|
Post by Roger Everyone on Jan 8, 2020 19:55:03 GMT
Vip sports stream great on an android phone 😉 How do you get them to play and go full screen ? I've tried on 3 devices and they won't play on any close any adverts that appear in front of the tv player box. Usually they will have a x by the side of them, sometimes this will send you to another page just close the page as it opens. When you have cleared all the adverts and you are just left with the tv screen click on it, this will normally open another page just close that like you do with the adverts. Hover the mouse over the tv player and the controls should appear at the bottom of the screen click on the full screen one and the play one. It's fiddley to do but once you get the hang of getting them to work it's easy. I find this link works fine on my android phone www.vipleague.lc/football-sports-streamGood luck
|
|
|
Post by teenagefanclub on Jan 8, 2020 20:16:18 GMT
Pay to watch it on sky 100% not getting my money back. Pay to watch it on bet365 maybe win some money.
|
|
|
Post by shipshape on Jan 8, 2020 20:31:24 GMT
Seems strange to pick a competition we stopped taking any meaningful part in back in 2011. I suppose it means no possible perceived conflict of interest at least. We did orate in 2012.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 8, 2020 20:54:51 GMT
How do you get them to play and go full screen ? I've tried on 3 devices and they won't play on any close any adverts that appear in front of the tv player box. Usually they will have a x by the side of them, sometimes this will send you to another page just close the page as it opens. When you have cleared all the adverts and you are just left with the tv screen click on it, this will normally open another page just close that like you do with the adverts. Hover the mouse over the tv player and the controls should appear at the bottom of the screen click on the full screen one and the play one. It's fiddley to do but once you get the hang of getting them to work it's easy. I find this link works fine on my android phone www.vipleague.lc/football-sports-streamGood luck Yeh I do that on a Windows pc and it works but on Android tablet,phone and tv box the play arrow in the centre of the video never responds Which browser are you using mate ?
|
|
|
Post by Roger Everyone on Jan 8, 2020 21:43:34 GMT
close any adverts that appear in front of the tv player box. Usually they will have a x by the side of them, sometimes this will send you to another page just close the page as it opens. When you have cleared all the adverts and you are just left with the tv screen click on it, this will normally open another page just close that like you do with the adverts. Hover the mouse over the tv player and the controls should appear at the bottom of the screen click on the full screen one and the play one. It's fiddley to do but once you get the hang of getting them to work it's easy. I find this link works fine on my android phone www.vipleague.lc/football-sports-streamGood luck Yeh I do that on a Windows pc and it works but on Android tablet,phone and tv box the play arrow in the centre of the video never responds Which browser are you using mate ? Google chrome on my phone mate
|
|
|
Post by Etain Tur-Mukan on Jan 9, 2020 7:20:07 GMT
Ever tried to watch a football stream on bet365 on an android phone? Yup. No problems for me.
|
|
|
Post by franklin66 on Jan 9, 2020 10:37:45 GMT
Bet365 being slaughtered in the house on commons now. Its the first important question of the new year and Nigel Adams not happy.
|
|
|
Post by Goonie on Jan 9, 2020 10:49:41 GMT
If only Stoke City was run like Bet 365 😎 Champions League contenders!
|
|
|
Post by franklin66 on Jan 9, 2020 10:51:04 GMT
The government are looking at withdrawing their funding to the FA if they dont sort this out. And bring in new laws against gambling and to reduce their practices in the UK.
|
|
|
Post by spitthedog on Jan 9, 2020 10:57:39 GMT
The government are looking at withdrawing their funding to the FA if they dont sort this out. And bring in new laws against gambling and to reduce their practices in the UK. Good. They can’t have it both ways, public money in effect sponsoring betting companies marketing.
|
|
|
Post by Kenilworth_Stokies on Jan 9, 2020 10:58:26 GMT
Who can be involved with football though? Whether its sponsorship, broadcasting or anything else. Sky, subsidiary of a group who spend their time trying to play kingmaker in political fields - pretty scummy. Amazon, have the potential to make zero hour contracts seem like the good old days - pretty scummy. Alcoholic drinks companies, people become addicted, it doesn't add enough benefit to their lives etc. Fizzy drinks companies, loaded with sugar, bad for health etc. Fast Food companies, loaded with sugar/fat, bad for health. Regular food, some people still can't control how much they eat, and people who are predisposed to overindulging shouldn't be advertised to in such a way. Bookies, people become addicted, it doesn't add enough benefit to their lives etc. Utilities companies, tend to thrive off of public subsidiaries and just take the piss with how much they charge while investing nothing in infrastructure. Religious groups, would have to be one of the ones not noncing kids in their spare time - maybe get some Buddhist sponsors? Car manufacturers, use oil & petrol, bad for the environment. Tech companies, if they manufacture something its almost certainly come from a sweatshop. Clothes manufacturers, largely the same as tech manufacturers. You'd basically reach down to charities, and even with most charities you have to be careful because a fair few of them have poor track records when it comes to spending funds. It's the sad reality we live in, pretty much everything is cuntish if you look at it including all elements. You could probably even make a couple of good arguments the FA shouldn't be allowed to be involved with football. Those Buddhists can be violent bastards at times: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Buddhism_and_violence
|
|
|
Post by franklin66 on Jan 9, 2020 11:04:32 GMT
The government are looking at withdrawing their funding to the FA if they dont sort this out. And bring in new laws against gambling and to reduce their practices in the UK. Good. They can’t have it both ways, public money in effect sponsoring betting companies marketing. The shit storm this has caused and the tone in the HoC now is very aggressive towards bet365. I can see this being shelved and bet365 and the others who are in this deal 6 or 7 in total suffering financially.
|
|
|
Post by Cast no shadow on Jan 9, 2020 11:14:43 GMT
...... The Emirates FA cup
|
|
|
Post by somersetstokie on Jan 9, 2020 11:26:20 GMT
In our defence it seems that it is not just BET365 that have taken advantage of this opportunity, although the focus on it is perhaps a reflection of the Coates Empire's pre-eminent position of influence within the Gambling community.
News is now emerging that the original media group that were handling the rights issues, allowed several Gambling operations to acquire rights to show or control the screening of specific matches. So although there might be a political and social storm about the extent of the power that companies such as BET365 now hold, and the ethics, and rights and wrongs of the latest development, there is more extensive involvement and "blame" here, beyond one individual major player in the industry. Everyone is apparently potentially "at it" as they manouevre to attain or retain dominance and initiative in the field.
BET365 alone is not the target here.
|
|
|
Post by stokeson on Jan 9, 2020 12:17:02 GMT
This will be "debated" on Jeremy Vine on ch5 tomorrow...
|
|
|
Post by Davef on Jan 9, 2020 12:36:04 GMT
I wonder if any MP will be making the point that over Christmas, Premier League matches were only available to watch via Amazon, a company that has paid just over £200M in tax in the UK on revenue of nearly £11B?
Let's face it, professional football in this country is in the gutter.
|
|
|
Post by spitthedog on Jan 9, 2020 13:29:18 GMT
In our defence it seems that it is not just BET365 that have taken advantage of this opportunity, although the focus on it is perhaps a reflection of the Coates Empire's pre-eminent position of influence within the Gambling community. News is now emerging that the original media group that were handling the rights issues, allowed several Gambling operations to acquire rights to show or control the screening of specific matches. So although there might be a political and social storm about the extent of the power that companies such as BET365 now hold, and the ethics, and rights and wrongs of the latest development, there is more extensive involvement and "blame" here, beyond one individual major player in the industry. Everyone is apparently potentially "at it" as they manouevre to attain or retain dominance and initiative in the field. BET365 alone is not the target here. Definitely not. There is a bigger problem. I think one distinction here is that you have to open a betting account to access it. This makes sense from a business point of view but how does that work with access to under 21s, faith groups where gambling is prohibited, those suffering from addictive personalities. Should we be actively encouraging young people to open betting accounts to access their teams’ games. As others have said no-one is forcing anyone here, but should the FA ( an organisation who also get public funding) be going down this route??? It’s a valid question.
|
|
|
Post by spitthedog on Jan 9, 2020 13:34:38 GMT
I wonder if any MP will be making the point that over Christmas, Premier League matches were only available to watch via Amazon, a company that has paid just over £200M in tax in the UK on revenue of nearly £11B? Let's face it, professional football in this country is in the gutter. This is the FA not the Premier League The Premier League is a corporation The FA gets substantial public funding MPs have a duty to debate FA policies seeing as we fund them.
|
|
|
Post by franklin66 on Jan 9, 2020 13:36:41 GMT
In our defence it seems that it is not just BET365 that have taken advantage of this opportunity, although the focus on it is perhaps a reflection of the Coates Empire's pre-eminent position of influence within the Gambling community. News is now emerging that the original media group that were handling the rights issues, allowed several Gambling operations to acquire rights to show or control the screening of specific matches. So although there might be a political and social storm about the extent of the power that companies such as BET365 now hold, and the ethics, and rights and wrongs of the latest development, there is more extensive involvement and "blame" here, beyond one individual major player in the industry. Everyone is apparently potentially "at it" as they manouevre to attain or retain dominance and initiative in the field. BET365 alone is not the target here. Definitely not. There is a bigger problem. I think one distinction here is that you have to open a betting account to access it. This makes sense from a business point of view but how does that work with access to under 21s, faith groups where gambling is prohibited, those suffering from addictive personalities. Should we be actively encouraging young people to open betting accounts to access their teams’ games. As others have said no-one is forcing anyone here, but should the FA ( an organisation who also get public funding) be going down this route??? It’s a valid question. The FA sold the rights to IMG who then sold it on so the FA dont get their hands dirty. But I do agree it should not be about betting they should have maybe a small PPV account setting but I'm not sure a bookmaker would do it.
|
|
|
Post by spitthedog on Jan 9, 2020 13:45:51 GMT
Definitely not. There is a bigger problem. I think one distinction here is that you have to open a betting account to access it. This makes sense from a business point of view but how does that work with access to under 21s, faith groups where gambling is prohibited, those suffering from addictive personalities. Should we be actively encouraging young people to open betting accounts to access their teams’ games. As others have said no-one is forcing anyone here, but should the FA ( an organisation who also get public funding) be going down this route??? It’s a valid question. The FA sold the rights to IMG who then sold it on so the FA dont get their hands dirty. But I do agree it should not be about betting they should have maybe a small PPV account setting but I'm not sure a bookmaker would do it. Whatever way you look at it, the FA have screwed up big time here. They have also taken advantage of the fact that the Government have dragged their feet on gambling guidelines (due to the very strong commercial pro-gambling lobby) hence the resignation of Tracey Crouch who I have a great deal of time for. When you know someone well who has taken their own life through gambling addiction (aged just 24) it does tend to change the way you look at these things. www.gamblingwithlives.org/
|
|
|
Post by franklin66 on Jan 9, 2020 13:51:41 GMT
The FA sold the rights to IMG who then sold it on so the FA dont get their hands dirty. But I do agree it should not be about betting they should have maybe a small PPV account setting but I'm not sure a bookmaker would do it. Whatever way you look at it, the FA have screwed up big time here. They have also taken advantage of the fact that the Government have dragged their feet on gambling guidelines (due to the very strong commercial pro-gambling lobby) hence the resignation of Tracey Crouch who I have a great deal of time for. When you know someone well who has taken their own life through gambling addiction (aged just 24) it does tend to change the way you look at these things. www.gamblingwithlives.org/You're talking to the converted I dont bet other than the lottery and I dont intent to go any further. I'm just concerned by the fact it's our owners business who've pissed people off amongst other of course.
|
|
|
Post by spitthedog on Jan 9, 2020 14:19:56 GMT
Whatever way you look at it, the FA have screwed up big time here. They have also taken advantage of the fact that the Government have dragged their feet on gambling guidelines (due to the very strong commercial pro-gambling lobby) hence the resignation of Tracey Crouch who I have a great deal of time for. When you know someone well who has taken their own life through gambling addiction (aged just 24) it does tend to change the way you look at these things. www.gamblingwithlives.org/You're talking to the converted I dont bet other than the lottery and I dont intent to go any further. I'm just concerned by the fact it's our owners business who've pissed people off amongst other of course. Good for you. I think it's the FA who are the focus for questioning here though. Bet365 are just doing their job, it's not their fault that they were given this opportunity. Should a publicly funded body (the FA) be actively encouraging people to open accounts with betting companies?
|
|
|
Post by franklin66 on Jan 9, 2020 14:23:38 GMT
You're talking to the converted I dont bet other than the lottery and I dont intent to go any further. I'm just concerned by the fact it's our owners business who've pissed people off amongst other of course. Good for you. I think it's the FA who are the focus for questioning here though. Bet365 are just doing their job, it's not their fault that they were given this opportunity. Should a publicly funded body (the FA) be actively encouraging people to open accounts with betting companies? Unfortunately despite it being stated numerous time in the HoC bet365 was slaughtered. Virtually all the MPS debating it lambasted bet365 not anyone else. And I agree the FA have some serious explaining to do. But the focus 100% is bet365 then the FA today in parliament. And no they(FA) should not encourage gambling with such contracts but they will argue IMG not us.
|
|
|
Post by Davef on Jan 9, 2020 14:26:05 GMT
I wonder if any MP will be making the point that over Christmas, Premier League matches were only available to watch via Amazon, a company that has paid just over £200M in tax in the UK on revenue of nearly £11B? Let's face it, professional football in this country is in the gutter. This is the FA not the Premier League The Premier League is a corporation The FA gets substantial public funding MPs have a duty to debate FA policies seeing as we fund them. Fair enough. However, Bet365 (and other other gambling companies) aren't doing anything illegal. This is entirely a question of morality, so it's the FA who have to take most, if not all, of the shit being thrown around.
|
|
|
Post by franklin66 on Jan 9, 2020 14:30:26 GMT
This is the FA not the Premier League The Premier League is a corporation The FA gets substantial public funding MPs have a duty to debate FA policies seeing as we fund them. Fair enough. However, Bet365 (another other gambling companies) aren't doing anything illegal. This is entirely a question of morality, so it's the FA who have to take most, if not all, of the shit being thrown around. Quite right but they are not bet365 are even though there are 6 other companies involved. There was a huge debate in parliament today with an "urgent" question and it was all bet365 with a bit of the FA thrown in.
|
|
|
Post by thepremierbanksy on Jan 9, 2020 14:33:49 GMT
|
|
|
Post by spitthedog on Jan 9, 2020 15:03:57 GMT
This is the FA not the Premier League The Premier League is a corporation The FA gets substantial public funding MPs have a duty to debate FA policies seeing as we fund them. Fair enough. However, Bet365 (another other gambling companies) aren't doing anything illegal. This is entirely a question of morality, so it's the FA who have to take most, if not all, of the shit being thrown around. 100% Criticising Bet365 is ridiculous and hypocritical imho. The approach to this by this Government has been that it is the companies responsibility to self-regulate. This is absurd. Bet365 are just doing their job. It demonstrates with certain aspects of public life Government intervention and regulation are absolutely necessary. Criticising Bet365 is the easy way out. It is the Government who should be insuring that this doesn't happen in the first place. They are just shifting the onus and also trying to deflect from the fact that they dont change these things because of the huge corporate pro-gambling lobbies that exist, filling their pockets. This is one of reasons Tracey Crouch resigned (one of the few with a conscience it seems!) As ever knee jerk reactions when these things come to a head. It does need to come to a head though. It's got way out of control.
|
|
|
Post by Malcolm Clarke on Jan 10, 2020 8:35:41 GMT
As so often, a lot of wisdom from Dave Conn on the subject, and a lot of hypocrisy from politicians. As a member of the FA Council I had absolutely no idea of this arrangement until the story broke this week. To be fair to the FA, it did decide a couple of years ago to terminate its direct sponsorship by Ladbrooks and not enter into any new sponsorship agreements with betting companies, but this deal had already been signed by then. At the FSA we are now sponsored by Gamble Aware (our/my statement on it is in the post above). It was suggested that I might prefer not to comment on the issue, as my own club is owned by Bet 365 but it would be hypocritical and unprincipled to operate like that. It's a bit embarrassing for the FA that this should break just after the weekend of its commendable focus on mental health. www.theguardian.com/football/blog/2020/jan/09/politicians-blame-growth-football-betting-gambling
|
|
|
Post by spitthedog on Jan 10, 2020 11:11:02 GMT
As so often, a lot of wisdom from Dave Conn on the subject, and a lot of hypocrisy from politicians. As a member of the FA Council I had absolutely no idea of this arrangement until the story broke this week. To be fair to the FA, it did decide a couple of years ago to terminate its direct sponsorship by Ladbrooks and not enter into any new sponsorship agreements with betting companies, but this deal had already been signed by then. At the FSA we are now sponsored by Gamble Aware (our/my statement on it is in the post above). It was suggested that I might prefer not to comment on the issue, as my own club is owned by Bet 365 but it would be hypocritical and unprincipled to operate like that. It's a bit embarrassing for the FA that this should break just after the weekend of its commendable focus on mental health. www.theguardian.com/football/blog/2020/jan/09/politicians-blame-growth-football-betting-gamblingSpot on this.
|
|
|
Post by crouchpotato1 on Jan 13, 2020 23:11:08 GMT
|
|