|
|
Post by crapslinger on Jan 3, 2020 18:20:07 GMT
WTF is pansexual is it something to do with bonking on the sink unit or utilising the utensils for sexual gratification  , by the way she looks like Gwendolyn off Wallace & Grommit no wonder the Liberals are toast. |
|
|
|
Post by vokeswagen on Jan 3, 2020 18:25:09 GMT
WTF is pansexual is it something to do with bonking on the sink unit or utilising the utensils for sexual gratification , by the way she looks like Gwendolyn off Wallace & Grommit no wonder the Liberals are toast.  |
|
|
|
Post by felonious on Jan 3, 2020 18:25:26 GMT
They?
|
|
|
|
Post by zerps on Jan 3, 2020 18:26:32 GMT
WTF is pansexual is it something to do with bonking on the sink unit or utilising the utensils for sexual gratification , by the way she looks like Gwendolyn off Wallace & Grommit no wonder the Liberals are toast. I think it’s like bi-sexual but if you say bi-sexual nowadays you’re automatically elected to the nazi party. |
|
|
|
Post by felonious on Jan 3, 2020 18:27:14 GMT
Hope this helps Crappy  |
|
|
|
Post by Pretty Little Boother on Jan 3, 2020 18:27:31 GMT
Traditionally means sexual attraction to everything, including kids.
Now it means that you're attracted to "all genders".
Basically bisexual but more virtue-signallingly-woke.
|
|
|
|
Post by crapslinger on Jan 3, 2020 18:41:10 GMT
Traditionally means sexual attraction to everything, including kids. Now it means that you're attracted to "all genders". Basically bisexual but more virtue-signallingly-woke. How many genders are there now ? there were traditionally only two but I am not up to speed on the subject, would it include self identifiers could become very complicated, has the definition changed as it has with sectarian which apparently now comes under an all embracing umbrella term for whatever the libtards deem it to mean to suit their agenda ie. racist, islamaphobic etc etc. |
|
|
|
Post by RipRoaringPotter on Jan 3, 2020 18:47:49 GMT
WTF is pansexual is it something to do with bonking on the sink unit or utilising the utensils for sexual gratification , by the way she looks like Gwendolyn off Wallace & Grommit no wonder the Liberals are toast. So the Liberals are toast because one of their MPs has a sexuality that you don't know? One of the more unique political insights. |
|
|
|
Post by vokeswagen on Jan 3, 2020 18:47:57 GMT
The only thing more daft than coming out as pansexual is getting cross on a Stoke City forum about someone else coming out as pansexual. Honestly who gives a fuck?!  |
|
|
|
Post by crapslinger on Jan 3, 2020 18:53:12 GMT
WTF is pansexual is it something to do with bonking on the sink unit or utilising the utensils for sexual gratification , by the way she looks like Gwendolyn off Wallace & Grommit no wonder the Liberals are toast. So the Liberals are toast because one of their MPs has a sexuality that you don't know? One of the more unique political insights. Obviously it was said in jest, the main reason they have been decimated along with the Labrador Party was their failure to understand the wishes of the people on Brexit, bollocks to Brexit  , the rest is just the icing on the top of their massive shit cake. |
|
|
|
Post by The Drunken Communist on Jan 3, 2020 18:57:24 GMT
Pansexual? Does this mean it's okay to tell her she belongs in the kitchen?
|
|
|
|
Post by Pretty Little Boother on Jan 3, 2020 19:01:42 GMT
The only thing more daft than coming out as pansexual is getting cross on a Stoke City forum about someone else coming out as pansexual. Honestly who gives a fuck?! I don't think anyone's getting cross. You're right to an extent that it's nobody's business what they call themselves or what they do with their squishy bits and the squishy bits of others... But when you view it in the broader terms of identity politics and the social conditioning experiment of normalising this type of thing, then it does become other people's business. |
|
|
|
Post by Pretty Little Boother on Jan 3, 2020 19:05:03 GMT
Traditionally means sexual attraction to everything, including kids. Now it means that you're attracted to "all genders". Basically bisexual but more virtue-signallingly-woke. How many genders are there now ? there were traditionally only two but I am not up to speed on the subject, would it include self identifiers could become very complicated, has the definition changed as it has with sectarian which apparently now comes under an all embracing umbrella term for whatever the libtards deem it to mean to suit their agenda ie. racist, islamaphobic etc etc. I don't know if this is the current, complete list, but: genderfluidsupport.tumblr.com/gender |
|
|
|
Post by felonious on Jan 3, 2020 19:06:10 GMT
Pansexual? Does this mean it's okay to tell her she belongs in the kitchen? Brings a whole new meaning to going down the pan. |
|
|
|
Post by crapslinger on Jan 3, 2020 19:07:07 GMT
Pansexual? Does this mean it's okay to tell her she belongs in the kitchen? Sinksexual Stovesexual Washersexual
|
|
|
|
Post by hoffgreen on Jan 3, 2020 19:08:15 GMT
Wasn't this the nutjob who assaulted her partner at the lib dems conference?
Total fruitloop.
Probably suffering some mental condition.
Why oh why did we close our mental asylums.... people like her would be first in the queue
|
|
|
|
Post by crapslinger on Jan 3, 2020 19:10:36 GMT
How many genders are there now ? there were traditionally only two but I am not up to speed on the subject, would it include self identifiers could become very complicated, has the definition changed as it has with sectarian which apparently now comes under an all embracing umbrella term for whatever the libtards deem it to mean to suit their agenda ie. racist, islamaphobic etc etc. I don't know if this is the current, complete list, but: genderfluidsupport.tumblr.com/genderShe's going to be very busy isn't she, I hope she has plenty of lube in to accommodate that ensemble, she will need her tonsils taking out and end up with a f8nny and arsehole the size of a clowns pocket. |
|
|
|
Post by vokeswagen on Jan 3, 2020 19:12:55 GMT
The only thing more daft than coming out as pansexual is getting cross on a Stoke City forum about someone else coming out as pansexual. Honestly who gives a fuck?! I don't think anyone's getting cross. You're right to an extent that it's nobody's business what they call themselves or what they do with their squishy bits and the squishy bits of others... But when you view it in the broader terms of identity politics and the social conditioning experiment of normalising this type of thing, then it does become other people's business. carps seems to be getting cross but I admit he does that about most things on here I feel like you're contradicting yourself fella. Surely the libertarian position here is that everyone has absolute freedom to smash the back doors in of whomsoever they choose without it being anyone else's business. ie the first part of your post. Can't help feeling this conspiracy theory about social conditioning experiments is just a licence to be inconsistent whenever you feel uncomfortable with someone else's free choice. |
|
|
|
Post by crapslinger on Jan 3, 2020 19:12:57 GMT
Wasn't this the nutjob who assaulted her partner at the lib dems conference? Total fruitloop. Probably suffering some mental condition. Why oh why did we close our mental asylums.... people like her would be first in the queue  She likes holding balls. |
|
|
|
Post by franklin66 on Jan 3, 2020 19:16:23 GMT
I think it means she'll shag anything that moves which when I was a lad had a different lable.
|
|
|
|
Post by songthrush01 on Jan 3, 2020 19:18:06 GMT
there all sick in the head to me!
|
|
|
|
Post by wagsastokie on Jan 3, 2020 19:19:32 GMT
Traditionally means sexual attraction to everything, including kids. Now it means that you're attracted to "all genders". Basically bisexual but more virtue-signallingly-woke. So basically she'll shag anything with a pulse (, legally of course) |
|
|
|
Post by crapslinger on Jan 3, 2020 19:19:58 GMT
Wasn't this the nutjob who assaulted her partner at the lib dems conference? Total fruitloop. Probably suffering some mental condition. Why oh why did we close our mental asylums.... people like her would be first in the queue Twas her sounds like a nice girl. |
|
|
|
Post by GrahamHyde on Jan 3, 2020 19:20:54 GMT
It tends to be the case that the people who call everyone else snowflakes are the ones who are the most offended themselves by freed of choice and expression.
|
|
|
|
Post by crapslinger on Jan 3, 2020 19:21:16 GMT
I think it means she'll shag anything that moves which when I was a lad had a different lable. Careful too much information.  |
|
|
|
Post by crapslinger on Jan 3, 2020 19:31:32 GMT
It tends to be the case that the people who call everyone else snowflakes are the ones who are the most offended themselves by freed of choice and expression. Who's offended ? personally I have never heard the terminology before. |
|
|
|
Post by Pretty Little Boother on Jan 3, 2020 19:36:03 GMT
I don't think anyone's getting cross. You're right to an extent that it's nobody's business what they call themselves or what they do with their squishy bits and the squishy bits of others... But when you view it in the broader terms of identity politics and the social conditioning experiment of normalising this type of thing, then it does become other people's business. carps seems to be getting cross but I admit he does that about most things on here I feel like you're contradicting yourself fella. Surely the libertarian position here is that everyone has absolute freedom to smash the back doors in of whomsoever they choose without it being anyone else's business. ie the first part of your post. Can't help feeling this conspiracy theory about social conditioning experiments is just a licence to be inconsistent whenever you feel uncomfortable with someone else's free choice. The libertarian position is absolutely that she should coat herself with whatever bodily fluid she likes, this is correct. My objection is that this now seems to be treated almost as a professional qualification in some arenas, or that it makes that person worthy of being listened to by virtue of itself. Or even that it should be applauded. I could still consider her to be immoral and / or disgusting (not that I do) whilst still recognising her right to behave as she wishes. That's all tolerance means. Doesn't make anyone immune to criticism. Doesn't mean anyone has to like it or even respect it. Just accepting its right to exist. You can call the social conditioning thing a conspiracy theory if you want. I have no proof of it, other than an ever increasing exposure of gender / sexuality politics with only positive reactions to it shown in the media. Only first hand, anecdotal observations. |
|
|
|
Post by crapslinger on Jan 3, 2020 19:47:57 GMT
carps seems to be getting cross but I admit he does that about most things on here I feel like you're contradicting yourself fella. Surely the libertarian position here is that everyone has absolute freedom to smash the back doors in of whomsoever they choose without it being anyone else's business. ie the first part of your post. Can't help feeling this conspiracy theory about social conditioning experiments is just a licence to be inconsistent whenever you feel uncomfortable with someone else's free choice. The libertarian position is absolutely that she should coat herself with whatever bodily fluid she likes, this is correct. My objection is that this now seems to be treated almost as a professional qualification in some arenas, or that it makes that person worthy of being listened to by virtue of itself. Or even that it should be applauded. I could still consider her to be immoral and / or disgusting (not that I do) whilst still recognising her right to behave as she wishes. That's all tolerance means. Doesn't make anyone immune to criticism. Doesn't mean anyone has to like it or even respect it. Just accepting its right to exist. You can call the social conditioning thing a conspiracy theory if you want. I have no proof of it, other than an ever increasing exposure of gender / sexuality politics with only positive reactions to it shown in the media. Only first hand, anecdotal observations. Could be an interesting choice as next leader of the Lib/Dems, definite vote grabber. |
|
|
|
Post by vokeswagen on Jan 3, 2020 20:11:39 GMT
carps seems to be getting cross but I admit he does that about most things on here I feel like you're contradicting yourself fella. Surely the libertarian position here is that everyone has absolute freedom to smash the back doors in of whomsoever they choose without it being anyone else's business. ie the first part of your post. Can't help feeling this conspiracy theory about social conditioning experiments is just a licence to be inconsistent whenever you feel uncomfortable with someone else's free choice. The libertarian position is absolutely that she should coat herself with whatever bodily fluid she likes, this is correct. My objection is that this now seems to be treated almost as a professional qualification in some arenas, or that it makes that person worthy of being listened to by virtue of itself. Or even that it should be applauded. I could still consider her to be immoral and / or disgusting (not that I do) whilst still recognising her right to behave as she wishes. That's all tolerance means. Doesn't make anyone immune to criticism. Doesn't mean anyone has to like it or even respect it. Just accepting its right to exist. You can call the social conditioning thing a conspiracy theory if you want. I have no proof of it, other than an ever increasing exposure of gender / sexuality politics with only positive reactions to it shown in the media. Only first hand, anecdotal observations. I don't think that the concept of "person says/does something unusual - it makes the news" is anything new though mate. It seems logical to me in a world where fucking Love Island makes headlines that a Lib Dem MP announcing they're pansexual has the same effect. I don't think it's any kind of conspiracy or programme or anything, just that people are obsessed with other people's sex lives and sexual predilections. Twas ever thus. I personally couldn't give a fuck. Live and let live and all that. I don't think anyone is saying that this person has to be listened to or anything - you're free to ignore the article. I would dispute your assertion that it "Doesn't mean anyone has to like it or even respect it. Just accepting its right to exist." I think respect is a fundamental part of acceptance. |
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 3, 2020 20:19:49 GMT
There's a few pamsexuals on the oatcake
|
|
, by the way she looks like Gwendolyn off Wallace & Grommit no wonder the Liberals are toast. 
, the rest is just the icing on the top of their massive shit cake. 
