|
Post by Pretty Little Boother on Nov 17, 2019 3:25:47 GMT
Pass him a rope so he can properly hang himself. Ahh, the old "Anti-Epstein"?
|
|
|
Post by jones on Nov 17, 2019 3:55:04 GMT
That man is on a real slippery slope. If he carries on treating women in that manner he'll end up as the President as of the United States. As the leader of the country with a hyper-active support base?
|
|
|
Post by partickpotter on Nov 17, 2019 7:20:59 GMT
He should have been interviewed by police not Emily Matlis. Deep down inside Prince Andrew knows he's got nothing to worry about. It's one law for them and one law for us. In time this story will start to fade away and the establishment's media will reframed it as being being anti British or not in the public interest or something. And plenty of the public will accept it. Then there will be some kind of slur on Virginia Roberts which will be built to discredit her. Yeah, but Emily Matlis is more important than the Police. I think Sting might disagree.
|
|
|
Post by wizzardofdribble on Nov 17, 2019 8:05:28 GMT
I never realised His Royal Highness didn't sweat.
Must be the blue blood.
That might change once he flies over to the States.
This time on an FBI plane, rather than Epsteins 'Lolita Express' (as his private jet was called, which HRH made several journeys on)
|
|
|
Post by raythesailor on Nov 17, 2019 8:12:58 GMT
I never realised His Royal Highness didn't sweat. Must be the blue blood. That might change once he flies over to the States. This time on an FBI plane, rather than Epsteins 'Lolita Express' (as his private jet was called, which HRH made several journeys on) I think it may be quite along time or maybe never before he ventures west to the good old US of A again. 😄 Maybe we could swap him for the diplomats wife who (allegedly) was involved in the fatal accident in the Uk and then fled home.
|
|
|
Post by wizzardofdribble on Nov 17, 2019 8:45:34 GMT
I never realised His Royal Highness didn't sweat. Must be the blue blood. That might change once he flies over to the States. This time on an FBI plane, rather than Epsteins 'Lolita Express' (as his private jet was called, which HRH made several journeys on) I think it may be quite along time or maybe never before he ventures west to the good old US of A again. 😄 Maybe we could swap him for the diplomats wife who (allegedly) was involved in the fatal accident in the Uk and then fled home. It was a car crash of an interview.. I'd rather have a lift off Prince Phillip than watch that again. 😄
|
|
|
Post by PotteringThrough on Nov 17, 2019 9:24:53 GMT
Just out of curiosity how many people have stayed at someone's house, after being invited, 3 times but wouldn't consider them close friends?
I'm sure we've all ended up at friends of friends houses after a night out and other examples but they weren't exactly invites at the start of the night. 3 times though?
|
|
|
Post by JoeinOz on Nov 17, 2019 12:03:22 GMT
The pizza express thing is just completely stupid.
|
|
|
Post by wizzardofdribble on Nov 17, 2019 12:32:37 GMT
The pizza express thing is just completely stupid. Strange how HRH remembers the exact time and date he ordered a pizza but can't remember shagging the same bird 3 times? Make no mistake, the press will be all over this, trawling through Pizza Express hardrives to find every receipt issued that particular day. And if they can't find one attributable to HRH? Attachment DeletedHow's about that then?
|
|
|
Post by mattyd on Nov 17, 2019 12:56:10 GMT
Just cringeworthy. Prior to this I was prepared to give him benefit of the doubt, another " Me Too " victim. After that abomination he is as guilty as fuck.
|
|
|
Post by followyoudown on Nov 17, 2019 13:50:29 GMT
The pizza express thing is just completely stupid. Complete noncesense you could say. Although surely with police protection they would be able to say exactly where he was.
|
|
|
Post by RichieBarkerOut! on Nov 17, 2019 15:51:34 GMT
The name Randy Andy is back...
|
|
|
Post by wizzardofdribble on Nov 17, 2019 15:54:32 GMT
I don't sweat
|
|
|
Post by harryburrows on Nov 17, 2019 15:59:59 GMT
Never been a massive fan of the royal family . To be tolerated if they can be a force for good in anyway possible . Andrew has always represented everything that's bad about them . His sense of entitlement and abuse of his status has characterized his life . I hope the FBI put him on trial and he goes to federal prison to be someone's bitch
|
|
|
Post by harryburrows on Nov 17, 2019 16:01:04 GMT
I never realised His Royal Highness didn't sweat. Must be the blue blood. That might change once he flies over to the States. This time on an FBI plane, rather than Epsteins 'Lolita Express' (as his private jet was called, which HRH made several journeys on) Royals don't sweat they glow 😉
|
|
|
Post by RichieBarkerOut! on Nov 17, 2019 16:19:52 GMT
Where did that photo of Andrew and a young bikini clad woman go?
|
|
|
Post by wizzardofdribble on Nov 17, 2019 16:21:10 GMT
I never realised His Royal Highness didn't sweat. Must be the blue blood. That might change once he flies over to the States. This time on an FBI plane, rather than Epsteins 'Lolita Express' (as his private jet was called, which HRH made several journeys on) Royals don't sweat they glow 😉 Attachment DeletedNow then..Now then
|
|
|
Post by wizzardofdribble on Nov 17, 2019 16:23:48 GMT
Where did that photo of Andrew and a young bikini clad woman go? I have no recollection of seeing it.
|
|
|
Post by RichieBarkerOut! on Nov 17, 2019 16:25:01 GMT
Where did that photo of Andrew and a young bikini clad woman go? I have no recollection of seeing it. I must have been mistaken, but I stand by my decision.
|
|
|
Post by RichieBarkerOut! on Nov 17, 2019 16:26:53 GMT
On another note; Emily Matliss, yes I certainly would.
|
|
|
Post by supersimonstainrod on Nov 17, 2019 16:51:19 GMT
On another note; Emily Matliss, yes I certainly would. She certainly has an interesting affect on her interviewees.The Prince Andrew interview was as compelling and uncomfortable,in a different way admittedly,as her discussion with Anthony Scaramucci.
|
|
|
Post by bathstoke on Nov 17, 2019 16:55:59 GMT
Aurf with his head!
|
|
|
Post by RichieBarkerOut! on Nov 17, 2019 16:56:18 GMT
On another note; Emily Matliss, yes I certainly would. She certainly has an interesting affect on her interviewees.The Prince Andrew interview was as compelling and uncomfortable,in a different way admittedly,as her discussion with Anthony Scaramucci. Did she get Scaramucci to do the fandango?
|
|
|
Post by bigjohnritchie on Nov 17, 2019 17:53:35 GMT
I've never liked Andrew, seems guilty to me but the law needs to take its course..... so it's doubtful that there will be prosecutions....but I think that Lee has a point about the things " we" should be alarmed about.
|
|
|
Post by richie22 on Nov 17, 2019 17:53:47 GMT
On another note; Emily Matliss, yes I certainly would. She certainly has an interesting affect on her interviewees.The Prince Andrew interview was as compelling and uncomfortable,in a different way admittedly,as her discussion with Anthony Scaramucci. she’s no naga manchetty
|
|
|
Post by wagsastokie on Nov 17, 2019 19:18:54 GMT
She certainly has an interesting affect on her interviewees.The Prince Andrew interview was as compelling and uncomfortable,in a different way admittedly,as her discussion with Anthony Scaramucci. she’s no naga manchetty No she’s good at her job
|
|
|
Post by serpico on Nov 17, 2019 19:43:46 GMT
just to play devils advocate, if he was having sexual relations with that girl would he really pose for a photo with her ? seems unlikely no matter how much he trusted epstein or his missus... i dunno, i'd like to see the royal family abolished so have to be careful i'm not just confirming my bias by automatically thinking he's guilty.
|
|
|
Post by bathstoke on Nov 17, 2019 20:01:40 GMT
just to play devils advocate, if he was having sexual relations with that girl would he really pose for a photo with her ? seems unlikely no matter how much he trusted epstein or his missus... i dunno, i'd like to see the royal family abolished so have to be careful i'm not just confirming my bias by automatically thinking he's guilty. In defence of QEII, She has taken her duties V seriously, but I’m not sure Charlie has it in him. “The defender of the faiths”
|
|
|
Post by serpico on Nov 17, 2019 20:12:55 GMT
just to play devils advocate, if he was having sexual relations with that girl would he really pose for a photo with her ? seems unlikely no matter how much he trusted epstein or his missus... i dunno, i'd like to see the royal family abolished so have to be careful i'm not just confirming my bias by automatically thinking he's guilty. In defence of QEII, She has taken her duties V seriously, but I’m not sure Charlie has it in him. “The defender of the faiths” suppose he was stupid enough to go to epstein's house even after he epstein was convicted, so maybe he is stupid enough to allow epstein to take a picture of him with an underage girl he was abusing ? ... might well have been for blackmail purposes ?
|
|
|
Post by bigjohnritchie on Nov 17, 2019 20:17:54 GMT
In defence of QEII, She has taken her duties V seriously, but I’m not sure Charlie has it in him. “The defender of the faiths” suppose he was stupid enough to go to epstein's house even after he epstein was convicted, so maybe he is stupid enough to allow epstein to take a picture of him with an underage girl he was abusing ? ... might well have been for blackmail purposes ? I guess that one issue that might come out is...are there any many more?. is it likely that there is only one person that he met in these circumstances.. ...particularly as this accuser is 17 which would not be an offence in itself in this country..... leaving aside the trafficking issues of course.
|
|