|
Post by lordb on Nov 17, 2020 19:15:17 GMT
Reasonable to assume some of their wages are being met by those clubs but probably not much Next time we are in the Premier League what do we do, pay the wages or not? Trick is of course for most of your signings to be successful. Trick is to groom our youngsters and lowcut signings so they can perform at PL level - which few of them can right now. Obviously we would have to sign experienced players to play alongside them, but we should look for many SJWs and no Inces. And some Sidebes and no Etebos. No Gunns on loan on double pay when we have a potentially future England prospect on our books, but out on loan to a lesser team. Send him to Burnley or Sheff U next time or play him here. He ,Bursik, had Butland and Davies ahead if him He needed to play, it's a good loan for him. A season of U23 football isn't what he needed. Next season he should be on our bench pushing for first choice.
|
|
|
Post by The battheader chronicles on Nov 17, 2020 19:57:11 GMT
See that the thing that pisses me off and something that MON has highlighted. The players actually contributing to the side atm are the ones on the least money because those twats in the top column ( Ryan excluded) are fucking the job I don't think Gregory is "fucking the job". He's slightly overpaid when compared to someone like Powell, but Gregory is an hard working pro. He's just not a very good footballer. He won't be missed when he's gone next summer (or before). I was more referring to the likes of Ince, Wimmer and Bauer Gregory tbf to him does contribute the odd goal and comes without the fee
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 17, 2020 21:51:52 GMT
Trick is to groom our youngsters and lowcut signings so they can perform at PL level - which few of them can right now. Obviously we would have to sign experienced players to play alongside them, but we should look for many SJWs and no Inces. And some Sidebes and no Etebos. No Gunns on loan on double pay when we have a potentially future England prospect on our books, but out on loan to a lesser team. Send him to Burnley or Sheff U next time or play him here. He ,Bursik, had Butland and Davies ahead if him He needed to play, it's a good loan for him. A season of U23 football isn't what he needed. Next season he should be on our bench pushing for first choice. I don't know if that's true. Butland was ahead of nobody at the time. Davies had finished the previous season very well, but there's been a question mark against him since he got here. If we aren't going to push for promotion, then Bursik could have played the odd rotation game and all of the Caraboa games with players he knows very well, Souttar, Collins, Tymons, and Campbell. Instead it's a wasted opportunity. Now when he returns he'll have Gunn and Davies ahead of him. Unless of course O'Neill buys another keeper and I wouldn't be surprised if he did. He hardly knows Bursik.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 17, 2020 21:53:18 GMT
I don't think Gregory is "fucking the job". He's slightly overpaid when compared to someone like Powell, but Gregory is an hard working pro. He's just not a very good footballer. He won't be missed when he's gone next summer (or before). I was more referring to the likes of Ince, Wimmer and Bauer Gregory tbf to him does contribute the odd goal and comes without the fee You had Gregory in your "team", so you were referring to him as well.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 17, 2020 23:16:59 GMT
I wonder how accurate these are? It would be useful if by each player they provided a reference, otherwise this could well just be guess work. I personally feel that the majority are in line with what I expect. It also highlights why no one was interested in buying Ince, Lindsay or Gregory!
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 17, 2020 23:18:35 GMT
Find it hard to believe that Vokes is on more than Afobe. 🤔 I find it hard to believe that’s vokes and afobe are on more than Edwards 😱 Why? Regardless of their poor performance for us, both are seasoned professionals and both were bought for a ridiculous fee.
|
|
|
Post by clarkeda on Nov 18, 2020 7:14:36 GMT
I hope they’re looking at upping Tyrese’ wages I heard he was on 40k a week after his new deal. And looking at the rest of the wages I’d say that was there or there abouts.
|
|
|
Post by thestatusquo on Nov 18, 2020 7:21:46 GMT
It's a strange world when Vokes earns double what Fletcher does. He’s paid by the kilo
|
|
|
Post by lordb on Nov 18, 2020 7:57:05 GMT
I wonder how accurate these are? It would be useful if by each player they provided a reference, otherwise this could well just be guess work. I personally feel that the majority are in line with what I expect. It also highlights why no one was interested in buying Ince, Lindsay or Gregory! There's been a fair bit of interest in Gregory. A smidgen of interest in Lyndsey.
|
|
|
Post by RAF on Nov 18, 2020 9:36:17 GMT
Surely the Ince figure has to be in pence? Even then I feel cheated.
H
|
|
|
Post by s7oke on Nov 18, 2020 9:39:30 GMT
I find it hard to believe that’s vokes and afobe are on more than Edwards 😱 Why? Regardless of their poor performance for us, both are seasoned professionals and both were bought for a ridiculous fee. It’s called sarcasm
|
|
|
Post by thebet365 on Nov 18, 2020 10:46:30 GMT
I hope they’re looking at upping Tyrese’ wages I heard he was on 40k a week after his new deal. And looking at the rest of the wages I’d say that was there or there abouts. 40K He was a shining light amongst a shower of shit, but he's no Ronaldo. 12.5K will be around what his new deal was.
|
|
|
Post by lordb on Nov 18, 2020 12:35:28 GMT
I heard he was on 40k a week after his new deal. And looking at the rest of the wages I’d say that was there or there abouts. 40K He was a shining light amongst a shower of shit, but he's no Ronaldo. 12.5K will be around what his new deal was. Double that you'd think. At least He was all but gone to Celtic They can stretch way beyond £12.5k
|
|
|
Post by hardcastle on Nov 18, 2020 12:56:34 GMT
Was Ty's contract due to run out last summer before he was offered a better one in Jan / Feb (?). If that was the case then a lesser Premier League club could easily have hoovered him up for a modest fee and offered him a sizeable signing on fee, if only as a relatively inexpensive squad player. So if we wanted to keep him we would have been 'bounced' into upping his salary quite considerably l would have thought.
Like the rest of us l've no idea what we now pay him, but, as it happens, he's come on considerably since January, so l won't be losing any sleep over it.
|
|
|
Post by clarkeda on Nov 18, 2020 14:06:20 GMT
I heard he was on 40k a week after his new deal. And looking at the rest of the wages I’d say that was there or there abouts. 40K He was a shining light amongst a shower of shit, but he's no Ronaldo. 12.5K will be around what his new deal was. Looking at the wages I wouldn’t be surprised. 40k is reasonable for how important he is to us, and his potential. He was in a super strong position when negotiations started as he was on the verge of leaving for free.
|
|