banned and will have had a negative impact on the overall message which has this year, at least made some strides forward towards equality. **I believe the thread has gone and I am open to changing my view on this but I can't imagine anybody defending that viewpoint. I anticipate it moved very quickly from the individual (correctly condemned for her words) and more about Black Lives Matter. For the American audience they changed it from that to trigger The road sweeper off Only Fools
|
|
|
Post by RedandWhite90 on Jan 4, 2021 19:52:19 GMT
And here is the target audience ✅ 😁 To humour you with a responce, and as you have asked for my personal view. I, along with 99.99% of the population couldn't give 2 flying Boris' about a PG musical and wouldn't give it the time of day to dissect mild subliminal tones. The Dam Busters was a fantastic accomplishment in our history, one I imagine we are all proud of. Do I need to hear a dog called n**** in 2020 to fully embrace that story - not really, and especially not in a film when it is overwhelmingly accepted as a racist term. Not removing the Dog or it's unfortunate name from the History books as it is widely available, but it isn't necessary in the film. The idiot on Twitter was correctly banned and will have had a negative impact on the overall message which has this year, at least made some strides forward towards equality. **I believe the thread has gone and I am open to changing my view on this but I can't imagine anybody defending that viewpoint. I anticipate it moved very quickly from the individual (correctly condemned for her words) and more about Black Lives Matter. For the American audience they changed it from that to trigger The politcal b*stards! Spoilt Only Fools and Horses for me now. 😁
|
|
|
Post by RedandWhite90 on Jan 4, 2021 19:59:17 GMT
And here is the target audience ✅ 😁 To humour you with a responce, and as you have asked for my personal view. I, along with 99.99% of the population couldn't give 2 flying Boris' about a PG musical and wouldn't give it the time of day to dissect mild subliminal tones. The Dam Busters was a fantastic accomplishment in our history, one I imagine we are all proud of. Do I need to hear a dog called n**** in 2020 to fully embrace that story - not really, and especially not in a film when it is overwhelmingly accepted as a racist term. Not removing the Dog or it's unfortunate name from the History books as it is widely available, but it isn't necessary in the film. The idiot on Twitter was correctly banned and will have had a negative impact on the overall message which has this year, at least made some strides forward towards equality. **I believe the thread has gone and I am open to changing my view on this but I can't imagine anybody defending that viewpoint. I anticipate it moved very quickly from the individual (correctly condemned for her words) and more about Black Lives Matter. Unsurprisingly really seen as she is a spokesperson for BLM and therefore inexorably linked, she doesn't want equality and as far as I am aware no one from BLM has condemned what she posted make of that what you will! what shall we change next so as not to offend maybe Enola Gay should have a name change , why change history it is what it is changing it is not an option. You should most definitely consider a subscription, they may even offer you a job. Take an individuals views and apply it to the masses ✅ There will be a handful of people within the BLM movement who will be more 'extreme' than others. It would be like using Nigel Farage to encompass everyone who voted Leave, or Desmond Swayne to encompass all Tory voters. If you fail to recognise the difference between the extremities and the overwhelming broad message of Black Lives Matter and the continued pursuit of equality I cannot help you.
|
|
|
Post by foster on Jan 4, 2021 20:28:34 GMT
Unsurprisingly really seen as she is a spokesperson for BLM and therefore inexorably linked, she doesn't want equality and as far as I am aware no one from BLM has condemned what she posted make of that what you will! what shall we change next so as not to offend maybe Enola Gay should have a name change , why change history it is what it is changing it is not an option. You should most definitely consider a subscription, they may even offer you a job. Take an individuals views and apply it to the masses ✅ There will be a handful of people within the BLM movement who will be more 'extreme' than others. It would be like using Nigel Farage to encompass everyone who voted Leave, or Desmond Swayne to encompass all Tory voters. If you fail to recognise the difference between the extremities and the overwhelming broad message of Black Lives Matter and the continued pursuit of equality I cannot help you. In any case, she denies she posted it (fake account) so it wouldn't make sense for BLM or the media to condemn her, without conclusive proof.
|
|
|
Post by RedandWhite90 on Jan 4, 2021 20:30:28 GMT
You should most definitely consider a subscription, they may even offer you a job. Take an individuals views and apply it to the masses ✅ There will be a handful of people within the BLM movement who will be more 'extreme' than others. It would be like using Nigel Farage to encompass everyone who voted Leave, or Desmond Swayne to encompass all Tory voters. If you fail to recognise the difference between the extremities and the overwhelming broad message of Black Lives Matter and the continued pursuit of equality I cannot help you. In any case, she denies she posted it (fake account) so it wouldn't make sense for BLM or the media to condemn her, without conclusive proof. Could all get a bit Joleon Lescott this...
|
|
|
Post by crapslinger on Jan 4, 2021 20:32:36 GMT
Unsurprisingly really seen as she is a spokesperson for BLM and therefore inexorably linked, she doesn't want equality and as far as I am aware no one from BLM has condemned what she posted make of that what you will! what shall we change next so as not to offend maybe Enola Gay should have a name change , why change history it is what it is changing it is not an option. You should most definitely consider a subscription, they may even offer you a job. Take an individuals views and apply it to the masses ✅ There will be a handful of people within the BLM movement who will be more 'extreme' than others. It would be like using Nigel Farage to encompass everyone who voted Leave, or Desmond Swayne to encompass all Tory voters. If you fail to recognise the difference between the extremities and the overwhelming broad message of Black Lives Matter and the continued pursuit of equality I cannot help you. She is a spokesperson for BLM ie. she speaks for them
|
|
|
Post by crapslinger on Jan 4, 2021 20:36:28 GMT
You should most definitely consider a subscription, they may even offer you a job. Take an individuals views and apply it to the masses ✅ There will be a handful of people within the BLM movement who will be more 'extreme' than others. It would be like using Nigel Farage to encompass everyone who voted Leave, or Desmond Swayne to encompass all Tory voters. If you fail to recognise the difference between the extremities and the overwhelming broad message of Black Lives Matter and the continued pursuit of equality I cannot help you. In any case, she denies she posted it (fake account) so it wouldn't make sense for BLM or the media to condemn her, without conclusive proof. I bet she does
|
|
|
Post by RedandWhite90 on Jan 4, 2021 20:50:31 GMT
You should most definitely consider a subscription, they may even offer you a job. Take an individuals views and apply it to the masses ✅ There will be a handful of people within the BLM movement who will be more 'extreme' than others. It would be like using Nigel Farage to encompass everyone who voted Leave, or Desmond Swayne to encompass all Tory voters. If you fail to recognise the difference between the extremities and the overwhelming broad message of Black Lives Matter and the continued pursuit of equality I cannot help you. She is a spokesperson for BLM ie. she speaks for them What, all of 'them'? (as you so eloquently put it) We're back on point to The Daily Mail aren't we. Take an individual and apply it to the masses ✅ She has been suspended on Twitter, has little to no support whatsoever over the Tweet. It has been condemned by the overwhelming majority and that is omitting Foster's point that it has been denied.
|
|
|
Post by thevoid on Jan 4, 2021 21:12:00 GMT
I'm not wound up, it's a discussion forum and we're discussing it are we not? It's not even a film I like, but plenty of people do and I find the current climate of people wanting things cancelled laughable. As I said before, there's a good chance it'll be people who accuse others of being triggered by trivialities. Anyway, aren't you complaining about me complaining about other people complaining? I'm not complaining. I'm pointing out your hypocrisy at calling people with an opinion snowflakes when almost everything seems to bother you and trigger the need for you to tell everyone your opinion. You talk about these people as if there's a 20 million strong army of them aiming to destroy everything you like about Britain. There isn't. You're fighting back against something you've fabricated in your mind. There's a few people on twitter who think some of the scenes aren't appropriate for today's audiences. Hardly makes them 'snowflakes'. People claiming those views mean they want to cancel everythimg very much are though. If they're snowflakes for having an opinion, then so are you. And me. Slow down Speed Racer. I've not used the word 'snowflake'. Go and read it again. The only place that word appeared in my post is in the link itself, which is out of my hands I'm afraid. The rest of your post is pure conjecture and you putting words in my mouth. All I've done is comment on the recent trend for people demanding that stuff gets banned- and whether or not this particular film gets banned or not, other things have suffered that fate recently. Again, I've not even mentioned 'a 20 million strong army...aiming to destroy everything I like about Britain'- we're talking about an American film about American college culture that I don't even like (but I know that many others do). What's Britain got to do with it? 😆 Hyperbolic nonsense and strawmanning. As for 'almost everything seems to bother you and trigger the need for you to tell everyone your opinion'- again, a bit of a weird one, DB. This is an obscure discussion forum that I'm a member of and they're just points for discussion, take it or leave it 🤷♂️ I don't feel the need to post my views to thousands on Twitter as I'm not on it and have no desire to join. Maybe if my views piss you off so much, perhaps ignore the (few) threads I start? The fact that you have more of a problem with what I've written rather than people bitching about a perfectly innocent film speaks volumes about you though. I bet you're all for cancel culture.
|
|
|
Post by crapslinger on Jan 4, 2021 21:18:49 GMT
She is a spokesperson for BLM ie. she speaks for them What, all of 'them'? (as you so eloquently put it) We're back on point to The Daily Mail aren't we. Take an individual and apply it to the masses ✅ She has been suspended on Twitter, has little to no support whatsoever over the Tweet. It has been condemned by the overwhelming majority and that is omitting Foster's point that it has been denied. I didn't put "all of them" she is spokesperson for the organisation BLM fact, she denied posting it I bet she fcuking did , if her account was "hacked" why was she suspended and presumably still is hardly a ringing endorsement for her claims is it, I don't read newspapers they are not trustworthy but I hasten to add not as untrustworthy as Twitter.
|
|
|
Post by claytonscrubs on Jan 4, 2021 21:19:36 GMT
|
|
|
Post by heworksardtho on Jan 4, 2021 21:35:53 GMT
It’s gone crazy , my black Labrador is now just a Labrador
|
|
|
Post by dutchstokie on Jan 4, 2021 21:44:43 GMT
It’s gone crazy , my black Labrador is now just a Labrador .....more to the point what should I do with my box of black magic choccies I got for Chrimbo?
|
|
|
Post by heworksardtho on Jan 4, 2021 21:48:24 GMT
It’s gone crazy , my black Labrador is now just a Labrador .....more to the point what should I do with my box of black magic choccies I got for Chrimbo? Hide them from my Mrs she’s on slim fast shakes 😜
|
|
|
Post by claytonscrubs on Jan 4, 2021 21:51:03 GMT
It’s gone crazy , my black Labrador is now just a Labrador I never get tired of watching this... 😂
|
|
|
Post by bigjohnritchie on Jan 4, 2021 21:56:13 GMT
This is also what has been happening politically. "Our" attempts to accommodate minorities have escalated over the years, and have left the majority without a decisive voice.
|
|
|
Post by RedandWhite90 on Jan 4, 2021 21:59:32 GMT
What, all of 'them'? (as you so eloquently put it) We're back on point to The Daily Mail aren't we. Take an individual and apply it to the masses ✅ She has been suspended on Twitter, has little to no support whatsoever over the Tweet. It has been condemned by the overwhelming majority and that is omitting Foster's point that it has been denied. I didn't put "all of them" she is spokesperson for the organisation BLM fact, she denied posting it I bet she fcuking did , if her account was "hacked" why was she suspended and presumably still is hardly a ringing endorsement for her claims is it, I don't read newspapers they are not trustworthy but I hasten to add not as untrustworthy as Twitter. Yes, I know you didn't you said 'she speak for them' to which I asked you a question of 'what, all of them?' Her suspension was welcomed and there has been next to no noise for it to be overturned. I would also find it strange if it was a hacking job but as Twitter is so untrustworthy as you put it, it may be a possibility. All that being said it has kept your fires burning for a few days and now you can Grease the wheels.
|
|
|
Post by crapslinger on Jan 4, 2021 22:29:33 GMT
I didn't put "all of them" she is spokesperson for the organisation BLM fact, she denied posting it I bet she fcuking did , if her account was "hacked" why was she suspended and presumably still is hardly a ringing endorsement for her claims is it, I don't read newspapers they are not trustworthy but I hasten to add not as untrustworthy as Twitter. Yes, I know you didn't you said 'she speak for them' to which I asked you a question of 'what, all of them?' Her suspension was welcomed and there has been next to no noise for it to be overturned. I would also find it strange if it was a hacking job but as Twitter is so untrustworthy as you put it, it may be a possibility. All that being said it has kept your fires burning for a few days and now you can Grease the wheels. I actually said she "speaks for them" which funnily enough is exactly what a spokesperson does for an organisation strange that in it, if which is highly unlikely she did post those highly offensive, racist and extremly inflammatory words should she face legal action ? in fact should she be put on the racist list she is advocating ?
|
|
|
Post by Dave the Rave on Jan 4, 2021 22:32:07 GMT
I'm not complaining. I'm pointing out your hypocrisy at calling people with an opinion snowflakes when almost everything seems to bother you and trigger the need for you to tell everyone your opinion. You talk about these people as if there's a 20 million strong army of them aiming to destroy everything you like about Britain. There isn't. You're fighting back against something you've fabricated in your mind. There's a few people on twitter who think some of the scenes aren't appropriate for today's audiences. Hardly makes them 'snowflakes'. People claiming those views mean they want to cancel everythimg very much are though. If they're snowflakes for having an opinion, then so are you. And me. Slow down Speed Racer. I've not used the word 'snowflake'. Go and read it again. The only place that word appeared in my post is in the link itself, which is out of my hands I'm afraid. The rest of your post is pure conjecture and you putting words in my mouth. All I've done is comment on the recent trend for people demanding that stuff gets banned- and whether or not this particular film gets banned or not, other things have suffered that fate recently. Again, I've not even mentioned 'a 20 million strong army...aiming to destroy everything I like about Britain'- we're talking about an American film about American college culture that I don't even like (but I know that many others do). What's Britain got to do with it? 😆 Hyperbolic nonsense and strawmanning. As for 'almost everything seems to bother you and trigger the need for you to tell everyone your opinion'- again, a bit of a weird one, DB. This is an obscure discussion forum that I'm a member of and they're just points for discussion, take it or leave it 🤷♂️ I don't feel the need to post my views to thousands on Twitter as I'm not on it and have no desire to join. Maybe if my views piss you off so much, perhaps ignore the (few) threads I start? The fact that you have more of a problem with what I've written rather than people bitching about a perfectly innocent film speaks volumes about you though. I bet you're all for cancel culture. You're right. I let too much of that utterly nonsense Daily Mail article influence my response. Apologies for that. And I'm not for cancel culture - unlike those who complained about Diversity's performance on BGT.
|
|
|
Post by danceswithclams on Jan 4, 2021 22:40:47 GMT
It genuinely puzzles me as to how people find the time and energy to get angry about shit like this (and I mean both those who find offence and those who are furiously offended by people finding offence).
Just go and have a big wank or something.
|
|
|
Post by Goonie on Jan 4, 2021 22:44:41 GMT
An interesting exposé of how certain words have become taboo whereas others, once deemed the most highly offensive, drift into common use
|
|
|
Post by RedandWhite90 on Jan 4, 2021 23:27:47 GMT
Yes, I know you didn't you said 'she speak for them' to which I asked you a question of 'what, all of them?' Her suspension was welcomed and there has been next to no noise for it to be overturned. I would also find it strange if it was a hacking job but as Twitter is so untrustworthy as you put it, it may be a possibility. All that being said it has kept your fires burning for a few days and now you can Grease the wheels. I actually said she "speaks for them" which funnily enough is exactly what a spokesperson does for an organisation strange that in it, if which is highly unlikely she did post those highly offensive, racist and extremly inflammatory words should she face legal action ? in fact should she be put on the racist list she is advocating ? I will give it to you, you are like a young jack russell puppy who has been given its first bone with your feverish replies. So, one more time, are you saying that the speaks for all of them? Or is it another case of an individual who has (or possibly hasn't) spouted off some disgusting views on Twitter at which you have decided to affirm those views to anyone and everyone who is in support of Black Lives Matter? If she has broken the law, and it is proven then appropriate action could and possibly should be taken. This really isn't difficult is it?
|
|
|
Post by mattyd2 on Jan 4, 2021 23:29:10 GMT
What, all of 'them'? (as you so eloquently put it) We're back on point to The Daily Mail aren't we. Take an individual and apply it to the masses ✅ She has been suspended on Twitter, has little to no support whatsoever over the Tweet. It has been condemned by the overwhelming majority and that is omitting Foster's point that it has been denied. I didn't put "all of them" she is spokesperson for the organisation BLM fact, she denied posting it I bet she fcuking did , if her account was "hacked" why was she suspended and presumably still is hardly a ringing endorsement for her claims is it, I don't read newspapers they are not trustworthy but I hasten to add not as untrustworthy as Twitter. Maybe the woman in the videos that were on the thread that sheik, err, sorry, admin removed, was in fact an actress that looked like her.
|
|
|
Post by maninasuitcase on Jan 5, 2021 0:08:43 GMT
Well i watched Blazing Saddles and Kentucky Fried Movie the other day. Theres 2 films that are definitely on the banning list.
God knows what they would say about Rex Kramer - danger seeker or the slim pickens getting the rail truck out of the quick sand.
|
|
|
Post by foster on Jan 5, 2021 6:25:20 GMT
I didn't put "all of them" she is spokesperson for the organisation BLM fact, she denied posting it I bet she fcuking did , if her account was "hacked" why was she suspended and presumably still is hardly a ringing endorsement for her claims is it, I don't read newspapers they are not trustworthy but I hasten to add not as untrustworthy as Twitter. Yes, I know you didn't you said 'she speak for them' to which I asked you a question of 'what, all of them?' Her suspension was welcomed and there has been next to no noise for it to be overturned. I would also find it strange if it was a hacking job but as Twitter is so untrustworthy as you put it, it may be a possibility. All that being said it has kept your fires burning for a few days and now you can Grease the wheels. I don't think either of you actually know what happened with her account, from reading your posts. The tweet was made in August from an account (that she alleges to be fake, not hacked). The account was suspended. The account she uses now (and which is NOT suspended) was created in September. She claims this one is her first and only twitter account. It really doesn't take much research to get the facts. Just pop onto twitter and take a look.
|
|
|
Post by prestwichpotter on Jan 5, 2021 13:50:31 GMT
Two of the most permanently offended people on the planet talk about the permanently offended brigade live on air.....
|
|
|
Post by sheikhmomo on Jan 5, 2021 15:25:28 GMT
Two of the most permanently offended people on the planet talk about the permanently offended brigade live on air..... Imagine having that poison dripping in your ears every day.
|
|
|
Post by thehartshillbadger on Jan 5, 2021 15:27:51 GMT
Two of the most permanently offended people on the planet talk about the permanently offended brigade live on air..... Imagine having that poison dripping in your ears every day. It’s like anything else though mate, social media is poison and turns perfectly rational people into imbeciles for the whole world to see. Sad as fuck.
|
|