|
|
Post by harryburrows on Feb 15, 2019 18:18:34 GMT
Not sure why the media including the BBC keep. Calling her a schoolgirl
|
|
|
|
Post by henry on Feb 15, 2019 18:21:56 GMT
When's the crowd funding page being set up.
|
|
|
|
Post by thevoid on Feb 15, 2019 18:28:10 GMT
Not sure why the media including the BBC keep. Calling her a schoolgirl Drip, drip, drip. |
|
|
|
Post by felonious on Feb 15, 2019 18:43:40 GMT
More sympathy for a groomed jihadi than groomed kids in Yorkshire White girl's lives don't matter.  |
|
|
|
Post by supersimonstainrod on Feb 15, 2019 18:53:32 GMT
Not sure why the media including the BBC keep. Calling her a schoolgirl Trying to predicate her innocence in all this: "she's just misguided," 'naive' a pawn,little more than a baby etc etc... Singularly missing the point that at an age when we were all learning about Newton's Laws and differential integration,dreaming of being footballers,astronauts etc and fantasizing about kylie Minogue et al she was looking at severed heads and "being all right with it.." Not remotely a decent person. |
|
|
|
Post by Northy on Feb 15, 2019 20:25:47 GMT
Evening Standard in their story now saying 'as a 15 year old she was groomed by ISIS'
|
|
|
|
Post by Boothen on Feb 15, 2019 20:29:54 GMT
Bitch and her spawn can fucking rot.
|
|
|
|
Post by crapslinger on Feb 15, 2019 20:48:34 GMT
Took less time to identify her though, even though she's in Syria and they were operating in Sheffield etc. You’re back!... I thought you’d fucked off to Syria to fight for ISIS 😀 Did you miss me  maybe just a little bit perhaps. |
|
|
|
Post by claytonscrubs on Feb 15, 2019 20:52:07 GMT
You’re back!... I thought you’d fucked off to Syria to fight for ISIS 😀 Did you miss me maybe just a little bit perhaps. Yeah, I missed your views on James McClean 😉 |
|
|
|
Post by dutchstokie on Feb 15, 2019 20:52:37 GMT
BOLLOCKS to her...... let her rot
|
|
|
|
Post by crapslinger on Feb 15, 2019 21:23:49 GMT
Did you miss me maybe just a little bit perhaps. Yeah, I missed your views on James McClean 😉 Better not go there, I am a reformed character after my sabbatical, I have found religion but not in the caliphate  that is/was Syria where are Muslim brothers and sisters are now sadly shitting themselves, peace to all apart from terrorist scum and there well meaning sympathisers naturally. |
|
|
|
Post by crapslinger on Feb 15, 2019 21:26:47 GMT
BOLLOCKS to her...... let her rot She is but a poor misguided child, she had no idea what she was signing up to when she voluntarily joined a bunch of murdering heathen terrorists !, just imagine the shock when she was being gang raped day after day by her brothers in arms.  |
|
|
|
Post by claytonscrubs on Feb 15, 2019 21:40:36 GMT
Yeah, I missed your views on James McClean 😉 Better not go there, I am a reformed character after my sabbatical, I have found religion but not in the caliphate that is/was Syria where are Muslim brothers and sisters are now sadly shitting themselves, peace to all apart from terrorist scum and there well meaning sympathisers naturally. You couldn’t resist a sly dig at the end 😉... A reformed character? My arse! 😀 |
|
|
|
Post by Gods on Feb 15, 2019 22:13:51 GMT
We're 100% certain to let her back in.
She left as a school girl, is a British citizen and she can't be left stateless under international law, and she has an innocent child inside her who has rights and must be protected. In short the Home Secretary can't do a single thing about it. It may be possible to prosecute her when she gets back.
I don't understand why we are suddenly talking tough on this one. We have already welcomed back over 40% of the ISIS 'tourists' who went out to Syria, nearly all adult males, so why would we suddenly put our foot down when a pregnant teenager is involved?
It won't happen, she is coming back for better or worse.
|
|
|
|
Post by crapslinger on Feb 15, 2019 22:22:36 GMT
We're 100% certain to let her back in. She left as a school girl, is a British citizen and she can't be left stateless under international law, and she has a child who has rights and should be protected. In short the Home Secretary can't do a single thing about it. It may be possible to prosecute her when she gets back. I don't understand why we are suddenly talking tough on this one. We have already welcomed back over 40% of the ISIS 'tourists' who went out to Syria, nearly all adult males, so why would we suddenly put our foot down when a pregnant teenager is involved? It won't happen, she is coming back for better or worse. Why would we prosecute her ?, she has done nothing wrong ! everyone deserves a second chance in life, we should be paying this poor child compensation for what we have put her through, just a holiday with her bezzie mates that went horribly wrong happens all the time in Magaluf, move on nothing to see here. |
|
|
|
Post by kidsgroveboxxy on Feb 15, 2019 22:47:39 GMT
The girl is an utter cunt. Even The Gulag would be too good for her.
Her child should be neutralised in the womb and herself be subjected to some of the horrific methods these 'peace loving' Muslims utilise.
All in all, if she's bought back into the UK, I will make it my promise and civic duty to find her and give her a swift cunt-punt in a public place.
|
|
|
|
Post by felonious on Feb 16, 2019 7:04:11 GMT
We're 100% certain to let her back in. She left as a school girl, is a British citizen and she can't be left stateless under international law, and she has an innocent child inside her who has rights and must be protected. In short the Home Secretary can't do a single thing about it. It may be possible to prosecute her when she gets back. I don't understand why we are suddenly talking tough on this one. We have already welcomed back over 40% of the ISIS 'tourists' who went out to Syria, nearly all adult males, so why would we suddenly put our foot down when a pregnant teenager is involved? It won't happen, she is coming back for better or worse. I think it's the interview which has pushed a few buttons on the left and the right. I'm not aware of other interviews from returnees. |
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 16, 2019 9:01:38 GMT
If we want to prove that we're the modern society, above the atrocities of these butchers - then we have to behave that way and prove it. We want to uphold our freedoms, our rights and our approach to democracy and rule of law to the extent that we use this to justify intervention and foreign diplomacy - so surely we have to prove that system is in place.
She is a British Citizen, and should come back to face the result of her actions in UK and the system which we so strongly uphold and show to the whole world. Her beliefs alone are not a crime - it is her actions, and if she has acted in an unlawful manner than the law shall be applied.
Her child to be born - has NOTHING to do with the circumstances under which he/she was conceived. Why should that unborn child be banished and judged for the crimes of her parents? Again - if we believe strongly in our system, then we have to apply it and educate.
The moment we want to bypass the rule of law and freedoms and rights of this country, we stop being the civilised democracy we want to promote and portray.
|
|
|
|
Post by Gods on Feb 16, 2019 9:26:48 GMT
We're 100% certain to let her back in. She left as a school girl, is a British citizen and she can't be left stateless under international law, and she has an innocent child inside her who has rights and must be protected. In short the Home Secretary can't do a single thing about it. It may be possible to prosecute her when she gets back. I don't understand why we are suddenly talking tough on this one. We have already welcomed back over 40% of the ISIS 'tourists' who went out to Syria, nearly all adult males, so why would we suddenly put our foot down when a pregnant teenager is involved? It won't happen, she is coming back for better or worse. I think it's the interview which has pushed a few buttons on the left and the right. I'm not aware of other interviews from returnees. Exactly right I think. We have already welcomed back 400 real ISIS fighters from Syria I read without anyone batting an eyelid. Reading between the lines this girl was in essence little more than a sex slave. The story seems to be that they repented and she has not. But did they really repent? How did they repent and to whom and how do we know they meant it ? So many questions. |
|
|
|
Post by wizzardofdribble on Feb 16, 2019 9:38:57 GMT
If we want to prove that we're the modern society, above the atrocities of these butchers - then we have to behave that way and prove it. We want to uphold our freedoms, our rights and our approach to democracy and rule of law to the extent that we use this to justify intervention and foreign diplomacy - so surely we have to prove that system is in place. She is a British Citizen, and should come back to face the result of her actions in UK and the system which we so strongly uphold and show to the whole world. Her beliefs alone are not a crime - it is her actions, and if she has acted in an unlawful manner than the law shall be applied. Her child to be born - has NOTHING to do with the circumstances under which he/she was conceived. Why should that unborn child be banished and judged for the crimes of her parents? Again - if we believe strongly in our system, then we have to apply it and educate. The moment we want to bypass the rule of law and freedoms and rights of this country, we stop being the civilised democracy we want to promote and portray. And that applies to all the other hundreds if not thousands of British Citizens who have gone off to support & fight for an organization which seeks to destroy and kill British Citizens. She'll get some celebrity solicitor & barrister representing her in Court & become famous for wanting to bite the hand that feeds her. And it goes right to the heart of the problem. Western Democracies and Islamic Belief Systems are incompatible. Religious tolerance of a religion that wants to destroy it..will eventually be destroyed. |
|
|
|
Post by bathstoke on Feb 16, 2019 9:52:58 GMT
I think it's the interview which has pushed a few buttons on the left and the right. I'm not aware of other interviews from returnees. Exactly right I think. We have already welcomed back 400 real ISIS fighters from Syria I read without anyone batting an eyelid. Reading between the lines this girl was in essence little more than a sex slave. I heard she requested an English speaking husband & was married off to a Dutch convert to Islam |
|
|
|
Post by wagsastokie on Feb 16, 2019 10:01:28 GMT
Bring her back stick her on trial
Then hang her
Job done
|
|
|
|
Post by Gods on Feb 16, 2019 10:11:30 GMT
Exactly right I think. We have already welcomed back 400 real ISIS fighters from Syria I read without anyone batting an eyelid. Reading between the lines this girl was in essence little more than a sex slave. I heard she requested an English speaking husband & was married off to a Dutch convert to Islam Yes, she had 2 kids both of whom died and a 3rd one is on the way, were they all from the flying Dutchman? Either way I'm pretty sure we have already rolled out the red carpet and welcomed home from Syria some far dodgier characters than this mad bird. |
|
|
|
Post by bathstoke on Feb 16, 2019 10:13:30 GMT
I heard she requested an English speaking husband & was married off to a Dutch convert to Islam Yes, she had 2 kids both of whom died and a 3rd one is on the way, were they all from the flying Dutchman? I don’t know, she doesn’t answer my calls |
|
|
|
Post by Gods on Feb 16, 2019 10:17:55 GMT
Yes, she had 2 kids both of whom died and a 3rd one is on the way, were they all from the flying Dutchman? I don’t know, she doesn’t answer my calls I thought you had your finger on the pulse of what is going on here :-) |
|
|
|
Post by Staffsoatcake on Feb 16, 2019 10:30:42 GMT
The sprog will be an innocent new born,according to the slags family,
Then the scumbags get their fucking ideals drilled into its brain and it wont be innocent for long.
|
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 16, 2019 10:30:47 GMT
If we want to prove that we're the modern society, above the atrocities of these butchers - then we have to behave that way and prove it. We want to uphold our freedoms, our rights and our approach to democracy and rule of law to the extent that we use this to justify intervention and foreign diplomacy - so surely we have to prove that system is in place. She is a British Citizen, and should come back to face the result of her actions in UK and the system which we so strongly uphold and show to the whole world. Her beliefs alone are not a crime - it is her actions, and if she has acted in an unlawful manner than the law shall be applied. Her child to be born - has NOTHING to do with the circumstances under which he/she was conceived. Why should that unborn child be banished and judged for the crimes of her parents? Again - if we believe strongly in our system, then we have to apply it and educate. The moment we want to bypass the rule of law and freedoms and rights of this country, we stop being the civilised democracy we want to promote and portray. And that applies to all the other hundreds if not thousands of British Citizens who have gone off to support & fight for an organization which seeks to destroy and kill British Citizens. She'll get some celebrity solicitor & barrister representing her in Court & become famous for wanting to bite the hand that feeds her. And it goes right to the heart of the problem. Western Democracies and Islamic Belief Systems are incompatible. Religious tolerance of a religion that wants to destroy it..will eventually be destroyed. It applies to everyone. Regardless of the crime they have committed - we have a rule of law in this country and we apply it. The best way to uphold our way of life it to continue to apply it. She shouldn't be 'welcomed' home - but put straight in to custody and tried by a jury of peers. The hand that feeds is also that hand that applies the law and punishes people in accordance with the system we have. Let her get a celebrity solicitor and barrister represent her... people have that right to do so in this country and part of the system we want to promote. No society is incompatible with any person who wants to harm, kill and destroy others no regardless of their cause. She made her choice, being old enough to know what is lawful and unlawful. She should now face the consequence of those choices within the rule of law. |
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 16, 2019 10:43:17 GMT
Only crawling back now that IS have been twatted by Donald and co.
Needs the harshest punishment possible.
Hopefully over to the U.S - If Home Office allow her back here it'll be community rehab and all sorts of measure to help her avoid any real jail time or actual punative measures.
On top of that you and I the taxpayers will subsidise her existence.
On top of all that(!) she has no regret about being a terrorist.
Off you fuck duck...
|
|
|
|
Post by felonious on Feb 16, 2019 13:45:03 GMT
I don’t know, she doesn’t answer my calls I thought you had your finger on the pulse of what is going on here :-) You obviously don't follow Barth then |
|
|
|
Post by wizzardofdribble on Feb 16, 2019 14:10:05 GMT
And that applies to all the other hundreds if not thousands of British Citizens who have gone off to support & fight for an organization which seeks to destroy and kill British Citizens. She'll get some celebrity solicitor & barrister representing her in Court & become famous for wanting to bite the hand that feeds her. And it goes right to the heart of the problem. Western Democracies and Islamic Belief Systems are incompatible. Religious tolerance of a religion that wants to destroy it..will eventually be destroyed. It applies to everyone. Regardless of the crime they have committed - we have a rule of law in this country and we apply it. The best way to uphold our way of life it to continue to apply it. She shouldn't be 'welcomed' home - but put straight in to custody and tried by a jury of peers. The hand that feeds is also that hand that applies the law and punishes people in accordance with the system we have. Let her get a celebrity solicitor and barrister represent her... people have that right to do so in this country and part of the system we want to promote. No society is incompatible with any person who wants to harm, kill and destroy others no regardless of their cause. She made her choice, being old enough to know what is lawful and unlawful. She should now face the consequence of those choices within the rule of law. A good Legal anwser. The only problem is that it sets a precedent..any scumbag with British Citizenship can go and fight for ISIS then come back 'home' and be entitled to all the Rights & Benefits that being a British Citizen brings. Having your cake and eating it.. |
|
maybe just a little bit perhaps.
that is/was Syria where are Muslim brothers and sisters are now sadly shitting themselves, peace to all apart from terrorist scum and there well meaning sympathisers naturally. 
