|
Post by wizzardofdribble on Jun 8, 2019 11:09:11 GMT
Not as dangerous as having a Marxist PM What about a daft racist, proven lying bastard, serial philanderer as the next PM, as is the current favourite? One thing he isn't is daft. Scheming,decietful,dishonest,manipulative cunt,yes.
|
|
|
Post by wagsastokie on Jun 8, 2019 12:12:14 GMT
In this election it is not possible to ascertain the exact percentage of postal votes for each ward as this information has not been released if ever it will be as I have doubts on that I am merely going on the previous election where the person in question was charged and convicted in a court of law As you seem intent on defending the indefensible what is your opinion on a individual convicted of voter fraud being allowed to remain a member of the Labour Party What is your opinion on the for said Labour Party member and activist sharing a platform and being allowed to campaign publicly and maybe not so publicly The Labour Party morality lower than a snakes foreskin What is 'the indefensible' I am defending here? As for this guy still campaigning for Labour, it's not a good look but they took the risk in having him back into the party. As far as I know they haven't broke any rules in allowing him back in, even if I wouldn't want him around if I was Labour member in Peterborough. For what it's worth, I think there should be a rule stating people with criminal convictions based around elections (electoral fraud, voter intimidation etc) should be barred from being involved in elections. Well you’ve just answered what I describe as indefensible To have someone convicted of voter fraud playing a part in your campaign is beyond the pale I will of course wait with baited breath for the bbc / channel 4 or any of the National newspapers lead or give any mention of this
|
|
|
Post by wagsastokie on Jun 8, 2019 12:22:20 GMT
What about a daft racist, proven lying bastard, serial philanderer as the next PM, as is the current favourite? One thing he isn't is daft. Scheming,decietful,dishonest,manipulative cunt,yes. He’s definitely not daft That is his problem he usually gets into trouble by over thinking things
|
|
|
Post by felonious on Jun 8, 2019 12:30:12 GMT
What is 'the indefensible' I am defending here? As for this guy still campaigning for Labour, it's not a good look but they took the risk in having him back into the party. As far as I know they haven't broke any rules in allowing him back in, even if I wouldn't want him around if I was Labour member in Peterborough. For what it's worth, I think there should be a rule stating people with criminal convictions based around elections (electoral fraud, voter intimidation etc) should be barred from being involved in elections. Well you’ve just answered what I describe as indefensible To have someone convicted of voter fraud playing a part in your campaign is beyond the pale I will of course wait with baited breath for the bbc / channel 4 or any of the National newspapers lead or give any mention of this Unfortunately the problem of postal vote election fraud is always going to follow Labour around. When you have a criminal member of the Labour party at a bi election to replace a criminal Labour MP then it's not a good look.
news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/4410743.stm
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 8, 2019 12:34:34 GMT
Some of the media fringes have covered it but most of the MSM appear to have ignored it. link
|
|
|
Post by trickydicky73 on Jun 8, 2019 12:40:51 GMT
Not as dangerous as having a Marxist PM What about a daft racist, proven lying bastard, serial philanderer as the next PM, as is the current favourite? Racist?
|
|
|
Post by followyoudown on Jun 8, 2019 13:01:41 GMT
Not as dangerous as having a Marxist PM What about a daft racist, proven lying bastard, serial philanderer as the next PM, as is the current favourite? I knew you would see the light on Corbyn eventually sheiky
|
|
|
Post by felonious on Jun 8, 2019 13:04:47 GMT
Some of the media fringes have covered it but most of the MSM appear to have ignored it. linkPiss poor from Labour. Is he one of the Momentum lads?
|
|
|
Post by sheikhmomo on Jun 8, 2019 13:08:52 GMT
What about a daft racist, proven lying bastard, serial philanderer as the next PM, as is the current favourite? Racist? “Obama had an ancestral dislike of the British empire” because he was “part-Kenyan”. "Muslim Letterboxes" "Picanninnies with ‘watermelon smiles" "The people of Papua New Guinea are cannibals" "Writing in The Spectator in 2012, Mr Johnson suggested that Africans would be better off if ruled by white colonisers." He's not funny or 'a character', he is a deeply offensive racist cunt
|
|
|
Post by followyoudown on Jun 8, 2019 13:17:18 GMT
What is 'the indefensible' I am defending here? As for this guy still campaigning for Labour, it's not a good look but they took the risk in having him back into the party. As far as I know they haven't broke any rules in allowing him back in, even if I wouldn't want him around if I was Labour member in Peterborough. For what it's worth, I think there should be a rule stating people with criminal convictions based around elections (electoral fraud, voter intimidation etc) should be barred from being involved in elections. Well you’ve just answered what I describe as indefensible To have someone convicted of voter fraud playing a part in your campaign is beyond the pale I will of course wait with baited breath for the bbc / channel 4 or any of the National newspapers lead or give any mention of this I voted by post in 2017 when I had dislocated and fractured my ankle it had details on it to identify you from memory and I think I had to sign it, if there was a fraud they would have spotted unusual voting patterns and would look into. The leave vote was split which allowed labour to creep through not sure why Labour celebrated so much all they have done is delay their reckoning at the hands of the voters whilst they lose remain supporters in London, Scotland while they continue to commit to neither leave or remain.
|
|
|
Post by wagsastokie on Jun 8, 2019 13:29:40 GMT
Well you’ve just answered what I describe as indefensible To have someone convicted of voter fraud playing a part in your campaign is beyond the pale I will of course wait with baited breath for the bbc / channel 4 or any of the National newspapers lead or give any mention of this I voted by post in 2017 when I had dislocated and fractured my ankle it had details on it to identify you from memory and I think I had to sign it, if there was a fraud they would have spotted unusual voting patterns and would look into. The leave vote was split which allowed labour to creep through not sure why Labour celebrated so much all they have done is delay their reckoning at the hands of the voters whilst they lose remain supporters in London, Scotland while they continue to commit to neither leave or remain. The the whole problem with postal votes is you can have four five or more to some addresses And you assume each one is filled out by the relevant voter whilst under no duress from other family members or members of the community On the point of unusual patterns or such I don’t believe they automatically look into this There has to be a complaint
|
|
|
Post by followyoudown on Jun 8, 2019 13:35:57 GMT
I voted by post in 2017 when I had dislocated and fractured my ankle it had details on it to identify you from memory and I think I had to sign it, if there was a fraud they would have spotted unusual voting patterns and would look into. The leave vote was split which allowed labour to creep through not sure why Labour celebrated so much all they have done is delay their reckoning at the hands of the voters whilst they lose remain supporters in London, Scotland while they continue to commit to neither leave or remain. The the whole problem with postal votes is you can have four five or more to some addresses And you assume each one is filled out by the relevant voter whilst under no duress from other family members or members of the community On the point of unusual patterns or such I don’t believe they automatically look into this There has to be a complaint And that doesn't happen anywhere else how many times have I read on here or elsewhere that when when I was old enough to vote my dad took me to the polling station and said we vote labour etc A split vote was the cause let Labour celebrate, fence sitting will catch up with them.
|
|
|
Post by RipRoaringPotter on Jun 8, 2019 13:46:35 GMT
|
|
|
Post by wagsastokie on Jun 8, 2019 13:53:55 GMT
The the whole problem with postal votes is you can have four five or more to some addresses And you assume each one is filled out by the relevant voter whilst under no duress from other family members or members of the community On the point of unusual patterns or such I don’t believe they automatically look into this There has to be a complaint And that doesn't happen anywhere else how many times have I read on here or elsewhere that when when I was old enough to vote my dad took me to the polling station and said we vote labour etc A split vote was the cause let Labour celebrate, fence sitting will catch up with them. He stood in the booth with you then most unusual When you enter the polling station and handed your voting slip the only person who knows who you voted for is you No amount of pressure can be asserted
|
|
|
Post by followyoudown on Jun 8, 2019 13:58:24 GMT
“Obama had an ancestral dislike of the British empire” because he was “part-Kenyan”. "Muslim Letterboxes" "Picanninnies with ‘watermelon smiles" "The people of Papua New Guinea are cannibals" "Writing in The Spectator in 2012, Mr Johnson suggested that Africans would be better off if ruled by white colonisers." He's not funny or 'a character', he is a deeply offensive racist cunt I don't think he is racist he has a crass / juvenile style of writing / humour, don't necessarily think he should be PM either but the fact at least a couple of those quotes is a misrepresentation suggests you know that too. On PNG he actually said "For 10 years we in the Tory Party have become used to Papua New Guinea-style orgies of cannibalism and chief-killing, and so it is with a happy amazement that we watch as the madness engulfs the Labour Party." Its widely accepted in 1900s cannibalism was practiced, its clear its a crap joke on tory leadership contests and no comment on modern day PNG. On Obama he actually wrote "“Some said it was a snub to Britain. Some said it was a symbol of the part-Kenyan President’s ancestral dislike of the British empire – of which Churchill had been such a fervent defender,” he wrote." He said Muslim women wearing burkas "look like letter boxes" whilst arguing against bans on face-covering veils in public places, seems a pretty incompetent racist to me, the general point was they look ridiculous but they are free to wear what they want
|
|
|
Post by followyoudown on Jun 8, 2019 14:05:16 GMT
And that doesn't happen anywhere else how many times have I read on here or elsewhere that when when I was old enough to vote my dad took me to the polling station and said we vote labour etc A split vote was the cause let Labour celebrate, fence sitting will catch up with them. He stood in the booth with you then most unusual When you enter the polling station and handed your voting slip the only person who knows who you voted for is you No amount of pressure can be asserted My parents never told me to do anything above making sure to vote, don't think there is anything in the postal fraud the vote was split, the tories had a good local pro brexit candidate who had put in work so the fall away in vote was less than expected, brexit party candidate seemed a bit crap too, the outcome of this is likely to be some sort of pact with the next pro brexit tory leader to make sure this does not happen again.
|
|
|
Post by wagsastokie on Jun 8, 2019 14:13:36 GMT
He stood in the booth with you then most unusual When you enter the polling station and handed your voting slip the only person who knows who you voted for is you No amount of pressure can be asserted My parents never told me to do anything above making sure to vote, don't think there is anything in the postal fraud the vote was split, the tories had a good local pro brexit candidate who had put in work so the fall away in vote was less than expected, brexit party candidate seemed a bit crap too, the outcome of this is likely to be some sort of pact with the next pro brexit tory leader to make sure this does not happen again. Well to me the only way to ensure a majority for brexit in the next parliament will have to be a pact of some kind between the new Tory leader and the brexit Party But you can see my point about the only secure form of voting is the booth it’s self
|
|
|
Post by wagsastokie on Jun 8, 2019 14:20:27 GMT
Classic had me spitting my bovril across the room Oh the irony a remainer tweeting about leavers not accepting a result You sir / madam are also the master / mistress of irony That or your on a monumental wind up
|
|
|
Post by wizzardofdribble on Jun 8, 2019 14:26:03 GMT
One thing he isn't is daft. Scheming,decietful,dishonest,manipulative cunt,yes. He’s definitely not daft That is his problem he usually gets into trouble by over thinking things Well he'll have a lot of thinking to do if he becomes PM. He'll inherit the same problems that fucked May. His only saving grace is that the opposition are utter shit.
|
|
|
Post by RipRoaringPotter on Jun 8, 2019 14:50:35 GMT
Classic had me spitting my bovril across the room Oh the irony a remainer tweeting about leavers not accepting a result You sir / madam are also the master / mistress of irony That or your on a monumental wind up I've accepted the result over and over and over again. I have said that we should leave the EU after the result of the 2016 referendum. Now, how many excuses have you come up with for the result in Peterborough?
|
|
|
Post by wagsastokie on Jun 8, 2019 15:01:59 GMT
Classic had me spitting my bovril across the room Oh the irony a remainer tweeting about leavers not accepting a result You sir / madam are also the master / mistress of irony That or your on a monumental wind up I've accepted the result over and over and over again. I have said that we should leave the EU after the result of the 2016 referendum. Now, how many excuses have you come up with for the result in Peterborough? Dear me I must of hit a nerve if you read my post I have not accused you of not accepting the referendum result I mentioned the original tweet that you somehow thought was funny enough to post Maybe you were just unlucky that I know the original tweeter I used to sell him his nightly pint or three for quite a few years
|
|
|
Post by RipRoaringPotter on Jun 8, 2019 15:07:44 GMT
I've accepted the result over and over and over again. I have said that we should leave the EU after the result of the 2016 referendum. Now, how many excuses have you come up with for the result in Peterborough? Dear me I must of hit a nerve if you read my post I have not accused you of not accepting the referendum result I mentioned the original tweet that you somehow thought was funny enough to post Maybe you were just unlucky that I know the original tweeter I used to sell him his nightly pint or three for quite a few years Right you are - I had misunderstood your post. Mainly I posted the tweet to show there's very little difference between the two 'sides' in terms of accepting results. Everyone is making excuses to try and see it their way.
|
|
|
Post by wagsastokie on Jun 8, 2019 15:12:14 GMT
Dear me I must of hit a nerve if you read my post I have not accused you of not accepting the referendum result I mentioned the original tweet that you somehow thought was funny enough to post Maybe you were just unlucky that I know the original tweeter I used to sell him his nightly pint or three for quite a few years Right you are - I had misunderstood your post. Mainly I posted the tweet to show there's very little difference between the two 'sides' in terms of accepting results. Everyone is making excuses to try and see it their way. To be honest I thought the tweet was quite humorous And I have to agree with you people today seem intent on making excuses Whichever side of the argument they are And do not spend enough time looking into why a result was not to there liking and what they could do differently
|
|
|
Post by rogerjonesisgod on Jun 10, 2019 22:56:56 GMT
|
|
|
Post by wagsastokie on Jun 11, 2019 4:29:25 GMT
Well there’s a shock The guys on a monumental windup or is a complete idiot if I was the brexit Party I’d take that to the local plod and insist on a investigation
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 11, 2019 5:51:28 GMT
Apparently a petition has been started over this situation at Change.org "Investigate the postal votes that were counted in the Peterborough by election".
This could get interesting.
|
|
|
Post by RipRoaringPotter on Jun 11, 2019 6:34:50 GMT
Worth investigating if it's indeed true. Bit it aint gonna change the result of the 2019 election, as the tweet is from 2017.
|
|
|
Post by bathstoke on Jun 11, 2019 6:50:21 GMT
Apparently a petition has been started over this situation at Change.org "Investigate the postal votes that were counted in the Peterborough by election". This could get interesting. Hanging chads
|
|
|
Post by sheikhmomo on Jun 11, 2019 6:50:39 GMT
People not accepting the result of an election. Fucking enemies of the people.
|
|
|
Post by wagsastokie on Jun 11, 2019 7:00:22 GMT
People not accepting the result of an election. Fucking enemies of the people. I couldn’t agree more I’ve fully accepted the people of Peterborough voted in a anti Semite
|
|